Hi,
I got the following error with streaming data coming from an HTTP API connector:
The message cannot be validated due to the data type error. Expected type: Integer, found: Double.
When I looked at the failed batch, I see that the JSON field value associated with the error is 0.
How is 0 not an integer in AEP?
Any clues or insights on how to proceed with this error?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
Topics help categorize Community content and increase your ability to discover relevant content.
Hey @filouterrible
That's a weird issue.
Is the JSON value 0 or 0.0 ?
Can you share the payload with sensitive information blurred out or removed?
Cheers,
Abhinav
Hi @abhinavbalooni ,
The field value is 0.
As for the failed payload, it looks like this (+ error message)
Our schema is fully custom.
Thanks
Thanks for sharing the above @filouterrible
Does seem to be weird. Let me try it once at my end and get back by tomorrow.
Cheers,
Abhinav
Hey @filouterrible
I tried to replicate the issue at my end but was successfully able to ingest 0 in a field set to datatype Integer.
Seems to be an issue with the way your schema is setup at your end.
Below is the postman payload with the attribute 'testInt' with 0 being passed.
Ingested into AEP just fine. Screenshot below:
Hope the above helps zero in on the cause.
Cheers,
Abhinav
Hi @abhinavbalooni,
After carefully reviewing the issue. We realized that the issue was indeed at the source which was sending NUMBER 0.0 instead INTEGER 0.
The initial confusion was due to the fact that AEP is showing incomeAmount = 0 in the error log (as shown in my previous API response screenshot) and in the UI.
Not sure how this is happening, but looks like a bug to me.
Thanks for your help!
Also check if there is any schema constraint defined on that field.
Is that JSON payload xdm compliant or you mapped a custom one?
Regards,
Arijit Ghosh
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi @arijitg, I replied in the above comment
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Can you share the payload with Abhinav?
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies