Build better products with our product team
The Activity ID is a unique identifier assigned to each activity in Adobe Target. It plays a crucial role in various processes, including tracking, reporting, and raising queries with Adobe Support.The addition of an "Activity ID" column in the Activities List would allow users to:1) View the Activity ID directly in the Activities List without opening each activity.2) Search for activities using the Activity ID in the search bar, improving efficiency.3) Quickly reference Activity IDs when raising support queries or managing multiple activities.Currently, users have to open each activity individually to retrieve its Activity ID.
Description - When triggering the WF/Jira integration you have to go into the issue under the project. We would like the ability to add the custom form and trigger the integration via Boards.Why is this feature important to you - We primarily work out of WF Boards and having to go out and into the project and then search the issue is time consumingHow would you like the feature to work - Ability to trigger the Jira integration field from Boards Card.Current Behaviour - We go out of the Board and into the project then search the Card name to find the relevant issue and then go to issue details and add the custom form then we select the Jira and select yes.
Summary Description of Your IdeaI propose a feature in Workfront that allows administrators to lock deliverables, objects, or specific project components from further edits after a defined cutoff time. This functionality would help teams, especially those managing time-sensitive deliverables, maintain consistency and prevent unauthorized or last-minute changes that could disrupt workflows. The goal is to ensure that once a project reaches a designated phase, certain users (e.g., Dentsu/PMs/Planner/CMs) can no longer make changes, while maintaining flexibility for those who still need access.Why Is This Feature Important to You?Prevents disruptions: Last-minute edits from external teams can disrupt Creative Services' workflow, leading to inconsistencies in project deliverables.Ensures process integrity: Locking objects ensures that final versions remain untouched once a project moves to the next phase.Reduces manual oversight: Currently, permissions must be updated manually, requiring extra effort to monitor and enforce deadlines.Enhances collaboration: Allows teams to work freely within a defined timeframe but ensures stability after the cutoff dateHow Would You Like the Feature to Work?Configurable Locking Mechanism:Admins or project owners should have an option to set a lock date for specific deliverables, tasks, or documents.Past this date, the defined objects become read-only for designated users or teams.The ability to edit can still remain for admins or specific roles (e.g., Project Owners).User-Specific Access Controls:Ability to lock objects for specific groups (e.g., Dentsu) while maintaining edit rights for internal teams.A "Locked State" should be configurable within user access settings.Manual & Automated Locking:Admins can manually apply a lock at any time.Option to automate the lock based on project phases or due dates.Visual Indicator for Locked Items:Clearly mark locked items with an icon or banner to indicate restricted access.Provide an error message when restricted users attempt to edit locked objects.Audit Trail & Override Option:Maintain a log of when an item was locked and by whom.Allow authorized users (e.g., Creative Services leads) to override the lock in special cases.Current BehaviorThere is no direct way to lock deliverables, tasks, or objects from edits after a certain date. Teams must manually adjust permissions for users after deadlines, which is time-consuming and prone to human error.Users with past access can continue making changes unless an admin removes their permissions.There is no visual indication of an object being locked or restricted, leading to confusion.While projects can be marked as Complete, this status change locks access for all users, rather than just a select group.
The ability to change the owner of a Dynamic Board has been removed (only the admin can be the owner). In the most recent release Jan 2025 the change of ownership was given for basic, retrospective, and Kanban boards, but not dynamic boards. Our business cannot own the boards, as the admin was set up by an external provider. Functionality to change the owner of a dynamic board is highly desired.
The naming and format of the CJA ootb metrics time spent (seconds), time spent per session, time spent per person is very confusing for the user. Time spent (seconds) -> the name of the metrics highlights that the format is in seconds -> actual format HH:MM:SS -> confusingtime spent per session, time spent per person -> name doesn´t say anything about the format -> actual format is seconds -> not very user friendly, if it´s more than 60 seconds -> user needs to calculate in HH:MM:SS My expectations: easy to understand names of the metrics, user-friendly format
Description -This is a feature we did have until recently. We had an external user landing page with a couple dashboards. One was a dashboard with that specific request type those users would need to make requests on. Why is this feature important to you -This is important to centralize things for our external users. Simplifies their experience and keep s them on one page. How would you like the feature to work -Until recently we could put the path to the request type in the "external page" field and the dashboard would show the request menu open to that request form/type. Current Behaviour -Recently doing things the way we had been now shows a dimmed unclickable request menu option. The current "fix" is to take the user to the regular request page.
Need the ability for anyone who can resolve comments to do so and reply to comments WITHOUT unlocking the stage. We DO NOT want reviewers to be able to add new comment while we are resolving.
Hello together,We have a small stumbling block in our process that significantly impairs the efficient work of our users. -If our users start an upload / upload an asset and this takes a certain amount of time, then our users must remain on this page in Workfront, i.e. they must watch how the loading bar loads. Because if they continue working and leave the page at the upload, the upload will stop (and there will be no information that there was an cancellation)This is of course very inconvenient for everyday work, because if the file is larger, the users would not work for a few minutes. In the meantime, they could carry out further work steps for the work process.Is it not possible to keep the uplaod running in the background so that it is possible to leave the page WITHOUT the upload cancelled? Best Jasmin
Description - It would be wonderful to have a feature to force all/specific fields to lowercase in datasets (similar to CJA component settings) Why is this feature important to you - When adding lookup datasets to CJA, if there's variance in casing the metadata isn't returned, even if the dimension is displayed in all lowercase. How would you like the feature to work - Radio button to force all fields to lowercase. Checkboxes to allow only specific fields to be forced to lowercase. Current Behaviour - Can use data prep to lower case specific fields. But that's not retroactive and only applies to one field at a time.
It would be great to have an option (setting) to enable a "Pop-up text box" to allow users to provide information on why the Status has changed. So that when the Approval gets the required information when approving the project. Example: If a project is set to "Cancelled" and approval is configured, the project manager would be prompted to fill in the necessary details explaining the reason for the cancellation. This would equip the approver with the essential information needed to make informed decisions.
Description - Introduction of "Expiry Date" for each API key on the Customer Info page.Why is this feature important to you - Being able to see when an API key is due to expire can allow for forward planning of recycling API keys.How would you like the feature to work - An additional column in the API Key Settings on Customer Info page which displays the API keys expiry date.Current Behaviour - The expiry date is not listed.
Description - I have been manually monitoring the amount of rows ingested into CJA and using rolling windows to keep the consumption within licensed range. Why is this feature important to you - to prevent the company from being overcharged for overusage. In addition, this forces us to keep only the most relevant data in CJA. How would you like the feature to work - in the current License Usage section, just update the number on a daily basis. Current Behaviour - CJA license usage is updated on a monthly basis.
Description - We have custom Rich Text fields that we take project notes in. We use bullets, bolding, underlining, etc to separate ideas and make the notes more quickly understandable. When I export the report to PDF or to excel the formatting disappears. It would be very helpful if we could keep the formatting in the exported report.
Description - Each file in Workfront when a proof is created has the SOC status views. We think adding A for Approved would be a good at-a-glance look to confirm a proof has been approved rather than pull over the sidebar and scroll down to see if a proof is approved.Why is this feature important to you - It would provide less clicks to know if a number of files are approved rather than clicking into each one and pulling the sidebar to confirm each are approved when there could be over 5 files.How would you like the feature to work - We would like to have the SOC to look like SOCA where A = Approved.Current Behaviour - Currently, there is no way of knowing a list of files are all approved without clicking into each one.
Description -After being migrated to the IMS Admin users can no longer delete user accounts from their system. The drop down menu option is still there but we can not make use of it. Give us back that capability. Why is this feature important to you - There have been occasions where someone entered an incorrect account, for whatever reason. The account is now sitting in our user list as deactivated but still there. It would be nice to be able to clean up the user list and delete unnecessary accounts. How would you like the feature to work - Just as it always has. The menu options are there, just turn them back on for us. Current Behaviour - I select the Delete option and I get an errror saying delete has been turned off and this is being managed by the IMS. But there is no way in IMS to delete either, just remove user permissions.
Description:Currently, users can add personal To-Do tasks either via the Home widget or by creating tasks directly within their personal To-Do List project. However, these tasks do not reflect planned hours by default and therefore are not factored into Workload Balancer capacity calculations, even though they may take up meaningful portions of an individual's day. This creates a disconnect between actual user availability and what project/resource managers see when planning workloads. For example, a user may be spending several hours on personal To-Do items (e.g., training, internal documentation, self-assigned initiatives), but still appear 100% available for project work in the Workload Balancer view. Suggested Enhancement:Allow users to optionally assign planned hours and durations when creating personal To-Do tasks—ideally directly from the Home widget interface or through a simplified entry form. This would allow the system to:Accurately reflect that time as allocated in the Workload Balancer.Provide project/resource managers with a more realistic view of team member availability.Reduce the need for manual workarounds such as navigating to the Personal Tasks project or embedding planned hours into task names.Optional Features for Consideration:Enable a toggle when creating a To-Do item to "Include in workload capacity."Allow admins to define whether these tasks can be visible to others (e.g., team leads or managers) or remain private.Improve visibility of these To-Dos in reports and dashboards alongside regular task assignments.Business Value:This improvement would help organizations more accurately manage resources and plan projects by ensuring that all time commitments, including self-managed tasks, are visible during capacity planning. It would also reduce overhead from workarounds, improve forecasting accuracy, and support better workload distribution across teams.
Description - Reviewers on proof should be able to see the deadline of the stage they're part of on multi-staged proofs Why is this feature important to you - many clients have asked for this How would you like the feature to work - on users Home Work List it would have the stage deadline shown for proofs pending their approval. Also on users My Updates area, proofs pending approval should display their stage's proof deadline Current Behaviour - proof deadlines are not shown or displayed often and if they are, it only displays the furthest out stage proof deadline.
We're having huge challenges with our users not tagging people in their comments in updates. When you go to post an update in a project, could it automatically tag everyone with access to the project and give you the ability to opt people out? This would be instead of putting it on the user to remember to tag the specific people on the project they need to notify. That would alleviate users posting updates with no tagging and no one getting notified of the update.
Description - Would love to have a tag to use to indicate everyone on a Project. Such as "@Everyone" or "@All"Why is this feature important to you - Because the People tab is limited in formatting and missing all the bells and whistles of the Updates tab.How would you like the feature to work - When putting a note into a Project, or a Task, or an Issue related to a project, I'd like to be able to put an "@All" and it tags everyone.Current Behaviour - You have to go to the people tab to do that and you can't format the text.
Description - Currently, when you edit an approver in an approval process, it resets all issues back to the first stage. Why is this feature important to you - One of our projects has over 100 issues at a time. When we have to edit a single approver in the chain, it means we have to have manually reset every issue back to where it was (and hopefully whoever edited the process saved an excel history of where everything was!) How would you like the feature to work - When editing an approval process, issues should be updated with the correct approver without resetting everything.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The proposed feature aims to enable businesses to generate customizable, template-based reports by leveraging metadata criteria for assets stored in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM). These reports can be scheduled for automated generation and distributed to various platforms or teams. Use-case: Businesses often need reports filtered based on specific metadata values (e.g., region, asset type, product category). These reports are essential for: Supporting marketing campaigns by identifying suitable content. Generating insights for compliance or governance reviews. However, manually filtering and compiling this data is time-intensive and prone to errors. Automating this process would save time and improve data accuracy. Current/Experienced Behavior: We need to manually filter the content after generating reports for all assets. Improved/Expected Behavior: Report Templates: Admins can create and save report templates with predefined metadata filters. Automated Scheduling: Reports can be scheduled (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly) to run and generate outputs in standard formats like CSV, Excel, or PDF. Customizable Distribution: Generated reports can be automatically emailed or pushed to other integrated platforms (e.g., Slack, Teams, or SharePoint). Granular Access Control: Access to report creation and data is managed via AEM’s existing permissions model. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Mondelez Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description: Enable sharing of request drafts, which is currently not possible in Workfront.Importance: Requestors save drafts to gather missing information or discuss with managers. Sharing drafts allows for manager input before submission.Benefits:• Manager review and feedback.• Team collaboration.• Comprehensive review by all parties.Desired Functionality: Add a "Share draft" icon to share drafts with internal team members.Current Behavior: Workfront allows sharing request queue links for direct submissions, but drafts remain private until submitted.
For better usability, we should have the ability to select multiple constraints within a filter simultaneously.For example, I am setting up a smart list with multiple account-level requirements, and I need to add upward of three constraints to each filter individually. Instead of having to click into filter and add constraints one at a time, it would be much more efficient to select all the necessary constraints at once.
Description - The Fusion UI automatically zooms out on paste, or starting the scenario (Run once). When adding a note, it scrolls to the left until the first module is in view. Why is this feature important to you - The automatical scrolling/zooming is super annoying when working in a large scenario. It serves no purpose, and I really would love to see it turned off, or at minimum, be a user setting How would you like the feature to work - Do not scroll, zoom or modify my view when I copy/paste modules, run scenarios or add notes
Description - it is not possible to configure sharing option in project template's tasks. Why is this feature important to you - This way I dont need to go to each task of the project and add/remove sharing permissions manually.How would you like the feature to work - when create a project template, I would like to be able to sharing permissions on tasks level and this way it won't inherit from the project template permissions.Current Behaviour - When create a project template, on the Tasks level doenst there is no option for sharing permission.Attached file for reference.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
