Welcome to the Adobe Target Community! Connect with peers to ask questions, share best practices, explore release updates, and contribute ideas that shape the future of Adobe Target.
Recently active
I'm facing the following issue with an SPA:Context:At implementation level in Launch, I'm initializing Target on page load and firing a triggerView on History Change (in two different rules, both using Target v2 Extension events).The SPA root is root/The intended Page Delivery for my activity is root/item/1Issues:When I set Page Delivery in Target activity to be root/item/1, it only gets activated on page load and not when navigating from the SPA root/.In this last case, by debugging using the Mbox Trace the intended activity doesn't appear in the Evaluated ActivitiesMy guess here is because the last page load was made in /root then the activities with Page Delivery set as root/item/1 won't even be evaluated here because of the Server-side decisioning.By setting the Page Delivery url as the SPA root/ and refreshing the page in root/item/1 the expected modifications get applied, however when navigating from the SPA /root the expected modifications are not applied.In this last
We'd like to test out Target Recommendations on our blog. To start, we only want the recommendations to show up on a few articles and measure engagement before scaling. We'd also like to only start with a few articles to recommend - not our entire library/catalog. How would I go about setting that up as it relates to the criteria? There doesn't seem to be a way to just evenly rotate the inventory on a handful of articles rather it has to be cart/person-based.
Dear All, I want to understand whether it is a good practice to add prehide snippet on the page only when we have consent from the user. In my case if we add event listener (for checking the cookie consent )for prehide snippet and load it when we have collected the response from the user, we face flicker issues and the original intent of placing prehide snippet is not achieved. If we use prehide snippet without collecting consent from the user , we are able to fix flicker issue. PS- We are taking consent for loading target and analytics calls , this question is specific to only prehide snippet.
I currently have an activity that stored product information into the localStorage ~ This is all done through Javascript (custom code option). I then read from the local storage and display a popup with the product information on other pages.Is there a way to move away from localStorage and instead store the product information in Adobe Target instead?If so, how would I go about this?I've had a look at profile scripts, thinking that I could send a json object to the profile script to either save a new value or just return what it has stored.I've looked at mboxes and some adobe.target functions. None of which do what I want or at least I don't think it does. I've looked at the targetPageParams() function, but I'm not sure how this works.
In an A/B test , the winner is shown. I am having a doubt, checking the report of an AB test, "all qualified visitor" audience that is present default in AT goals and settings mismatches with the sum up of all account types that we have added as an audience to this activity for reporting. I am attaching the screenshot here for reference. Here, B2B approver, B2B customer, Adminlite, B2B admin, B2C sums up gives the all visitor. All visitors for this activity will be falling under in any one of these. There is no other account type we have in this project. I have highlighted the order section in the image, there is a difference of 1297 orders. Help to know from where this 1297 orders are getting placed.Thanks ,Damini Mohan
Hello Experts,Hope you are doing well!Is it possible to read key-value pairs from browser (LocalStorage, SessionStorage or Cookies) and use any of them for Audience Segmentation in Adobe Target? I tried with a particular key-value pair from Local Storage via Profile Script, I could create a segment with custom (mbox). However, I would like to check if we can read all key-value pairs from LocalStorage (or even SessionStorage or Cookies)? Thank you in advance! Best,K
Hi Team, We have implemented Target Server side using Delivery API and our website follows AEM headless architecture. Wanted to check for the below queries -1. Will there be any usecases where we will require QA urls to preview the experience or since its server-side and headless, QA urls will not make sense.2. Will debugging parameters like mboxTrace/mboxDebug/mboxDisable will also not be required in case of server-side and headless implementation Regards,Disa
Is there anyway to view the current version of Target Standard/Premium that my organization is on? I understand it is a SaaS solution and version updates are applied automatically. However for documentation and other internal processes, it would be helpful if there is a way to view the current version of a given Target instance, especially since, per, the Target release notes, it appears as if most releases are staggered. For example, I could probably assume our Target instance is on version 22.6.1, but is there any way, whether through the UI itself, in an HTTP header, the page source or elsewhere, where this can be confirmed?Thanks.
Our Adobe Experience cloud communities are the heartbeat that connect, engage, and empower our users to create game-changing digital experiences for their customers. We onboard Advisors every quarter into the program. Today, I'm thrilled to announce the Community Advisors, class of 2022. During their tenure, Advisors will participate in speaking engagements, provide product feedback, and most importantly, share their expertise with the Experience League/ Marketo/workfront Community.The Advisor program is designed to promote career growth and develop deep connections with users by giving them a voice in the broader customer ecosystem. Announcement on Adobe blog 🎉🎉 Congratulations to the class of 2022 🎉🎉
Hi all, I am new to Adobe Target and i found myself with this problem where the documentation does not cover. My companys site uses the same URL for both desktop and mobile sites, but the mobile version is not responsive so i cannot use mobile viewports. However i cannot find any option to load the mobile version of a website while making the activity, thus all my activities can only work for desktop version. Does anyone know how i can choose the non-responsive mobile website when i make a new activity? Thank you.
Currently we have an Adobe Target Experiment active on our site for an A/B experience. It seems to fail to load the experience on the initial load of the website (we have cleared all cookies/cache/history). However, when we refresh the page, Adobe Target successfully loads the experiment in either A or B experience. Any suggestions as to what could be causing this to happen? Why does Adobe Target experience only begin to load after a refresh?
Description- New Enhancement on Adobe Target UIWhy is this feature important to you - Business team requirement, this filter enables team to differentiate their activities in target UIHow would you like the feature to work - The ability to search on a “team” / “set of team members” / “custom filter” is a business requirement that came up after a demo to the business stakeholders, when we mention a team name, individual name while creating activity (Under Other Metadata Option), can we have a filter showed in target UI beside activities what ever mentioned under other metadata option..Current Behaviour - There is no filter that specifies this user/team created the activity. This new enhancement will bring a better understanding to the business team to work on their own activities..
Hello, I'm new to Adobe Target, so this may be a basic question.If I have multiple activities set up to deliver content on the same page to the same audience, can I control when a user sees one activity as opposed to another?For example, say I have activity 1 and activity 2 with overlapping audiences that deliver content to the same page. Can I set a rule that says that if a user has never visited the page before he will see activity 1? After the visitor sees activity 1 three times, then he will see activity 2 going forward?Assuming this is possible, does this go against best practices? Should collisions be avoided as a general rule?Thanks,Keith
Join us for the next Adobe Target Community Q&A Coffee Break taking place Wednesday, June 29th, 2022 @ 8am PT - 9am PT ~ REGISTER HERE ~ We'll be joined by @jison, @kati_mckinney, @justine_lee_at_adobe , and @kaela_cusack of the Adobe Solutions Consulting team, with extra support from Technical Support Engineer @ramihammad. The experts will be signed in here to the Adobe Target Community to chat directly with you on this thread about your Adobe Target questions pertaining to their areas of expertise, and those specifically related to topics covered during the 6/2/22 Personalization with Precision: Adobe Analytics & Target Webinar: How marketers, developers, and product teams can open the ‘black box’ of AI to drive future testing and personalization strategies How to overcome challenges in optimizing web, mobile app, email, IoT and each digital touchpoint for higher conversion and
We’re running into an issue with the recommenders with our SPA (Singe Page Application) implementation using ReactJS. The problem is that recommenders only show in the SPA when the page is refreshed. This seems to be related to how the different calls are being made into target. For the initial load of a page, the page load request is sent but for all subsequent pages, just the triggerView call is sent. This is because for a SPA the page doesn’t reload, it just changes the content in the views. In my testing it seems that ONLY the page load request seems to load the recommenders, not the triggerView. I did some debugging of the launch code and it seems to have confirmed it. When trigger view is called, it just tries to load and view changes out of the local cache and then tries to render it. For something like an A/B test there are changes present and are rendered accordingly. For recommenders however, there isn’t an entry stor
I would like to be able to tell the type of Offer (e.g. HTML Offer versus Experience Fragment) from the Modifications window. Right now when I view an activity in edit mode I can't tell if the author correctly set up the activity using an experience fragment with the name "My Offer" or if they are pointing to an HTML fragment with the name "My Offer".This is critical to increasing our throughput as authors who use HTML Offers need their code reviewed before activation and authors who use Experience Fragments do not.
Hello community, I do have a few questions related to the target activities in AA.I created a dozen of activities in target, tested with them, waited for a few days already. 1. some activities still don't show up in the dropdown list. Does report suite configuration matter?2. some deleted activities are still shown up in the dropdown list. I would like to get rid of them...3. is there anyway that I can "hide/ignore" the activities from a specific target workspace.
Why is this feature important to you -Since this feature is only supported with Recommendation type activities we run a risk of having someone update criteria logic that is actually being used. Most of our recommendation activities (zones) do not use the 'recommendation' activity type. How would you like the feature to work -Like it does today when review the criteria logic used in recommendation type activities but for other activity types as well. One can click "i" icon on the criteria, then click on the Algorithm Usage tab to see that the criteria is in use. Current Behavior -The Algorithm Usage feature is currently only supported for Recommendations activities. It is not supported for A/B Test, Auto-Allocate, Auto-Target, and Experience Targeting (XT) activities that include recommendations as an offer.
Description - Currently, we can add only one condition in exclusion rule. In some cases if I need to combine multiple condition for exclusion that becomes difficult. Why is this feature important to you - Having ability to combine multiple condition in single rule would help keep track of all conditions in one exclusion rule itselfHow would you like the feature to work - as we can add multiple rules in collection, it would be great if we do same in exclusionCurrent Behavior - Currently, we can add only one condition in exclusion rule. In some cases if I need to combine multiple condition for exclusion that becomes difficult.
Hi all, I'm inspired by the use case mentioned that "Products with incomplete metadata fields (missing thumbnail, price, or other important metadata)."(source from https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/target/using/recommendations/entities/exclusions.html?lang=en). It's a good idea to manage feed quality, especially for the null value. Unfortunately, I failed to implement this concept in AT. I listed what I've tried to configure below.1. From the "Exclusion" interface, I put "null" text after the equal operator. Unfortunately, it doesn't work. 2. From "Catalog Search" > "Advanced Search," I'd found two special operators such as "value is present" and "value is not present." It seems it could solve this issue. Unfortunately, again, the drop-down selection from "Save As" doesn't allow it to be used. Does anyone have practice managing a feed file with null values except by pointing to the source file? As you know, by leveraging Launch, it can pass
Hi team, While setting up Adobe recommendations, we tried to import Google Product Feed. However, we ran into an error saying 'File parsing failed' (like below) with no further details. Can you provide more information on what this error is related to? Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot? Thanks! Regards,Jingjing
There's new documentation about how to implement Target with the Edge Network API, However, it doesn't mention how I can pass all the options/params I usually send to the Target Delivery API, for example, let's say I need to send an "at_property" token to be able to retrieve activities from a specific Target workspace. How can I achieve this in the Edge Network API? is there any docs explaining how to migrate from the Delivery API to the Edge Network API?
We are experiencing Adobe Target status code 403 error across all our websites.This is what we see in the Target call: This is what we see in console: Can anyone help urgently?
Hi,Are we able to target users based on the page they land on using adobe target?Thanks
I have an Adobe Target at.js v2.x question, we are in the process of migrating from 1.x to 2.x and hoping to leverage preloading and triggerView for a VEC friendly implementation that scales.The question I have is around the naming convention of the triggerViews - let me give an example:Say we are an eCommerce website that has many different product detail pages (PDPs), we have 2 options when defining view names for each PDP..We keep it generic - i.e. single view name for all PDP `shop:product-detail`We make it granular - i.e. single view name per product `shop:product-detail:product-123` Each has a pro and con, if we want to run a test across all PDP pages then #1 is most effective, otherwise if we wanted to test on a sub-set of PDP then #2 might be more effective.Would be interested on how others have approached this? Does the triggerView also allow a templated approach where I can apply modifications to many triggerViews that match a certain pattern - e.g. starts with `sho
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
