Description - Provide UI ability to select group of segments and perform bulk delete. Ex: Select all unused / underused / Zero Audience segment and perform delete operation. Why is this feature important to you - Segment governance Current Behaviour - Individual segment has to be manually selected and processed for deletion. (Multiple selection is not allowed)
I hope I'm not the only one that is having this issue, or at least is similarly frustrated. The current state of the search system of design studio is extremely flawed. It took me about 10 minutes to find the document I needed in my instance due to the change of the search from "contains" to "starts with." It got to the point that I may as well went through my 10 pages of documents in the specific folder to just find the file because it would have been faster. No other search system does has "starts with" for a search. Also, trying to find all the pdfs that talk about similar things is non existent (i.e. I want to see all pdfs that mention "UX" in the title). This, in my opinion, is a bad user experience. The new marketo UI is powerful, and overall very awesome, but I shouldn't have to switch to vanilla Marketo to search for a pdf.
I use Premiere Pro and After Effects and I use color labeling for layer to help organize content. I thought it would be nice to have a similar option for the main WF project list screen. Be cool if I could add colors to listed projects for organization. Outlook as the option too. Thanks!
Similar to the new "Undo" pop-up message, can we add a warning pop-up when you are about to send an update without notifying anyone? This would tremendously help because despite constant reminders, people share updates without tagging people, creating many missed communications.
Description - Once a project, task or issue has entered into an approval flow, the approval flow cannot be edited. You cannot add or remove an approver as needed. It would be nice to be able to at the minimum, add an approver to a stage. This would allow an existing approver to say, I really want this person to review and approve as well. Why is this feature important to you - Allows flexibility with approvers and add or reassign as needed, without starting the approval process over again. How would you like the feature to work - Perhaps it can be limited to those users that are on the approval flow already. If they feel they want another user to review and approve the project, task, issue, they can add that in the approval section. It would be nice if an admin or group admin can have rights to edit an approval flow while in flight. Current Behavior - Once an approval flow is in flight, it cannot be edited without stopping the complete flow.
Description - AEP segment should auto delete based on defined retention date (expiry date) Why is this feature important to you - Would like to establish segment governance, and clean out unused / underused / Time sensitive segments How would you like the feature to work - During segment creation, provide ability to add retention period (90/180days) / add segment expiry date and after defined expiration date segment should auto delete. Current Behaviour - Segments have to be manually reviewed and deleted from inventory.
Measurements need to be exact. Our print production teams need to use decimals.
We need the ability to exclude custom forms when attaching a template to an existing project. Currently, when you attach a template to an existing project, it forces you to include all custom forms associated with that template. This means filling out the required fields just to attach the tasks you need. In some cases, the current behavior has also caused us to go over the limit of the number of custom forms we can have on one project. Our PMs regularly need to attach new tasks when the project scope changes, or if work needs to be redone. Their current workaround is to create a fake project from the template they would like to use, then copy over the tasks from the fake project to the actual project. Copying tasks from similar active projects does not work and causes issues with inherited permissions/notifications. So, the only workaround they have now is very cumbersome.
It would be very helpful if we had the option for Proof Deadlines to automatically adjust based on PTO submitted by an approver.
When proofs are routing through ProofHQ, those who have time off in their calendar and submit a delegation of their work should be able to do so for proofs as well. At my company the only approvals that are sent are those through the proofing process and when people are on vacation they would rather not have their inbox filled up and have their decisions for proofs be delegated to someone else.
Being able to pull reports that indicate the stage due date instead of the proof end date. When there are multiple stages in a single proofing workflow, it is misleading to just get the end date instead of the stage date.
Hi, Is it possible to enable multiple selections for folders, assets, and reports,...? It'd be beneficial when cleaning up the instance, for instance, to move or delete several assets simultaneously. Thanks, Charlotte
Hi Team, While exploring and testing TAM, I found that: We cannot customize the weekly reports We cannot subscribe to Account smart lists I believe it would be great if we can customize the weekly reports (if not much, at least to some extent) and set up subscriptions for account smart lists as well. Kind Regards, Vinay
Description Beyond the install referrer data that comes from the App Stores... with Universal Linking and Deep Links so prevalent now, we are losing potential referrer attribution for traffic that comes to our mobile apps. Yes, we can track our campaigns, but I would love to be able to attribute Natural Search or Organic Social Media that trigger Universal Linking to our Mobile Apps. Why is this feature important to you Most sites/apps are using Universal Linking, this means organic traffic that opens the app directly is unattributed. How would you like the feature to work Not sure if Deep Links and Universal Links have referrer headers (in theory they should, since they are still web calls), that referrer data should be captured and processed. Directly opening the app (with no referrer) would be attributed to "Typed/Bookmarked". Current Behaviour Mobile Apps currently have no referrer instances and no referral data at all... in the past, this was somewhat expected since the Apps were always "opened", but now, there are so many ways that apps can be opened directly that I think it's time for a shift. Then when we pull a referrers report, the App can be included in the data.
Description - Allow Global definition (or Group) of User Defined Roles Or Apply Roles at a Project Level. Should be able to use a Wildcard such as $$ROLE:Campaign Manager in assigning tasks to that role automatically and use in routing rules and approvals Why is this feature important to you - Makes assignment much simpler. Can then dynamically route issues and/or approvals to more roles or people, not be tied to "Project Owner" etc. How would you like the feature to work - Allow for setup of User Defined Roles to apply on Objects and for each project etc. to have a resource assignable (with an alternate). Current Behaviour - Roles can be added to tasks.
Description - Allow use of defined wildcard users in the routing for Issues similar to Approvals Why is this feature important to you - Do not want to make the routing User Specific How would you like the feature to work - Same as on Approvals Current Behaviour - Need to use a role or a person's name
Default the values for a custom form in the Request Queue / Queue Topic Allow the form to be displayed when building Queue Topics so that you can then make selections Cannot currently default different values for any field, except in Project Template
Description - Why is this feature important to you - It is important especially if there are people coming back early from a christmas break. At the moment, its showing they are off during the close down period. Is there a way we can remove "holidays" tfrom their schedules so we can book their leave and start booking in work. How would you like the feature to work - Current Behaviour -
We are constantly proofing 20-30 proofs at once and need a report that can give us a high level snapshot of which stages have been approved and which haven't. Our stages are usually tied to a particular business function - R&D or Regulatory.What's currently missing is a Current Stage Name field that we can add to a Proof Approval report. This will allow us to track which stages have approved per approval round/version.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - If the label section of the field could be unique to each form then we could reduce the number of redundant fields created. How would you like the feature to work - The label section of the field could be unique to each form. Current Behaviour - When we require slight wording variations to a field for a form we must create a new field even though the basics of the field are the same
Description - How to report on parameter /category used in reports? Why is this feature important to you - As part of a clean-up activity in Workfront, it is pivotal to know what fields (parameters) have been used in report filters, other than on projects, tasks or issues. How would you like the feature to work - Category ID or Parameter ID to be introduced under Report's report. Current Behaviour - No such feature
Description - Today the Segmentation view has a table view of all segments created, while naming convention can help organise things what is really required is ability to create custom folders to organise Segments Why is this feature important to you - This feature will keep segments view clean and help user to look for relevant segments by category or job function How would you like the feature to work - A feature which allows you to create folders to organise segments, in addition an option within segmentation create view to save it to an existing folder or create a new for that segment Current Behaviour - This functionality does not exist today.
At this moment, Dutch is not a supported language in Workfront. Within our company, we have a need for having all standard Workfront fields shown in Dutch.
It would be very efficient to be able to change the name/label of a field that's in use in Marketo without first removing it from use. This would help create less fields and be scalable/save time when changing the field. Even a better option, if a field is created in SFDC and exposed to Marketo and the name/label is changed in SFDC, to reflect the field name change in Marketo automatically. Vote up for both or either of these ideas!
Allow Project Manager to restrict access to document folders. The PM could limit who has access to a folder that contains sensitive or confidential project documents even though users had access to the project and other folders with non-sensitive information.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
