Hi
I'm trying to implement the new at.js on my test environment, but it seems to be flickering in my experiments?
This isn't what I was hoping for, so how can I solve this issue?
Regards
Andreas
Link: http://ecapacity-lounge.com/HRM/ecom/merce/1/shop-index.html
Solved! Go to Solution.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Morten,
How do I know the mboxCurrent error is associated with the legacy integration? If you look in your mbox response you will see the integration response plugin code--note the use of mboxCurrent:
<script type=\"text/javascript\">\r\n/
*T&T to SiteCat v4 ==>Response Plugin*/\r\nwindow.s_tnt=window.s_tnt||'', tntVal='125507:1:0,';\r\nif
(window.s_tnt.indexOf(tntVal)==-1){window.s_tnt+=tntVal}\r\nif (mboxCurrent.getFetcher().getType()=
='ajax'&&(window.s &&\r\nwindow.s.tl)){s.tl('TnT', 'o', 'TnT');}\r\n</script>
mboxCurrent is not an object that exists in at.js, which is one of the reasons we have documented at.js as incompatible with the legacy integration. The newer A4T integration is compatible and customers should upgrade.
If your company is no longer using the legacy integration in any way, you should deactivate this response plugin in Target Classic. If you are not sure how to do so, you can add this to your client care ticket.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi There,
Thanks for reaching out to Adobe Community.
Please keep a note of the below things before implementing at.js:
When implementing at.js, be aware of the following:
Thanks!
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Morten,
I wasn't able to see flickering when loading your page. Though I'm not sure exactly what to look for. Are you using the target-global-mbox to serve the test content? Or are you using a custom mbox location?
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Morten,
Is your test rearranging the elements in your top navigation? I do see some flicker if i stare at that portion of the page.
A few side notes:
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Morten,
You should submit this to client care to have the engineering team take a look at this.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Dwright
How can you see that this error is associated with T&T-SC integration? The SiteCatalyst integration is deactivated in the backend.
I have created a ticket in client care, and they are working on a solution. I hope.
Regards Morten
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Morten,
How do I know the mboxCurrent error is associated with the legacy integration? If you look in your mbox response you will see the integration response plugin code--note the use of mboxCurrent:
<script type=\"text/javascript\">\r\n/
*T&T to SiteCat v4 ==>Response Plugin*/\r\nwindow.s_tnt=window.s_tnt||'', tntVal='125507:1:0,';\r\nif
(window.s_tnt.indexOf(tntVal)==-1){window.s_tnt+=tntVal}\r\nif (mboxCurrent.getFetcher().getType()=
='ajax'&&(window.s &&\r\nwindow.s.tl)){s.tl('TnT', 'o', 'TnT');}\r\n</script>
mboxCurrent is not an object that exists in at.js, which is one of the reasons we have documented at.js as incompatible with the legacy integration. The newer A4T integration is compatible and customers should upgrade.
If your company is no longer using the legacy integration in any way, you should deactivate this response plugin in Target Classic. If you are not sure how to do so, you can add this to your client care ticket.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Like
Replies