Hi, It would be VERY helpful if we could preview documents, i.e., xlsx, .pdf., docx, .msg, etc., that are added to Documents instead of having to download and open them. Being able to preview would allow the user to quickly go through them (when there are several of the same type) to find the relevant one they need. The Preview button exists, but it acts the same as the Download button except for pdfs which open in a new browser window. Thanks, Kenny
We can access API call information currently via Admin console.It would be good if we have subscription facility to get this report without logging to Marketo tool.
Description - Add in a carrot dropdown icon option next to each object header title within the Favorites and Recents menusWhy is this feature important to you - To reduce the scroll time to find things quickly based on object typesHow would you like the feature to work - Add a carrot icon the to the right of the object header titleCurrent Behavior - Does not exist; Only able to do a long scroll
Description - Just moving the pointer over a User's name link causes their contact info to popupWhy is this feature important to you - Even when not intended (almost always), it pops up and prevents any further interaction until closed (X click)How would you like the feature to work - Remove auto pop up unless name is clicked on, or at least provide the option to do so.Current Behaviour - This behaviour is quite disruptive and often interferes with the user's intended actions.
Request: Add the 'Save as New View' button when editing the Report Default view Benefit: Users can easily create/test new views without impacting all users by changing the Report Default view
Description - Add date and time dimensions in Data Warehouse reports Why is this feature important to you - Because most of the exported reports related to user interactions within digital channels, or even data from Adobe Target generally need a Date and Time for data analysis to be more complete. How would you like the feature to work - Date and Time dimensions appear in the "Items" > "Breakdowns" > "Standard" section to add to reports. Current Behaviour - These dimensions don't exist.
We need to export the "Adobe Analytics dictionary" to CSV/XLSX file to easy to use
Description - I would like a built in filter within the widget to show the Completed tasks. Why is this feature important to you - Our team likes to see their recently completed tasks for reference and edits. How would you like the feature to work - I would like a built in filter within the widget to show the Completed tasks that could be selected and show information the same you can select other built in filters. Current Behaviour - Currently, the built in filters within the Task Widget do not play nicely with custom filters to show Completed Work. Tasks will go missing and not appear.
Description - We have a reporting requirement from our VP that requires us to weigh actual project hours against portfolio 'allotments'. Why is this feature important to you - Without being able to set a range for the actual hours, the project report comparison is not accurate. We need accurate data to report to our VP so that we can charge back the business lines that overuse our resourcesHow would you like the feature to work - The screenshot is from our project report and this is what we need in an hour report. Current Behaviour - The issue we are running into is that a project report gives us the groupings by portfolios we need, but the actual hours cannot be added as a filter or range. We would need to run an hour report for this feature. As such, we opened a ticket and worked with a wonderful Support person name Kristina Smith, who was able to give us the text mode syntax to add the portfolio level data into an hour report, but we were unable to group by it and we are back to square one. She suggested I submit a feature request here.
Many of our users ask for the ability to save a draft of a request to come back to later.
Description - Need the ability to move multiple fields at once in the custom form builder Why is this feature important to you - It takes hours to move new fields around when a form is nearing 500 fields. When multiple fields are going to the same section on our forms, this would be optimal to have to save time clicking and scrolling. How would you like the feature to work - Be able to select multiple fields at once either through a checkbox or holding the Shift key and then the fields selected could be dragged at once. Current Behaviour - Only able to move one field at a time which is time consuming and inefficient. I have seen some old ideas posted on this topic but no traction. This should be a native feature of the tool and should not need a third party app to assist with this functionality.
Please add the ability to filter based on SFDC ID.
Description - I would love to see us be able to brand the New Request Page. Currently it is a very odd customer experience with an illustration of a toboggan. Why is this feature important to you - Customer experience, brand integrity.How would you like the feature to work - Simple update of toboggan to company logo.Current Behavior - No customization is currently available
Description - On the My Work widget on New Home, we would like to be able to distinguish between the "READY" and "NOT READY" objects within the lists. This is important to know when you are viewing both statuses in your view, but can't tell the difference between the two without using the filter (to eliminate one or the other).. Legacy home did have this distinguishing information displayed on each object in the list and it was very helpful when viewing and working through your list. Current Behaviour - You are unable to tell between "READY" and "NOT READY" tasks in your Work List if you have the filter displaying both status types. This is not helpful when displaying both status types in the list.
Description - We have migrated to InTune for mobile device management. Users would like to utilize the Workfront mobile app, but without it being managed via InTune it's not as secure so the Security Team won't approve it's use. Why is this feature important to you - See aboveHow would you like the feature to work - Workfront to provide a connection for InTune. Current Behaviour - The app is not approved for use by the Security Team.
—It would be great to be able to add a PDF to an Update "new comment".—When we are updating teammates we have a lot of pdfs we work with as a multi-page file that we find it valuable to add the the "new comment" in Updates so support what we are explaining.—It would be beneficial to be able to add a pdf as well. Right now only pdfs can be added to Documents or as Proofs.—Currently only jpgs, pngs, gifs can be added to an Update comment.
When using the Log In As feature, the prompt shows both the full name and email address of the users. However, it doesn't appear to search on the email address. Only the first name is matched. In some cases, because the email is actually more unique, it would be really helpful to fuzzy match on BOTH the email and full name.Searching on name:Searching on email mailbox:
Description - I would like the ability for the mobile app to accept comments and decisions on mobile apps Why is this feature important to you - 1)We work a lot with video and need approvals on those videos. 2) The world has gone mobile and stakeholders/decision makers in our field don't live at a PC anymore. Decisions need to be made in the field and on the road. 3) SAdditionally, some video products are created for mobile and should be proofed in that fashion. How would you like the feature to work - I'd like it to work like Proofs do on PC. It'd be understandable if it lost some advanced functionality so long as comments/approval and preview/playback still functioned on mobile devices. Ideally all of the same function would remain if you consider some people are still on large tablets - not only phones. It seems like you could proof pretty much the same way as on PC on a tablet. Current Behaviour - The Proof function on mobile gives an error directing you to use the Adobe Workfront App to view on mobile. If you do that it does not preview the video or provide any comment/approval functions. It actually seems more like a bug as if it is supposed to play the proof but is not actually performing the function.
Description - We would like to have the ability to create a new "Equates With" field, labeled something similar to "N/A" or "Not Applicable".Why is this feature important to you - We have project templates that use all the tasks but some projects don't need certain tasks. We want to mark them N/A and not delete them, but currently since the status equates with "Complete", if there are planned hours attached, it still counts those planned hours towards the overall project planned hours. How would you like the feature to work - We need a way to not have those planned hours attached to project with a certain status.
As part of the GDPR, we need to get consent from people in order to be able to keep their data. If someone registers to download a white paper but does not opt-in, we are supposed to delete any reference to the person. This means deleting it or anonymize it.One very big issue with this is that when we delete the person, it is automatically deleted from all reporting.The work around this is to anonymize the person, since it is accepted that we keep anonymous information in our systems. We can easily replace the first name, last name or email address in the database with "John Doe" or "Anonymous Person". But there are some information that cannot be manipulated from a smart campaign:Cookie IDs attached to the personInferred and system data such as the IP addressData value changes in the activity logsFills out form in the activity logsFurthermore, relying on users to run data value changes is error prone.It would be very helpful if a new "anonymize Person" flow step was created.In the field management, we would be able to define which fields should be anonymized, and what would be the anonymous value for each of them (for instance, we would define that the anonymous value for first name would be "Anonymous" and for last name it would be "Person", and NULL for the email address).Then, when running the "Anonymize person" flow step, Marketo would automatically replace all the fields set in the admin with their anonymous value, cleanse the system fields that could be considered as personal Ids and also cleanse all the DVC activities (either deleting them or replacing all values with their anonymous counterpart).-Greg
Hi Team,please consider the possibility to report on folder name from Document section. Thank you!
How come when I choose to filter by Task Name the report automatically defaults to Task ID? Why isn't the "Name" feature accessible in the filter section? I think it's like that for all "name" filters. Then I'm forced to switch to text mode and manually code the report to filter by name. Please fix this.
Description -We are seeing a crash in the SDK when we are trying to open a web view but the Android System WebView is disabled. If this tool is disabled and Adobe SDK tries to show a screen that contains a WebView it will crash immediately with the message of "Failed to load WebView provider: No WebView installed".Class where the issue was found: MessageContent.kt line 56 in com.adobe.marketing.mobile.services.ui.message.views.MessageContentKt$MessageContent$1.invokeAdobe versions:com.adobe.marketing.mobile:places:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:target:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:analytics:3.0.1com.adobe.marketing.mobile:userprofile:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:core:3.1.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:assurance:3.0.1com.adobe.marketing.mobile:edge:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:edgeidentity:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:edgeconsent:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:messaging:3.1.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:campaign:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:campaignclassic:3.1.1com.adobe.marketing.mobile:lifecycle:3.0.1com.adobe.marketing.mobile:signal:3.0.0com.adobe.marketing.mobile:identity:3.0.1Why is this feature important to you -We are reducing our crash rate.How would you like the feature to work -This could be an empty screen or a generic error message from Adobe side. Current Behaviour -Regarding the crash. I would like to mention that it is more technical rather than a flow for specific user or something similar.Let me add the details.- All the Android devices contains an hidden app called "Android System Webview". It can be found by going to Settings -> All apps -> Android System Webview.- When the user tries to open a Webview for any app, the operative system delegate that action to this hidden app "Android System Webview"- There are to cases that happens when the user open a Webview in relation to Android System Webview.Case #1: If the Android System WebView is enabled ( enabled is by default in all devices ) it will open the webview as any common webview that we know.Case #2: If the Android System Webview is disabled, it will crash when the user tries to open a Webview view, this hidden app is disabled.What we would like to have a fix is for Case #2, if from Adobe side we can get some checks when this hidden app is disabled. By doing that we can prevent the crash.
Description: Allow announcements to be sent to all individuals of a specific layout template or access levelWhy this feature is important to you (and others using Workfront): This would allow for easier and streamlined communication when a layout template or access level is modified. We recently made changes to a layout template for more than 500 users. We had to manually type in the users names to communicate with them. This would save hours for each system admin who needed to communicate to large groups of usersHow would you like this feature to work: Allow the layout templates and access levels within the Workfront instance to be selected when sending out a notificationCurrent Behavior: No way to easily address those assigned a given layout template or access level. We have to manually enter the user name to send announcement.
Description - The project timeline only instantly updates when you manually recalculate the timeline of the project OR when an update is made to the project. So when a cross project predecessor is completed, it more or less doesn't signal the dependent project that a change has been made until the dependent project updates based on a separate criteria. Why can't we add a simple functionality to update project 2 when the task in project 1 is completed or updated? Honestly, if cross project predecessors are made available to customers, they should probably have the same functionality available as normal single project predecessors. Right? - Jaxon
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
