Description - Currently, there is an option to select either "Eventual path" or "next hit" between touch points. In addition to the "next hit" option what we really need is a "next page" option (which ignores all link tracking data). Why is this feature important to you - Currently you cannot look at the conversion between two pages where you want to specify the second page is viewed immediately after the first. This is because any link tracking calls that happen in between the two page views will cause users to fall out, even if the pages are view one after another. Worryingly, people may incorrectly be assuming that "next hit" is the equivalent to "next page" (this has happened inside our company.) Note: The same issue used to exist with sequential segments but it was fixed i.e. there is now a "next page" option, in addition to "next hit". How would you like the feature to work - A new "next page" option that ignores link tracking calls.
Description - I'm missing following functionalities that were previously available in WF One: I cannot re-assign ticket to my peer admins (e.g. when I plan longer leave) I cannot tag other users in support communication thread I cannot sort my ticket by "last update" Escalate case, seems to be always greyed out for me, so I'm unsure when will I be able to use it I cannot see details of my ticket submission. With multiple tickets constantly in the queue, I don't always remember all details relevant for the case, and lack of preview of my original submission forces me to keep track of this. Why is this feature important to you - I want to manage my support tickets more efficiently How would you like the feature to work - apply all above mentioned missing pieces. Current Behaviour - see above
As a future release improvement, I think it would be nice to have 6 or possibly 7 project header fields. I wouldn’t want to lose any of the existing 5 fields (project owner, percent complete, planned completion date, status and condition). It would be really beneficial to have project reference number as the 6th header field. Currently, we ask our project owners to add the project reference number in the project title manually. As the 7th field, it would be nice to have the request (“This Resolves”) field.
Description - An alert triggered for the APNS certificate expiation in Adobe Control Panel. Why is this feature important to you - This would automate and provide a larger audience awareness of the expiration of APNS certificate required for Push notification channel via the control panel How would you like the feature to work - Similar to SSL Certificate Process Current Behavior - Required to managed outside Adobe Campaign Control Panel
It would be great if we could create charts using calculated columns so they can be added to dashboards. We can use the built in views locally (e.g. grouped columns in the detailed view) but when communicating with other teams we must export to Excel and create charts that way. I'd love to move to using WF as our operational system of record but limitations like this reduce feasibility. Without this I find myself exporting to Excel and giving Sr. Leadership multiple reports/dashboard views. This impacts adoption of WF across the organization (especially at the Executive level) as they want a single place to get their results. Thank you for your consideration!
From the activity log, I check which pages the customer referred to by typing the URL into the browser one by one. Could you please help me to do this efficiently?
Description - When viewing the Resource Management Planner, when viewing by role or project, it would be great to see capacity as a % by role. Today you're able to see capacity as a % when you're viewing by user, but not by role or project Why is this feature important to you - we measure capacity in terms of % not hours, so in the current state we have to export these data points and then calculate the % in excel How would you like the feature to work - I want to see the Capacity % in the Workfront UI when viewing by Role instead of just when viewing by User
Description - add enhancements to out of office delegation where it allows for you to select specific tasks/issues within the timeframe and be able to provide "next steps" for the user you're delegating to. Why is this feature important to you - in its current state, the tool works well to allow access and notification to an object while someone is out of office, however, there are times where teams work differently and thus a backup might need more instruction other than what is provided via a notification or workfront process. How would you like the feature to work - allow for more flexibility/customization of this function. Its a good start but needs some personalization. view to kanban boards and tie-in/view to "boards" would be useful. Current Behaviour - good tool to allow access to individuals acting as backups where it removes the need to wait for access to be granted as well as a way for both users to stay notified via notifications.
When assigning layout templates, there may be a prompt saying "This assignment will override an existing Layout Template assignment." Unfortunately, this only applies when assigning and listing individual users. Trying to assign the template to a group or team results in the same prompt, but the members of that group or team do not actually inherit the new assignment and retain their prior layout template.
Description - For a system like Adobe Experience Cloud Experience Platform Dynamic Data Collection Launch, by Adobe Tags, it is very important to provide a clear view on what has been changed when and by whom. This information is available already through the amazing Audit Event tab. However, it can be tricky to figure out what has changed due to the information being presented in a different place from the resource in question, like a Rule's Action. For example, looking for information about who changed a Rule's Action is difficult, because the displayed information would only work if every Action has a unique name: To help with that, I would like to propose the following enhancements: In the view above, always include the ID of the resource and allow to search for it Make the results clickable, so users can jump directly to the Resource in question Display Audit Events in the context of the Resource they belong to. For example, add another menu item below the existing Notes button for qualifying Resources (like Rules, Rule Components, Data Elements, Extensions, Libraries) where only Audit Events for the respective Resource would appear: Why is this feature important to you - Because I like to know what is going on How would you like the feature to work - See above Current Behaviour - A lot of 🕵️♂ for very little 💡
Description - Callbacks provide a tremendously helpful way to integrate Adobe Experience Cloud Experience Platform Dynamic Data Collection Launch, by Adobe Tags with other systems, like ticketing or messaging tools. However, the fact that we need to use an API to set them up means not many customers a) know about the feature or b) use it to its full potential. To help with this, please provide a way to create, manage, and delete Callbacks from the Tags interface. Why is this feature important to you - Because Callbacks have a lot of value, so everybody should use it a lot (me included) How would you like the feature to work - Add the option to create, manage, and delete Callbacks from the Tags interface within a Property, maybe directly in the left-hand menu? Current Behaviour - A lot of 🩸💦 and 😭
Description -At the moment rules are triggered in a sequence determined by the rule order number. However, each rule executes asynchronously meaning that rules with a higher priority may finish after rules with a lower priority. This can cause issues where there is a dependency between rules. Why is this feature important to you -We are experiencing issues where there are dependencies between rules. They are hard to spot because the are intermittent and are difficult to resolve due the the asynchronous execution. How would you like the feature to work -I would like to be able to force rules set to different order numbers to wait for other rules. This would be similar to the "wait then" behaviour of actions within a rule.
I would like the ability for Marketo to be able to see the data layer objects on a page in order to use that data as part of triggers and filters in smart campaigns. This could be part of AEM integration with Marketo as well possibly. Example Use case - Leadscoring: Right now Marketo can only rely on URL structure and parameters in order to identify content type on a web page. This is limiting on our website as we have very complicated content with a lot of attributes to it that won't work in the url structure. Our site is utilizing tags in AEM to populate Data Layer objects to populate this data into other Adobe products such as Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target. If we could access the data layer objects this would make this task much easier
Description - Currently when working with combined proofs the order of files happens according to the default drag-and-drop option. After dragging files into the proof's creation menu, some files will be allocated "randomly". There is no way to order files by naming (A-Z), or other meta data information of the file. We are only able to drag-and-drop them manually. As we cannot see a preview of the files, and when working with large amounts of images in one proof, this becomes highly inefficient. Furthermore, when working with two or more versions of the same images we cannot guarantee that the right images will appear in the side-by-side comparison feature. Why is this feature important to you - We are not able to work efficiently with large, combined proofs. How would you like the feature to work - We would like to have a dropdown next to the file file list, to choose how to sort the list of files in the creation menu of a new proof (based on metadata, like the name). In addition, it would be great to be able to readjust the order of images within an existing proof. Current Behaviour - Currently there is no option to reorder files in combined proofs after creation, and only the option to manually adjust the order of files, after uploading files into the proof's creation menu.
We are looking for a way to easily run a report to show the programs without any activity for a specific time period. For example: I want to know which on-demand webinar events are still collecting data and if not then turn them off and archive them. Right now the only way to do this is to manually look at each program one by one which is not scalable.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:Support long term cache config to generate a hash each time clientlibs are modified for AEM on-prem instance.Use-case:Currently, we have to use ACS commons for long term cache config and that has lot of deprecated APIs and more features than required. So can Adobe add the feature of 'hash' for on-prem instances similar to AEM Cloud - beyond auto and none? [com.adobe.granite.ui.clientlibs.impl.LongCacheConfig]Current/Experienced Behavior:It generates a longtermkey based on system time of the service restart.Improved/Expected Behavior:Generate a new key based on last modification of clientlibs to make it dynamic.Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):AEM 6.5.5Customer-name/Organization name:TA DigitalScreenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Push notifications for version update Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: No notifications provided for push version updates on the AEM production pipeline. Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide notification updates for readiness Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: PTZ Insurance Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Direct integration/connectors to Messaging protocols like MQTT within AEM Use-case: Messaging use case, M2M connections Current/Experienced Behavior: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-64/communities/develop/essentials-messaging.html?lang=en https://adapt.to/content/dam/adaptto/production/presentations/2016/adaptTo2016-Microservices-and-IoT-with-AEM-Carsten-Ziegeler-David-Bosschaert.pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/original.media_file.download_attachment.file/adaptTo2016-Microservices-and-IoT-with-AEM-Carsten-Ziegeler-David-Bosschaert.pdf and used of 3rd party integartion via APIs, java libraries etc. Improved/Expected Behavior: To use direct connectors to Messaging protocols similar to existing SMTP for MQTT,ZeroMQ etc. This protocol is useful for IoT communication via sites. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Smart Tags to also support WebP image formats. The default SmartTags service runs every day at 12.00 AM, it would be beneficial if customers can have control on changing that. Use-case: Better managing Smart Tags on assets Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently WebP images are not supported for SmartTagging. The SmartTag service run time is also not adjustable. Improved/Expected Behavior: Smart Tags to also support WebP image formats, and also be able to control when the default SmartTag service runs. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AR/VR Authoring experience in AEM/ Integartion of Adobe Aero Use-case: Future proof content authoringAR e-commerce CMS experience. Current/Experienced Behavior: Authoring mode in AEM / Adobe Areo Improved/Expected Behavior: AR authroing experience.AR asset management.Using AR to create content. AR website experiecne. Adobe Aero Integartion. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi, I'm looking for a way to make personalization (A/B tests, targeted ID, etc..) more visible on a page in editor mode for all authors. In classic UI the annotations are more visible and directly on the page. In Touch UI most authors do not notice the annotations in the right corner. Comments in the timeline could also be an option but that is still not very visible or specific.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: It would be helpful in AEM Assets if the breadcrumbs were always visible, so that you can click directly on the selected parent folder. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Breadcrumbs not fully visible Improved/Expected Behavior: Breadcrumbs fully visible Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Maurine Zorko, REWE Markt GmbH / REWE Systems GmbH Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The "..."-menu in AEM Assets should always be at the end and the order of the menu items should also always be the same, so that you don't have to search for elements. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Position of "..."- menu changes. Sometimes it's in the middle of the elements but you expect it at the end. Improved/Expected Behavior: Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In AEM Assets you have to refresh manually to see changes. It would be helpful if this happens automatically. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Changes are not automatically visible. Improved/Expected Behavior: Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Integration tests and UI tests are executed automatically on the Stage environment as part of a Production pipeline. We would like to run our integration tests earlier, when pushing code to one of our Development environments. This would allow us to catch bugs early without risking the timeline of Production deployment. Use-case: We have two Development environments. One receives the latest code, another is used as a stabilization/bugfixing environment before a Production release. We would like to run our integration tests on the stabilization environment to catch issues early. Current/Experienced Behavior: Integration tests can only be executed against the Stage environment, as part of a Production pipeline. Improved/Expected Behavior: Integration tests can be executed against a Non-Production pipeline. This could be another toggle in the UI, in addition to the Deployment Trigger and Important Metric Failures Behavior toggles. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: NI Screenshot (if applicable): N/A Code package (if applicable): N/A
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
