Adobe Workfront

Workfront Report: This idea is submitted with reference to Adobe Workfront reporting limitation on Task reportCase id: #E-002087382Please consider this idea for further implementation:Task-level comments are populating in Project Last Note field, which results in the actual project-level comments being overwritten? Unable to capture last user comment and not API/system generated comment in Project/task last note

Hi,Let me explain what I’m trying to do.We have a custom user typeahead field. When that field is populated with someone’s name and the ticket is raised, I want the ticket status to change to CLIENT REVIEW. Once the status changes, the approver should be the person whose name is entered in the typeahead field (the name could be different for each ticket). After that person approves, the ticket status should move back to NEW, where the default approval process (applied to all requests) should start.My Fusion scenario works up to fetching the user ID from the typeahead field, but I’m unable to set the approver based on that field.Can you confirm whether this is possible? Regards,Diksha G.

As organizations grow, so does the complexity of onboarding, training, and supporting users. What works for a small pilot team often breaks down at scale. That’s where Adobe Workfront Blueprints and Project Templates can provide structure, consistency, and speed. In this session, we’ll explored how Workfront can drive the engine for training and enablement, powered by Blueprints and shared ideas for:   Designing scalable training paths for different roles and maturity levels  Organizing enablement projects, content, and documentation in one system  Using onboarding workflows to reinforce adoption through real work  Tailoring Blueprints to fit enterprise governance and operating models  Learning from multiple approaches, because enablement is never one-size-fits-all  If you weren’t able to attend live — or want to revisit any part of the session — you can access everything below:  Slide Deck  Webinar Recording  We’d love to keep the conversation going here in the community. Drop yo

Current situation is that if the group member does not follow the process and creates projects without the group share, the group administrator would not be able to see the project. This means that the group administrator does not have autonomy and would either require the systems administrator to share those types of projects to the group administrator or do a default sharing via access level which is missing the share to group administrator and only share to the homegroup.Let’s give the group administrator the autonomy so that they can create workflows and see all the projects for their group!

Our company has a non-standard Fiscal Year and it makes Reporting on the Fiscal Year very difficult as Calendar year or Quarter are not what our company goes by. Can we make a Setting that sets a Fiscal Year as well as Fiscal Quarters by either Company OR just for an instance?

Our proofs are saved at the project document level. We have different workflows for approvals, but we also have corresponding tasks, so we build the SLAs into our project timeline. Is there a way with Fusion to link stages to specific tasks? For example, Compliance Review proof stage to auto complete a task called “Compliance Review (PROOFING STEP).” Is this possible?

Hello, I was wondering, is there any way to combine/sum f few expense types and display that sum as a wedge in a piechart. I need to sum up a few different expense types and show those against one different expense type. So 2 wedges in a piechart, one of them is ths sum of a few expense types and the other is just one.

 Turn Workfront data into polished, stakeholder-ready deliverables!  Hosted in partnership with Brian Haight and Pete Worth of Adobe Professional Services, this session focused how to use Workfront Fusion to pull existing data and automatically generate branded, templatized PDFs that can be attached directly to Workfront objects and shared with stakeholders - no manual copy-paste required. They walked through real-world use cases and best practices, so you can start automating with confidence.  Watch the on-demand recording HERE, download a copy of the slide deck HERE, and the.zip file shared during the session HERE.   Don't forget to connect with the Experience League Fusion Community, where other customers share their Fusion use cases and advice.  Be sure to check the Events page on Experience League for more sessions coming soon! 

I’m running an access level report in Workfront and I’m trying to get collection data to appear on the report. Based on the API explorer I’d like to get the following fieldsAccess Level PermissionscoreAction forbiddenActions secondaryActionsI set up the collection text mode column and was able to successfully get values for “coreAction”. However, it’s not returning the proper values for forbidden or secondary and instead returns a string of code.  I’ve noticed that the field types for coreAction is different than the other 2 field types Field Type: string vs Field Type: string[]  Anyone able to help solve for this?  

Hi Guys,How to write the correct format for Entry date under filter condition? This is my current format but it wont pass to it.  Thanks, 

Hello everyone,I've a Fusion job where I create a folder in AEM and then through a custom call to Workfront, I add it as a linked folder in the desired project. I do all this in Fusion because I have a business logic that handles how and what folder i need to create and in which project i need to add it.The problem arises when i've to create a new folder inside the Linked Folder created in the previous step.i'm making the following POST request: URL /attask/api/v18.0/DOCFDR request JSON body{"name":"folderName","taskID":"xxyyzz","objCode":"DOCFDR","parentID":"aabbcc"} the error I get in both fusion and postam if I try the same request{    "error": {               "message": "Authorization is required.",               "title": null,               "msgKey": "exception.attask",               "attribute

As the title says, I am at a loss.  I do not know where to begin, I just know that I need to become the admin.  Does anyone have the patience enough to help me through it?

Is there a way to re-order the custom forms that exist on multiple projects (they exist on all of the projects)? I could not find a way to do it through bulk edit. Thank you.

Hello all,We have several Request Queue Templates that our groups use to embed requests in their projects. These are configured to use the same routing rules as the corresponding “actual” Request Queues.However, none of the embedded requests are visible in the users’ Requests tab or in their Requests widget, even though the regular submitted requests from the main queues show up as expected.I’ve tried to find documentation of this or others in the community encountering the same issue with no luck.Is this a known/temporary issue tied to the new experience, or does this sound like a configuration problem/bug that warrants a Support ticket?Thank you for you input.

I have a proof report that shows me everything I need except the planned routing due date. I have the field attached to all of our issues and projects, but I can’t find a way to get it to show on the report. Anyone have an idea how to do it?

Context: Workfront New Experience (not Fusion) - we want to set up an email notification (not an in-app notification) to a few specific users that lets them know when the status of a request (issue) = New.There is an existing Request Status Change to Request Primary Contact event notification, but we don’t see a way to copy it to make modifications or to copy the html of it so that we can modify it for an email template.Appreciate any assistance - thanks!

Hi,I have a custom form with a field where the users are expected to insert a 3 character code. I would like to have this code validated against a table from Planning, and only accept the user input if that code is not present in the table. Is this something that can be done with field validation?  Thank you in advanceJoao

We have a dropdown field (Project Scope) where the label and value differ (e.g., label = Maui SMA, value = SMA). I’m trying to build a report that displays the value instead of the label, but the only way I’ve found to do this is through text mode— which then disables inline editing.Is there any way to show the value in a report while still keeping inline editing enabled?

Hi all!I know this will probably get the standard response that nested lists cannot pull data in a specific order, but asking anyhow😅I’m pulling child tasks as a nested list like this:displayname=Child Taskslistdelimiter=<p>listmethod=nested(children).liststype=iteratevalueexpression=CONCAT({taskNumber},". ",{name}," (",{status},")")valueformat=HTML… can I then add something that sorts it alphabetically? I assume not, because I haven’t been able to find anything, but here’s hoping!TYIA!

Setting up a forum for any additional questions that we didn’t get to as part of the Workfront Fusion Foundations: The Scenarios Every Beginner Should Know session. We’ll have Adobe Workfront Champions on deck to help answer 😀