Hi Team,
While reviewing the documentation, I noticed that the differences between AEM Sites DAM and AEM Assets (Cloud Service) aren't always clearly delineated. This raises an important question—if a client wants to build a DAM, is there a significant advantage in choosing AEM Assets as a Cloud Service over simply using the DAM capabilities within an AEM Sites instance?
From what I’ve seen, many of the advanced features—such as Smart Tagging, Dynamic Media, and Asset Delivery—can be integrated into an AEM Sites-based DAM. This makes it seem like most enterprise DAM functionalities can be achieved without a dedicated AEM Assets program.
So the core question becomes:
Do we really need a separate AEM Assets Cloud instance if the Sites DAM can be extended to meet the same requirements?
Thanks,
Prajwal
Solved! Go to Solution.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi @PrajwalRe ,
For content-led digital experiences, start with Sites DAM.
But for asset-led strategies (e.g., marketing ops, multi-channel campaigns), invest in AEM Assets Cloud - it is built for that purpose and will pay off in flexibility, governance, and integrations.
I would suggest to stay only with AEM Sites + DAM.
When AEM Sites DAM Is Enough
Use the built-in Sites DAM if:
When to Choose AEM Assets Cloud
Choose a separate AEM Assets instance when:
Hi @PrajwalRe ,
For content-led digital experiences, start with Sites DAM.
But for asset-led strategies (e.g., marketing ops, multi-channel campaigns), invest in AEM Assets Cloud - it is built for that purpose and will pay off in flexibility, governance, and integrations.
I would suggest to stay only with AEM Sites + DAM.
When AEM Sites DAM Is Enough
Use the built-in Sites DAM if:
When to Choose AEM Assets Cloud
Choose a separate AEM Assets instance when: