How does your web design team intake feedback/markups? | Community
Skip to main content
J
Justin_Charles
Level 3
May 14, 2024
Question

How does your web design team intake feedback/markups?

  • May 14, 2024
  • 1 reply
  • 808 views

Our web design team uses Figma for web design and we use Workfront for project management.  We also have Workfront Proofs.  We're currently receiving markups via various channels, and we're looking to consolidate them into 1 tool.  I'd love to use Workfront Proofs for markups, but I don't know how to get this working.  When I put the Figma prototype link in the Workfront Proofs URL, all you get is an image of the Figma login screen.  It would be best to be able to receive markups on interactive Figma prototypes.  Any ideas?

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

1 reply

skyehansen
Community Advisor
skyehansenCommunity Advisor
Community Advisor
May 14, 2024

Did you specify that the URL you were entering is an interactive proof?

 

(see instructions on the documentation page:

 

https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/review-and-approve-work/proofing/create-proofs/generate-interactive-proof-for-website-or-other-web-content

 

)

J
Justin_CharlesAuthor
Level 3
May 15, 2024

thanks skye!  i was able to get an interactive proof of a figma prototype created, but i see 2 barriers to user adoption here:

1) it requires them to download an app

2) it is prompting users to log in to Figma.  not all of our reviewers have Figma logins.  when we send a prototype link directly (not as a proof), it allows them to view it without logging in.

 

any advice there?  or any other ideas for how you gather feedback from stakeholders for web projects?

skyehansen
Community Advisor
skyehansenCommunity Advisor
Community Advisor
May 19, 2024

well... we already trained everyone to use the desktop app. And our stakeholders are not going to let lack of logins stop them from using the tool. I think my bigger concern is there's no ability to use the mobile interface to proof interactive proofs. So this is honestly my priority.

If you're concerned about the logins thing, I would probably say to submit an idea to the community for voting (we have a similar one on our side, because it does feel like the interactive proof app forces more authenticating than what would normally be needed -- it's just not a showstopper, more of a nice-to-have)

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

Loading footer...