Question Re Cohort Analysis | Community
Skip to main content
morvaride921412
morvaride921412
February 14, 2019
Solved

Question Re Cohort Analysis

  • February 14, 2019
  • 2 replies
  • 1480 views

I am trying to measure my campaign effectiveness for retaining users over time through cohort analysis.

Even though, I'm using the same date range and parameters for Inclusion criteria, the data shown within the cohort table for both visits and orders are way below than when I build/pull it within a freeform table.

Does anyone know why and what is causing the gap?!

Thank you!

I've attached the screenshots if it helps:

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
Best answer by Andrey_Osadchuk

Replacing Visits with Unique Visitors in the freeform table should fix the issue. However, I'm seeing a discrepancy anyway. Attaching another screenshot for a better week-by-week comparison:

The numbers do not match for the first and last weeks.

2 replies

Andrey_Osadchuk
Andrey_OsadchukAccepted solution
Level 10
February 15, 2019

Replacing Visits with Unique Visitors in the freeform table should fix the issue. However, I'm seeing a discrepancy anyway. Attaching another screenshot for a better week-by-week comparison:

The numbers do not match for the first and last weeks.

morvaride921412
morvaride921412Author
February 15, 2019

I would be happy if my numbers were as close as they're shown in your week by week comparison : ) I could live with minor gap as long as data are aligned. The major issue is "orders submitted"; cohort table shows only 30% of numbers reflected in the freeform, now I am wondering which one is accurate?!

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

Loading footer...