Idea Exchange Promotion | Community
Skip to main content
A
AlisonMi
Level 5
March 13, 2018
Question

Idea Exchange Promotion

  • March 13, 2018
  • 286 replies
  • 34289 views
Hi everyone! I've collapsed down a list of ideas that we have upvoted within our internal team and would appreciate your support too! Managing Tasks/Approvals Prevent Task from Being Marked as Complete If Required Fields on Custom Form Attached to the Task Are Blank Routing Custom Forms for Approval or Print to PDF Link Proof and Task approvals Task getting auto-approved when a Proof or Document associated with the Task is approved Managing Proofs Proof reviewer / approver delegation by current reviewer / approver Add/Edit Automated Proof Workflow from Inside the Proof Viewer New Proof: Change default from basic to automated Automated Proofs: Add option to create automated proofs as default or expose to API UX/Other/Admin Ability to export Custom Forms "https://community.workfront.com/discussions/community-home/digestviewer/Ability%20to%20report%20on%20issues,%20tasks,%20and%20projects%20together%20in%20one%20report" Ability to report on issues, tasks, and projects together in one report Allow screenshots in updates/comments Ability to convert the field type to another field type Make Custom Forms Appear as Tabs Implement Quick Pins for Custom Forms for shortcuts to Layout Templates New Home: Bring back Recent Updates I want to be able to set a default View/Filter/Grouping from Layout Template Ability to move from Sandbox to Production Mandatory logging of time on task Out of Office auto replies to directed updates Populate empty profile pictures with user's initials James Hill
    This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

    286 replies

    Show previous replies
    K
    KevinQu1
    Level 10
    February 18, 2020
    This one could really use some love... Team Management in Access Level https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSbdAAG/detail We've had some near-misses where non-admins create teams and start using them in ways contrary to process because they do not understand the ramifications. We want teams to be the purview of admins so we can create them on behalf of users that might need them, apply naming standards, and otherwise keep chaos to a low roar. Kevin Quosig
    K
    KevinQu1
    Level 10
    February 18, 2020
    Workfront's handling of finances--the current bane of my existence (and the Financial Coordinator's!): Exposing Rate Sheet Source Information (Resource Revenue) https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000Xht9AAC/detail Been going round and around with Support for months figuring this out; the level of frustration over this has been very high each time we do End-of- finances (Year, Month, Quarter). Kevin Quosig
    AileenTa
    AileenTa
    Level 5
    February 18, 2020
    If you use expenses please upvote this... hide or delete default expense types. The defaults cause a lot of confusion for my team since accounting uses different labels to track expenses. https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSfxAAG/detail Aileen Taylor Cell Signaling Technology
    P
    parkerc51788251
    Level 2
    February 19, 2020
    I've submitted an idea to give us an option to enable some form of object approval override for Project Owners. We frequently come across situations where a project owner is having to get around approvals in order to complete their projects. Right now they have to move the object to a non-pending status, delete the approval, and then change the status of the item back. Since project owners already have th eability to do this, it seems silly that we can't have a simple override to prevent confusion when looking back at logs. Please upvote here: https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XhtYAAS/detail Thanks! Parker Cantu
    V
    VicAl1
    Level 10
    February 19, 2020
    Yes!! Upvoted! ��
    K
    KevinQu1
    Level 10
    February 26, 2020
    Today is PHQ issues day...this one is in regards to the hard-to-see thin, gray line connecting the comment to the markup when clicking on an existing comment. PHQ: Pointer from Comment to Markup https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XhvPAAS/detail Kevin Quosig
    K
    KevinQu1
    Level 10
    February 26, 2020
    An improvement to help wade through dozens of PHQ comments and tiny little markers: PHQ: Highlighting Comment Also Highlights Markup https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XhvUAAS/detail Kevin Quosig
    D
    DreadkiailiWork
    Level 4
    February 26, 2020
    We would really like requestors to be able to duplicate requests themselves. I found this one: https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSnTAAW/detail Kristine Ross
    Maddy-Martin
    Maddy-Martin
    Level 4
    February 27, 2020
    Ability to set report column widths based on % of available space (or at least improve the current "content aware" auto-width feature)! Workfront's reports are supposed to be content aware when choosing automatic column widths, however this is not the case. We see reports every day where the column with the most content will be squished into a difficult to read narrow width, while a different column with less content (like a date) will take up a disproportionate amount of space. The text mode columnwidth = function seems to work for the most part, but once you manually set a width for one column, you have to do it for every single column after that because it disregards the automatic sizing! Improved column width options would not only make reports look prettier, but make them easier and faster to read so that our team can get their best work done. If you've been struggling with this too, please upvote the idea! https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XhvjAAC/detail Maddy Martin
    L
    Leah28850075mvkt
    Level 5
    February 28, 2020
    I would like the Typeahead field to be linked to the object it is referencing. https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XhwIAAS/detail Leah Janz Metro Transit
    Show more replies
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

    Loading footer...