Diese Konversation wurde aufgrund von Inaktivität geschlossen. Bitte erstellen Sie einen neuen Post.
Level 1
Level 2
Melden Sie sich an, um alle Badges zu sehen
Diese Konversation wurde aufgrund von Inaktivität geschlossen. Bitte erstellen Sie einen neuen Post.
Hi,
I have started developing on AEM 6.3 but there are some dependency issues. The package com.adobe.cq.sightly is not resolved in aem 6.3 felix console. It gives error like this
com.adobe.cq.sightly com.adobe.cq.sightly,version=[3.1,4) -- Cannot be resolved
I am using a class which extends WCMUsePojo. I have also included uber.jar in the pom.
Can you point me to if there is some change here in 6.3 for this. Is it that it now allows only sling models to use ?
Regards,
Gelöst! Gehe zu Lösung.
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Just tested this - only difference from this artilce
is use this:
dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId>
<artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId>
<version>6.3.0</version>
<!-- for AEM6.1 use this version : <version>6.1.0</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP1 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP1-B0001</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP2 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP2</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.2 use this version : <version>6.2.0</version> -->
<classifier>obfuscated-apis</classifier>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
New article here: https://helpx.adobe.com/experience-manager/using/aem63_htl.html
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
WCMUsePojo works on 6.3
Can you test the package here on 6.3? And then maybe compare the diffs?
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
We need a community article on this. This is on our ToDo list.
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Just tested this - only difference from this artilce
is use this:
dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId>
<artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId>
<version>6.3.0</version>
<!-- for AEM6.1 use this version : <version>6.1.0</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP1 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP1-B0001</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP2 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP2</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.2 use this version : <version>6.2.0</version> -->
<classifier>obfuscated-apis</classifier>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
New article here: https://helpx.adobe.com/experience-manager/using/aem63_htl.html
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Hi,
Yes, I too tested with the below dependency used.
Use this dependency under Parent POM file.
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId>
<artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId>
<version>6.3.0</version>
<!-- for AEM6.1 use this version : <version>6.1.0</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP1 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP1-B0001</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP2 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP2</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.2 use this version : <version>6.2.0</version> -->
<classifier>obfuscated-apis</classifier>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
Also, make sure you add this dependency in POM file under core:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId>
<artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId>
<classifier>obfuscated-apis</classifier>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec</artifactId>
</dependency>
Please find the attached screenshots.
We will release the new article on AEM 6.3 which uses WCMUsePojo Shortly!!
Thanks,
Ratna Kumar,
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Since 6.2 there is no need anymore for obfuscated-apis, just use apis
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Hi,
We are in the process of migrating from 5.6.1 to 6.3 I am seeing similar issue with the AEM 6.3. I am getting error -
com.day.cq.mailer,version=[5.6,6) -- Cannot be resolved
com.day.jcr.vault.util,version=[2.4,3) -- Cannot be resolved
Can you please help on with dependency I need to add for it ? Also, can I use JDK1.7 to compile backend bundles ? We are maintaining both the version currently until we fully migrate. So, just wanted to check if I can still use JDK1.7 to compile the code from jenkins build to deploy to 6.3.
Thanks,
Snehal
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Are using the uberjar?
Here are the tech-requirements: Technical Requirements . 1.7 is not supported
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Thanks. No , I haven't added uber dependency in POM. Do I need to add below dependency and remove the deprecated one?
<groupId>com.adobe.aem</groupId>
<artifactId>uber-jar</artifactId>
<version>6.3.0</version>
<!-- for AEM6.1 use this version : <version>6.1.0</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP1 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP1-B0001</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.1 SP2 use this version : <version>6.1.0-SP2</version> -->
<!-- for AEM6.2 use this version : <version>6.2.0</version> -->
<classifier>obfuscated-apis</classifier>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Yes, also use
<classifier>apis</classifier>
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Thanks for your reply. One more question - we just did jcr to OAK migration and moved all 5.6 version sites to 6.3. When I open the pages that were working in 5.6 in 6.3 it shows just blank page. Is it because my bundles are not resolving ? Is this expected behavior when we migrate until we make code compatible to 6.3 ?
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Hard to say without details, I would always first check the logfile (error.log)
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
I included uber jar dependency and still see the same error. Any other solution I can try ?
com.day.cq.mailer,version=[5.6,6) -- Cannot be resolved
com.day.jcr.vault.util,version=[2.4,3) -- Cannot be resolved
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Did you follow the article I posted exactly as is. It works!
Zugriffe
Antworten
Likes gesamt
Zugriffe
Likes
Antworten
Zugriffe
Likes
Antworten