Adobe Experience Manager Sites

Hi Community I have a requirement where i want to show page path in the title for participant step workitem at http://localhost:4502//mnt/overlay/cq/inbox/content/inbox.htmlAs shown in below image i want to update this title dynamically

Hi All,  I am inquiring if there is certification for AEM DAM (Adobe Assets). Can you please share the links for learning path and certification. Thanks you in Advance for help!NM

Hi, I would like to limit access to certain areas of the AEM landing dashboard for some groups, for example, the "Form". So they can't even see it. Here is my package Under jcr_root/libs/cq/core/content/nav/forms/_rep_policy.xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <jcr:root xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0" xmlns:rep="internal" jcr:primaryType="rep:ACL"> <deny1 jcr:primaryType="rep:DenyACE" rep:principalName="dept1-admin" rep:privileges="{Name}[jcr:read]"/> <deny2 jcr:primaryType="rep:DenyACE" rep:principalName="dept2-admin" rep:privileges="{Name}[jcr:read]"/> </jcr:root> Then the META-INF/vault/filter.xml<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <workspaceFilter version="1.0"> <filter root="/libs/cq/core/content/nav" mode="replace"/> </workspaceFilter> But after installing the package, I don't see anything changing under the /libs/cq/

We have a requirement where the client wants to create new templates and replace the existing templates that are currently mapped to existing pages. We have tried using AEM Launches, which works well for single pages, but not for bulk updates. We are now exploring using a Groovy script. Are there any other methods we can consider?

I'm have a page with a template where all the components are configured in initial layout. Now I have created a new template with different resourceType and configured few components in initial layout and few components in structure as per my requirement. Since the page is dynamic and the data comes from a 3rd party service based on the ID from URL, I have to forward the request from the old page to new page which I have created and the ID will be appended to the new page so that dynamic data comes. The old page URL remains same but the layout changes based on the new page.Now I'm facing issue when the components are configured in the initial layout and the components under structure are loading in the page. But when I manually open the new page all the components are loading in the page. String newPath = "/content/aem/en_us/product.html";String oldPath = "/content/aem/en_us/categories.html"Resource res = request.getResourceResolver().getResource(newPath);if(res!=null){RequestDisp

Hi Team,AEMasCS -SitesWe have received a Salesforce form from the business team and were asked to add it to AEM. Our initial analysis suggested using the Embed component to include the form. However, we're considering whether that's the best approach or if we should use Connected Apps instead. This is part of a migration from another CMS to AEM. The business team mentioned that the previous CMS did not have any backend configuration and that they simply used Salesforce forms directly. Given this, what would be the most appropriate way to handle this in AEM?Geo

In AEM text component, where there is a option to add link, can we add links which has authentication requirements ?I have tried adding one, for normal external links it is working fine, when I add a link which requires authentication, AEM link checker is showing it as invalid and it is showing up as broken link on page in Edit mode. How can we bypass this and give that link on page ?one solution is to add this domain in Link checker service config to bypass, for that we have to add multiple domains. Please let me know if there are any other solutions. 

Hi everyone,I’m working on implementing structured data markup for paywalled content on AEM as a Cloud Service, and I’d like to add a verification mechanism to ensure that requests claiming to be from Googlebot are legitimate (i.e., through reverse DNS IP verification as described in Google's documentation https://mfpchiesi.atlassian.net/browse/MP-3153  https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/verifying-googlebot?hl=en ).Before going further, I wanted to ask:Has anyone implemented IP verification for Googlebot within AEM as a Cloud Service?Is it necessary to configure this in collaboration with Dispatcher rules, or can it be handled entirely within AEM?If both systems (Dispatcher + AEM) are involved, what’s the best practice to ensure smooth communication between them? For example, how would you share or pass verification results between the dispatcher layer and AEM?Any examples, guidance, or lessons learned would be greatly appreciated!Thanks in advance,Ad

I am in the process of migrating AEM 6.5 codebase to AEM as a cloud service. In my current code we are using nu.xom for XML elements processing. There are huge number of classes utilising this library. We are using jdk 11 for our local development. The nu.xom is working fine and services are giving expected results in local. But after deploying to AEM cloud instance, my services are not getting initialised .Below is the error we are observing for the service component:Please suggest how to resolve it.         "state": "failed activation",        "failure": "java.lang.IllegalAccessError: superclass access check failed: class nu.xom.JDK15XML1_0Parser (in unnamed module @0x5a2bd86e) cannot access class com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.SAXParser (in module java.xml) because module java.xml does not export com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers to unnamed module @0x5a2bd86e\n\tat java.base/java.lang.ClassLoa

Hi All,I’m currently working in AEM as a Cloud Service, and I'm in the process of creating author groups and assigning the appropriate permissions for my sites.Group A – Read-only accessGroup B – Write-only accessGroup C – Full accessTo achieve this, I am creating groups and assigning permissions as follows: I deny access globally using a rule like /content with deny and rep:glob="/*", then I explicitly grant read access to my specific site using /content/mysite with read permission. That is working fine. However, I'm encountering an issue: when I try to access /content/dam, I'm getting permission errors. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to configure it this way successfully. Could you please suggest how to achieve this setup? Specifically, I want to:Restrict global access to /content/damAllow access only to /content/dam/mysiteIs this possible to configure in AEM cloud? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks

I wanted to use core wcm components but all of them were not showing. Only a few were showing up and working fine.Then I stumbled upon thisUsing Core Components | Adobe Experience ManagerI downloaded and installed zip packageRelease Core WCM Components 2.29.0 · adobe/aem-core-wcm-components · GitHubAfter this all the components started showing up in CRX but none is workingOn checking the bundles  I saw the class implementations were different ( CarouselImpl) whereas in component htl file it was Carousel and path was different . Even after manually fixing it components are not working

Hi, Below is my server configuration,AEM version : 6.5.21Java : 11.0.14Acs commons : 6.0.4 This issue happens in prod environment only, not in local, dev or staging environments.Not sure why this happens in prod environment, I have deploy the code in dev, QA, staging environment it's working fine, but prod environment build the code causing some latency overall on the platform.Attached 2-thread-logs.fileI have attached full error log in file.-21.05.2025 01:10:23.924 *INFO* [162.119.162.10 [1747789823814] GET /content/kp/som/homepage.html HTTP/1.1] com.adobe.granite.ui.clientlibs.impl.HtmlLibraryManagerImpl Start building CSS library: /apps/org/kp/som/clientlibs/base (minified)21.05.2025 01:10:24.293 *ERROR* [162.119.162.10 [1747789823814] GET /content/kp/som/homepage.html HTTP/1.1] org.apache.sling.engine.impl.SlingRequestProcessorImpl service: Uncaught Throwableacscommons.com.google.common.util.concurrent.ExecutionError: java.lang.StackOverflowError  at acscommons.com.g

I am facing issue with WCM components core bundle and we retail core bundle installation. Both the bundles stay in installed state. I can see few dependencies are not resolved there. How may I resolve them?Please refer below snapshots for better understanding.WCM Components core bundle -Bundle State -Unresolved dependencies -We.retail core bundle -Bundle State -There are no unresolved dependencies in this bundle. But I believe this might have dependency on WCM core components so it's not active.More Details - AEM version - 6.5Service Pack - 6.5.17Archetype - 49core components package - 2.24.6 

Hey everyone,I am working on an AEM 6.5.17 and trying to trigger content replication to the publish instance from a custom workflow step. I have injected the Replicator service in my workflow process implementation, but when the step is executed, I am getting a NullPointerException when calling replicator.replicate(...).Here is a simple code:public class CustomReplicationStep implements WorkflowProcess {@3214626private Replicator replicator;@9944223public void execute(WorkItem workItem, WorkflowSession workflowSession, MetaDataMap args) {String payloadPath = workItem.getWorkflowData().getPayload().toString();try {Session session = workflowSession.adaptTo(Session.class);replicator.replicate(session, ReplicationActionType.ACTIVATE, payloadPath);} catch (Exception e) {log.error("Replication failed", e);}}} I registered this workflow properly in OSGI, and it appears in the workflow model, but the error suggests the replicator is null. I even tried switching to @586265, but it didn’t h

Hi Team, I am currently looking to deepen my understanding of AEM Assets (DAM), but I’ve been unable to find comprehensive documentation or structured learning resources. If anyone has useful documentation links or learning materials to get started with AEM Assets, I would greatly appreciate it if you could share them. Thanks!

This is regarding the AEM upgrade as we are upgrading to AEM SP 6.5.17  and The issue is when we add fields in the nested Multi-field then the focus is wrongly mapped to the first field of the parent or the first field of the first set of the nested field. This issue happens only if the nested multi-field is added inside the tabs. Please let me know if any one experience this issue in AEM SP 6.5.13. Any help is appreciated. Thank you.

I am trying to set cookie inside my sling model class but the cookie is not setting. Here is my sling model class @Model( adaptables = {SlingHttpServletRequest.class}, defaultInjectionStrategy = DefaultInjectionStrategy.OPTIONAL) public class TestModel { @SlingObject private SlingHttpServletRequest request; @SlingObject private SlingHttpServletResponse response; @PostConstruct private void init() { Cookie cookie = new Cookie("categoru", "11111"); cookie.setMaxAge(86400); // in seconds, 86400 = 24 hours. response.addCookie(cookie); // server response response.setStatus(200); } } But I am able to set the cookie successfully when I try to setup a cookie using servlet. Here is my servlet code.@8220494( service = { Servlet.class }, property = { SLING_SERVLET_PATHS + "=/bin/setCookieExample" } ) public class TestModelSer extends SlingAllMethodsServlet {

as above. The servlet would be of class org.apache.sling.api.servlets.SlingSafeMethodsServlet.The OSGI component would be of org.osgi.service.component.annotations.Component.Thank you. 

Date: June 27, Friday Registration Link: Here The 5th AEM UG at Tokio Marine & Nichido with Theme: AEM Function Development - Tokio Marine & Nichido Edition Even if the same CMS is used, feature development varies depending on the business and corporate structure. Do you have any original developments? This time, Mr. Furukawa, who became an Advocate in the 2025 Japan Adobe Advocates - AEM division, will talk about the development situation at Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Tokio Marine & Nichido). Let's chat with other participants at the Tokiwabashi Tower in Otemachi. ▼About this event:An offline meetup for Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) users.During the networking session (optional participation), you will be able to speak directly with not only the speakers but also the other participants.Please take this opportunity to further deepen interactions between users and liven up the users' group. ▼Target audience:Ado

Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2025Time: 8 AM PDT | 5 PM CEST | 8:30 PM IST Join us for an in-depth, technical walkthrough of Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Sites Optimizer. A cutting-edge, AI-first solution designed to improve your website’s performance and impact. What to Expect: Discover how Sites Optimizer uses agent-based automation to continuously monitor and optimize enterprise sites. Learn how to proactively resolve SEO issues, improve page speed, and refine user journeys with actionable insights. See how it empowers both marketers and developers to drive measurable outcomes aligned with business goals and more. Session Recording: Session Presentation: https://adobe.ly/4ek9rVN  Session Q&A: Question Answer This question is for Q&A. Answers when you want. My question, does the AEM Site Optimizer work for only AEM sites or other sites (Commerce, Dreamweaver, .NET, or Java, etc.)? AEM Clouds only at this stage: AMS, CS with publish tier and EDS. Is thi

Date: Monday, June 23, 2025 | 4:00 to 7:00 PM EST  In-Person Registration Link: Here Now that Adobe has 3 very-different and powerful experience platforms on-offer at the same time, which is appropriate for your workloads and personnel? We tackle some of the hard questions with Adobe's new products at our first AEM Mid-West User Group meeting in Columbus, Ohio!  Join us at 4pm on Monday June 23rd for a lively discussion of the following topics - all are invited! What does the new AEM 6.5 LTS offer, and is it still a good idea to stay on AEM 6.5 in 2025?What's the real scoop on its end-of-life plans?  How does AEM 6.5 LTS differ from AEM as a Cloud Service? Is Edge Delivery Services a viable option to migrate to, and what are the trade-offs? Can Edge Delivery Services offer the same power and flexibility as AEM 6.5 when it comes to localization & rollout of complex sites? Are all of Adobe's new AI products such as Site Optimizer, Experience Catalyst, and practica

Hi,I have some product nodes under this jcr path - /etc/products/mycompany/media. The structure is as below - I ran a query to find all leaf nodes under a specific path like /etc/products/mycompany/media/2183. My query is this which returns all nodes correctly. But due to large number of nodes I'm getting Traversal query warning. So I wanted to create oak index to optimize this query. However, query doesn't contain any property to specify in the index. So can anyone suggest index definition for this query? select * from [nt:unstructured] as a where isdescendantnode(a, "/etc/products/mycompany/media/2183") Please note that I'm using AEM cloud service. Thanks

I added new module in magento to extens product attributes in graphql. Now I get the extension_attributes in POSTMAN."extension_attributes": {                        "website_ids": [                            1                        ],                        "downloadable_product_links": [                            {    

I'm trying to configure LogForwarding from AEM Cloud Service to Splunk Cloud but getting a 404 error during the credential audit phase.Error Message: Error in config kind 'LogForwarding': credentials audit job failed for splunk: Error: splunk audit failed: request to the provider Splunk failed due to an unexpected status code: 404, please check credentials | [credential audit failed]  Current Configuration:  yamlkind: "LogForwarding" version: "1" metadata: envTypes: ["dev"] data: splunk: default: enabled: true host: "org.splunkcloud.com" port: 443 token: "${{SPLUNK_HEC_TOKEN}}" index: "name_aem"  Splunk HEC Token is valid and enabled Index "caat_aem" exists in SplunkUnsure about correct Splunk Cloud HEC endpoint URL 

We're getting BPA warnings about too many child nodes (1000+) under xmpMM:History in our AEM DAM assets (e.g., /content/dam/2015/2015-05/ABC.pdf/jcr:content/metadata/xmpMM:History). The recommended value is under 100. Seeking advice on: Reducing child nodes under xmpMM:History. Impact of ignoring this warning. Preventing future occurrences. Automation options for resolution.   Any help is appreciated!