Downsides of paused workflows in ACS? + Best practices
Hi all,
I just want to preface this thread by saying I am a marketer so if any one replying could please keep answers simple with little technical jargon - that would be great!
So, I'm back using Adobe Campaign after some time. Previously when I was using Adobe Campaign Classic, I was told paused workflows would slow performance of the platform. As per this thread, the slower performance seems to relate to a strain on data tables/storage capacity - https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-campaign-standard/importance-of-end-activity-in-a-workflow/m-p/274119#M10019
I just wanted to confirm if this applies to Adobe Campaign Standard as well i.e. that pausing multiple workflows will slow down the performance of ACS for the end user e.g. navigating to new pages/creating subsequent workflows. The current practice of my new organisation is to pause every workflow after it has executed successfully.
Can anyone recommend what the best practice is for optimal performance and also explain the differences between 1. just allowing a workflow execute 2. allowing the workflow to execute then manually pausing the workflow 3. allowing the workflow to execute then manually stopping the workflow? I vaguely recall that there would be impacts on reporting based on what actions were taken but may be mistaken.
Lastly, is it best practice to add an end activity in the workflow after a deployment of an email/comms activity?