Workflow Approval Process (we don't want to use it)
We're running AEM 6.5.19.
We would prefer not to use workflow approval inbox/email chains and instead rely solely on content permissions.
However, some of our editors are seemingly subject to certain approval workflows when they attempt to replicate, edit, move, or delete content.
For example, I might have full permissions on a node (except for edit acl), yet if I attempt to replicate this page, an approval workflow winds up in the admin user's inbox.
We've been deleting these workflows but are worried user's requests wind up in a workflow black hole of sorts. The user may be expecting someone to act on the request.
We would prefer for a user who does not have the correct permission on a node to be unable to take the action.
We do not want to trigger a workflow that winds up in the admin user's inbox.
We would prefer that the action just not be possible for a user without the corresponding permission.
In a different case, some of our users seem not to be subject to this workflow approval process?
I'm not sure what separates these 2 cases, maybe some underlying permission difference?
A support engineer suggested as much, and also suggested copying some of the default workflows and editing them to remove the approval step? Any advice on this?
Also, assuming this is a potential solution, how would we change association from the default workflow to the new/edited workflow without the approval step?
Thanks for any suggestions and/or info on how your team is or is not using workflow approval steps.