Adobe Analytics

This is a feature available in the legacy version of report builder, but not the new one. This feature is a tremendous help in doing reporting for fiscal time periods (WTD, MTD, QTD and YTD) through the previous day without having to manual work in Excel in the form of creating a fiscal calendar reference table, which would then need to get manually updated every year as well. This is an overview of how/why I used this feature:My reports are scheduled to send early in the morning, with reporting through previous day. Our Adobe instance is set up to use our fiscal calendar, and I use fiscal dates for reporting. The issue I have would be when the report is run on day that's the first day of a new fiscal period because I would want this report to actually run the data for the fiscal period that just ended. For example, our weeks start on Sunday. When the report is run on Sunday, I want my WTD reporting to be for the previous Sunday-Saturday. With new report builder, if I just have my week

It Would be nice if I could rename a variable in Analysis Workspace for a specific project.For example, I just created a simple report for a colleague of mine looking at tracking codes and the number of clicks. For number of clicks I used 'Tracking Code Instances'. As a regular AA user, I understand what Tracking Code Instances means but someone who isn't a bug AA user might not know what it means. So, it would be good if I could right click on the metric and have an option to rename it. This renaming would only exist in the specific project.Thanks.

In the Omniture Legacy UI,  there is an option to expire a user after a set amount of days (I have a screenshot I can provide). It would be helpful to be able to utilize the same functionality within the Admin Console, specifically Adobe Analytics, to ensure that external users are expired after a certain number of days (ideally 6 months), but ONLY if they haven't had any activity in the last 6 months.By having to expire every external user after 6 months, we are facing many users being locked out every 6 months, requiring our User Admins to unlock them, as well as not allowing them within the tools in the interim. If we changed the solution to only expire the inactive users, we would prevent time lost and would properly expire only those who required it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The customer, General Motors, requested a product enhancement for Adobe Analytics to automatica

Description - Currently in CJA, there is a limit to 5 digits to the right of the decimal point. This limits the granularity at which values of dimensions can show up in CJA, and it would be great if this limit was increased. Why is this feature important to you - We have received multiple use cases where users want to split populations by a propensity score. Essentially, each customer in an audience receives a score representative of how likely they are to respond to marketing and the scores range from 0 to 1. What we want to do is filter for a group of people whose scores are between two values that would be the cutoff point for the top X% of propensity scores. For example, if the top 60% of scores are people whose scores range from 0-0.00324512, we cannot filter for this exact population because after 5 decimals the number gets rounded. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the limit to be increased to 5 to a more reasonable value such as 10 which would allo

DescriptionWhen creating a segment or calculated metric, I have the option of saving it for use in other Workspace projects or keeping it limited to this project. The image below shows what this option looks like in the segment builder.  Regardless of which option is selected, that segment will be assigned an ID. For example, "6807ccdcbabe23c88f67abe9." If I share a project that uses project-only segments with someone else, and if that person saves a copy, any changes they make to the project-only segment will also apply to the original project's project-only segments.  Ideally, when someone saves a shared project that includes project-only segments and calculated metrics, those components would be assigned a new ID. This would mean that project-only components are an "island." Why is this feature important to youAssigning a new ID to project-only segments and calculated metrics will allow us to create Workspace project templates that allow users to save t

DescriptionThe guided analysis feature in Workspace allows users to configure several different types, including active growth, conversion trends, and frequency. The tooltip for each of the options gives some information about what the guided analysis does, and includes a link to the Adobe documentation for that type (see screenshot). Once a guided analysis has been created,the tooltip for the saved item contains no information about what the type was. If the naming convention of the saved guided analysis doesn't reference the type, people will be less likely to know what the guided analysis will show once used. The recommendation is to update the tooltip for saved guided analyses to include the type and a link to the Adobe documentation. A separate request for guided analysis updates can be found at https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-ideas/cja-add-description-field-to-guided-analysis/idi-p/748973.  Why is this feature importa

We would like to see Adobe workspaces have an option to embed a link to the live report that allows a visitor to interact with the report. We would like to use the “Share with anyone” link in the workspaces to be able to embed this in iFrame. This would make our work a lot easier.

DescriptionThe guided analysis feature in Workspace allows users to share configured items with others. While the creator can use a descriptive name to help others understand what the guided analysis may be about, there is not an option to add a description that provides more information about what the guided analysis is about. The screenshot below shows what the tooltip currently looks like:  Why is this feature important to youThe point of guided analysis is to allow users to include pre-configured analysis into their Workspace projects. As more of these are created and shared, it will be increasingly important for people to know which one to use. Currently, there is no way to convey what a guided analysis should be used for or what the settings of the guided analysis are. How would you like the feature to workAllow a description field in the guided analysis configurator. This would be similar to descriptions in the filter and calculated metric builder, as well as

Description - When calling data collection API, product not validating dataset id and schema id's. Getting 200 even for invalid datasetsWhy is this feature important to you - To be able monitor Ingestion calls accurate statusHow would you like the feature to work - API should give 4xx when right dataset or schema id's are providedCurrent Behaviour - When calling data collection API, product not validating dataset id and schema id's. Getting 200 even for invalid datasets

Description -Why is this feature important to you -  Allowing users to change individual line colors in graphs is essential for clear data visualization. This feature enhances the distinction between multiple datasets, making it easier to identify trends and patterns at a glance.  Additionally, for a large business with multiple Lines of Businesses, customizable colors, enable better alignment with branding guidelines, creating visually consistent and professional reports.How would you like the feature to work - Being able to say lock "Value X" to blue, and "Value Y" to red across all visualizations (regardless of which one has the highest count), or just being able to make specific visualizations look better and to match our different brands' colors by adjusting their colours specifically would be a fundamental feature.Current Behaviour -  You cannot change individual visualizations.  What one can do is change the colour palette for the entire project.

Description When searching for projects by name, a bunch of criteria comes up.  I'd like to also filter that criteria by most recently edited date.  I don't believe this is possible today.    Why is this feature important to youI have so many projects, this helps to find projects more quickly.   How would you like the feature to workOnce there's data in the name field, I could click on the 'last modified' filter at any time.    Current Behaviour - Only one filter can happen at a time and they cannot be mixed together.

Change the value "Others" to "Desktop" for the "Mobile Device Type" dimension.

We are currently weighing whether to enable the IAB bot filtering functionality in Analytics (this is a communication challenge internally - as a B2B media company, we often quote traffic numbers in sales materials, and these numbers will obviously be impacted). Some of the primary downsides of enabling IAB filtering functionality include: no solid estimate of how enabling filter will impact traffic numbersloss of the ability to accurately measure year-over-year growthIf a segment were available in Analytics that allowed us to either exclude or isolate bots, we'd be able to address both of the above concerns. The segment would obviously need to be regularly updated to keep up to date with the IAB list.

In Adobe Analysis Workspace we found a little nuisance with the description of one of the default Date Ranges (Last Week) - it says "By default, this refers to the time period that starts on Sunday and ends on Saturday prior to the current week.", but our users don't know that our defaults are set differently in Europe (week starts on Monday). Can Adobe please update this description to something like "This is set accordingly to the respective Report Suite configuration" (in Report Suite Manager > General > Calendar Settings)?

We need a better way to auto sort 'bucketed' values in CJA.Current Method: Value bucketing is a great feature, but the current sort method uses either alphabetical sorting or population based sorting. Neither of them are useful. Current Workaround: To get values in the right order I either need to make manual segments and drop them in a particular order OR use table builder to pre-determine the order. This is a tedious process, and there is a risk of everything resetting should I choose to change the bucket values. Feature Request: We need a more intelligent way to sort dimension values - for example, ordering in descending order should put values in following order...less than 2525 to 5050 to 75so on...  Supporting images: 

Dear Adobe Team,I hope this message finds you well. I would like to propose an enhancement for Adobe Acrobat Reader that I believe would significantly improve user experience and efficiency.Currently, when users open a PDF document, they need to reselect their frequently used tools each time. This can be time-consuming and disrupts the workflow, especially for users who rely on specific tools for their tasks.I suggest implementing a feature that retains the recently used tools when a user reopens a PDF. This would allow users to quickly access their&nbsp

Description - Working on monthly scorecards, I need a date range that can always update itself to the report date range, but in the prior year. Would be even better if there was a day-of-week adjusted version, but I would take a "this month last year". This seems very basic for what Workspace should offer. Just a "this date range minus 365" would get me there. Why is this feature important to you - Creating comparison date ranges that can't update themselves and/or have labels that don't make sense to my internal customers means that we are going to have to create the reporting in PowerBI or Excel. How would you like the feature to work - If my panel date is for the month of February 2025, "this month last year" would show February 2024. Current Behaviour - I can create a static date range for this comparison, but it will not update when it's time to update this monthly scorecard for the next month.

The naming and format of the CJA ootb metrics time spent (seconds), time spent per session, time spent per person is very confusing for the user. Time spent (seconds) -> the name of the metrics highlights that the format is in seconds -> actual format HH:MM:SS -> confusingtime spent per session, time spent per person -> name doesn´t say anything about the format -> actual format is seconds -> not very user friendly, if it´s more than 60 seconds -> user needs to calculate in HH:MM:SS My expectations: easy to understand names of the metrics, user-friendly format 

Description - I have been manually monitoring the amount of rows ingested into CJA and using rolling windows to keep the consumption within licensed range. Why is this feature important to you - to prevent the company from being overcharged for overusage. In addition, this forces us to keep only the most relevant data in CJA. How would you like the feature to work - in the current License Usage section, just update the number on a daily basis. Current Behaviour - CJA license usage is updated on a monthly basis.

Description - When creating a new report suite by copying an existing one, certain settings are not carried over. Currently, users must manually review and compare each setting between the original and copied report suite, which is a tedious and time-consuming process. Why is this feature important to you -Many clients frequently create copies of original report suites to track regional or country-specific site traffic. Manually verifying each setting is inefficient and requires significant effort, leading to delays and potential inconsistencies. How would you like the feature to work -An interface should be available to compare the settings of two report suites side by side. This would minimize manual effort, streamline the process, and provide a clear view of which settings are not copied over during duplication. Current Behaviour -There is no existing interface to facilitate report suite settings comparison.

Analysis workspace does a great job showing you the value of a bar or a line data point when you hover over them.  However when you export the project to a PDF, that information gets lost to the scale on the side of the graph.it would be great if we could display the data points on top of the bars or next to the link data points.  having the option to display all data points or just the min/max so the user's don't have to hover them and so they get printed to the PDF would be enourmously helpful as we (analyst) tend to share information via email and slack in a more informal situations.these labels should change based on the scale so if I want to display % vs numbers, I just need to change the scale of my graph and the data labels will update automatically

Hi there,An idea that would be really useful for us is metric filters/criteria in workspace.At the moment if you drop an Evar on a free form table you can filter based on values.What I would love to see is the ability to do this on metrics (greater than / less than) as currently we have to do these reports in report builder / excel.An (very crude) example of what I am after is below.ThanksDave

I would like to be able to have two items on the left axis because their scale is similar and have rate on the right axis because its scale is different. 

Hello fellow Adobe-pros,Another feature request to make all our lives a lot easier: Please, bring Full Path reports from Reports & Analytics to Analysis Workspace. That report is super helpful to understand how users move through a page in general and from a given point:What I would like to have is quite simple: A full path dimension for every dimension in Workspace! That dimension would hold the paths through that dimension for a given session with values like "Entry -> Homepage -> Product Page -> Exit". Ideally, this value would be calculated when the report runs, so that segments are also respected. For example, if I would exclude all Hits on the homepage, the dimension would then show "Entry -> Product Page -> Exit". Ideally, we would also have the option to search this dimension in a clever way, like with the old PathFinder report: With a report like this, it would be super easy to train our business users to do in-depth pathing analysis on their own. As th

As much as I love being able to hyperlink dimensions in a freeform table, this is only limited to either: Having a URL-based dimension so you can allow Adobe Analytics to create hyperlinks for all rows or Manually enter the URL for each row (There is an option to create a dynamic URL string, but that requires the dimension having direct ties to the URL.)   It would be nice to designate a URL dimension (for example, evar1 Page URL) as the destination link for the corresponding non-URL dimension currently chosen in the freeform table (for example, evar2 Page Title). This would be helpful if users are looking at Page Title or Video Names and want to know more about the page content that may influence the KPIs they are seeing.