Adobe Target

Hi,I am trying to set up  A/B Testing in Adobe Target but when setting up location its showing no matching result in Location1 Box and Experience A.Please see the attached screenshot for reference.Please help me how to setup MBox for A/B Testing.Thanks in Advance.Mohit Vashisht

Is there a way to remove a visitor from an AB test after they have already been added to a variant? My problem is that the user enters the test on an unauthenticated page. The test is only for New Visitors. Later on this user authenticates so I now want to kick them out of the A/B test so that they do not see the rest of the variant flow. Is there a way to remove them from the test?If I can remove them, will the that be reflected in the conversion reporting in Analytics (we use A4T)?

I'm not very good at mbox I know B is wrong. Could anyone explain the other choices please? Thank you!4. A stakeholder asks the Target Business Practitioner (BP) to create an activity that tests the addition of a pop-up message after a visitor adds an item to their cart. Which of the following would allow the BP to correctly target this audience?A. Add a custom mbox parameter for users with cart additions and target this audience to users with that parameterB. Create an Analytics segment published to the Marketing Cloud for visitors with cart additions and target this audience to that segmentC. Select Visitor Profile > "Cart Additions" in audience creationD. Target the activity to the cart URL

In Target a/b test reports tab, I think Unique Visitors means the UV of the page that the test is running, which means that if my test component is at the bottom of the page, users will still be counted in report even if they didn’t scroll down to be able to see my change?If the above is correct, what's the best and accurate way of measuring test result in this case? Is it to create a mbox that only fires when users scroll down to the test component and then set the test target audience to that mbox?Thank you!

Hi,I've accidentally saved over an experience in Target.I've corrected this by finding the old code in my own records I keep and updating the experiment again but have a nagging feeling it isn't identical to the original code.Is there any way to check?Thank you,Jordan

As an organization, we are trying to use Adobe Target Premium for recommendations. This is my first time building a recommendation, so I am trying to build a prototype. The issue I am having is only the first recommendation ($entity1.name) properly displays information.   The design is coded to display 3 recommendations (entities). I am new to Recommendations, so my troubleshooting knowledge is limited.I have created:A sample feed with 14 products (CSV Feed). I confirmed it processed correctly.Multiple sample criterias. I have enabled backup recommendations. No exclusions.A 3 entity design, along with the Target sample designs.   I hardcoded the design, such as $entity1.name, $entity2.name, $entity3.name. It's not part of a function/loop.While building the activity, the "preview" properly displays information on all 3 entities, however, when activated to production or using QA links only the the first recommendation displays information. The other 2 recommendations are blank.I have tri

What causes slow load times on Adobe Target experiences?Asset sizes (i.e. optimize your files)Test asset coding (i.e. make sure your code isn't looking for something that's not there or optimized)Network speedExcessive experiences on the same DOM elements (i.e. 100+)Blocked endpoints (i.e. mboxedge28.tt.omtrdc.net)What else should be listed here that I missed? 

Hello, We have recently ran a A/B test. The test had a goal to see if a redesign would increase conversion. They was it was set up is by creating 4 sets of urls with the redesigned pages and within experience B of target, set the pages to redirect to these URLs.My question is even though the pages are set to redirect, will a hit still be count for the old url as well? Thanks

Lately we've been getting a bit of pressure from the business to use Target as a CMS to deploy new features to 100% of the traffic. Some requests are especially complex in terms of development effort. The reason for this is the IT department isn't as quick as us Target Team are in developing, and naturally it requires a big investment from the business. We are pushing back strongly saying this is not what Target is designed for, but I was wondering if you could share with me exactly what the risks and limitations are of using Target as a CMS, or point me to resources that can help? Thanks in advance for the help!

Hello everyone,We are not seeing a lot of visitors/views being counted for an A/B test when we pull up the reporting in Analytics. I've tried my best to explain below how the A/B test is setup, and have also explained my understanding of the issue. Any help with shedding more light into this issue, or confirming my theory, is greatly appreciated!!This A/B test is being run within our Single Page booking engine. We wanted to deliver the test only to visitors who are clicking on the CTA (Call To Action) buttons to add a product to the cart.We have implemented this by setting click event listeners on those buttons through an XT Activity that is delivered to all visitors to the page. So, when the visitor clicks any of those buttons, an mbox request is fired (using adobe.target.getOffer() and adobe.target.applyOffer()) with an mbox parameter. This param is configured as the qualifying audience for the A/B test, and so the mbox call returns with the A/B test.Now, based on the experience that

Hello,It's been a while since I worked in Target and Target Classic used to have a "Landing Page Campaign" that kept a visitor in a campaign until they converted (or no longer qualified).  For example, a visitor clicked a campaign offer on the homepage which entered them into Campaign A.  This allowed us to present "Campaign A" related content throughout the site (multiple pages) even if they never clicked the button again.I'm not seeing a way to do this is Campaign Standard - how do you persist a visitor's qualification in a campaign without them having to re-qualify (click the button in my example).Simply put - what equals the Classic "Landing Page" functionality in Standard?Thanks

Hello,I have been experiencing a flicker on the very first load (cache, cookies cleared).  We are using mbox.js Version 62. To try to remedy this issue, I’ve tested this in two ways:Using the Visual Composer to make the edits:- Flicker is still there on the _very first_ load, and seems to work on subsequent visits.Using vanilla javascript to immediately inject a style with visibility: hidden through the custom code section (in the head).  Then show it (visibility: visible) after the content loads.- Flicker is still there on the _very first_ load, but works on subsequent visitsIn the previous release notes it stated that:Mbox Version 61 (16.7.2) Body hiding is disabled by default. Target uses body hiding only when global mbox auto-create is enabled and body hiding is enabled.AndMbox Version 60 (16.4.1)                  window.targetGlobalSettings = {                     bodyHidingEnabled: true,                     bodyHiddenStyle: "body{opacity:0}",                     visitorPageDispla

Hi There, I have a website which is implemented using Adobe launch with Target as an extension, I upgraded the Adobe Target extension using the upgrade option but my the at.js version doesn't seems to get updated .Is there something else which I need to do after upgrading the extension. My Launch code is still present on my website.Appreciate your help.Thanks

Is it mandatory to use FTP for giving the product data feeds to Adobe Target?Create Feed I'm using the documentation mentioned in the below link, but it doesn't clearly call this out. I'm trying to supply the feed from a SFTP, but getting an error saying invalid user credentials.

Hi,I am trying to setup a Map array for design, I am able to set the map array but I can access it's value Apache Velocity Engine - User Guide #set( $monkey.Map = {"banana" : "good", "roast beef" : "bad"})$monkey.Map.get("banana") Doesn't workIs map included? rgds,jerome

Hello all,My team is trying to run an AB test using 2 distinct flows throughout the form. We have collapsible sections and we're trying to figure out if having the topmost section always open would be better.The way we've implemented this is by adding some control flow logic to see if the feature flag (named 'ALWAYS_SHOW_SECTION') is on the window and is true. The idea was to add a Custom Code modification to our A/B test in which we added <script> window.ALWAYS_SHOW_SECTION = true; </script> to the HEAD.Locally, this strategy works, but when we try to do this through Adobe Target, it doesn't seem to change our logic. Is this strategy sound? Does this strategy just not work on Adobe Target because of some asynchronous logic?Thanks in advance

HI ,I am using Adobe Target ( Mbox.js ) for the past few years. Now we are migrating to AT.js. I have integrated and I am making a getOffer callIn our new application , we have setup few CORS rules due to which each XHR call is preceded by an Http OPTIONS call ( pre-flight call ) for security reasons. BUT the http pre-flight (OPTIONS) calls are failing when I am making this call to Adobe  Target . It gives 200 Application Error Response status and in response I get a response mboxEnv.disable(10 * 60) // got 500 from node. But if I hit the same Target Call directly as a GET call it works. ( the OPTIONS pre-flight request gives error response ). Is there anything that I need to enable OR request Adobe Team to setup in my campaign ?