Adobe Analytics

Description - This is something I continue to be frustrated by when I have to break out data in Workspace.  I created Classifications so I could break out my data, but it's a highly time-consuming challenge to constantly break out the data to make it consumable on a larger scale.  Instead of a limited set of results, I am requesting for Adobe to simply blow out the full breakdown for a specific table that we build in a Workspace.For instance, if I have THREE fields from a Campaign Tracking code I would want to break down, it would be a lot easier to drag them into the Table Builder and hit BUILD than to individually drag my fields into the Freeform table, even if I have multiples highlighted to enable a certain level of mass updates. Why is this feature important to you - This is about saving a LOT of time and tedium. How would you like the feature to work - Drag the necessary fields into the Freeform Table, and instead of being limited to 5 items in my breakdown, it wou

Description - We have a business use case where users need to export CJA Reports to DLZ. Currently, the exported file names appear as follows: cja-export-CDE-9a9DDD-e6bd-456b-a1e6-f99b9fb1d622-173111111537-0.csv.gz. With this naming convention, it's challenging to identify which user exported a specific CJA report when multiple users are exporting files to DLZ.Why is this feature important to you - If multiple users are exporting the files its hard to understand who exported the file and what type of export it is.How would you like the feature to work - What we need:1. Is there a way to prefix the report with the  (user ID) and a timestamp during export2. As soon as a scheduled (or manually) report is exported, an alert email should be sent to the end user, indicating that the report CNID_DATESTAMP_REPORTNAME... has been exported to DLZ. Current Behaviour -  file export to DLZ just shows this:  cja-export-CDE-9a9DDD-e6bd-456b-a1e6-f99b9fb1d622-1731111

We currently use the metric "Adobe Advertising - CPC" and "Adobe Advertising - Costs" in our reports with a key metric summary visualisation. The problem is, the color highlighting Costs/CPC decreases = red or Costs/CPC increases = green is not correct in this case and make visual analysis more difficult. If Costs/CPC decreases, the colour in the visualisation should be green and if it increases, it should be red. Would be very nice if this could be configured in some way or at least corrected for these metrics.

Description - In CJA, persistence setting should always be shown, even when not set ("none" or something similar) Why is this feature important to you - We teach users to use the information available for components.  It's confusing to them when there's nothing shown for persistence . How would you like the feature to work - When set, show value (as it currently does).  When not set, show "none" or something similar. Current Behaviour - Nothing is displayed for persistence as shown here  

Description - I want to filter out all the rules and Data elements which I have worked on, so that it is easy to publish those changes(only my changes) or may be add " add all changes done by me" section while building library. Why is this feature important to you - Lot of developers and different teams work simultaneously and building library is tideous as I need to pick rule by rule before adding it to libraryHow would you like the feature to work - Should be able to add filter option on top ( filter by developer, build stage( dev,stage,prod), etc)Current Behaviour - No such filter. There is only way to sort it.

On our website and in our apps, we have a lot more traffic on Weekdays than on Weekend days.For some flows/pages we have data alerts.  But defining the level on which we want to be alerted is very difficult.If the level is too low, we won't be alerted if there is an issue on weekdays; if the level is too high, we'll get (unwanted) alerts on Weekend days. In the As Is situation you can (theoretically) add "Weekdays" in the definition on the alert.Eg. I had created an alert for specific pages: if the # of pageViews was 0 on Weekdays (only on Weekdays), I wanted to receive an alert.On Weekdays the alert works fine.  But for each Saturday and Sunday I received an alert saying that the # of pageViews was 0, although this was NOT the case.  It was very confusing. We had plans to create a lot more alerts, a very nice feature of AA, but because of the impossibility to  differentiate the levels to test on between Weekdays and Weekend days, this feature looses a lot

Description - Our Firm has not been able to use Activity Maps since it was re-engineered to v3 due to our security policy that forces us to modify the extensions guid as software is not permitted to update outside of the Firm. Why is this feature important to you - Adobe Extension is a great tool that makes analytics more accessible to users.  The work around limits its use for some users. How would you like the feature to work - We would like Adobe to allow custom guid so that our users can authenticate using the extension. Current Behaviour -  Authentication is blocked by Adobe as it does not recognize our GUID. 

We would like to understand what combination of events equal to what user actions via CJA Audit logs.The CJA Audit logs help doc https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics-platform/using/cja-privacy/audit-log gives insights on very general things but we want to be able to get more specific information.For example: Project Created: Name = #### will that only show up once per project creation? Project Viewed will show up multiple times for a single view of a project(tested) or on a future date after the actual view. This makes it a bit challenging to extract precise usage insights.What are API_REQUEST? Why is there no User Name against some Action Name in the Audit logs? Description would show: Project Viewed: Project Objects - What are Project Objects?

Description - I found community threads from 10 years back(?!) where people asking about lowercasing prop/evar values in processing rules. Till date, this still does not seem to be possible, correct? Why is this feature important to you - Why would I use processing rules if even this simple functionality does not exist? How would you like the feature to work - have an option to lowercase as string value as one of the given dropdown items Current Behaviour - still no can do in 2024

We have an app that functions both online and offline, with offline tracking working as expected.A key business question is how often the app is used offline versus online. However, the Connection Type dimension does not accurately reflect this, as offline hits are attributed to the connection type available when they are eventually sent to the server.To address this, I propose categorizing these hits under a new dimension item: Offline. 

Description -It would be great if Fusion would support TLS 1.3 for their HTTP module (at least).As per right now, only TLS 1.2 is supported - which is not enough to integrate between software solutions which are already using TLS 1.3.Whilst some of these applications can be enabled to support version 1.2, it surely is not always possible.  This is very important to us, as this leads to Fusion simply being unusable for certain use cases All the best, Marius

Description: Enable China RDC support for Web SDK implementation. This is important to us as we want to continue the China tracking but data privacy regulations need the data to be passed to a China server first for all the tracking in the China site.Current Behavior: We are utilizing the China RDC together with the Adobe Analytics implementation. Right now, we are in progress with the migration effort to utilizing AEP Web SDK with an identified high risk for China site tracking.

Description:In our use case, we utilize the WebSDK and the Datastream for data collection. In addition to AEP, we also use Target, Analytics, and Event Forwarding as services. Our goal is to use IP obfuscation [full] and identical GEO lookup data across all services. Why is this feature important to you:For security and data governance reasons, it is important to us to configure these settings only once and not have to configure them additionally for each service. How would you like the feature to work:General settings and additional data determined in the datastream (IP obfuscation, geo lookup data) are extended in the payload/XDM, and all services use this data if available. The configurations that rely on previous integrations from AppMeasurement.js only apply if this data is not already present in the payload. Current Behaviour:Currently, and according to Adobe Support, we need to set the IP obfuscation in the datastream from "Full" to "Partial" so that the IP addres

DescriptionIn Customer Journey Analytics, dimensions can be configured to use a date-time schema data type. For example, a dimension showing when a product was added to wishlist could use this data type. Despite dates being akin to numbers, they cannot be used with greater than and less than operators in fitlers. The recommendation is to allow for this type of functionality. Why is this feature important to youAllowing the use of operators on dimensions that use a date-time data type would be useful for filter creation. For example, let's say that a user wanted to see a list of customer IDs that added a product to a wishlist between September 20, 2023, and October 20, 2023. A dimension exists that captures the date that a product was added to a wishlist (Dimension 1), and the dimension's values are in date-time format. If filter operators worked with date-time dimensions, the user could build a filter with logic similar to "greater than or equal to Dimension 1 = Sep 20,

Hello, we are missing the GZIP format in the Datawarehouse export, because just as Data Feed exports in GZIP, the processes that we have set up to drink from both sources, would help if they had the same format.Greetings and thank you very much,

Description: The current process of uploading IP BOT rules is manual and repetitive. When updating multiple report suites, each suite must be selected individually. An API or tool that allows for the bulk upload of the latest IP BOT rules to all report suites would save a significant amount of time.Why is this feature important: The current process is both manual and redundant. Even using the 'Control' button to select multiple report suites is time-consuming. A more efficient method for bulk uploads would greatly reduce the time required.How the feature should work: We should be able to add all the latest IPs to the BOT file and then have an option to update all the report suites within the organization.Current Behaviour: The BOT rules must be manually selected and uploaded for each report suite.

Create a more robust reporting source to identify internal users within my organization who are actively accessing Adobe Analytics. In order to help with account management, having the ability to filter for things such as specific dates without having to select multiple users will bring a greater ease.  I think it would be beneficial it the reporting was to how client data is filtered by date and whatever else data is available in the standard Adobe Analytics UI Currently, we have to navigate to the "Last Analytics Access" for any user you want by following these steps: 1. Login to experience cloud, Go to Analytics. 2. In the top toolbar click on Admin. 3. Then click on Analytics users and assets. 4. Here, you can view the list of users. There is a column titled "Last Analytics Access," which indicates the date and time when a particular user last accessed Adobe Analytics. You can sort this column by oldest to newest or newest to older by clicking on it then se

Description - It's great to be able to share a dashboard with anyone, even if they don't have Adobe Analytics accounts. However, it would be amazing if whatever this user is changing in terms of selected dropdowns or date ranges would be reflected in the URL, so a deep link can be created.   Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes it is needed to show something to a client or colleague, and it would awesome if I could prepare a shared dashboard with a set of preselected elements and date range for instance, to show a certain finding, without affecting the overall shared dashboard to other users.   How would you like the feature to work - A shared dashboard link looks something like this https://www3.an.adobe.com/spa/?linkId=<some UUID>&dpc=lon   So, if I now make a selection to a dimension drop down, I would hope that the SPA URL reflects this somehow e.g., https://www3.an.adobe.com/spa/?linkId=<some UUID>&dpc=lon#dim1=ch&...   and

Introduce an AI-powered virtual assistant within Adobe Analytics to help users navigate the platform, create segments, set up reports, and analyze data more efficiently. The AI assistant would understand natural language queries, allowing users to ask questions and receive insights or recommendations based on their data.Key Features:Natural language processing: Understand user queries in everyday language, making it easier for users to interact with the platform without needing deep technical knowledge of Adobe Analytics.Personalized recommendations: Provide users with tailored suggestions for segments, reports, and visualizations based on their data and previous activities.Automated data analysis: Perform complex data analysis tasks and provide actionable insights, helping users identify trends, anomalies, and opportunities within their data.Voice or text input: Enable users to interact with the AI assistant through voice or text input, depending on their preference and context.Integr

We need to use a calculated metrics as a different formula before and after specific date. Current Behaviour:When there is modified a global date range, the calculated metric date range filters stays constant/fixed as it has defined fixed dates in the segment.If there is selected reporting period December, nothing changes on this metric, because the segments are fixed date.How would you like the feature to work:The global date range would be applied to the date range filters/segments. For example taken from the picture above, if there would be selected date range Dec1th-Dec31th there would be divided only December visits by 0,423Why is this feature important to you:to allow more complex calculations within the same project. It saves time at combining the reports data when the reports are split to before and after date. 

The idea is to create a user group using the existing Adobe accounts. The goal is to assign this group as the owner of dashboards and segments to simplify ownership management, particularly in cases of employee departures.

Description & Current Behaviour - As stated in post https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-ideas/creating-shared-folders-in-adobe-analytics-outside-of-company/idc-p/724951 already the functionality of the Company Folder is very restrictive and doesn't make much sense:as stated in the existing thread, it should be able to give specific User rights (esp. editing rights) for various Subfolders (e.g., Marketing Team 1 has their own folder in the Company folder with their own reports which are then immediately shared with everybody in the Company because the reports are in the Company folder)Current state: such permissions are not available and only administrators are able to do anything with the Company folderWith this Status Quo comes the next problem that I've discovered: As an administrator I am able to see all Workspace projects of all users. I can also save over them and do anything I want with them. Except for on singular point: I am 

Description - Currently, we are trying to run a report that will pull back all visitors that have placed an order in the last 30 days, what have they done in the last 365 days.  We can set the calendar for the last 365 days, but we are unable to have a segment that will automatically look back to the last 30 days.  Using day, or month will be a manual solution, but is an extra step.  And using granularities will over-ride the current calendar, meaning we cannot look at behaviour previous to the order.   Why is this feature important to you -  Currently, most in the business is using granularities to do this, without realising the impact is has on the reporting.  This means false information / analysis is being used to make business decisions.   How would you like the feature to work - For the short term, can there be a pop-up when granularties is used in the segment to warn that this will override the calendar date range?  Lon

We have fairly static time filters such as Last 3 full months, Last 13 full weeks, Last Week, etc. And I also understand I can go into Date Range Builder and build my own timeframe.However in building reports and having more agility in analytics, a dynamic Last Year (LY) option would be great.  For example, if I want to look at Black Friday TY over LY, it would be easier to just drag in an “LY” filter to compare instead of creating a date filter which is then saved and static.A more use case scenario would be looking at a promo from Oct 25 – Oct 28, if I want to compare TY/LY for this random date it would be easier, as well as usually in a meeting someone would ask “ok what about just Oct 26 – Oct 28”, I need to more agile than building a new date filter.Another scenario is building reports and dashboards, having an LY column (which is the number one question we’re asked) to change as each individual changes the date range they want to see would be huge.

Description - Currently there is the ability to use an advanced function "column sum" in calculated metrics. This adds up the value of all the rows in the dimension and gives a sum. The issue with this is that the number is often different from the 'grand total' at the top of the column of the original metric. This is because the grand total is deduplicating items by default, but the column sum doesn't do the deduplication. For example, if your dimension is products and your metric is orders, the grand total will give you the total number of orders and each row will give you the number of orders for that row. The column sum will add up each of those rows, ignoring the fact that a single order can have more than one product, and give you a sum that overcounts the actual total. To fix this, create a new function that is a grand total, it will take the grand total value associated with the dimension it is put against.    Why is this feature important to you - This is important