Adobe Experience Manager Sites

AI is changing the way experiences are discovered, delivered, and optimized as people increasingly use AI to answer questions and even act on their behalf. As Adobe Experience Manager customers, you’re already building incredible digital experiences. Now, Adobe is helping you take them a step further. We’re excited to introduce five Adobe Experience Platform agents now surfaced directly in Experience Manager. These agents are designed to help your teams accelerate development, automate governance, and optimize content in real time — all while ensuring experiences remain human‑centered, brand‑safe, and discoverable by both people and AI systems.  Why this matters These new agents bring Adobe’s agentic web vision to life by helping you: Move faster with automated experience creation and optimization  Scale safely with built‑in governance and trustworthy guardrails  Improve discoverability for both human audiences and AI agents  Maximize impact by shifting from AI experimentation to measu

Hi everyone,I’m working on a storefront project using Adobe Edge Delivery Services (EDS) and wanted to clarify the expected behavior around Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and SEO.In particular, I'm reviewing how dynamic content (e.g., product names, links, headers fetched via GraphQL or similar APIs) is treated in the SSR output. Scenario:Some pages (like PLP and PDP) display content that is rendered client-side, and when inspecting the HTML source (view-source), this content does not appear to be present in the initial SSR response from the edge. Questions: What is the recommended way to ensure that critical content (titles, product names, links) is included in the SSR output for SEO purposes? Can this be addressed using enhancements in helix-markup.yaml, scripts.js, or other EDS configurations? Are there known strategies for SSR fallback or crawler-specific behavior in EDS to ensure search engines receive a fully rendered version of the page? My main goal i

Hi everyone,I'm working on AEM as a Cloud Service and trying to convert JPEG/PNG images to WebP using a DAM Workflow (creating a new WebP asset programmatically).I'm using this library: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.sejda.imageio/webp-imageioDependency:<dependency> <groupId>org.sejda.imageio</groupId> <artifactId>webp-imageio</artifactId> <version>0.1.6</version></dependency>In the bnd-maven-plugin**,** I added it as an embedded dependency:<configuration> <bnd> <![CDATA[ Embed-Dependency: *;scope=compile|runtime;inline=false ]]></bnd></configuration>During OSGi service activation, I am getting this error below:java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/luciad/imageio/webp/WebPImageReaderSpiThe JAR contains classes under:com.luciad.imageio.webp.*What am I missing here? Why am I unable to properly embed this library**?** what are the other ways of achieving this, WebP image conversion?

I'm creating a video portfolio - I'm a film editor - using Adobe Portfolio. I was uploading some work, but I noticed that there's no way to choose the cover frame (a serious flaw). This was ruining the look of my portfolio, so I tried embedding directly from Vimeo and YouTube, but after doing so, I noticed that only a tiny thumbnail appeared, it didn't look good at all. Does anyone know what's happening or how to fix this?Thank you.

I restarted my mac book and started AEM from terminal getting this error after AEM is started HTTP ERROR 404 Not FoundURI: /STATUS:404 MESSAGE:Not FoundSERVLET:org.apache.felix.http.base.internal.dispatch.DispatcherServlet-e31d7b5  Please help me resolving this issue, it is working fine morning , after my mac restart it I am getting this issue  

Creating multilingual digital experiences is now a baseline expectation. Yet anyone who has worked with Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) knows the reality — traditional translation workflows are slow, expensive, and often lack flexibility. Curious to explore a better way, I experimented with building an AI-powered translation workflow in AEM. The goal was simple: use GenAI models like GPT/Claude4 to translate complete AEM pages automatically with accuracy, structure, and context intact.Beyond speed and accuracy, this approach is highly cost-effective: it eliminates per-word licensing, recurring connector fees, and heavy platform dependencies. You pay only for what you translate — around $10–20 per million characters — saving significant costs compared to third-party services, while gaining the flexibility to switch between AI models rather than being locked to a single vendor.What started as a personal project ended up becoming a highly promising alternative to traditional localization.h

hi folks, I  had to write a link rewriter but I get the above warning with it. So the jist is, I stored the resource Resolver in the init() and use it in the startElement() I don’t know any other way of doing a link rewriter except this :-)Any suggestions welcome.thanksFIoa  @Component(        label = "External Link Transformer Factory",        description = "Rewrites external links by ...")@Service(value = TransformerFactory.class)public class ExternalLinkTransformerFactory implements TransformerFactory {    @Property(value = "extlink", propertyPrivate = true)    private static final String PROPERTY_PIPELINE_TYPE = "pipeline.type";    @Override    public Transformer createTransformer() {        return new ExternalLinkTransformer();    }        private ResourceResolver resourceResolver;    private class ExternalLinkTransformer implements Transformer {        private static final String TAG_ANCHOR = "a";        private static final String ATTR_HREF = "href";        private ContentHandle

I'm using 6.5.21 and trying to call the google maps api from backend. As part of it, I have added the below dependency. in my core pom.xml  <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution> <id>copy-google-maps-runtime</id> <phase>generate-resources</phase> <goals> <goal>copy-dependencies</goal> </goals> <configuration> <includeScope>runtime</includeScope> <includeGroupIds> com.google.maps,com.google.code.gson,com.squareup.okhttp3,com.squareup.okio </includeGroupIds>

Hello!I’ve hit a brick wall with something and hoping someone can help.I have a component that has a drag and drop container. The container’s resource super type is core/wcm/components/container/v1/containerI want to restrict the components that can be dragged onto this container to a sub set of those allowed on the page, but can’t find a way to do that. Note: This component is not fixed to a template. It is optional on the page and is itself dragged onto a page container at author time.Given it is not part of the template, I can’t use the template editor to set a policy to restrict components (that I can see). Essentially I’m stuck will allowing the set of components defined at page template level.Is there a way to achieve this in Touch UI projects?I recall this was easy in Classic UI projects, but not so much with Touch UI and editable templates.Any help would be appreciated (Generative AI is no help - constantly hallucinating)

 Leveraging AI Translation Tools in AEM: Example using DeepL? by @daniel-strmecki IntroductionAI-powered translation has undergone significant improvements over the past few years. What once produced awkward, literal results has evolved into language output that is often remarkably fluent and context-aware. For many use cases, modern AI translations are already close to perfect.Still, close to perfect is not the same as ready to publish. Brand tone, domain-specific wording, legal nuances, and SEO considerations mean that manual review is still required before publication. The real breakthrough of AI translation is therefore not full automation, but the speed gains. Modern AI translation tools enable teams to generate high-quality drafts in seconds instead of days, shifting human effort from translation to review and refinement.For Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) projects, especially large multi-language enterprise websites, this change has a massive impact as it can save significant tim

We have a number of long-running OOTB workflows on one of our environments. Workflows like Request for Activation or Request for Move Completion. Looking at the documentation here it only makes mention of custom workflows (mentions paths under /conf). https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/sites/administering/workflows-administeringWould it also be appropriate for purging long running OOTB workflows? If not, what's the proper way to handle these? 

This article - Developing with AI Tools talks about developing for Edge delivery services using AI coding tools using llms.txt and AGENTS.md files which provide a lot of contexts to the AI about the project they are operating one. Can we have a similar thing that gives similar  starter files for AEM Sites as well?

Dynamic Page Publishing in AEM Edge Delivery with BYOM and App Builder   by Lars Auffarth Introduction Bring Your Own Markup (BYOM) is a powerful feature of Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Edge Delivery Services that allows you to programmatically generate HTML pages from a dynamic HTTP endpoint. Rather than relying on authored content or documents, BYOM enables automated page rendering from APIs, product databases, or other backend systems - while still using the same semantic blocks and styling shared across your AEM site. In this post, we’ll explain how BYOM works, how it fits into the AEM Edge Delivery Services rendering pipeline, and how to integrate it cleanly using Adobe App Builder. Key Points BYOM is ideal for building dynamic, API-driven pages in AEM Edge Delivery Services - without sacrificing performance or consistency. In this post, we’ll walk through: What BYOM is and how to think of it as an “HTML API” How BYOM fits into the Edge Delivery Services publication fl

Hi Community, I want to define a rule in the cdn.yaml using the origin selector as described in the documentation https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/content-delivery/cdn-configuring-traffic#origin-selectors that would route the traffic for a particular path to an external website (www.website.com).Something similar to originSelectors: rules: - name: blogs when: allOf: - reqProperty: tier equals: publish - reqProperty: domain equals: <our domain> - reqProperty: path matches: "^/en-us/prefix/.*"However, prior the routing I want to manipulate the path, so the /prefix part is eliminated and for the /en-us/prefix/page path it would send a request to www.website.com/en-us/page.We have this logic working at the dispatcher tier using the ProxyPass directive. I am trying to understand if the same logic can be handled at the cdn level. Regards,Rustam 

Hi Everyone,    We have implemented the following business use case -  1. Send a request from AEM Publish to Runtime 2. Runtime action is able to generate the access token against the IMS to access the AEM Author instance 3A. Use cURL command to directly ping the author server with the payload -- Gives 200 OK works fine 3B Use the runtime action to generate the request to author instance -- gets blocked at CDN layer 4. The servlet at author takes the payload and does its own custom logic processing.   So locally and via curl the servlet worked fine but when invoked from Adobe I/O runtime it failed with 403 not allowed.   Conclusions -  1. Issue not in servlet, not in dispatcher rules as direct curl from local machine gives 200 OK The curl command when hit gives the below response -  rohan_garg@work hello-runtime % curl -X POST \"https://author-p123456-e1234567.adobeaemcloud.com/services/abc/save" \-H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUz..." \-H

We are working on an AEM project where the site structure is language-only, for example:/content/site/global/en/content/site/global/de/content/site/global/fr/content/site/global/esThere is no country structureFor translation management, we are using Phrase/Microsoft translation, and technically the translation flow is working as expected. However, over time we are facing serious content inconsistency issues across languages. Because there is no Master + Live Copy (MSM) setupPhrase only handles translation when content is explicitly sent, but:It does not enforce that all languages are updated It does not guarantee structural/content parity across languagesAfter some time, each language version of the same page looks different:Missing components/pages Different layouts Outdated text in some languagesWe are trying to find a scalable and maintainable approach to ensure:Content consistency across all languages A clear “source of truth” Less manual rollout effort Better control over what is

Hi Adobe Community Team,Content Fragments Save and close at a time is not working in AEM 6.5.23Is this knwon issue with SP 23?

Hi Team, We have implemented dynamic media for our project and we have a requirement to publish the asset to dynamic media.We have 1000’s of images to move. What approach we can use here.Selecting the asset and running the workflow for each asset will be very tedious task 

Hi,We have requirement to restrict the specific asset folder path while search in pathfield. Since there’s no ootb property to restrict the path. Is there any other way where we can do it? Also I need to disable the dates previous to currentdate. How to set that? How to dynamically set min date so that we can disable the previous dates.Thank you.

Hi Community, We’re running a storefront on Edge Delivery Services (EDS) with AEM Universal Editor as the content source. I’d like guidance on the recommended EDS pattern for hreflang so that international targeting works reliably. Context (simplified): AEM provides content via Universal Editor.EDS serves the site (no custom SSR layer today).We can generate XML sitemaps on our side.Today, hreflang would be easy to inject client-side, but I understand SSR or sitemaps are more reliable for search engines. Questions (EDS/AEM implementation): Preferred pattern in EDS: For hreflang, should we prioritize SSR <link rel="alternate" hreflang="…"> in <head>, <xhtml:link> alternates in sitemaps, or both? How to do SSR in EDS: If SSR is recommended, what’s the supported way to ensure hreflang is present in the served HTML (view-source) within an EDS architecture that uses AEM as the content source? Is there an edge/rewriter pattern (e.g., worker