Adobe Experience Manager Sites

Get certified at Summit - we are ready with expanded testing capacity! Full passholders attending Adobe Summit 2026 can get certified for free by passing an on-site certification exam. All exams (except Adobe ColdFusion and Adobe Captivate) will be available. You may take as many different exams as you like, but you may not take the same exam more than once.  Testing hours are April 19-21 @ 9am-5pm PT and April 22 @ 8am-1pm PT. Seating is first-come, first-served. Find us at the Adobe Certification table on the 5th floor of the Venetian.  You must bring your own fully-charged laptop to take advantage of this offer. Free stable and secure Wi-Fi will be provided.  Learn more today! 

👉 Calling all AEM practitioners in the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond ‼️👋We're thrilled to announce the launch of the AEM User Group - Bay Area chapter! Hosted by seasoned AEM experts KrishnaKalyan Gorthi and Mrinal Kumar, this is a community dedicated to passionate AEM users who come together to share best practices, collectively problem solve, and network.This chapter will host in-person and virtual meetings, so there is no shortage of ways to connect with your peers. 🙌Sign up here: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/aemug-bay-area/

We are using the WCM Core component PDF Viewer (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-core-components/using/wcm-components/pdf-viewer) on our site to improve the pdf experience of our customers but we are getting analytics cookies coming along for the ride:acrobatservices.adobe.comdc-api.adobe.iop.typekit.netp13n.adobe.iouse.typekit.netviewlicense.adobe.ioObviously we need to make sure if the users disables analytic cookies in our cookie consent manager that these cookies don’t get dropped.This isn’t a problem for js that we managed in Adobe Tags, we have rules to wire it up to the consent manager but im not sure how to go about wiring up these cookies from this core component.Any ideas?

1. DescriptionWhen an AEM author uses the "Convert to Experience Fragment Variation" action from the page editor, the OOTB servlet ConvertToExperienceFragmentVariation (from bundle com.adobe.cq.cq-experience-fragments) hardcodes the sling:resourceType on the converted component node to:cq/experience-fragments/editor/components/experiencefragment This prevents us from using our custom brand-specific Experience Fragment component during and after conversion. There is currently no extension point, OSGi hook, or request parameter to override this value. . Steps to ReproduceOpen any AEM page in the page editor. Right-click a component (e.g. Hero component). Select "Convert to Experience Fragment Variation". Fill in the conversion dialog and click Submit. Observe the POST request sent to:            /libs/cq/experience-fragments/content/v2/conversion/converterOpen CRXDE Lite and inspect the converted component node. Observe that sling:resourceType is hardcoded to the OOTB value. Expected vs.

Are there recommendations/best practices to manage content as code.One of the team I work with mentioned this as their problem statement “Our code gets deployed through Cloud Manager but our QA cannot test anything yet nor can automated regression tests be triggered through Continuous Test Pipelines because they have to wait until content is authored.”The human element in the process feels like a huge bottle neck in the process as it is hindering immediate feedback loop.I am trying to understand what strategies other enterprises who use AEM have implemented in their SDLC process.For example in a sprint, if the code and content are planned to be delivered together, cant the content creators(BA/Business) be ready with the content that go in with the fragments that get deployed as part of code 

Dear AEM Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with AEM.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for March 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEM. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEM-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – empowering you to provide a truly personalized experience to your customers with AEM.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles!Take a look:W

Check out the list of AEM User Group meetings happening in April:🌷 [VIRTUAL] April 15 @ 12pm ET: "Adobe Summit Prep 2026: Know Before You Go" with AEM - Midwest Chapter🌷 [VIRTUAL] April 28 @ 10am ET: "Adobe Summit 2026 Recap – focused on AEM Assets" with the AEM - Global DAM Chapter🌷 [VIRTUAL] April 30 @ 2pm IST: "AEM APAC Office Hours: Adobe Summit 2026 Recap" with AEM Champion Office Hours👉 See you there!: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/events/#/list

Adobe's MCP servers are great. But what if you could build AI tools designed exactly for your business or development use-case?In my latest article, I show how to custom-build MCP integrations in TypeScript so AI tools like Claude or Cursor can:🗂️ Find and act on expiring DAM assets in plain language⚡ Bulk update metadata without juggling the UI🔍 Query logs with natural prompts like “show errors from the last 4 hours”🔗 Chain multiple operations in one smart prompt And the best part? It works for on-prem, AMS, and AEMaaCS setups - all tailored to your deployment, letting AI do the heavy lifting while keeping you in control 🎯 Check the article here: https://medium.com/@vorajineet/aem-mcp-your-way-design-business-specific-ai-tools-for-any-aem-deployment-ff66c3fde22dLink to Github: https://github.com/vorajineet/aem-mcp-server

Adobe photoshop is failing and wont reinstall

trying to execute "aio login" and result is:Visit this url to log in: https://aio-login.adobeioruntime.net/api/v1/web/default/applogin?id=********&port=*****&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Faio-login.adobeioruntime.net%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fweb%2Fdefault%2Fapplogin%2Flogin-success - Waiting for browser loginnode:events:497 throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event ^ Error: spawn undefined\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell ENOENT at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:285:19) at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:483:16) at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) Emitted 'error' event on ChildProcess instance at: at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:291:12) at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:483:16) at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) { errno: -4058, code: 'ENOENT', syscall: 'spawn undefined\\System32\\WindowsPower

How do I create a custom API on AEM so that any external system (ex: postman, curl) can access the API via some authentication(OAUTH/SAML). Once the handshake is done external system needs to send AEM some data, AEM will do some business process and pass a response.

Hi All, I am trying to set up universal editor in my local and usinig AEM Cloud Service SDK (aem-sdk-2025.9.22758.20250928T092442Z-250900) for local development.I have done below set upAEM - http running on port 4502AEM - https running on port 8443Local universal editor service running on port 8000Trusted the local certificate in the browser for self signed certificatesThe problem I am facing is,when I try to load AEM page running on https (port 8443) inside universal editor, it gives this error "Blocked autofocusing on a <input> element in a cross-origin subframe." I followed whats mentioned in this document - https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/universal-editor/developer-overview?lang=en for same site cookie settings but it doesn't help and I continue getting the cross origin error. Has anyone come across the same issueThere is no Universal editor service related configuration available

I am running my AEMaaCS local SDK and I keep getting ERROR likecom.adobe.aem.wcm.dataplane.rewriter.MetaTagExternalPageIdTransformer authorSourceLocator is null. AEM_SERVICE env var is missing or malformedI am starting the AEM instance with java -jar aem-author-dev-p4502.jar -r author,dev,localI tried setting AEM_SERVICE = “author”environment variable (in addition to other vars I am setting), but it does not helpIt may be harmless, but its polluting my logs and is annoying when trying to find real errors.Whats the proper value to set, to silence this? 

Hi all,I hope you are doing well! This is continution to while upgrading to AEM 6.5 LTS i’m facing challenges with guava library replacement/alternatives.as per the LTS analyzer guidance, “The `15.0.0.0002` bundle version of Guava is no longer available out of the box in AEM 6.5 LTS due to critical security vulnerabilities. Please update and use latest non-vulnerable version of guava.”, so started with using latest versions with no vulnerabilities.<!-- Source: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.guava/guava --><dependency>    <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>    <artifactId>guava</artifactId>    <version>33.5.0-jre</version>    <scope>compile</scope></dependency> This is working at Java side but not at AEM instance, because there is no such library provided by Adobe runtime, so we need to embed this ourselves in our application generated bundle, this is failed because ‘com.google.guava’ bundle is a multi-rele

Hi everyone,I am working on extending the AEM Rich Text Editor (RTE) to add custom functionality for tables. Specifically, I want to add two buttons to the table toolbar: Cell Background Color (origintable#cellbg) Cell CSS Class (origintable#cellclass) I have implemented a custom Plugin and Command using CUI.rte.plugins.Plugin and CUI.rte.commands.Command. While the current implementation works using window.prompt, I would like to know if this approach is considered "best practice" or if there are more "AEM-native" ways to handle this (e.g., using Coral UI dialogs instead of browser prompts).Current Implementation Details: Plugin Registration: Using CUI.rte.plugins.PluginRegistry.register. UI Initialization: Adding elements to the tableEditOptions toolbar via tbGenerator.addElement. Data Persistence: Manually triggering the change event on the editable container after updating the DOM via jQuery. Code Snippets:1. Plugin Logic (cell-bg-plugin.js):(function ($, CUI) { 'use stric

Some of our authors reporting intermittent issue (like once a month per user behavior) while authoring pages in our internal prod author.Issue is that they are not able to save component dialogs in middle of authoring work even though they are able to login and navigate through pages. They get error failed to submit form. Upon clearing cache for all time and logging in again only is fixing this issue. Same time they are able to edit and save using other browser.upon checking HAR file we see that the csrf token request is giving 403 response (I think only post calls are not getting authenticated) and on further checking their login-token cookie is missing in the browser. This issue is not getting solved until they clear cache for all time and force login back.Is there any reason why the login-token OOTB cookie get dropped or not being set for a logged in session (even though the user is logged in and can navigate through pages and even can see component edit dialogs)?Below are some log

Hello Everyone, We have observed an inconsistency between the Content Fragment Editor and the Universal Editor regarding enforcement of Content Fragment model constraints.A multi-value field  in our Content Fragment model is configured with Maximum number of items = 3.In the Content Fragment Editor, this constraint is respected and authors are prevented from adding more than three entries. In the Universal Editor, the same field allows adding a fourth item, and the value is persisted without any validation error. After saving from the Universal Editor, reopening the fragment shows all four values stored in the repository.This suggests that the Universal Editor does not currently enforce the max items constraint defined in the Content Fragment model.Please confirm:Whether this behavior is expected or a known issue If there are plans to align Universal Editor validation with Content Fragment model constraints Whether any server-side validation or configuration is recommended to prevent t

Hi, To resolve "Deprecated Service User Mapping Detected", I created the following file under the osgiconf of the ui.config"org.apache.sling.serviceusermapping.impl.ServiceUserMapperImpl.amended.cfg.json"Following are its sample content. {   "user.mapping": [        "com.adobe.acs.acs-aem-commons-bundle:twitter-updater=[serviceuser--com.adobe.acs.acs-aem-commons-bundle--twitter-updater]",         "aem-precompiled-scripts:scene7-asset-reader-service=[serviceuser--aem-precompiled-scripts--scene7-asset-reader-service]"     ]}Does it look good to resolve the "Deprecated Service User Mapping Detected"? Or is there anything more to do?  

It would be extremely helpful if the Adobe Cloud Manager UI displayed clear information on which user initiated a pipeline execution as well as which user approved or rejected the pipeline in the approval step.Today, identifying who triggered or approved a pipeline often requires navigating through logs or API calls, which is not intuitive. Having this information surfaced directly in the Cloud Manager interface would provide:Better traceability – Quickly identify the person responsible for starting a deployment or making an approval decision. Improved auditability – Essential for teams that must comply with governance, security, or compliance standards. Faster troubleshooting – When a deployment causes issues, teams can easily see who initiated or approved the pipeline and follow up with the appropriate individual. Enhanced collaboration – Team members and stakeholders can more effectively coordinate by knowing who has taken action at each stage.Displaying the triggering user and the