Adobe Analytics

Hi,It would be a time if "create segment" or create calculated metric options is provided on right click of dimensions/metrics/segments and when a specific dimension item is opened.Thanks

When building workspace projects, sometimes it would be great to be able to toggle segments. I know I can remove segments and re-insert them, but being able to activate/de-activate them would be great.The new drop-down segment list feature is great, and does have the ability to choose the "No filter" option, which is something similar I am after.

Currently there is no way to select the date range in the 'server calls usage' interface. I cannot look back at my historical data. The simple solution is to make the date range something the user can select rather than a fixed range.

It would be great to have the ability to archive old segments so that they’re not gone forever, but perhaps only show up when using a new "Archived" filter in Segment Manager.  It becomes extremely distracting and cluttered to have old segments show up in Segment Builder, Analysis Workspace, etc.

It seems like "instances" is only available in the regular Reports & Analytics interface.  When using a listvar, I want to be able to see instances, not occurrences, associated with the dimension.  Thanks!

Surprised Workspace scheduling does not allow for the reports to be sent to publishing lists.  Being able to schedule report to be sent to publishing lists and having reporting suite overide is a huge benefit within an organisation that has 200+ websites each with multiple reports and specific recipients.Without this we cant migrate over to using Worskpace for scheduled reports.Request ..1. Allow for publishing lists to be added 2. Allow for publishing suite override to work3 Have option to Prefix report name (and email subject) dynamically using report suite specified in publishing list.

Hi,we would like to have an Option in Report Builder to "Not count Repeat Instances". This option already exist in Workspace, but we would like to have it also in Report Builder. It is really important.

looking at the current project manager in adobe analytics i can see a lot of improvements. it currently looks like this:i would love to see the following improvementsSchedules flag: projects with a schedule should have a sign/flag (maybe other colors for active, failed, expired)Metrics/Dimensions: columns with used metrics/dimension/segments within the project workspaceFilter: Currently there are only "positive" filter, no way to "exclude" certain flagswould love to have more information within this list.

I would like the ability to write calculated metrics. This is for two reasons:I'm used to writing long formulas, nesting conditions and operators. I'll brave a sweeping statement that most analysts are famiiliar with this tooThe UI for the calculated metric builder is not space efficient at all. As soon as your calculated metric definition goes below the fold of your screen, it becomes very hard to managePerhaps the requirement for #1 can be resolved by simply improving the UI as mentioned in #2, however, I'd still like the ability to write formulas out. I see it working like:Start typing name of metric e.g. "uniq"UI predicts "Unique Visitors", and maybe some dimensions, segments, time ranges and other metricsI hit tab to select the top resultI can type an operator (-+/*)I can simply type a fixed numberI can navigate within the formula bar using arrow keys to wrap items in parentheses / brackets as neededSome method to wrap items within a segmentBelow is an example of not the most extr

It would be great if we could design our query in excel and have the plugin check the design for errors to create blocks.  Creating report blocks would become much faster.  Given the recent enhancements to wizard i would anticipate this to be a difficult task.  Let me know.

Unfortunately, these are the only parameters that can be setup while creating a virtual report suite.{ "rsid":"vrs_dehans0_newvrs", "parent_rsid":"sistr2", "name":"new vrs", "segment_list": [ "536bfa98e4b06d874b0c927a", "536bfa99e4b06d874b0c927f" ] }However, it would be great to have the possibility to adapt tags and description of a virtual report suite as well.

OverviewThe 'performanceTiming' plug-in is extremely useful; however, the conditional logic triggering its s.performanceWrite function should be more robust.DetailThe s.performanceWrite function (which calculates the performance timings and writes them to a cookie) is triggered as part of an interval timer; however, the interval timer relies on the performance.timing.loadEventEnd attribute being equal to 0 for the interval timer to be started, and if the plug-in is loaded with a delay of a few seconds, the loadEventEnd attribute may already be greater than 0 - as a result, the s.performanceWrite function is never called.SuggestionOne solution is to include a flag that is set to true as part of the s.performanceWrite function executing; while this flag is false, s_doPlugins will repeatedly attempt to run the s.performanceWrite function.

Currently if you drag a segment A into another segment B in the builder it will just copy it in i.e. it rebuilds A in B. This means if you change the original segment A it won't update in B.What would be great is if you could drag a segment into another segment in a similar way to how a calculated metric works. This means you only need to maintain the original A segment as it will feed through into any other segments that reference it.

It would be infinetely beneficial to enable processing rules to build/handle the product variable.  This is something other 3rd party tools like Segment & mParticle are able to do.  As our implementation becomes more complex and spans multiple platforms we are reliant on mutliple developers (web, ios, android, windows, etc) for implementation support.   Asking our developers to update the product string for all new measurement requirements requires time & money.  However, asking them to prgoramatically solve adding new variables to a product context variable (or any context variable) reduces developement resources and increases implementation speed & flexibility. It would be great if we could pass an array of product data as a context variable that we could then use to build the product string with processng rules.  See below for an example array. Also, it would be an added bonus if we no longer had to set s.events for events existing wthin the product variable.  But if thi

Allow revenue to be viewed in workspace to be viewed in the user defined currency rather than the report suite default currency.

In case bugs happen on the web page events and variables in Adobe can be affected, especially with "wrong" data. As an example: you are measuring error events for a webpage component and due to a bug all events are fired 10x instead of once. In all reports this massive spike is now messing up averages, etc You could deal with that by using filters, but the more users have acces to the raw data the harder this is as you can't enforce segments or filters to all users. You could also set calendar events, but those only show up in charts, not in tabular analysis. Therefore we need the capability of deleting data from individual evars and props for selected time frames.

Adobe is a global company, offering its products around the world. The expectation is that the tools work also in non-English environments. There are several issues where functions do not work as designed due to lack of language support (or foreign language testing), especially in ReportBuilder.I am not talking about translation issues or missing languages (all our reporting and also Adobe UI settings are in English), but there are issues if the Windows client and/or UI is not English. For example, the "segment segment from cell" script does not work if the OS is German (even if Excel UI and ReportBuilder UI are English). My suggestion: Adobe, please test your tools in non-English UI environments before rolling it out to the customer.

Hi,I would like to raise a feature request relating to Adobe Analytics Data Feeds. Currently there is no option to move fields that have been added up and down in the list. For example, if I move post_evar30 into 10th position in the feed criteria but later decide I want it to be in column 30 having added many more variables, I need to remove them all and start again. This is very slow if you copy an existing feed and simply want to rearrange the order of the variables.Having a drag and drop UI for Data Feeds would be great.Thanks,Tom

Hi I am one of the people who still use Ad Hoc more than Workspace. I do like Workspace, but there is one main reason for my love to Ad Hoc.When I search within my thousands of segments, it does not matter whether I write "Car sale" or "Sale Car" as search phrase in Ad Hoc. It will find the stuff nevertheless.In Workspace I have to remember exactly what order my segments are named.This is such a big difference for someone playing around with thousands of segments. I do have namestructures on them, but the order can be difficult to recall at times. Did I put the "." before or after "Sweden" for example.Anyway. Please update the workspace search box so that it does this as well as Ad HocMichael

In Venn visualization would be great to see size and generate new segments outside of the overlaps.  Today you can only get totals in segments (full circles) and in the overlaps, and you can only generate new segments from the overlaps.

Currently, reporting on A4T redirect tests are counted accurately (from a visits and bounce rate perspective) within the one report suite you chose when setting up your Target activity. However, if you have a global report suite for example, which combines numerous report suites, this data would not be counted accurately. Not only do you not see Target Experiences or Target Activities under this other report suite, but it DOES NOT count visits and bounce correctly. For example, if I run a redirect in Canada, and I choose the Canadian report suite, my visits and bounce rate show accurate numbers, i.e. the first page that a visitor gets redirected from DOES NOT show up as a visit, and only the redirected visit shows up. However, if I pull visits and bounce rate on these two pages in a Global Report Suite, the original page AND redirected page both show a visit, therefore the visits for that market are inflated, and bounce rate is incorrectly reduced.My suggestion for a feature update is

For each panel of analysis workspaceI want the export function as a CSV file.※ No Copy to the clipboard, export function.Currently, from the menu at the top of the screen, projectWhen downloading as CSV, PDF, there are multiple panels,It is specification that all data is downloaded.When right clicking on the top of the panel or freeform tableAn export link as a CSV file is displayedI want to download  each as panel .

It would be extremely useful if we could have an option to add sparklines to tables containing metrics.  See the below example.  This would enable users to:1. Create workspaces with less tables and visualizations.  Allowing for faster and more efficient workspaces.2. Analyze data faster.3. Isolate where we need to dig further faster.4. Reduce dependency on report builder for similar purposes.See below for an example.  Let me know your thoughts.

With our enablement of Customer Attributes in Analytics via the Marketing Cloud, it became clear that we did not have a good way of limiting access to this data without creating a new virtual report suite that was general user friendly. Because this requires us to switch the default report suite of most of our internal users (100+ users), this is not an ideal option. There should be a way to limit Customer Attributes in Group User Management Settings (the same way we limit dimensions/metrics/tools).Though not PII, this customer-based data can be misinterpreted and misused if not managed appropriately. We'd like to limit the interaction our users have with these attributes by default, giving permission to only key members of our marketing organization.

Managing segments across requests had been a huge time saver fo us.  Can we get something similar for managing metrics?  I see the potential  issues as adding metrics will increment either rows or columns to the request.. I assume there could be a check if the action to add metrics will cause overlapping requests.