Is it possible to create a multi-entry Typeahead field? | Community
Skip to main content
Level 2
May 5, 2020
Question

Is it possible to create a multi-entry Typeahead field?

  • May 5, 2020
  • 1 reply
  • 1555 views

I would like to create a field that functions like the Assignments field on the Task object, so that I can associate some people with tasks without formally assigning them. But when I create a Typeahead field using User as the Referenced Object Type it is single-entry and I cannot find any way to change that.

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

1 reply

Doug_Den_Hoed__AtAppStore
Community Advisor
Community Advisor
May 5, 2020

Not yet James, as per this related thread.

If you have a finite set of users in mind (unlikely, since you're trying to use type ahead) you might consider using a multi-select drop down with one entry per person (and -- bonus marks -- using their GUID as the value in the drop down so you can do other cool $$USER.ID things with it),.

Regards,

Doug

@Kyna Baker - inactive‚ to find that previous thread, recalling that in Classic Community that I'd put an image of a silver bullet cartoon on my post (and mentioned that in the text), I tried your tip from yesterday and searched in 0ne for "silver AND bullet" (meaning I needed both terms in the post), and presto! Two hits matched, and the first one was the one I wanted. I will definitely keep using AND in my searching -- thanks for pointing it out!

Level 6
May 7, 2020

I was wondering about this also.....@Doug Den Hoed‚ I understand the multi-select dropdown but I don't understand what the rest means lol ....what do those name options look like in form with GUIDs?

we have a "stakeholders" field that I had to leave as a text ---but when there are several names I was hoping type-ahead might solve for that....would still need another text field to account for non-users.

Level 6
May 7, 2020

@Doug Den Hoed‚ Thank you! I get it...we use this for cost centers....users just see the name but the code attached in underneath!

this is great info, I knew those codes carried over but never thought about using in this way!