Adobe Target

Hi All, I am interested in integrating Adobe Target with a Cordova-powered mobile app. However, I am aware that the Cordova SDK has been deprecated by adobe in August 2023. In light of this, I'd like to know if there are alternative methods or if it's still feasible to integrate adobe target with Cordova mobile app.Your guidance will be deeply appreciated. Regards,Sabeel Aarish   

Hello Everyone! Welcome to 'Tuesday's Tech Bytes' your weekly source for expert insights on Adobe Target. We as ( @gokul_agiwal & @rajneesh_gautam_) will be leading this thread for next 6-8 weeks where you can expect some cool content from our side based on below theme.    Adobe Target - Tips & TricksAdobe Target - Best PracticesAdobe Target - Integrations & Success StoriesAdobe Target - Golden Nuggets   We're really excited to embark on this journey of learning and growth with all of you.   Authors Introduction I am Gokul Agiwal, (@gokul_agiwal) and I work as Solution Architect at TCS where I am responsible for building future proof digital experience solutions for clients empowered by the industry leading Adobe Experience Platform and Experience Cloud suite of products. Introducing @rajneesh_gautam_ , as he leads his own company called https://dexata.co/, He is an experienced digital marketing professional dedicated to help create i

Hi All, I am preparing for AD0-E406 Adobe Target Business Practitioner Expert, Can anyone please advise where can I get the authentic and current study material for this Certification?Thanks. Puspendra

Hi Team,I am facing a problem where the collection is not returning all the products configured in the collection. I configured a collection with just three products and but only one of them is returned in the recommendation api response. Tried changing the criteria, also updating the goals as well still there is only one product returned in the response. Is there a way to debug the activity in detail to get a indebt understanding why certain products are not returned. RegardsDivya Shankar

I have XT activity already running but incase I want to change the audience at any point does that impact my running experience?

Hi Community, Below is my scenario am trying to apply I was run A/B testing for 18 days but it didn't announce the winner. So I have stopped. I would like to understand and apply Auto-Allocation. Below is the activity details and test result Activity Details: Inserting new component about the product detail description.Experience A: Control: 6600 Visitor, Conversion Rate: 14.74%Experience B: 6500 visitor, Conversion Rate: 15.20%, Confidence Level: 53%Average Lift: 3% If I re-run the same activity by setting Auto-Allocation, Can i determines the winner more quickly . Suggestion please. ThanksKP

From what I'm reading it appears that in the activity type I don't set the audiences, I just allocate all traffic. Then the algorithm works out which experience each individual customer would prefer based on their attributes. That correct? Having a debate with someone experienced in using Auto-Target and they say the human determines the audiences and the AI simply works out which pre-defined audience prefers which experience. 

Hello guys,   I am running a simple A/B test with Experience A and Experience B.  During the test in UAT i had no issue but after publishing th A/B Test with html injection, I am not able to see the experience B with injected html. Any idea? If I try to see the QA link I cannot see the Experience. Thanks

Hi, As we aim to reduce exits on the specific page, we ran an A/B test with two different variants for this page. However, how should I measure the exit rates for control and treatment groups? We pull Visits data for these groups and use Exits metric, but it seems this metric is not right the one because the visits and exits are going to be the same? Please help.

Hello, We are switching to WebSDK and notice many of our Target campaigns which use Profile Scripts do not behave as previously did under at.js.  Take for example this script we use for abandoned cart;  if (mbox.param('pageURL').indexOf('/user/checkout.html') > -1 ) { return true; } else if (mbox.param('pageURL').indexOf('thank-you.html') > -1) { return false; }   In the WebSDK, the "true" value is returned only when the visitor is on the checkout.html page; False is returned on any other page which means the profile script value isn't being saved. Is this a known issue or is there some sort of workaround?

Hi Everyone, I have created a CSV file that contains 20 products and uploaded a CSV file in recommendations through feeds. Product data is available in the feeds and catalog search for a development environment. Also, I have created new rules in the launch to capture entity.id. I have created two activities on the product detail pages and used recently viewed & most viewed products criteria. When I am in edit mode I can see the product data which includes the image, message, name, and pageUrl of the product. But when I am checking this activity on the browser I am only getting the name of the product because I am capturing it in the rule which I have created in the launch. I also checked in the mbox Trace and data is available there too. In addition to this, when I am downloading data from an activity, data is available in the production environment and the development environment is empty. The same issue I am getting in the catalog, where product data is getting cap

We have a test that is ongoing for 3 months+ now. WE have reached the significance value if you see the auto allocate tables.  however, the target activity says "No winner yet"How long do we have to wait? if you see the numbers we already have a winner: we just want to see it turning green. how long does it take for Adobe to declare? we need an actual estimation method. we know about the article: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/target/using/activities/auto-allocate/determine-winner.html?lang=enthe article page doesn't clearly or specifically say how Adobe Target measures that.   

How to spoof different regions from US, through Adobe Target when trying to render experience fragments for other regions like Australia, United Kingdom ?For example, I have this URL and trying to build VEC activity on this -https://www.princess.com/en-ukBut this URL gets converted back to US version when using it in Target.https://www.princess.com/en-usThe goal is to how to use different URL that are pointing to different countries in Adobe Target ?

Hi everyone, has anyone tried the importing data through SFMC.We were able to sucessfuly migate the data through FTP but the data isn't showing any records. We are facing some fomatting issue but we are not able to reolve this.

Hi Team,We run adobe target on our website to do AB tests and such. Our cms is Silverstripe.So when we set up an AB test, adobe target scrapes off the co ten from the from the html as value (not dynamic) so what happens is when we change some other information on the page,which is not tested, changes, it doesn’t reflect on the experiencePutting us at risk of showing tue customer outdated information.How can we fix this. Or rather make target to take value from one of the backend fields of Silverstripe ?

On the evening of Thursday, August 3, we deployed an updated Launch library that migrated our website from using the legacy Visitor ID, at.js and AppMeasurement libraries to the new Web SDK. The Analytics data in general looks good.  However, we are seeing a significant reduction in the reporting of the Activities and Experiences assigned in Target.  We see this both in Target reporting and in A4T.  It isn’t that no users are being reported as assigned to a test, just that the total number is a fraction of what we had seen in the days leading up to the update. This problem is keeping us from being able to report on site usage and we need to get to a solution quickly.

Our A/B testing process is built around using the form based activity set-up and leveraging html or JSON offers.   This is what the analysts and our developer partners are familiar with.  Would love to do some MVT testing, but not eager to try to figure the feasibility of a whole new approach.   Anyone out there executing MVT tests using the form based UI?  I know that we can execute full factorial test design via the form but I also want MVT type analysis output. Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Activities page user interface refresh (October 25, 2023) As part of the Adobe Target team’s ongoing effort to improve the user-experience for Target users, this release refreshes the Activities page in the Target UI. This update unifies and standardizes design patterns that were previously inconsistent, while adding new enhancements. Starting Wednesday, October 25, a percentage of customers will have access to the new UI with additional customers getting access in the next several days. For more information see Activities.   For more Adobe Target release notes, check out Target Release Notes (current) 

Hi,I am using mbox3rdPartyId whose value is equal to the user login id (1st party id) when a user is logged in and equal to null for a unauthenticated user. I cannot change this setting for now so trying to figure a workaround for this. Basically, when a user first visits the site, I need the experience served to the user before and after login to remain the same.Current Situation: Unknown / unauthorised users - Exp ALogs in using 1 account - Exp BLogs out and continues to browse - Exp BLogs in using second account - Exp CLogs out and continues to browse - Exp CLogs back into first account - Exp B Desired Situation:Unknown / unauthorised users - Exp ALogs in using 1 account - Exp ALogs out and continues to browse - Exp ALogs in using second account - Exp CLogs out and continues to browse - Exp CLogs back into first account - Exp AHow can I write a profile script that serves the same experience to a user in the same session, if the visitor has the same ECID & session

We have an XT activity live on websiteabc - which is appearing for a specific visitor in incognito, but not in their regular (non-incognito) browsing state.On a hunch, I suspected that It wasn't showing it because it was affected by something that had been stored/cached... and so I did two things to try and resolve it:Delete all cookie data for the websiteabc domainDelete all cookie data on websiteabc.demdex.netAfter I had done this and refreshed the page in question, the activity appeared. This leads me to think that this is something that might affect a much larger cohort of all website visitors - which is not ideal. I don't believe that our caching system (cloudflare) would affect this. Has anyone experienced this before and do you have any suggestions for mitigating it?

Hi, I am new to building up recommendation activities in Target. I have gone through all the documentation given in Experience League and followed it well. However, one problem I am facing is with the feeds which is an important step to run recommendations. I think the best possible way for us is CSV format to feed product data to Target. However, I am unable to understand the fields in the CSV file format that I downloaded from Target. Here is the sample I am pasting for reference.## RECSRecommendations Upload File          ## RECS''## RECS'' indicates a Recommendations pre-process header. Please do not remove these lines.          ## RECS          ## RECSUse this file to upload product display information to Recommendations. Each product has its own row. Each line must contain 19 values and if not all are filled a space should be left.&

i have two dropdown if  dropdown value2 =width & value1=height then  in second dropdown the alert message will showing and dialog wont close, as per below codenow if i change in first dropdown value not equal height but still alert message is showing  but dialog is able to closeNow how i can remove that alert message (function($, Coral) {"use strict"; var registry = $(window).adaptTo("foundation-registry"); registry.register("foundation.validation.validator", {selector: "[data-validation=field-validation]",validate: function(element) {let el = $(element);let pattern=/[0-9a-z]/;let value1=el.val();var value2 = $("coral-select[name='./fields']");if (($(value2).val() === 'width')){ if(value1 === "height"){return "Chosen copy block width" ;}}}});})(jQuery, Coral);

We are migrating a client to the Web SDK.  Their front end used to make a bunch of target.getOffer() calls using named mboxes to get back JSON data telling it which experience to render.  To migrate to alloy, we duplicated this with (roughly) this code: alloy("sendEvent", {  renderDecisions: false,  decisionScopes: [    "mbox_name_goes_here"  ].flat(),  data: _satellite.getVar("Target Profile Params") || {}}) It works like a champ from a test delivery standpoint.  However, when I look at the edge trace, I see that in addition to the scope that we include in the array, __view__ is added as well.  The target_trace items show the global mbox being called.  There are several of these calls made on one page (working to get that changed, but that is another tale), so it seems a lot of extra work.. We eventually WANT the global mbox tests evaluated when we track the page view. Something worse that I think might be related t

When testing a page wih the Activity QA link in Target, we're seeing the experience fire twice.  We are using AEP and there is only a single window-load based rule that allows a decision to occur, so in theory there's only one page load so the experience should only really trigger once.  Does anyone know what may be happening for it to fire twice?  I've just got a console.log output being sent at the moment Cheers

A data push is being made for a loading event, as soon as it is done the banner is displayed.When viewed in the app, the banner does not appear at first, only after performing another action in the app and returning to home.I checked and the event is being triggered correctly, but the banner only appears after some action in the app.Can you help me with this? please