Content Fragment Model is not loading after upgrading to AEM 6.5.19 | Community
Skip to main content
N
Nikita_Mazire
Level 2
December 1, 2023
Question

Content Fragment Model is not loading after upgrading to AEM 6.5.19

  • December 1, 2023
  • 1 reply
  • 1843 views

Hi Team,

 

We have upgraded AEM to 6.5.9 to 6.5.19. And using compatible ACS commons version 5.0.4.

Its still valid version according to this compatibity chart.  https://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/pages/compatibility.html 

 

After installing service pack 6.5.19, we observed once we create and open the new content fragment model its giving below error.

The query read or traversed more than 100000 nodes. To avoid affecting other tasks, processing was stopped

and only OOTB we.retail CF models are loading fine.

 

 

OOTB working copy: /mnt/overlay/dam/cfm/models/editor/content/editor.html/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/we-retail-experience

we tried to copy same model in the same location, still its not loading.

We have some project specific existing/old content fragments models, those are also giving same error on edit option.

Please let us know if anybody have any input on this. 

Thanks in advanced!

Nikita M.

1 reply

ArpitVarshney
Community Advisor
ArpitVarshneyCommunity Advisor
Community Advisor
December 2, 2023

Hi @nikita_mazire 

Could you please check the logs and shared the detail logs. Also, could you please confirm if there is overlayed functionality in CFM. If yes, please disable it and check if that is causing the issue.

Regards,
Arpit Varshney

    N
    Nikita_MazireAuthor
    Level 2
    December 4, 2023

    Hi @arpitvarshney 

    Thank you for your response.

     

    I've attached the warning and exception message below from error.log file.

    Warning:

     

    04.12.2023 07:51:19.578 *WARN* [10.150.0.133 [1701676279532] GET /mnt/overlay/dam/cfm/models/editor/content/editor.html/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.QueryImpl Traversal query (query without index): select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], * from [dam:Asset] as a where [jcr:content/contentFragment] = 'true' and [jcr:content/data/cq:model] = '/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model' and isdescendantnode(a, '/content/dam') option(index tag [fragments]) /* xpath: /jcr:root/content/dam//element(*, dam:Asset)[(jcr:content/@contentFragment = 'true' and jcr:content/data/@cq:model = '/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model')] option (index tag fragments) */; consider creating an index
    04.12.2023 07:51:19.600 *WARN* [10.150.0.133 [1701676279532] GET /mnt/overlay/dam/cfm/models/editor/content/editor.html/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.Cursors$TraversingCursor Traversed 1000 nodes with filter Filter(query=select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], * from [dam:Asset] as a where [jcr:content/contentFragment] = 'true' and [jcr:content/data/cq:model] = '/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model' and isdescendantnode(a, '/content/dam') option(index tag [fragments]) /* xpath: /jcr:root/content/dam//element(*, dam:Asset)[(jcr:content/@contentFragment = 'true' and jcr:content/data/@cq:model = '/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model')] option (index tag fragments) */, path=/content/dam//*, property=[:indexTag=[fragments], jcr:content/contentFragment=[true], jcr:content/data/cq:model=[/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model]]); consider creating an index or changing the query

    Exception: 

    04.12.2023 07:51:20.819 *WARN* [10.150.0.133 [1701676279532] GET /mnt/overlay/dam/cfm/models/editor/content/editor.html/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.ast.SelectorImpl The query read or traversed more than 100000 nodes. To avoid affecting other tasks, processing was stopped. for query select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], * from [dam:Asset] as a where [jcr:content/contentFragment] = 'true' and [jcr:content/data/cq:model] = '/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model' and isdescendantnode(a, '/content/dam') option(index tag [fragments]) /* xpath: /jcr:root/content/dam//element(*, dam:Asset)[(jcr:content/@contentFragment = 'true' and jcr:content/data/@cq:model = '/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model')] option (index tag fragments) */
    04.12.2023 07:51:20.826 *ERROR* [10.150.0.133 [1701676279532] GET /mnt/overlay/dam/cfm/models/editor/content/editor.html/conf/we-retail/settings/dam/cfm/models/test-content-fragment-model HTTP/1.1] org.apache.sling.engine.impl.SlingRequestProcessorImpl service: Uncaught SlingException
    org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.RuntimeNodeTraversalException: The query read or traversed more than 100000 nodes. To avoid affecting other tasks, processing was stopped.
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.FilterIterators.checkReadLimit(FilterIterators.java:70)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.Cursors$TraversingCursor.fetchNext(Cursors.java:341)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.Cursors$TraversingCursor.next(Cursors.java:320)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.ast.SelectorImpl.nextInternal(SelectorImpl.java:520)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.ast.SelectorImpl.next(SelectorImpl.java:508)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.QueryImpl$RowIterator.fetchNext(QueryImpl.java:876)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.QueryImpl$RowIterator.hasNext(QueryImpl.java:903)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryResultImpl$1.fetch(QueryResultImpl.java:103)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryResultImpl$1.<init>(QueryResultImpl.java:99)
    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryResultImpl.getRows(QueryResultImpl.java:83)
    at com.day.cq.search.impl.builder.QueryImpl$RowIterable.iterator(QueryImpl.java:833)
    at com.day.cq.search.impl.builder.QueryImpl.execute(QueryImpl.java:649)
    at com.day.cq.search.impl.builder.QueryImpl.getResult(QueryImpl.java:111)

    ArpitVarshney
    Community Advisor
    ArpitVarshneyCommunity Advisor
    Community Advisor
    December 4, 2023

    Hi @nikita_mazire,
    Have you tried creating index for the query mentioned in logs. You can use this tool https://oakutils.appspot.com/generate/index to generate index and put this in AEM to test it further.

    Regards,
    Arpit Varshney

      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

      Loading footer...