Adobe Analytics

Currently Referrer Instances are not counted if there is just an IP address as server or a short name. Those are referrers as well and should be counted as such. 

For some reason mobile data in the Visitor Profile > Technology reports shows up as Unknown, even though it's almost all being collected. As a test, try segmenting your Technology reports by "Visits from a Mobile Device". 100% Unknown. Even for things like Browser/OS that are available in other reports. It seems like it'd be really smart to *at least* have data in the Technology reports broken out as Mobile instead of Unknown. But why not just put the accurate data in there? Here's a list of Visitor Profile > Technology reports that could all use mobile data in them:Browsers, Browser Types, Browser Width, Browser Height, Operating System, JavaScript/Version, Cookies, Java, Color Depth

Right now I cannot view any of my mobile app lifecycle metrics within discover or create segments using any of this data. We need all mobile app lifecycle metrics available in Discover. Without these it is hard to do any hardcore analysis of how users are using our mobile apps or segment mobile app users from regular mobile users.

Any chance we can get an Occurrence segment container and a TRUE Page Views container? I find it contradictory that we can use a Page Views container and still pull custom link occurences.  This goes against the concept of a Page View, considering that if you pull a custom links report with the metric Page Views, you obviously do not get any data.  What we need is a Page View container that actually isolates/segments ONLY Page Views, as well as an Occurence container that segements Occurrences.  This is vital to any organization that passes s.props and eVars through both custom link tracking and page views.  Without this, we cannot separate out occurence counts of variables that are unique to custom tracking occurences (which we could do if there was an Occurence and PV container by excluding PVs from Occurences).

Please introduce functionality to allow us to classify a list var

Hi - For the most part, I find the graphs in Sitecatalyst to be of very little value and immediately hide them about 95% of the time.  I would love the ability to have a setting (per user) so that my reports open up with the graph hidden by default with the option to view it (so the opposite way the graphs currently show up in S.C.). Thanks a lotPhil

please allow us to classify list vars.List vars are a great alternative to s.products, but SAINT for them would be very helpful

Discover is such an awesome program, I cannot believe how aweful, terrible and horrible the reporting output is. Please update this or allow the ability to customize exported reports from Discover please.

When working with large data sets, I often miss a function in Discover (mainly, but also SC and RB) where I can choose to see line items (pages for example) where visits (or any other metric!) is above 499 or 4999 etc…It would be very helpful when working with multiple metrics, in order to filter out line items that are less important for analysis purpose (for example pages with very few visits). I have a pages report where many pages is seen only a few times, but the few users seeing those pages spend quite some time on them and since I’m in this example is interesting in finding the pages visits the longest by a representative share of out visitors, I’ll have to remove those myself (couple of thousand) each time I need to analyze this. Excel can help me by using a filter, but I’d like to stay in Discover for this purpose.

Currently if you schedule a report to be delivered daily via email using a rolling date range. The report attachement that you get in the daily email shows the correct dates, but if you click on the "Link to Report" to view the report within SiteCatalyst, it takes you to the date range that was used when the report was originally set up. Since you have specifically set the date ranges to "rolling" and you have scheduled the report to deliver daily, the expectation is that the link would go to the current date range and not the original. 

Discover 3.1 allowed you to break down dimensions and other metrics by left clicking on the variable or range of variables that you wanted to break down within the workspace. In version 3.2 you have to drag the dimensions and metrics down to the workspace. This makes things a lot more difficult and time consuming. The drag method also only allows you to break down one thing at a time instead of an entire range. 

A recent update in Sitecatalyst must have changed the way that this works, making trended reports difficult to use now.  For example, run the Pages report, bring in  "Bounce Rate" metric first, then the "Entries" metric, sort by "Entries", and then change to trended view.  The pages with most entries are no longer the top ones shown.  It re-sorts by "Bounce Rate" and shows pages which are not top viewed pages.  On a report like this you would usually want to look at the trend of bounce rate for top pages.  The only way to do it now is manually select the pages that you want which is time consuming and shouldn't be necessary.

When pulling revenue, allow revenue for international domains to be pulled in USD instead of local currency. 

I am copying a report suite, and both of them(original and duplicate. Ex : Dev, QA or for simlar region specific report suites) may change every now and then.I would like to see an option to keep them in synch, or to see the differences between them.

Allow drag and drop for resorting - hierarchy and report output.  Instead, if I need to reorder the output, I have to edit each one and redo the entire chart in the order desired  It looks like the dots on the far left of each line item refer to a movement function, but they do not move, nor can you add anything after deleting one. I have to restart the report entirely.

Can you make it an option for the customer to see either report specific totals versus suite specific totals when looking at reports.  As a customer I think its important to be able to look at a report total and see the total for the line items in the report, not the total for the metric. I know that there is the DE-duplication issue on conversion variables but since Traffic variables don't persist there is no DE-duplicate issue so its unnecessary to do suite totals for them. So at least it should be done for traffic variables but I think it should but the customers choice to do it for both. Thanks,Tim

It would be great to see a 'mute' feature in Discover, where instead of deleting the dimension or metric you could simply mute it / or turn it off or on. This would also keep multiple tabs to a minimum depending on the granularity you are modeling or butchering.

It would be incredibly useful to be able to create and save a template in DataWarehouse, I appreciate you can "duplicate" a report, but I want a template that includes the distribution method etc, effecitvly if we have regular ad-hoc requests that go to the same people with the same information but for different time periods it's a longer than nessasary process when a previous request already exists with all the relevant information.

I'd like to schedule a dashboard for different countrys and therefore it would be nice if i could choose a segment as a scheduling option. This would make it easer to schedule the same dashboard several times, without creating seperate dashboards.

It'd be really fantastic to be able to build rules based on other classifications. Although this sounds unnecessary, here's my use-case:I am using the DFA genesis integration to automatically populate several classifications of an eVar, one of which is "Campaign".I'd like to aggregate Campaign data as either "Branded Media" or "Unbranded Media". This information is included in the campaign, but other granular information is too (date, campaign name). Building rules based on the Campaign classification would allow me to look for Branded in the Campaign classification or Unbranded and I could easily split out this data. Make sense? Seems like a relatively simple request  Thanks!

On any trended metric report in Site Catalyst, you already have the option of setting the Day of Week Selector to All Days, or any individual Day of the week (only Mondays, for example) Could we get settings for Weekdays vs Weekends.  Most Financial Services businesses go dark on the weekends, so weekday traffic is much more germane. Ideally, we could turn that drop-down selector into a list of Checkboxes, so if someone had a reason to report on Mon, Wed, Fri only activity, they could do that as well.

Currently in the admin console, there is no way to download usernames and login information by user group.  You can only download the entire username list.  This makes it difficult for admins to easily audit who has what levels of access.

It's terribly frustrating that ALL of the dimensions used in Pre-Configured segments are not available in new segments.Paid SearchMobile DeviceSingle Page VisitPersistent CookieSo this means there's no way to create a segment focusing on Paid Search AND a specific Landing Page, etcAlthought there may be ways to duplicate some of the items above, why not make the above dimensions available so we don't waste an hour finding the exact match in non-pre-configured segments?It's just plain silly. Please make these updates.Thanks

With all the new great features available with SiteCatalyst rolling off the assembly line in the past few months a lot of user confusion has arisen. Mostly the issue is on the user's side by not reading notices sent out to users about new features but there isn't any 'flag' on the main SiteCatalyst report screen that tells the user the SC version and load date. There is some real estate available below the Adobe SiteCatalyst logo or next to the segment drop-down or next to the 'more actions' or over by the username and sign-out button or next to the search box where 'SiteCatalyst 15.5 5/23/2013 could be posted (as a hot link to the release notes). I know it's available in the help drop-down but out of site is out of mind and this link could go directly to the product release notes anchor.

It would be awesome to track bounce rate in 10 second intervals of 10, 20, 30 seconds up to two minutes. In Google Analytics I can do this via event tracking. If this can be implemented for SiteCatalyst as well this would be a vast improvement to understand where a boucne rate really happens. We can track this in Google Analytics but not in SiteCatalyst.