removing users via SSO or adminconsole only deactivates users and does not remove them from workfront - https://steelcase.my.workfront.com/usereven if they were added directly in workfront they cannot be deleted.not being able to remove makes the user listing a mess and over time could become quite extensive; especially when test accounts were created but no longer needed. there should be away just like other adobe products where we remove a user and can transfer any data associated with them to another user. and user is deleted.
Description - The ability to disable specific audiences from valuation instead of disabling/deleting ALL or no audienceWhy is this feature important to you - This allows customers to more dynamically select audiences when evaluating. How would you like the feature to work - Have a toggle to select which specific audiences to be included/excludedCurrent Behaviour - It only disables the audience evaluation for all or no audience.
Description - It would be helpful to modify the required permissions within SharePoint Online for Workfront and allow Sites.Selected when connecting it via Graph. Why is this feature important to you - Currently, it only works with full permissions to all site collections in the tenant which seems a bit excessive and raises security concerns.How would you like the feature to work - We would like to modify the permissions of the Workfront app after approving it and scope it to just the SharePoint Online sites that users are working with the app in.Current Behaviour - It currently prompts for all site collection access.
As a requester is completing a request form, if they answer a question in a specific way, it could then trigger an additional form to be added to their existing request prior to the initial request being submitted. This feature is important to us because we need an additional form attached to all Creative tactic type custom forms but ONLY for projects that are part of a specific initiative. Right now, we either need to add each of these fields to each form and add display logic or we need to attach this additional form to all requests and hope the user only completes this information for the specific initiative and ensure it is completed for those that are part of the initiative. We could also add form after the request is submitted but this leaves room for error as it is a manual step. Would be ideal to only have this form display if requester indicates it is part of the initiative.
Description - With the new commenting experience update, the "Notify" feature was removed from the document update comment box. Notify is used on the other commenting features/objects in Workfront (including on Document Details) so this is inconsistent with how other objects use commenting.Why is this feature important to you - Notify prompts users to think through if anyone needs tagged before they submit their comment. Some users are not used to or do not use the "@" feature for tagging. They can use Notify on other areas of Workfront comments, including on the Document Details page, but it's more clicks to get there. We already have users not getting tagged on document comments with this new change in place.How would you like the feature to work - Same as before. Although having "Ask for Approval" to come back would be a nice-to-have, I understand that removing that added consistency to the overall commenting experience across Workfront. However, removing "Notify" just made the flyouts work differently than everything else.Current Behaviour - User has to use "@" to tag anyone on document updates using the flyout menu or navigate to the document details page to make their update.
Description - We would like to be able to edit the Overview and Finance fields that are native to Workfront at the template level vs the layout template. Some projects we track finance for and some we don't. Seeing those fields and having to sift through the data when it's not needed is a time waste for our project managers. Since we have varying processes by project type, it's not an option to remove the fields for users at the layout template level since it will hide it for all projects. Why is this feature important to you - This would create efficiencies for our PM team trying to navigate the project details section on projects and only seeing the relevant fields they need specific to each project type. It's important to be able to do this at a template level vs a user level since there are varying types of work that teams work on. How would you like the feature to work - the same way it works on the layout templates just make it an option on the project templates also. Current Behavior - Currently it's a one size fits all approach and the fields are either available or not available no matter the project type through a user layout template.
An external lookup field can be added in a custom form to get data from external data sources into a dropdown box.This feature is very helpful to avoid redundant storage of data in external applications and Workfront. I would like to add this external lookup field additionally in list views and filters with all dropdown options coming from the external API.Currently this field appears as a Single Line Text Field and the dropdown options are not displayed at all.
Description - The option to make certain Workfront native fields as required (ie: portfolios and programs). Why is this feature important to you - We have certain criteria that project owners should be using that sometimes get overlooked and mess up reporting. Everything in our system should live somewhere instead of just floating around and it's up the admins to point this out with end of the quarter reporting. How would you like the feature to work - at the group level under project preferences, have the option to toggle workfront data as required similar to when we create custom forms. Current Behaviour - doesn't allow for required native fields and users overlook or "forget". edited to include additional items of consideration: not having the ability to create the description field as "required" means we have to duplicate the question by adding it to a custom form and hiding the native field from users views which essentially renders the workfront field pointless and makes admins duplicate efforts and fields.
Description - When I compose and update and use @ sign I would love for Workfront to suggest to me, e.g. users I tag the most, users related to given task/issue/project: entered by, sponsor, resource manager, last updated by etc. handful of names that I most likely want to inform about something. Why is this feature important to you - this would add a bit of efficiency in way updates are being composed in Workfront How would you like the feature to work - smart suggestions, similar to the way they work when making assignment, but for different purpose (sending and update), so the target group of users would be different Current Behaviour - no smart suggestions aside from narrowing down results (names of users) as I continue to type the name
The subject line and the body copy of the email sent to an approver/reviewer when they are added as an approver could be more clear and valuable. Include due date in subject lineInclude due date in body copy NOT the date the approval was requested. Pull in/add the description field from the overview area of the document summary.Delete ‘file name’, as the file name is listed in the blue bubble. ‘Other recipients’ can be renamed recipients and just list them all so it isn’t blank making is appear useless/like an error
Adding notifications for delegated work. When a Workfront Worker or Planner delegates their work Workfront will notify the delegated assignee that another Worker or Planner has delegated work to them. The issue is when new work come in or task date changes, there is no notification to the delegated worker that dates have changes or new work is assigned. There is no email notifications, no in app notice, the delegated worker needs to go to t heir home page in Workfront and filter for delegated work. This functionality can cause task to be missed or new work not started. Why is this feature important to you - Adding a notification allows awareness of the delegated assignee that new work has been assigned or task dates have been updated. How would you like the feature to work - Along with the notification of the original owner of the task or project a copy is also sent to the assigned delegate.Current Behavior - No notifications are sent to the assigned delegated Worker or Planner.
Recommending a feature where you can enable recurring/scheduled baseline captures to avoid the need for PM to remember to manually capture a new baseline. This would allow project history to be captured after a 1 time "set it and forget it" early in the project. This feature would be similar to the recurring report sending that already exists, just for baselines.
Description - To enhance the functionality and user experience of the "My Tasks" and "My Work" widgets, consider adding this column: "Assignments and Status." This will provide a clearer overview and better tracking capabilities directly from the home dashboard, improving project management and team coordination. Why is this feature important to you - Better options, easier view from home page for important information How would you like the feature to work - Add Assignments and Status column (not the two separate columns but the combined one) Current Behaviour - I was surprised that Assignments and Status wasn't a column that I could add in new widget settings area with the latest update. This would be helpful for some team members who share tasks with others but sometimes have to wait for them to complete their part before they can move forward. They have to click into summary or task now to see that information.
When saving reports from both Adobe Analytics and more importantly, Adobe Ad-Hoc Analytics would love to see that any date/time dimention on a report is formatted correctly on the Excel Spreadsheet to allow for easily sorting/ordering etc. For example, when running a Ad-Hoc report broken down by various months over a long time period, I want to be able to display this in date order (Which isn't possible in Ad-hoc to sort by the dimention at present). As these aren't date formatted for Excel, I have to manually move each row of this report to show the months in the correct order which is a time consuming process.
Description -Why is this feature important to you -The current timesheet hours totals are misleading. They don't show the correct total of all hours tracked. How would you like the feature to work -There should be a clear indicator of PTO entered, and corporate holidays already tracked. Current Behaviour -When I enter hours in Time Off, there is no indication on the timesheet. Likewise, corporate holidays don't show on the timesheet.So if there's an 8-hour corporate holiday during a week, and I take an 8-hour PTO day, I should only enter 24 hours in the timesheet. But nothing shows this. It just looks incomplete.It should show that 40 hours of time for the week are accounted for. Thank you.
Description - Hover over task name in timesheet and see task description.Why is this feature important to you - to help users report time accurately. How would you like the feature to work - Hover over task name in timesheet and see task description.Current Behaviour - Users would have to click on the task name, which brings up a new window, navigate to where the task descrption is, which they may not know how to do.
Description - Ability to add links to action items/bugs/issues/risks description area Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes the informaiton in the description is directing to a link; right now it is not possible to inset a link if the system default risk/issue/bug/action item queue topics are in use. Although it is possible to attach custom forms that provide the capability, it seems to be somewhat redundant to create the same fields to just provide formatting options. How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if formatting options , particularly adding a link to the Description field is possible. Current Behaviour - Right now the Description field accepts only plain text.
Description - On the layout templates Admins are able to set defaults for users to allow them to see the widget filters as we would want them to us them on the home screen.Why is this feature important to you - to keep confusion to a minimum for those users that are not in WF all the time but need the most simple screen displayed.How would you like the feature to work - However, on the Layout templates for Home Workspace, the term "Widget Settings" don't seem to be just for the Widgets as the title suggests. This functionality seems to carry on into the project itself and those filters and views inside the project should be different by default.Current Behavior - If I set the Widget Settings to Can Start on the filter it carries over to the tasks inside the project and I would prefer the Project tasks filter be set to All tasks not Can Start as we want the user to be able to see the entire flow of the project while inside of the project. But on the Home Page "My Tasks Widget" we only want them to see tasks when "their task" is ready to start. We feel this will keep the confusion down on the main home screen but inside the project give them more flexibility. I have encountered this because we just onboarded 70 users and we were setting their defaults prior to training.
A suggestion from a user: Width adjustments in text mode do not work as wished It would be great if we the option of defining fixed column width that can be applied to all Views where those columns appear, and also scaled to a different monitor sizes (for example, laptop and desktop) without losing their predefined width.
Hi Team, Can we please add different colors to panels so that we can differentiate them? Best Regards, Neha
Description - This idea is requesting to add the ability to add and decide on the placement of custom dashboards to a project template. Sometimes layout templates are unified but different types of projects offer information specific to those projects to the users who use the unified template but not all project types (belonging to different portfolios/programs) apply to them. Certain dashboards need to appear for certain projects, independent of layout template designs. Why is this feature important to you - My users who use the same layout templates would like to have access to certain informaiton specific to the type of project they are a part of. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the system provide the ability to add and define the order of custom dashboards at the project template level. Current Behaviour - The addition (for a no. of users) and order of the custom dashboards and other project items are only defined through layout templates.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - to ensure the recipient knows who sent the message so that it doesn't cause confusionHow would you like the feature to work - When I comment on behalf of someone else, when the email goes through to the tagged recipient, it would mention that "I" made entered the comment and not the account owner.Current Behaviour - In app - the system highlights "On behalf of", but not on the email as shown in the screenshots below.
Description - allow the ability to edit the story order number (priority) through in-line editing of the field. Why is this feature important to you - this will allow for a more efficient way of updating story order number when working with long backlog lists. How would you like the feature to work - double click on the story order number field, change the order number, click our of it, story gets moved to the defined story number. all stories with a number greater get shifted down. Current Behaviour - currently, the only way to change the story order number is to drag and drop the story to the correct position. This is difficult to do when working with long lists of stories. Story usually needs to get shift up or down multiple times to get it tot he right order.
Our teams would like to be able to use Board Views on the Agile Backlog screen with the ability to move cards up and down for order/prioritization.
Hi, I look the the figures linked to a specific page and I'm surprised to see that the bounce rate on this page is 100%. So I understand that clients that see this page always left. When I clicked in the info bubble of the metric, I see this definition about Bounce Rate : If I look for the calculation of the formula on the Adobe Website (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics/technotes/ga-to-aa/processing-differences#:~:text=In%20Adobe%20Analytics%2C%20Bounce%20Rate,formula%20Bounces%20divided%20by%20Entries.): So regarding to this last formula, the Bounce rate is ok but the definition of the metric in the tool is confusing for the end users because it's different (Bounces/Visits vs Bounces/Entries). So may I suggest you to adapt it. Thanks
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
