Adobe Workfront

I have created a Fusion scenario that removes deactivated users from their Home Team. The issue is that they still have Other Teams. I tried everything I could think of and kept getting errors to set their other teams to null. Does anyone know how I can accomplish this?Maybe I need to come at this from the Team side and remove any inactive users versus using the user update scenario to do it. It’s just that I have the user one accomplishing other actions so I was hoping to get the user profile corrected using the same scenario.

We have a Project report and have been asked to add a column that pulls in the next task that is due. Does anyone know how to accomplish this?  The closest I have been able to get is for it to pull in all incomplete tasks, but they come in all out of order. Even though the documentation says it defaults to the order of the tasks in the timeline. This is the code I am using currently.displayname=Next Task Duelistdelimiter=<br>listmethod=nested(tasks).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=IF({status}!="CPL",CONCAT({name}," - ",{plannedCompletionDate}),"")valueformat=HTML I tried replacing .lists with .first but that didn’t work either.Anyone have any suggestions?

Hello,I am trying to do a grouping at the Portfolio - Program Level and would like to group the results by ‘KPI Year’ which is a field on the Project Task custom form. I attempted to use the following text mode code. However, group is not working. Please advise if the syntax is incorrect or if there is another approach to group by a custom form field from the task level? group.0.displayname=KPI Yeargroup.0.valueexpression={project:program}.{DE:KPI Year}group.0.valueformat=HTML textmode=true Thank you,Deepa Mahishi

I’m trying to figure out the best way to report on the counts of selections made on a multi-select field for projects. There is currently a calculated field on the project form to capture choices, but that created entries on the report like “Choice 1, Choice 2”, “Choice 1, Choice 3, Choice 4” etc. Stakeholders are asking to segment them out individually. It sounds like I might have to make individual calculated fields for each of the 15 choices on the multi-select field. Am I on the right path to try and capture this data?

We're running into a reporting challenge in Workfront and I'm curious how others are handling it.Currently, many of our reports are project/campaign-based and rely on the campaign (project) reaching a Closed/Complete status. The issue is that most of the work is actually completed in the month prior, but the reporting doesn't reflect it until the campaign is closed.For example, a campaign may have the majority of its tasks completed in June, but if the project isn't closed until July, all of the reporting appears in July. This creates a lag and doesn't accurately represent the team's monthly output.How are others addressing this?Are you reporting on completed tasks rather than project completion? Do you use hour reports or task reports for monthly operational reporting? Do you report on open/in-progress campaigns to capture work activity before project closure? Have you implemented any custom fields or reporting strategies to better align work completed with the appropriate reporting p

Is there a way in Fusion to generate a report of all scenarios that have turned off/errored out in the past week or so?

Hi all! I’ve created several Fusion scenarios to create tasks based on a cadence and while everything is working as expected, the only portion I can’t figure out is adding planned hours to each of the tasks. I have a project I use to store the tasks and their planned hours and right before the create tasks module I have a search module to go through that project and match the task name and output the planned hours (work required), but when I map the planned hours section in the create task module the planned hours don’t get added. For context the tasks are being created on a Simple duration type with a Fixed Dates constraint and are initially unassigned. Any ideas? Thanks in advance!

Hi folks, trying to get a Project report to display a column pulling in a specific task start date.Its a parent task (because the child starting task for the section can change but we want to see when Data team starts).the task name starts with “Data | “  - the rest of the task name might change as they put in the audience name or date etc, so trying to use a contains.Heres what i tried from a previous post by ​@NicholeVargas switching out the “Strategy Comp” for “Data | “. displayname=Strategy Complistdelimiter=<p>listmethod=nested(tasks).liststextmode=true type=iteratevalueexpression=IF({numberOfChildren}>0&&CONTAINS("Strategy",{name}),{actualCompletionDate})valueformat=HTMLBut it is pulling in the start date of the project rather than the related task. See my version below, i was hoping to isolate the Task rather than project, but im not getting anything.  valueexpression=IF({numberOfChildren}>1&&CONTAINS("Data",{name}),{task}.{actualStartDate})valueforma

I’m looking to utilize the Resource Planner Share Link to build a dashboard for Sr. Leadership to view resouces allocations across a Portfolio, broken out by sub groups with the Portfolio.  For this view, I’d like to utilize the Custom column formatting and only show Available/Planned/% of Hours. Everything looks great in the Resource Management area, but when I add the Share URL to a dashboard the data doesn’t show for the custom view. Is this a known issue? Is there a fix?Resource Management Area: Dashboard (via External Link): 

Can anyone confirm that the menu bar layout will be changing for all users in the July 16, 2026 release?It’s mentioned on this page:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/product-announcements/product-releases/release-26-q3/26-q3-release-overview#other-enhancements And this page shows screenshots of the new layout, which matches what’s in Preview:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/basics/navigate/global-navigation-overview I just want to make sure it’s clear that the ‘waffle’ menu (the grid of nine dots in the upper right) is now being replaced by the ‘Main menu’ icon on the left, underneath the Workfront logo.  The new ‘waffle’ menu in the updated layout only contains links to Admin Console and other broader Adobe account areas. Do I have this right?  My users are sensitive to layout changes like this, so I want to make sure my communication is clear.   

Does anyone know if there is a way to create a Fusion scenario that could add/remove users from a Proof Group?Thinking if we create a request queue that has proof group name, a field for the user they want added, and another field for any user they want removed. Then create a Fusion scenario to make those user updates to the Proof group. Is this possible? and if so what modules would we need to accomplish this?

Has anyone worked with WorkFocus.io? We’re in the process of implementing Fusion within our Workfront environment and have purchased 40 hours of consulting support. We’ve outlined several automation scenarios we’d like to build and are hoping to learn from others’ experiences (see screenshot)A few questions for those who have worked with them:What was your overall experience like? How many Fusion scenarios were they able to help you set up within your allotted hours? Did they recommend or require purchasing additional hours? Did they provide training or explain what they were building behind the scenes? Did they conduct a discovery session and help estimate the effort required for each scenario upfront?Because Fusion consulting can be a significant investment, we want to make sure we're planning our time and budget appropriately. Any feedback, advice, or lessons learned would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!  

Here is the scenario. I have 10 tasks all assigned to the same person. Each task has 2 days duration / 12 hours (6 hour day is my default). The tasks also have the same predecessor, so they all have the same planned completion date based on that shared predecessor.Since they are all assigned to the same person and have the same due date, effectively the tasks pack 20 days’ work into only 2 days. The tasks will very quickly start showing as late.Two ways I have previously solved this problem:1. Make each of the tasks dependent on completing one another. Creates a hierarchy and distributes the time, but my end users want to be able to choose where to start on the tasks.Add artificially increasing durations so that the first task lasts 2 days, the second 4 days, etc. This includes the full time, but my end users don’t like inaccuracy of the durations.Is there some way to have Workfront treat these tasks as if they were one task and set a due date that is realistic for the group of tasks w

Hello,I’m having trouble figuring out the Text Mode code for my Task Report. How can I write the code in the Value Expression to achieve the following result? I would like to display the date difference in one field. IF ISBLANK({project}.{DE:EWIR Submission Date}) display ""elsecalculate WEEKDAYDIFF({project}.{DE:EWIR Submission Date},{actualCompletionDate})    IF ISBLANK({project}.{DE:EFIR Submission Date}) display ""elsecalculate WEEKDAYDIFF({project}.{DE:EFIR Submission Date},{actualCompletionDate}) Thank you,Deepa Mahishi

Hi,Usually, GET /attask/api/v20.0/proj/search?fields=name,status returns statuses like PLN, CUR, DED. Is there a way to pull the full, human-readable status names (like Planning, Current, Dead) directly in this same API call?

Hi, I’m having a strange situation, when a Team is mentioned in the Updates section - should all the team members receive an email notification ?What happens is that the members from one team do receive but not all the times when the team is mentioned and the same member belonging to 2 other teams, never receive an email notification.I have checked all the email notifications in the Set-up, is there anything I can check ?thanks,Bianca

I’m trying to investigate why some user-created Dashboards in a system don’t have an Owner Name/ID.  Does anyone know if the owner's name disappears if the creator is deactivated?  

When you @mention a team in the Updates section of a project, does the comment appear in the @mention widget? I tested this, and the comment only shows up in my notifications.Also, do only individual @mentions (not team @mentions) appear in the @mention widget?

Hi Team, I'm working on a usecase where I need to create a Interactive Proof for a Web URL and need some ideas and suggestion on how to achieve this. I have a field attached to an object(TASK) where we will enter the URL of the webpage that needs to be proofed and I need to develop the fusion scenario that will automate Interactive Proof for that URL entered. Any suggestions and ideas are appreciated. Thanks for your time!!!

Hello, all! I am a current Workfront Workflow/Core admin with the strategy/customer engagement team (including enterprise marketing, internal/external communication, org strategy, business development, and government relations) at a large US healthcare organization that provides both direct patient care and healthcare insurance plans.I am trying to determine whether Workfront Planning would be a good investment for us but am having a hard time visualizing how the application might be set up and effectively used in our environment -- at first glance the application seems quite complex and challenging to figure out.So, I’m interested in connecting with other healthcare-sector users of Workfront Planning who would be open to demonstrating how they set up and use the application in their organizations/departments. If you’re willing to give me a “look under the hood” as to how Planning works in your environment, let me know and hopefully we can initiate a connection/conversation!

We are facing scalability challenges with the current API design.Our use case requires that when a request is made to retrieve content metadata, the API should return metadata only for unrestricted content. In addition, project-level and related task-level fields need to be available as part of the response.However, we have identified several limitations with the current approach:The task API is limited to approximately 2,000 records per request. Retrieving task data requires making separate calls per project ID, resulting in a very large number of API requests for full-load scenarios. The volume of task data returned per project is limited, which impacts overall efficiency. Project fields are restricted in the current design, making it difficult to retrieve comprehensive project-level details alongside task data. While the current solution may be sufficient for incremental loads, it does not scale effectively for larger datasets or bulk extraction requirements.We are currently evaluat

Testing transition to Adobe Cloud storage via a Kickstart which is how we load our planned work.We converted our sandbox to Cloud so a small group of sys admin can test. I created a cloud portfolio and cloud campaigns and cloud templates.  First tried loading campaigns and projects with the existing legacy portfolios, campaigns and templates and all went well.Using the same formatting, I created kickstarts with the cloud portfolio, campaigns and templates and I get the error that “Your file is correct, but nothing was imported”.Any ideas what the issue is since the error is very vague?  We are having all sorts of other issues with legacy and cloud not playing well together or with Fusion for that matter so there is something going on. 

I’m probably not the only “Accidental IT” guy who now works in Fusion for a living. And for those of us “People who have liberal arts degrees who are trying to catch up with people with real degrees,” some of the newer and more code-y aspects of our job may be a little bit of a challenge. (“Work in publishing,” they said. “You’ll have a job for life,” they said...)The thing which trips me up is that I’ll play with the JSONata exerciser and something which works perfectly fine there...doesn’t in Fusion. While Claude was trying to work with me on that, I asked it to come up with some pointers for future use. I really don’t like having AI write simple things if I can do it on my own. So, I had it come up with this helpful one-sheet for me when it comes to working with JSONata expressions. I’m including it here in case anyone else may find it useful.-j WORKING WITH JSONATA IN WORKFRONT FUSIONHow Fusion deviates from canonical JSONata (jsonata.org)===========================================

The Bulk Assignments function in Workload Balancer ceased working for two users (one is a System Admin and the other a Group Admin). The functionality remains in tact for the other two System Admins and Group Admin who use it. Key info to note:Nothing was modified in the system setup or configuration The System Admin (myself) who has lost the functionality can’t assign any role in any project. The Group Admin who lost functionality only experiences with specific job roles.  All of the System Admins and Group Admins use company provided Mac computers and everyone has installed the most recent Mac system update. (I hoped that may have been the differentiating factor, but no.)Anyone experienced this before? Any advice on solving or troubleshooting the problem?