Build better products with our product team
We would like the number of risks to appear in the side navigation panel, similar to how issues and document labels are displayed (ex. Issues (3), Documents (1)). This would make it easy to quickly see the number of risks associated with a project.
I would like to post an idea here for the Marketo Engage development team. It is about having a way to change the time a Smart List subscription report is sent.Here is another post in this community that refers to the same topic: https://nation.marketo.com/t5/product-discussions/is-there-a-way-to-change-the-time-a-smart-list-subscription/td-p/54827
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to save/reuse properties to be exported in Metadata Export Use-case: Issue 1 There is no reporting function in the DAM. I mean there is a reporting capability, but it suffers from the same issue that the metadata export suffers from; namely, you have to enter the metadata fields you want to report on, one by one. Laboriously. And once you have done this once, there is no ability to save the report/metadata export so the next time you want to do either you have to go in and re-create the whole extract/report again. When you add properties to be exported, it is not a multi select screen so the task is painful when you need to export a big list. Issue 2 You can get around Issue 1 by selecting the All option to get all metadata fields… (See screenshot Issue 2) But for some reason despite us only having about 90 metadata fields, the ALL options produces a CSV of anywhere from 200-3000 metadata fields, depending on how many assetpaths it returns. This renders the Export ALL option completely useless because the CSV file generated for any large number of assets is so big that Excel cannot open it. Current/Experienced Behavior: See use Case Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to multi select properties in one go (not multifield - Add Property) and ability to reuse this selection when I needed re-create this export again in the future. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Coles Screenshot (if applicable): Issue 1 Press Add Issue 2 Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enhance the launches so that they can be published to PREVIEW service so that they can be reviewed/approved by people who do not have access to AEM. Use-case: As an editor I use launches to prepare future updates of a page separately from the current page. This prepared version needs to be reviewed and approved by people in my organization who do not have access to AEM. For them I would like to publish the launch page to PREVIEW in order to share the URL with them. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently I have no chance to publish the launch page to PREVIEW. Just view-as-published is available which does not help as the reviewers do not have AEM access. Therefore the advantage that I can prepare a page without blocking the current page is gone as I have no chance to get it on PREVIEW in order to let them check from approvers. At the end I need to promote it to do so and with this I'm back on the current page and could not working separately anymore. See documentation for Launches: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/sites/authoring/launches/overview Improved/Expected Behavior: Make the option available to publish a launch page to the PREVIEW. With that I would have the chance to share a preview URL with reviewers and approvers in my organization who do not have access to AEM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description, How would you like the feature to work and Current Behaviour - Our Goal is to create a template that can be pulled in over and over again into new project plans/Kanban boards. In the Kanban view, I want to see every story with the parent task as the header of the story with all accompanying tasks listed as a checklist item. I want this to be something that isn't something that an administrator would be required to do for us each time we need to generate a new project plan/Kanban board. Why is this feature important to you - For project managers utilization on a regular, ongoing basis.
Description - Currently if you are looking at a bar chart you need to hover your cursor over a bar to see details about that bar's total. It would be easier to show bar totals/values at the tops of each bar. Why is this feature important to you - Ease of stakeholder consumption of data. How would you like the feature to work -Allow bar totals to be toggled on and off. Allow for a more simple Max/Min toggle for cases where there are too many bars. Current Behavior - There are no displayed totals for bar displays without hovering over them.
Add time field to the custom forms enabling users to input time without a date component.Use Case: Users often need to record specific time data, like employee shift start and end times. Creating a dropdown with one-hour or 30 mins interval is not adequate for these situations.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Fix ManagePublication behavior to preserve child nodes in ExperienceFragment instead of deleting them Use-case: Use "Manage Publication" on particular parent folder on XF Structure. BEFORE ManagePublication (Publish Environment): /content/experience-fragments/customer/ └── en/ ├── company/ │ ├── company-overview-xf/ │ │ └── master/ │ ├── about-us-xf/ │ │ └── master/ │ └── contact-info-xf/ │ └── master/ ├── products/ │ ├── product-catalog-xf/ │ │ └── master/ │ ├── product-detail-xf/ │ │ └── master/ │ └── product-comparison-xf/ │ └── master/ └── ir/ ├── financial-report-xf/ │ └── master/ ├── investor-presentation-xf/ │ └── master/ └── earnings-release-xf/ └── master/ AFTER ManagePublication of /content/experience-fragments/customer/en (Publish Environment - ISSUE): /content/experience-fragments/customer/ └── en/ └── [EMPTY - All child folders and XF content deleted from Publish] Current/Experienced Behavior: When using ManagePublication on ExperienceFragment folder (/content/experience-fragments/customer/en), all child folders (company, products, ir) and their XF content are completely removed from Publish environment. All English XF content disappears from live site Impact : Broken user experience, missing localized content, language-specific content loss (Some Japan customers faced incident due to this functionality.) Improved/Expected Behavior: Prevent deletion of child nodes in ExperienceFragment - this is a bug, not a feature request Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Manufacturing Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Currently, you can add fields from Marketo to use in Dynamic Chat as attributes if they are company-object or person-object fields. However, this excludes system-managed fields, leaving core functionality like the ability to route by system-managed sales owner email address fields not possible. This seems like an oversight for a tool that offers sales engagements through live chat and meeting scheduling.
Description -We need the Abiltiy to determine the engagement of customer based on the the Journey or Campaign Name in an audience. In particular, to state, if the Journey Name starts with/contains "xyzFY25..." Why is this feature important to you -Currently, we can only use the Journey ID, which means that we need to manually update the audience each time a different journey would be applied. When a Journey is updated and republished this creates a different ID, more additional work. How would you like the feature to work -Journey Name would be a variable when creating Audiences and searching for an event. Current Behaviour -Only the Journey Version is available.
By allowing to manually set the recipient time zone we could easily define best send date using AI and then use "send in recipient time zone" to send an email without problems.
The tokens for interesting moments are a fantastic tool for sharing marketing engagement data at scale. With more and more MarTech integrating with Marketo via custom activities, it would be very helpful if when triggers are created for scoring these activities (such as Vidyard video views), that the trigger listening for the custom activity can enable the custom activity data to be used as tokens in your smart campaign. For example. Trigger: Watches Vidyard Video -- Percent viewed is 0.75 Flow: Change Score - Behavior -- {{my.B - Video View}} Interesting Moment: Milestone -- Watched video {{trigger.Player Name}}, Percent Watched: 75%, Video Length: {{trigger.Video Length}} seconds. Where the attributes "Player Name" and "Video Length" are attributes of the custom activity: Vidyard Video View which is listened to in the trigger.
Description - Workfront should provide the ability to develop reports on Boards to provide details on current usage.Why is this feature important to you - We do not have any visibility into Boards users have created (i.e., adoption) How would you like the feature to work - Workfront provide a Board object that would detail Entry Date, Last Updated By, Last Viewed By / Date, Columns, Column Detail (e.g., Attributes, Column Name, Dynamic, etc.), etc.Current Behaviour - Workfront does not provide the ability to report on Boards
Description - Need the same reporting capabilities with boards (all types of boards) as we do with all other areas on Workfront and for Admins to be able to see a list of all boards without the need to share the board with the Admin. Because of the lack of these features, we have instructed our users not to use boards. Why is this feature important to you - Without being able to report on boards or even find a list of all boards, it limits the usefulness of this feature. It makes it impossible for Admin to monitor the use of these, keep the system clean, and to tell the story of our work to leadership. There will be a missing portion of the bigger picture without including board information in reports. In fact, I'm extremely surprised reporting wasn't one of the first things created before pushing boards to production. How would you like the feature to work - Just like reporting for all the other areas within the tool that is available today. Also, the Admins should be able to see all boards like the can with EVERYTHING else in the tool. Current Behavior - No way to find out what boards are created, if the users are doing boards correctly, and what work has been done using boards instead of the typical method. @rudyha1 @suzyf @annapu @hollyse @rexxma
Description - A way to view color separations in a proof instead of having to download the proof to view. This adds in one more unnecessary step for when it's important to check the colors. Why is this feature important to you - It's important to view the color separations in proofs when design teams are reviewing. How would you like the feature to work - Add in a tool to be able to view the color separations - like how it can be done in Acrobat.Current Behavior - We are not able to view color separations when reviewing a proof in Workfront.
After applying the new SFDC OAuth scope app permission, the sync worked perfectly with just two permission settings from SFDC. The current Marketo documentation, which recommends granting permission to all options, needs to be updated. Manage user data via APIs (Api)Perform requests at any time (refresh_token, offline_access)Thank you, Vik
Description - We have Adobe Target on +30 websites, when selecting Analytics as a reporting source, the Report Suite's are listed in a random order. If they were listed alphabetically it would save time and reduce frustration. Why is this feature important to you - Would save time hunting for the correct report suite How would you like the feature to work - List report suites alphabetically Current Behavior - Report suites are listed in a seemingly random order
I love that the Workload Balancer is now available in user profile, it’s super helpful for visibility. But right now, it’s read-only. It would be a big win if direct managers could actually edit allocations directly from this page. In our case, managers have edit access to the projects/tasks their reportees are assigned.Here’s why I think this would help:Easier to spot imbalances and fix them immediately while reviewing someone’s profile.Saves managers a lot of clicks and time.Keeps the experience consistent with the full Workload Balancer.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow Bulk edit against a search result set maintaining selected schema Use-case: I filter for specific files, and I wish to batch edit fields in the result set of that search. Presently, If the result set of assets are located in different folders, the schema displayed is the OOTB basic schema, not the custom one we use. I'd like to do a search for assets that contain specific metadata, then bulk-update the result set of assets. That result set is spread across multiple (hundreds) of folders. I can't do an export csv function against assets in multiple folders as that function is only available against a single folder and its subfolders. Current/Experienced Behavior: What I do now, is select the top most folder, then export csv (that contains all files in and under that top folder including subfolders, then pull it all into a spreadsheet to parse for the files I need to modify, make the modifications in the spreadsheet, then upload as a metadata update. The flexibility of doing a metadata export against a search result would be extremely useful. Improved/Expected Behavior: Time, accuracy, consistency Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Nordstrom / PMO Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM as a cloud service when we are editing the through content tree its getting closed each time. collapsing content tree increases the editing time dramatically and unnecessarily without any recognizable advantage.Acknowledged by Adobe team, and also opened internal ticket for it. Hence we also request to provide and update/solution of this issue:-- SITES-13460: Automatically expand component nodes/keep tree state in content tree https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/SITES-13460 Use-case: It will reduce edit time for editors dramatically if the content tree does't get closed after edit. Current/Experienced Behavior: Every time after edit through content tree, whole content tree getting closed. Improved/Expected Behavior: Content tree should not get closed fter edit. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2025.7.21570.20250715T080514Z Customer-name/Organization name: BVB Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Based on the customer’s internal IT policy, it is required to restrict access to Content Hub endpoints using an IP allow list, similar to the current IP-based access control available for AEM Author (DAM). Without this capability, there is a significant risk that the customer will be unable to adopt Content Hub in their production environment due to internal security compliance requirements. Use-case: The customer utilizes AEM Assets and Content Hub to share content with both internal teams and external agency users. For security and compliance reasons, access to internal content must be restricted to pre-approved IP addresses. While AEM Author supports IP allow list configurations, Content Hub delivery endpoints are currently publicly accessible and do not support the same level of access control. The customer requires the ability to limit access to Content Hub by IP to align with internal security policies. Current/Experienced Behavior: Content Hub delivery endpoints (e.g., *-delivery) are publicly accessible by default. There is no configuration available to apply IP allow list restrictions specifically for Content Hub. IP restrictions set on AEM Author do not apply to Content Hub endpoints. Improved/Expected Behavior: Content Hub should support IP allow list functionality, allowing administrators to define which IP ranges are permitted to access delivery endpoints. If a user attempts to access Content Hub from a non-approved IP, the system should block access and return a 403 error. Ideally, this feature would also allow for different IP configurations for internal users and external partners. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Please make "In Box" button more visible - case1. when click download button - case2. when find assets that I downloaded Use-case: During user interviews several inverviewees complained he/she couldn't find In Box button when he/she wanted to find downloaded asset Current/Experienced Behavior: - case1. When click download button, it's difficult to find the In Box button (it's too small and on the bottom of the screen) - case2. When find assets that I downloaded, it's impossible to find In Box button at first. Because In box botton is found after I click the bell icon, so before I click this bell icon I can't find in box button. And, even thougn, I click the bell icon, it's still difficult to find the In Box button (refer to the 2nd attachement image) Improved/Expected Behavior: - case1. Make In Box button bigger - case2. Make In Box botton out from bell icon pop-up page. I'd like to see this in box button directly from the page (not from the bell icon pop-up page) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: LG Electronics Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Have an ability to add a suffix or prefix for the title tag for all the pages within EDS Sites Use-case: We wanted to add " | CVS Group " for all the title tags automatically within HTML. However, it seems like we do not have access to the script/code that generates the title tags. Current/Experienced Behavior: You need to add the prefix or suffix manually for all the pages which consumes a lot of time.Especially if the suffix changes and you have a lot of pages. Improved/Expected Behavior: There will be an ability to add a prefix/suffix for all the pages within a site all at once or add it within the title tag directly. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): EDS, AEM Cloud as a Service Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: New Content Fragment Editor does not honor JCR locking Use-case: In the new Content Fragment editor, JCR locks applied to CF nodes (jcr:lockOwner, jcr:lockIsDeep) are ignored. This allows other users to open, edit, and save CFs even when another user has locked the CF — breaking workflow integrity and increasing risk of data loss. Current/Experienced Behavior: Lock applied on CF node via workflow or API is respected in the old editor (UI prevents edits). In the new editor, the same CF is still editable by all users. No lock icon or warning shown to other users. Improved/Expected Behavior: The new CF editor must respect JCR-level locks like the classic editor. CFs should: Display a lock indicator with username. Prevent edits and saves by users other than the lock owner. Show a warning like “This CF is locked by [user]” Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Lock CF via workflow step or Node.lock() API. Open CF in classic editor → Editing is blocked (✅). Open same CF in new editor → Editing allowed (❌). Customer-name/Organization name: JNJ Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Request to add an option to set a password when generating a Share Link in Content Hub, similar to the existing functionality in LG DAM (AEM Asset) environment. This will enhance security and prevent unauthorized access to brand assets. Use-case: When users generate a Share Link in Content Hub, the link is currently public and can be accessed by anyone with the URL. Adding a password requirement would allow secure distribution of brand assets, ensuring only intended recipients can access the files. Current/Experienced Behavior: Share Links generated in Content Hub are public by default and have no password protection, making them accessible to anyone who obtains the link—intentionally or unintentionally. Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide an optional password protection feature when creating a Share Link. Recipients would be required to enter the password before accessing shared files, similar to the current LG DAM environment. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Content Hub Customer-name/Organization name: LG Electronics Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
