6 Comments
fujita0 26-07-2016

We vote for S3 Support in Data Warehouse.

The capability will save our costs by two ways and eventually take advantage of Adobe Solution over the other data provider:

Currently we have been deliverring more than 100 DWH reports by Day so that we need to keep the fixed amount of space in FTP server,
by which we will the incur fixed price cost. The S3 capablitiry will enable us to pay per use and it each quota of S3 will be far lower than that of FTP server.

Our Data Warehouse Reports have been intergrated into the other external system.
We come to get the data all the way to FTP server and transer it into the another directory for integration in to the environment that is almost entirely Amazon hosted.
If we could send DWH file into S3 bucket and handle it in the AWS programming, our integration will be much easier and cheaper, that brings Adobe capability higher.

Thanks if taking its considertion into account.

aiurateria 01-08-2016

MUST!!

kevintrannz 12-07-2018

Hi Adobe,

Do we have any internal plan to make this feature available in Data Warehouse ? (same as in Data Feeds)

Thanks,

Kevin Tran.

james_cf2588405 12-07-2018

Kind regards,

Google+.

THANK YOU

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:57 PM kevintrannz <forums_noreply@adobe.com>

ericmatisoff
Employee
03-08-2018

I've upvoted as well. Also, want to point out that S3 is an option for Data Feeds.

Agree that it'd be great to match the same outputs in Data Warehouse as we have in Data Feeds (not only adding S3, but also including Azure, SFTP, FTP).

Gigazelle
Employee
24-07-2019