Description - I used shared column function to merge information (View: merge information from multiple columns in one shared column | Adobe Workfront) from two columns into one in a custom view in the project section, but I am only able to edit the information of the first one and I would like also to edit the information of the second one, third, fourth, etc. Why is this feature important to you - It will be faster editing several fields in a merge column so I could edit several information at time. How would you like the feature to work - I attached a screenshot. I would love all rows in my merged column will be in-line editable Current Behaviour - So far only the first (left) column is in-line editable (if applicable). So, if I am wanting to in-line edit both (or more) of the fields in my report or view I need to separate all my columns to edit them. I think I could do the same but in my merged column. Please see my concern is the community too. Re: [Event Follow-Up] 10 Text Mode Tips in Adobe W... - Page 2 - Adobe Experience League Community - 667300
Description - a feature in AEP that allows the user to visualize all of the relationships between schemas/datasets/datastreams/tag properties/rules/data elements etc.. in one image. Imagine a DAG visual like in DBT where the bubbles explain what the component is with text and color coding, then there are lines between the bubbles that show how they are connected e.g., an individual schema would have the name of the schema in one bubble, then lines from it to the datasets (separate bubbles) that its being used in. Why is this feature important to you - It would speed up the validation process to be able to quickly view all the relationships involved from a schema to an actual rule in Tags. Instead of having to click around between two different tool sets you could see in one place all of the relationships and ensure you're pulling from the right dataset, datastream etc.. How would you like the feature to work - ideally there would be a global button in AEP next to the drop down to pick your sandbox, or something similar, and when you click the button you get a popup visual that illustrates all of the active relationships in the sandbox you're working in. The bubbles could be color coded or shaped differently depending on the type of component and if that component is live (already been published) or still in draft (still in testing). Current Behavior - none
Requesting that an Email Notification be sent to the team that is assigned to a request with an approval, once the request has been approved. Currently, it sounds like this Email Notification is sent when an individual is assigned to the request but is not possible when the request is assigned to a team. We have a number of Request Queues that are assigned to Teams rather than Individuals and it is important for the Team to be notified when the request is approved so that they can assign to a specific individual and begin work. As a work around, we have assigned the team as a Stage 2 approver, however, this adds an additional step.
It would be useful to be able to create calculated metrics in the data warehouse, or at least to be able to use in the data warehouse the calculated metrics you built in the analysis workspace. For instance this feature would, among other things, allow you to customize the attribution model by which the metrics that you use in your reports are calculated. As long as this feature isn't implemented you are stuck using the "last touch" attribution model.
Would like to add hyperlinks into the comment area of proof to direct users to the right internal web area for reference the way we can in the updates area.
We would like the custom email message when sharing a proof in Digital Proofing to also post an update on the project update stream. A small checkbox could be added to allow that trigger to happen. This custom message is an important part of the process and there is no record of it once you hit send and it's off to the user's email.
We want the custom messages, which may have special instructions or additional details to the project, to be saved and accessible either in the Proof details tab or Proof Comments tab. Often, people may have lost the custom message email, and the special instructions or details need to be recovered. Currently, you can access them by adding a new recipient and copying and pasting. However, many users need to be made aware of this and need help finding the messaging.
Description - Identify changes in Workfront made by Admin console in a clear way instead of showing as "Lou Ann Kleiman" who is the customer sys admin email/user. This confuses troubleshooting how an update got made.Why is this feature important to you - E-001202782 | E-001222120 we had cases open in relation to users who got removed from Workfront and it was showing up as Lou Ann removed the user when it was truly a User sync process run by a vendor.How would you like the feature to work - When admin console updates a record it should display "admin console" userCurrent Behaviour - currently it shows as "Lou Ann Kleiman" due to her being the sys admin.
Description - Please make available a production-ready Fusion API for back-end management purposes.Why is this feature important to you - Customers often have use cases where they would like to be able to automate the management of their Fusion environment. Currently there is no publicly documented and supported way to do this. This could allow Fusion customers to be more responsive when there are errors with their scenarios, or they wish to monitor the usage volumes of scenarios, or they would like to automate other DevOps style processes such as cloning scenarios, datastores etc.How would you like the feature to work - Allow API interaction with objects including Connections, Data stores, Data structures, Webhooks, Notifications, Organizations, Scenarios, Scenario folders, Teams, Templates, UsersCurrent Behaviour - Everything must be done via Fusion's UI without automation.
Description - Two separate asks here. One is that currently when a prop is turned on within report suites, it will permanently reside in the default view, this is not true to Events and eVars. The props being stuck permanently on is causing confusion as we only intent on looking at the enabled eVars and any missclick to "add new" will muddy the report suite. Second request is to have a description field visible on eVars from within report suites (same as it is for events). It would be helpful to be able to view a quick description of the eVars as we can for events and would save time maintaining an SDRWhy is this feature important to you - Will clean up our data and save timeHow would you like the feature to work - prop=disabled, then remove from report suite default view, Description field added for eVars page (same as events)Current Behavior - prop=disabled, prop permanently stays on default view, this is true for as many props as you enable
Currently in Workspace, we have Date Ranges like "This Month", "Last Month", "Last 7 days", etc. But these date ranges are relative to your current date.What I would like are date ranges that are relative to my project's date range.Example 1:Today is 15 August 2017.I run a report for 1-31 July 2017.The "Previous Month" date range would show the data for 1-30 June 2017, i.e. the month previous to 1-31 July 2017.Example 2:Today is 15 August 2017.I run a report for 1-31 January 2017.The "Previous Month" date range would show the data for 1-31 December 2016, i.e. the month previous to 1-31 January 2017.And similarly for "Next Month".And similarly for other time periods, e.g. day, week, month, quarter, year.
Could you let me know if there is any way to lock the task or issue status once it reaches the Complete stage? Preventing users from re-opening completed tasks is critical for audit purposes. Alternatively, a task or issue could be re-opened, but it would automatically trigger a notification or require approval.
It would be useful to be able to export reports from the Analysis workspace into AWS S3 or some other storage service, since the only option, as of today, is to export via email.Although you can use the data warehouse tool to export data into an S3 bucket, the analysis workspace offers some features that are unavailable in the data warehouse, like the use of calculated metrics.
Description - Provide visibility of the active user connection(s) to the AEP datalake. Why is this feature important to you - Feature is important for administration of the AEP sandbox to understand what the active connections to the datalake How would you like the feature to work - Provide an API or UI view of the active connections to the AEP datalake. Also provide the ability to drop the user connection to the AEP datalake. Current Behaviour - Unable to manage the active connections of users who are connected to the AEP datalake.
As a Manager of a team of users I would like a way to view the addition or removal of a custom form and by whom on a Job, Project or Request in the Update feed similar to when we track custom form fields.Having a team of 30 people and utilizing many different custom forms for specific jobs it is helpful to see who has added/removed specific custom forms.Current there is no way to view this information within a Job/Project/Request.Example:Sue P. deleted custom form Prodution Job Revision Form – Today 10:38 AM
Description - Once a user sorts by a column, they cannot undo the sorting. The only option is to sort by another column or leave as is.Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes we sort by a certain column but later no longer need to sort.How would you like the feature to work - Would like to see either an option to remove all sorting or deselect sorting from a particular column to shut off all sorting.Current Behaviour - See description
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Custom Metadata Schemas and fields developed in AEMaaCS should be visible in Assets Essential console as well. Use-case: Currently we are not able to see any of the custom buttons or menu along with the metadata schemas designed in AEM in the Assets Essential console. Current/Experienced Behavior: Any custom metadata schema and fields developed in AEM Assets Cloud console are not visible in the Assets Essential console. Improved/Expected Behavior: Any custom metadata schema and fields developed in AEM Assets Cloud console should be visible in the Assets Essential console. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Credera (Formerly TA Digital) Screenshot (if applicable): N.A Code package (if applicable): N.A Original Query Link - AEM Assets Essentials (Experience Manager Assets) vs Experience Manager - Custom UI Handling
Description - Need to adjust task rejection settings in order to consolidate feedback from multiple reviewers at a single stage. Why is this feature important to you - This should operate the same as the task approval does when multiple approvals are required at a single stage. This will enable the reviewers to add all feedback before the task status is reset, which will streamline revision time and keep the approval request in the work list of all required reviewers until all have made a decision to reject or approve. How would you like the feature to work - Just like the approvals do now. Task status will only reset to new once all reviewers have made a task approval decision, either approve or reject. Current Behaviour - Right now the task is immediately reset if any approver selects reject, which results in unnecessary revision rounds and confusion among multiple reviewers who rely on their worklists to track action items.
Description - Need a built-in standard way for assignees to see all of their logged hours per assigned taskWhy is this feature important to you - The assignees currently have no easy way to view the logged hours on their tasks without going one task at a time.How would you like the feature to work - There should be a built-in report or area for assignees (and managers) to view all logged hours and timesheets across the assigned tasks for a specific user. The assignee would only be able to see their logged hours on their assigned tasks. They can go back in history to view all tasks and all times logged, as well as totals per week, per month, and a way to filter on days with no logged hours in case they missed some days of logging.Current Behaviour - User must open a task to get to the task options to see "Hours", currently no way to see "Hours" across all assigned tasks.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Locked pages should prevent other users from editing the content; however, it should allow the content to get copied because the content can still be viewed. A locked page should Only restrict other users from editing the page. Use-case: We have Toolkit area which guides our Authors on how each component works. Additionally, we provide many samples to help authors come up with ideas for building new pages. All of those pages — which we refer to as Toolkits. As we have locked all these pages to protect from any unauthorized changes, it also prevent our Authors to copy those samples or examples. Therefore, it will be good if locked pages only prohibit users from editing the content and yet permit copying. Current/Experienced Behavior: Unable to copy a page or content Improved/Expected Behavior: Allow users to copy a page or content Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Ashish Grover / Fiserv Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): /
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Heap Utilization Warnings and graphs on Reporting console should match the heap memory usage on servers Use-case: The Cloud Manager Portal - Reports displays a System Monitoring stat for all the environments and servers in terms of Host, Network, Storage and Application. Sometimes it displays in warning "Heap size is 85% of the allocated memory"If you check the server in question, mostly the figures don't align - For instance in the publish server for which the warning was flashed the usage was around 35-40% which is way off the warning limits.Ideally there should be a strong co-relation between these 2 figures. Current/Experienced Behavior: The overall heap memory usage in /system/console/memoryusage does not align with the Reporting console in Cloud Manager. Improved/Expected Behavior: The overall heap memory usage in /system/console/memoryusage should align with the Reporting console in Cloud Manager. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM (6.5.0.20180328) | Adobe Experience Manager (6.5.18.0) Customer-name/Organization name: Credera Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This RFE proposes integrating AI capabilities into AEM to assist content creators with curation and content suggestion functionalities. Use-case: Content creators often spend significant time searching for relevant assets and information to build compelling content pieces. This can be particularly challenging when managing large content repositories. Current/Experienced Behavior: Content creators rely on manual searches and browsing through folders and tags to locate relevant assets. This process can be time-consuming and inefficient, especially for complex content structures. Improved/Expected Behavior: Integrate AI-powered content suggestion features within the AEM authoring environment. As a content creator drafts their content, the AI suggests relevant assets (images, text snippets, related articles) based on the current context. The AI considers factors like keywords, themes, content type, and past user behavior to deliver personalized suggestions.Additionally: Explore the possibility of AI-powered content curation tools within AEM. These tools could automatically generate summaries of existing content pieces, recommend best placements for specific assets within webpage layouts, or even suggest content refresh schedules based on performance data. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Request to add "find location of asset" feature in search results in Brand Portal which is already present in AEM DAM. Use-case: 1. We login to Brand Portal 2. We do a search for lets say "Truck" keyword in search bar. 3. Lets say, 25 assets show up in the search results. 4. Now, we want to navigate/go to the location/folder of any of one of these 25 assets. 5. Need an option to go to the location/folder of the asset. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we can only see the path of the asset like /content/dam/ Improved/Expected Behavior: The user can directly go to the location of asset. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager as a cloud service 2024.4.15860.20240410T113939Z-240300 Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Need the same option in Brand Portal as AEM DAM reference as shown below: Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Request to improve behaviour for View in Admin button during page editing. Use-case: When user clicks “View in Admin” he or she expects that the same page will be opened in sites admin. Usually pages have many children, so it takes time to find edited page again. Current/Experienced Behavior: 1. Open any page for editing (e.g. http://localhost:4502/editor.html/content/we-retail/language-masters/en/experience/arctic-surfing-in-lofoten.html) 2. Click “View in Admin” Opened parent page - http://localhost:4502/sites.html/content/we-retail/language-masters/en/experience Improved/Expected Behavior: 1. Open any page for editing (e.g. http://localhost:4502/editor.html/content/we-retail/language-masters/en/experience/arctic-surfing-in-lofoten.html) 2. Click “View in Admin” Opened edited page - http://localhost:4502/sites.html/content/we-retail/language-masters/en/experience/arctic-surfing-in-lofoten Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.20 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Instead of free form field when adding a content fragment variation, provide authors a pre-populated list of variation titles to choose from. Use-case: Content Fragment Variation titles are often used across an application. Current/Experienced Behavior: Author must type in correct variation title Improved/Expected Behavior: Allow developers to provide a list of variations for authors to choose from Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: UHG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
