Welcome to the Adobe Workfront Community! Connect with peers to ask questions, share best practices, explore release updates, and contribute ideas that shape the future of Workfront.
Recently active
Description - Fix how the "favorites" bar works Why is this feature important to you - It's bad UX and after 6 of those apps the menu gets truncated. it's not really favorites since it keeps any app that has a module placed in the canvas How would you like the feature to work - If it's "all apps used in this scenario" Don't name it "favorites" If it's "favorites" Don't remove apps when not used in a scenario Same faves across all scenarios (ie, user-based) In either case App bar should be scrollable The + (add) should be always visible (currently it moves outside the viewport) The popup menu of the app's modules should be placed so the right edge is within the viewport Current Behaviour - one icon per each app in scenario (whether connected or orphan) not "favorites" but specific to scenario re-generated when going into edit mode (apps that are not used in the scenario get removed) length of favorites bar grows with window width as apps fill bar the popup m
Description:There are a few functions available in Workfront expressions that aren't available or easily accomplished in Fusion. For example: WEEKDAYDIFF which works similar to DATEDIFF but only counts weekdays. This is useful since durations are measured in working days, and we have automations that need to calculate durations based on various inputs. WEEKDAYDIFF isn't available in Fusion as a function and there isn't a clear or easy way to calculate it using the available logic.Fusion supports advanced expressions that would never be possible in Workfront. There should not be any situation where Workfront can support a simple expression using a single function, but that same logic is difficult or impossible to accomplish in a Fusion expression. Why is this feature important to you:It is sometimes difficult to mirror Workfront logic in Fusion because Fusion doesn't always have a similar function to mimic. Extra time spent by developers trying to devise workarounds reduces the value th
There are several UX issues with how the notes are implemented Why is this feature important to you - In a large scenario it's often useful to see notes when fairly zoomed out. It's a nuisance to have to zoom in to see if the note is even the one I need. The positioning takes the cake. Now I get to drag, too, just to read notes. Notes should make my dev life easier - not add to my cognitive burden 🙂 How would you like the feature to work - I want note cards to open exactly where I positioned them I also want to not have to erase boiler plate text when creating a note I also want to be able to READ the note without having to zoom in So: - don't auto position notes, ever unless someone clicks Auto-align. Then move the note along with the module/filter it's attached to. Don't move the note as if it were a module - clicking a note should open what is the "editor" and show me the full note body (with scroll bar if needed) and and e
Hi, Currently there is not simple feature to allow us to update the approver ID through Fusion so that we can read data from either custom form or assigned to ID fields and accordgly assign that ID as an approver ID for a existing approval process.It will greatly help in streamlining approval processes where an approver can be dynamic entity from a wider team depending on some conditions
Description -The current Workfront Fusion Anaplan connector only supports CA certificate-based authentication for custom API calls via the HTTP module. The standard Anaplan modules (e.g., Run Export, Get File, Run Process) do not support CA certificate-based connections, limiting their usability for customers who have adopted certificate authentication for security and compliance.Why is this feature important to you -Our clients organization and many large enterprises enforce CA certificate-based authentication for Anaplan as part of IT security policies. Without native support for this connection type in the standard Fusion Anaplan modules, we are forced to reimplement core Anaplan actions using low-level custom API calls, increasing development time, reducing maintainability, and exposing us to higher error rates.Full support for CA certificate authentication would allow us to take advantage of Fusion's no-code modules for Anaplan without compromising compliance or system integrity.&
Description:Enable usage of Asset Request ID to allow us to group related assets and populate them as a single package to Bynder, improving our asset management process. Why is this feature important to you:As we enhance our asset management capabilities with Workfront and Bynder, we need a way to group related assets from a single task. This will improve efficiency, organization, and user experience, enabling easier tracking and management of assets. How would you like the feature to work:Introduce Asset Request ID to group assets. When assets are transferred, they should be sent as a package, utilizing Bynder's related functionality. The assets should automatically be marked as related and preferably show the actual user who uploaded them. If Asset Request ID is active in Bynder, Fusion can enable Workfront to bundle assets by leveraging subfolders etc when sending them to Bynder. Current Behavior:Currently, assets are transferred to Bynder individually
Description - There appears to be a good deal of confusion over the upcoming upgrade to Event Subscription v2. It would be great if we could have a workshop to lead customers through the installation steps and key points they need to consider.Why is this feature important to you - My team has several Fusion scenarios that are vital to our day-to-day operations--I want to make sure we don't do anything to disrupt them (personally I feel I know just enough to be dangerous).How would you like the feature to work - Workshop(s) and perhaps an accompanying user-friendly slide deck to guide customers through the upgrade.@cynthiaboon @nicholevargas @lesliespier
Description - The Fusion UI automatically zooms out on paste, or starting the scenario (Run once). When adding a note, it scrolls to the left until the first module is in view. Why is this feature important to you - The automatical scrolling/zooming is super annoying when working in a large scenario. It serves no purpose, and I really would love to see it turned off, or at minimum, be a user setting How would you like the feature to work - Do not scroll, zoom or modify my view when I copy/paste modules, run scenarios or add notes
Description - Adobe recently modified the Fusion API so that it only returns save-events, and not the actual execution logs. Instead, Adobe have implemented a different API that is not accessible to Customers. Why is this feature important to you - This breaks current scenarios that collect eg Warning/Error executions (eg to create a ticket in another tool or alert the support team). This was done without communications to customers and partners. How would you like the feature to work - I want to be able to search and retrieve execution logs like we used to be able to. In general, removing functionality without announcement and workaround reflects quite negatively on the Product and how change is being implemented.
Description - When creating a new webhook, it's very difficult to search for a custom field within a filter. We have a lot of custom fields and having a simple dropdown which is lengthy is not ideal in 2025. A searchable dropdown as for example this one (https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_js_filter_dropdown.asp) would be extremely helpful. This would primarily be for a webhook, but the same approach would be for other Workfront modules where currently CMD+F "does the trick".Why is this feature important to you - I spend ages in trying to find a custom field in a webhook dropdown.How would you like the feature to work - Just add a searchable dropdown instead of a regular HTML dropdown.
Description - Azure Secret Key for the Workfront Fusion Email account expires annually, requiring manual updates for all affected connections and associated email modules. The existing "Re-authorize" or "Re-verify" options do not support updating the secret key. That leaves no option except the creation of a new connection each time, which results in a high administrative burden.Why is this feature important to you - Operational Efficiency: Manually recreating connections and updating all email modules in Workfront Fusion is time-consuming and disrupts workflows.Error Prevention: The manual process increases the likelihood of errors, such as missed updates, which could lead to failed automation tasks. How would you like the feature to work - Provide an option to update the Azure Secret Key in the existing connection settings.Include a validation process to verify the new key before applying it. Current Behaviour - Currently, the Azure Secret
Description - The bynder upload asset module needs to have a field mapping to map accessRequestID.Why is this feature important to you - It helps to bundle up multiple assets which are pushed to bynder through fusion.How would you like the feature to work - The upload asset module should have a field mapping for accessRequestID, through which when we pass the accessRequestID of the 1st uploaded asset it should club all the remaning assets together as a collection.Current Behaviour - There is no field mapping for accessRequestID.
Description - All the API data should be visible and accessible in the module output in the bynder upload asset moduleWhy is this feature important to you - Need to bundle up multiple assets pushed to bynder using fusion.How would you like the feature to work - Upon an asset upload in Bynder using upload asset module in fusion the module should output all the metadata which is returned as part of the API call.Current Behaviour - The module output does not contain all the metadata returned by the API call.
Description - We would like some customization options around fully clearing out some fields when the copy and submit as new function is used.Why is this feature important to you - This would help to reduce risk of inaccurate data being entered into multiple systems (by way of integrations/API calls) and by resetting specific fields this would force the submitter/content owner to adjust things like expiration dates instead of carrying over an old/bad expiration date which could result in regulatory punishments and misuse of content.How would you like the feature to work - If we could have a checkbox within the field settings specifically for "When shown in the copy and submit function, clear previous input" this would be great.Current Behaviour - All data is carried over in the copy and submit as new function as it was previously entered.
It appears that the OpenAI module has not been updated to reflect recent developments in the OpenAI API. It is missing few actions, such as Message an Assistant, Transform Text to Structured Data etc.I request the developers to keep this module up to date.
Add Get content from HTML table action to the Text Parser. It's available in make.com, and it would be beneficial to have it in Fusion too, especially when extracting table rows and columns.Image from Make:
Description - When viewing event bundles in Fusion, I would like some sort of way to sort by native fields or to pin fields such as name and ID as the first 2 fields on the list of instant event bundles. I would say that 90% of the time I am looking for the ID to physically view the object and only need the ID.Why is this feature important to you - This would save me time of scrolling through projects that have 300+ fields.How would you like the feature to work - Sort by custom/native fields OR have an option to have ID and name be at the top of an event bundle.Current Behavior - Custom fields are on top, native fields are below
Description - Fix the Switch module so that it only evaluates the expression of the matching caseWhy is this feature important to you - Currently it evaluates all expressions for all cases, and sometimes this generates an error even if it is for a case that wasn't selected. The above has been confirmed by Support who said that other customers have reported this issue but it won't be resolved as a bug at this point.
Hi all, I tried searching for an answer and have done extensive testing, but have not yet arrived at a solution. Is there a way in the Microsoft 365 calendar module to set the parameter so when an event is created, it creates an all day event in your home calendar? I have been exploring the configuration/parameters in the module but have not seen a way to do this. This will be a great value add to our organization. Thank you for your help, Nick
DescriptionThe Sign module in Fusion currently only supports RS1 and RS256 as signing algorithms. Many applications are deprecating these in favor of PS256 (RSA PSS variant) or EC (elliptic curve). Why is this feature important to youNetSuite recently announced that RSA PSS is now the minimum required and RS256 is no longer allowed. https://community.oracle.com/netsuite/english/discussion/4490520/end-of-support-for-rsa-pkcsv1-5-scheme-for-oauth-2-0. As such, our Fusion-to-NetSuite integrations using OAuth 2.0 is now deprecated. How would you like the feature to workAdd the additional signing option(s) to the Encryptor modules. PS256 would be minimum, but PS256 and ES256 and EdDSA would be ideal for future proofing since RSA as a whole is generally less preferred than EC. Current BehaviourOnly RS1 and RS256 are given as options.
Description - Add more advanced reports to Fusion's Reports tab. Make the reports downloadable in any format. Why should I have to use an external tool to do this myself when it should be so easy for you guys to implement??Why is this feature important to you - Reviewing more in depth data analytics per scenario will give an accurate assessment of usefulness of each scenario and other variable metrics for upper management. While you can easily report something like projects converted by looking at the Fusion mark on each project converted, some scenarios do not have measurable marks that can be easily reported.How would you like the feature to work - Add scenario run count per day, week, and month. Maybe even averages or other data analytics? Make data downloadableCurrent Behaviour - Reports tab is not downloadable, and includes operation count (not run count) per day, week, and month.
We currently export email data--including the Subject Line--from Workfront as a CSV file. This file is then opened and edited in Excel, before being sent to an internal application (CGen). This export to CSV is done in Fusion. In order for Excel to correctly recognize the non-Latin characters and render them properly, the file needs to be defined as UTF-8 (Comma Delimited). We can force this to work by opening the CSV in Notepad, manually inserting a uFEFF (zero-width non-breaking space, or BOM) as the first character, and saving the file. This gives Excel the information it needs to recognize the contents and render the non-Latin characters correctly. But there is no way in Fusion to force the CSV file to be created in a way which Excel understands. Russell Howe worked with us on this. There was a change that needed to be made to Workfront as well; that has been completed (Link). This Fusion issue is still open, however. Two files are attached, note that the BOM charact
From time to time, we have one Fusion scenario call another Fusion scenario in order to centralize things like authentication token management. (An example of this is when we call NetSuite, where NetSuite requires a specialized token process that isn't supported out of the box by Fusion's credentials mechanism.) Adobe PS recommended we put the token generation/retrieval process be put in its own scenario, and then call that scenario in whichever scenarios we'll be doing further business logic (such as calling NetSuite for some specific API calls using that token gathered before).The issue we're finding is that Fusion sometimes returns an "Accepted" response rather than the intended webhook JSON. Basically, it looks like Fusion webhooks are not guaranteed to execute when called but may be queued under some loading conditions. Retrying isn't necessarily guaranteed to fix this, either.What's really needed is the ability to execute that dependent/child scenario _wit
Description - Add a comment block/section to each filter condition.Why is this feature important to you - It would provide clarity when looking at a filter with many different conditions.How would you like the feature to work - An optional comment block be added to each condition within a filter. Building off this, an option to also toggle them on or off within each individual filter as some don't have many conditions.Current Behavior - Filter has a label that generally describes filter behavior but not each individual condition.
DescriptionWorkload Balancer information is currently exposed via the ASSGN:workPerDate and TASK:workPerDate fields. These fields truncate at 1,000 entries, with no ability to investigate further into those due to how the API's pagination works at the parent object level (ASSGN/TASK). What is needed is the ability to pull the workPerDate information via a separate object that supports pagination (ideally via a cursor rather than an offset).Why is this feature important to youWe bring Workfront information into Snowflake and link it to data from other systems, such as Salesforce, NetSuite, Workday, etc. Workload Balancer is an incredibly powerful tool that helps our project managers, and we need the per-resource/per-day assignment information in order to ensure our systems are synchronized properly for reporting purposes. Without exposing this information via a proper API object, there is no way to ensure information is accurate and not truncated.How would you li
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
