Adobe Analytics

There is no good way for combining various visualisations in a grid layout. Consider the following example: There are two workarounds that are not ideal:1. Resize the visualisation to align them on height. The issue with this approach is that when the project gets viewed on the screens that are narrower that the screen the author used, the visualisations may get displayed with the vertical scroll bar. This happens when the columns are set up with wrapping and the narrow screens make the column name to be displayed in more lines. This often happens with metrics that names are relatively long.2. Add any visualisation in a collapsed mode as a divider. The issue with this approach is that the visualisation has to be name, it does not look good and the users may tend to expand it.   ProposalAdd a new Divider visualisation that will look as a thin horizontal line. Maybe with a configuration setting for choosing the colour (including transparent) of the line. 

right now, the only way to modify data from the "Activity Map plugin" is changing the source code. According to a recent incident I was told that there is no way to modify the data within processing rules (even if you select to override the values, it basically does not affect the data.I have several situation where the website changed without notice to me and started to collect PII data (especially email addresses). having the option to overwrite the "Activity Map link" if it contains an @ would be super helpful.I suggest to allow "modify Activity Map data" within processing rules to have more options to check (and overwrite) data in certain situations.

Currently it seems to be impossible to create a custom rolling date range that stays relative to the Panel Date Range when that range has a variable number of days (eg. when panel date range has fixed start and rolling end, or when users change the panel date range).  Without this, you cannot create standard comparison periods such as 'Same period previous year'), meaning you have to create a custom rolling range for every new project, and even then, if the user changes the panel date range to something with a different number of days, the custom range gets out of alignment. The easiest way to fix this is to allow custom date ranges to reference the Panel End Date as well as the Panel Start Date. eg. a 'Same Period previous year' date range could be defined as...Start Date = Panel Start Date -365End Date = Panel End Date - 365  

Description - Allow ability to determine where standard components are used in AA & CJAWhy is this feature important to you -  It's often valuable to have insight where components are used.  This information is available for segments/filters and calculated metrics but not for other dimensions such as props, eVars, standard metrics, etc.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to filter/segment search or calculated metric search, have the ability to add a used in column in other views such as props, evars, data view component search, etc.Current Behaviour - Currently not available except for segment/filters or calculated metrics (without building API tool)

Description - I need the possibility to add descriptions to classified variables (dimensions). It would appear in the Data Dictionary, what is very helpful esp. for normal users.Why is this feature important to you - My analytics users need to know what specific dimensions mean. Otherwise, they cannot decide on what to use.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to normal dimensions (variables)Current Behaviour - There is no possibility to add any descriptions to classified variables (the field is greyed-out - see screenshots). 

It would be very useful to have a "read only" permission for Processing rules.Currently (according to Customer Care) if someone is given permission for processing rules, that permission includes the ability to add or modify processing rules.We have staff who need to see how a processing rule is written, but should absolutely not have the ability to add or modify rules (intentionally or accidentally). For example, the QA team who may need to follow the data flow (page > tag manager > Adobe call > processing rule > vista rule> data feed > etl, for example) to identify the cause of some data issue. Or the dev person who is writing code dependent on what the processing rule will or has done and needs to understand that rule.

It will be helpful to provide annotations to a specific visualization only as this annotation may be only related to a specific area 

Description While using segments containing 'Unspecified' in the definition, in case the workspace project is seen in a language other than English (say Spanish), data discrepancy is observed in reports. This is because the name 'Unspecified' changes to 'No especificada' in Spanish and the segment is unable to filter data correctly.  Why is this feature important to youIt becomes extremely cumbersome to share such workspace projects with a large number of users who are using different languages in Analytics workspace to view reports.  How would you like the feature to work A pop-up warning to come up on screen while changing the language in workspace to alert users that they might expect data discrepancy in case segment being used contains Unspecified. Current Behaviour No such pop-up is displayed on screen

For those customers which use IP GeoIntelligence and the Digitial Envoy monthly feed, would it be possible to expand upon the dimensions available?  Checking the Digitial Envoy website, there is a new indicator (for identifying if an ip address is residential or buisnes) available with their feed and this is something our marketing folks are very interested in.  Also, would zip+4 be available versus just the 5 digit zip?

Description - We are working on uploading or data transferof  Adobe Analytics reports to Tableau. For this purpose we are using json response of the report in which the column headers ( i.e., visits, Page views etc.) and row field values ( eg., Page url's) are missing. Without these values and headers the report which we are getting from the json response is meaningless.Why is this feature important to you - For data uploadsHow would you like the feature to work - We are expecting all the fields and column headers to be present in the json response.Current Behaviour - missing Column headers and row field values

Team and I are supporting a privacy project and ask was to see what data is going out to what vendors. A support ticket was opened.  We limited the request down to just data feeds in not getting a reply. Ticket was escalated and engineering followed up with "From our back-end we don't record the headers per data feed ID.Best thing to do would be to have an admin review these feeds from Analytics UI -> Admin -> Data Feed to get this information" We know the data is available through the UI, but a programmatic way to get all this data is needed.  

Description - Currently, there is no way to manage the component curation of multiple Virtual Report Suites at a timeWhy is this feature important to you - If a company has multiple VRS for each geographical market, it is impossible to curate all the VRS in one go hence it is time consuming and cumbersome 

Description -We want to have secondary identity to stitch multiple dataset.Exdata set 1 > identity 1, identity 2, identity 3data set 2 > identity 1data set 3 > identity 2use case - we want create segment in CJA where segment created with data set 3 applied in data set 2 should show results.we are looking to integrate data set 2 and data set 3 using dataset 1 as a pivot and get results. Why is this feature important to you -With wasting data engineering teams time we want to accomplish the stitching within the tool  How would you like the feature to work -seamlessly  Current Behaviour -One identity used to stitch the data 

Many of you probably will have realized that excluding IP's on multiple report suites is a time-consuming task and a really annoying thing. Here's my idea to improve that topic: 1- Would be good to be able to upload many IP's from a spreadsheet (by uploading the file, or just copypasting a couple columns -like Adwords Editor method-). Also, there's a 50 IP limit that should be increased at least to 500 IP. 2- When trying to use regex to exclude ranges of IP's, such as 199.1.0.(19-57), isn't possible. You just can exclude the entire range using an * (this should be modified to be able to specify a data range, not the entire position) 3- And the last one, but maybe the most important... You should be able to apply the same IP exclusion on multiple report suites easily. So, an "Apply to Multiple Report suites" option should be available. What do you think about? Have you ever experienced the pleasure of excluding more than 40 different IP's in 20 different report

In the project list view, it would be very useful for user's management purpose to know which projects are shared with whom and what type of access they have.  On the "shared with" column, please add what type of access those users have. At a high level, we are not able to tell if users can edit the original report, copy it or just view it. At the moment, we have to open each project and check one by one. This is time consuming.  Best regards.Hakim. 

Hi Team,Presently, all the reports in Analytics/Workspace by default show 'sum total' of row items. It would be great if user has an option to change the default 'sum total' to different arithmetic calculations like average, weighted average etc. for all the metrics (custom, calculated and standard). At present if we want to see average, we may have to create a calculated metrics.Thank you!

Provide a way to edit and repurpose a completed DW request instead of duplicating it.Sometimes, a "completed" Data warehouse request can be repurposed to extract the same data again. When such requirements arise, the current design does not allow us to "edit" a completed data warehouse request providing a quick way to run them for a different date range, instead it requires one to duplicate the DW request and create a new one out of it.To me, this results in:1. Duplication of DW requests whenever similar "one time" extraction needs arise. 2. Increases the list of dormant "completed DW requests", thus clustering the DW request queue.3. Time & effort is spent in recreating the same request again - this can be avoided.Provide edit feature to improve user experience. Duplication can be used where necessary.

Description - The UI update in Data Warehouse removed the ability for all users to see all data warehouse requests. Currently non product admin users only have visibility on the data warehouse request they created.   Why is this feature important to you - The marketing team creates multiple data warehouse request a day by copying requests of other users. How would you like the feature to work -  I would like to have the ability to share a data warehouse request like you would do a component.Current Behavior - There is no way of sharing data warehouse requests

Description -When adding new metrics it would be great to be able to zero out part days (go live date) and incorrect data on new metrics without using data repair API.Why is this feature important to you -Historically we have had events go live in production with issues or analysis done where only part-day information is available. Ideally, I would like to be able to make a "safe" metric that is available to non-power users which only works from a certain point forward.How would you like the feature to work -When creating a calculated metric that would be shared, I would use the existing "Day" dimension and "If" logic to build a metric that shows will return 0 if the metric is before the approved date.Current Behaviour -The problem at the moment is that "Day" can only be selected as "equals/exists/does not exist" or as a "Count distinct" for greater than or less than. Having the ability to select Day greater than or equal to "Jul 22, 2021" would solve the problem..   &nb

I often have Workspcae Projects with multiple panels (logical groups), all of them have almost the same filters in the header. with the new feature "drip down filter" it's time to suggest a new idea:Idea: lock panel filters to be the same - and when selecting a dropdown value, it's currated to all panels. would be great to have it as a "per filter"-option...This way I have following benefits:1) easy setup/modification of dashboards with multiple panel (especially if you have more that a few panels)2) easely filter data with just one click over all panels (just use drop-down and all panels have the same filter applied)

In CJA Workspace, the 'image loader' option doesn't work correctly.   When you click to add an image to either the 'description' or 'text' input box, the Workspace project just flickers and it will not let you add an 'https' image reference location.  The attached GIF shows that you can use the 'link' feature, but not the 'import image feature'. To help support adding images of the user experience and company logos to our CJA Projects, I propose we fix this issue.

Hello, I love the new data warehouse UI and Layout, but would like to see a filter function (report suites, scheduled/completed, etc.) and a csv export of the list of the items as currently filtered. Basically how the scheduled reports export feature functions. I'm having to manually create a list which is quite painful. Thank you,Josh

Add Calculated Metrics (like Distinct Count) to CJA's Full Table Export capabilities. This is important as right now you cannot include them in Full Table Export, which limits what data we can export. For example, if we have a calculated metric taking the sum of 20 different activities, we currently cannot export that information in one table. Instead, we would need to create and export four different tables with all of those activities, and the VLOOKUP them together in Excel. Also, not being able to include Distinct Count metrics is also a major limitation, as that is a very common metric (e.g. 'distinct count of emails received). In an ideal situation, Calculated Metrics would be included in CJA's Full Table Export's OOTB capabilities. 

Using the Web SDK debugger on a website with two Web SDK instances makes it hard to differentiate the requests to each instance.In the Web SDK section, the debugger shows network requests to different instances just next to each other.In production, this can be seen on www.spiegel.de from February, 1st. Similar to Adobe Analytics requests shown for each report suite, I'd like to see Web SDK requests instance by instance. 

As a long-time user of Adobe Analytics, I would like to be able to fully analyze my user's behavior within CJA. CJA data views can consist of one data set or several data sets, but as I understand it the concept a 'web visit' is being expanded and re-labeled a 'session' within CJA. It seems obvious that if the data set has a 'time series' component, then the concept of 'sequencing' applies.As such, I propose that we add, at the AEP identity level, the ability for AEP to automatically add in both an 'Event Hit Depth' and 'Session Number' dimension to be used in our CJA data views. For example, let's assume a PERSON went to a company's website (on day 1), bought something at the company's retail store (on day 2) and called the company's customer service hotline (on day 3).Assuming all data is in AEP and all data sources are connected via that 'identify' feature of AEP, then AEP should be able to define the 'Session Number' based on all the known data in AEP and should be able to determin