How to save a JSON property in multifield in JSON rather than in Nodes | Community
Skip to main content
abhisheks144250
Level 2
November 27, 2018

How to save a JSON property in multifield in JSON rather than in Nodes

  • November 27, 2018
  • 1 reply
  • 4241 views

Hi,
I have a multifield in AEM 6.4(referring

granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/form/multifield).

I want to save a JSON property as "Items"  : {"language":"/content/languages/english","textText":"temp","emptytext":"jkjkjkjk"}
By default in aem 6.4 its storing these as nodes, which will lead me to a code change at many places.
Any way round there so that it still stores in JSON format instead of nodes.

Note:  already tried

acs-commons-nested="JSON_STORE" but not working in 6.4.

acs-commons-nested="JSON_STORE"

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

1 reply

arunpatidar
Community Advisor
Community Advisor
November 27, 2018

Hi,

ACS Common Multifield does not work with coral3/Granite components. you can try with coral2 multifield.

Granite- /libs/granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/form/multifield

Coral2 - /libs/granite/ui/components/foundation/form/multifield

Arun Patidar
smacdonald2008
Level 10
November 27, 2018

As Arun states - to save as JSON - you have to use granite and ACS-Commons.

For granite/coral MF (granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/form/multifield) -  it's saved as nodes as discussed here - Building Experience Manager Components using Granite/Coral Resource Types

I am always curious when i see questions like this. Why does it matter where these granite types store the data in the JCR. The purpose is for the data to be present when you open the component dialog (the data appears in the dialog) and when you update the component dialog.

Unless you want to read this data for a custom solution (other then a component and its dialog) - should be no reason to care if the data is stored as nodes or JSON.

abhisheks144250
Level 2
November 28, 2018

Thats correct, but we are migrating from 6.1 to 6.4. This will require a lot of code change i guess in the project i am working.