Build better products with our product team
Description: Make it possible to delete a report suiteWhy is this feature important: To clean up accounts or prevent an old, legacy report suite from receiving traffic (and therefore causing cost)How should this feature work: Add a button to the report suite manager that, after a confirmation dialog, will trigger the deletion of a report suiteCurrent behavior: Right now it is not possible to delete a report suite, though you can hide it from being displayed to the user
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Having an editorial feature to configure mapping of JSON fields Use-case: To decouple SPA deployments from Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Having an adapter layer that facilitates dynamic mapping of JSON fields between AEM components and frontend SPA components. This approach ensures that changes in frontend development require minimal configuration in AEM, promoting a more agile and independent deployment process. Current/Experienced Behavior: SPA deployment has to align with AEM deployments whilst mock data mapping in place. Improved/Expected Behavior: Realtime testing in pre-prod environments before hand. Also, helps in productivity by reducing dependencies in wider teams(Infra Dev and QA) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: PremierLeague Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
This idea is for Reviewer/Work license users to have the ability to view financial data/expenses within a project they are on. Right now they cannot see any financial data on the project because their plan license does not allow for "manage" rights even though the access level for the Reviewer licenses is set up with "View" under the "Financial Data" category - which does not work because of my previously stated comment about "manage rights". (sigh) I previously submitted this bug (err, feature) as a support ticket which was later closed because of the whole manage rights thing. But it is still an issue for us as we would like certain users to see this information... specifically for the project they are on. The option to give Financial Data (view) access can still be given/selected but does not work (again, because of the "manage rights" problem). Today I submitted a follow-up ticket which will probably get the same response originally given (you guessed it, because of the "manage rights" roadblock)... but I digress. :) So if this is a pain point for you too, please consider upvoting this idea to actually give the view rights to any license user we desire. Thanks in advance!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently, the list of available languages displayed in the Language Copy dropdown is sourced from the out‑of‑the‑box definitions located in /libs/wcm/core/resources/languages. To add or customize languages (such as adding Kazakhstan using ISO code “kk” or “kk‑KZ”), customers must overlay this resource to /apps/wcm/core/resources/languages. This enhancement proposes introducing a configurable authoring dialog (or admin interface) that allows administrators to manage the languages list in the Language Copy feature without the need to overlay OOTB files. Problem Statement: Current Behavior: The list of supported languages is static and defined in the repository under /libs/wcm/core/resources/languages. Customizations require creating an overlay (/apps/wcm/core/resources/languages), which is manual, error‑prone, and requires technical expertise. Impact: Customers who need to add or update language definitions (for example, when a new language like Kazakhstan is needed) must rely on a technical workaround. This process prevents non‑technical users (or content administrators) from easily managing the list and can lead to inconsistencies. Proposed Solution:Develop a new configuration dialog or admin interface that: Provides a user-friendly interface for managing the list of locales available in the Language Copy dropdown. Allows administrators to: Add new language entries (e.g., defining the ISO code, display name, and any associated metadata). Edit or remove existing entries. Reorder the languages as needed. Integrates seamlessly with the existing language copy functionality so that any changes in the dialog take immediate effect in the target dropdown. Uses a persisted configuration, such as an OSGi configuration or JCR node under /apps, ensuring that changes remain consistent across updates and do not rely on repository overlays of OOTB files. Benefits: Improved Usability: Authors and administrators can manage language definitions in a straightforward, non‑technical manner without editing repository files. Flexibility: The languages list becomes easily configurable, allowing for quick adaptations (e.g., new language support, corrections to existing definitions). Reduced Maintenance Overhead: Eliminates the need to overlay and maintain duplicate resources, reducing the risk of misconfiguration after updates. Use-case: A customer wants to include Kazakhstan in their language copy options. Instead of overlaying /libs/wcm/core/resources/languages to /apps/wcm/core/resources/languages and manually adding the language definition, the admin navigates to a “Language Copy Configurations” dialog, clicks “Add Language,” enters “Kazakhstan” with ISO code “kk” (or “kk‑KZ”), and saves the change. The Language Copy dropdown now immediately reflects the new language setting without any manual repository changes. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently the Language Copy dropdown is not configurable by the author Improved/Expected Behavior: Provides a user-friendly interface for managing the list of locales available in the Language Copy dropdown. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 all versions Customer-name/Organization name: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES - ACOM Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - It would be nice to have the read receipt function when someone reads your update, currently within our organization, we have a number of users that "ghost" our project managers or claim they never saw the message. The read receicpt functionality would help to decrease the number of those issues I believe. For the second part of my idea, having the ability to highlight and/or change the color of the font would mimic other communication platforms such as Teams and Outlook that allow for the user to highlight important information or call our different color text to mean certain this. It would just add another layer of customization for communicating in updates.Why is this feature important to you - I believe it will lessen issues regarding missed notifications as well as increase productivity if users know someone can see they have read their message.How would you like the feature to work - Once the person opens to the update that was sent to them, it automatically sends notification if that notification is toggled on in the users profile to show the sender the message was read and also shows the time and date stamp the message was read underneath the message in updates.Current Behaviour - There is no current behavior for this
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Request to make paraformat options configurable for Richtext field in content fragment in AEM 6.5.20 Use-case: Ability to author H4 to H6 in richtext field in content fragments in AEM 6.5.20 Current/Experienced Behavior: Richtext field(sling:resourceType=dam/cfm/admin/components/authoring/contenteditor/multieditor) in content fragment supports paraformat options from H1 to H3. If we have to add H4 to H6, it needs overriding of OOTB file /libs/clientlibs/granite/richtext/core/js/plugins/ParagraphFormatPlugin.js which should not be the case Improved/Expected Behavior: Please make the paraformat options configurable / make all the standard header options (H1 to H6) available OOTB Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.20 Customer-name/Organization name: NRG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Documentation shows that only a limited set of activities are compatible with the VEC:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/target/using/experiences/spa-visual-experience-composer#s... Description - Automated Personalization, Auto Target, and Recommendations are not supported by the Visual Experience Composer. Why is this feature important to you - Requesting these activity types get support through the VEC in the future, to enable SPA sites to utilize Adobe Sensei activities (Automated Personalization + Auto Target) and Recommendations. How would you like the feature to work - Enable "Current View" to display and for ViewName to be recognized from Single Page Applications when in the VEC for Automated Personalization + Auto Target activities. Current Behaviour - The VEC does not recognize ViewName, and activities do not render based on the ViewName. Documentation shows that only a limited set of activities are compatible with the VEC:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/target/using/experiences/spa-visual-experience-composer#s...
Description -I want to be able to send a file to proof but the way our organization works is with multiple artboards in one file. This would streamline a process by eliminating a step of export and mockup. How would you like the feature to work -Currently, I run into an error when sending the proof to workfront with multiple artboards. So I have to export JPGS and place them into another file to arrange the creative properly for the mockup approval.
Right now we can only edit comments if we have "Commenting Beta" enabled but only for 15 mins, after the comment/update was posted, we need to have to possibility to edit them at any moment, not only 15 mins after. Thank you.
Description - I think it will be great if campaign has a built-in change log to workflows that shows who made what changes and when. Why is this feature important to you - This will help improve collaboration, simplify troubleshooting, and support audit requirements especially in scenarios when multiple users edit the same campaign.How would you like the feature to work - When a user edits a workflow (adds/removes activities, makes changes in properties, modifies queries, etc.), the platform should automatically log the change with username, timestamp and type of change.Current Behaviour - Currently Adobe campaign does not track changes made to workflows. In case multiple users work on same campaign, its difficult to identify who made which all changes. This lack of visibility can lead to confusion, rework, errors etc.
Description - The AWS S3 connector provides a way to generate presigned URLs for both GET and PUT operations to a bucket.Why is this feature important to you - In WF/Fusion implementations (a common stack), if the customer is an AWS shop, a lambda function must be deployed just to generate presigned URLs. I _believe_ you could re-create the presigned URL algorithm in Fusion using the SHA256 HMAC function, but it's more intuitive to just use AWS's `boto3` and write a ~15 line script for generating presigned URLs and returning GET and PUT urls for a given object key. And it would be even _more_ intuitive to just have the option in Fusion.How would you like the feature to work - Either create a separate S3 module for "Presigned URLs", or, enable a toggle on the Download a file/Upload a file modules to return presigned URLs, allowing the user to input desired expiry and other inputs to the presigned URL generation process.Current Behaviour - No presigned URL generation for AWS S3 whatsoever.
Description: I want to have the ability to save the columns of a specific report as a new View.Why is this feature important to you: sometimes we figure that it will be good to have the same view of a report within the specific object and we need to manually create the view copying the report.How would you like the feature to work: within the reports editing view, columns (View) section, right next to the "Apply existing View" button, labeled as "Save columns (View) as new view".Current Behavior: there's no easy way to replicate a view (columns) of a report as a view in the object's list itself.
Description -I'm creating A/B test using AT auto-allocate but unable to choose AA calculated metrics for my optimization goal, while I still can use AA calculated metrics for my Experience Targeting activities. Why is this feature important to you - AA calculated metrics allow us to flexibly targeting events which is not well define by AA events yet How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour -
We are currently unable to capture url parameters when a user engages with a dialogue in Dynamic Chat. This is a big miss IMHO because it means we're unable to align dynamic chat engagement with campaign activities, or campaign costs. Many people user UTM parameters, and we currently use GCLID and CMPID as parameters to align user engagement to marketing activity, and marketing investment. Capturing these parameters is critical to showing DC value.
Description - When a request/issue is made we have a custom form where a user can select a product or program associated with a different portfolio. When the request is converted into a project, our project manager has to manually change the product or program field that in the overview section for the newly created project, based on what was input in the custom form on the request. Why is this feature important to you - It creates a lot of confusion and extra work for our project manager to try to manage these two fields. If they forget to change one of them it alters reports and dashboards for them and for management. How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice if there was a way to automatically populate the product or program field in the overview section of the project based on the field in the custom form of the request and even better to tie the two fields together so that if it's updated in the overview, it's updated in the custom form. Once the request is converted into a project the field in the custom form is used as a reference only, so it could even turn into a read-only or calculated field. Current Behaviour - Right now, the custom form field is separate from the product or program field on the project and both fields must be maintained and updated separately.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I often find my self in difficulty while comparing properties of a node in AEM CS instance, where crx/de is not accessible. So for accessibility purpose this will be a very good enhancement for Repository Browser in AEM CS. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Repository Browser in its current form, is not having property type option as it used to be in CRX/DE so it is often confusing where it is String or Long or Boolean for some of the value. Though it is provided "[]" for array type but which type of array it is. Some time we just need to compare number of property, since there is no numbering for each property we need to count one by one property this is very problematic. Improved/Expected Behavior: Type column for property and serial number for the same should be there. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): CRX/DE: Expected: Repository Browser: Should be improved: Code package (if applicable): NA
There are several UX issues with how the notes are implemented Why is this feature important to you - In a large scenario it's often useful to see notes when fairly zoomed out. It's a nuisance to have to zoom in to see if the note is even the one I need. The positioning takes the cake. Now I get to drag, too, just to read notes. Notes should make my dev life easier - not add to my cognitive burden 🙂 How would you like the feature to work - I want note cards to open exactly where I positioned them I also want to not have to erase boiler plate text when creating a note I also want to be able to READ the note without having to zoom in So: - don't auto position notes, ever unless someone clicks Auto-align. Then move the note along with the module/filter it's attached to. Don't move the note as if it were a module - clicking a note should open what is the "editor" and show me the full note body (with scroll bar if needed) and and edit/delete button - use the attribute "placeholder" instead of hard-coded content Current Behaviour - - notes are parked a mile away - notes are illegible unless I zoom in - i have to delete a boilerplate text when creating a new note
The current function of the Workfront Boards filters seem to be set up on an OR statement meaning if multiple filter options are selected the filter will pull [this selection] OR [that selection], and not [this selection] AND [that selection]. For example, we have a member of our team attempting to use the Boards column filter to see any tasks that are aligned to one particular project AND assigned to one particular user, but for some reason it is only pulling tasks assigned to the one particular user. It is extremely important to have flexible filtering options throughout Workfront and especially for Boards since they are used to allow teams to work in an agile way. If the filters are not flexible and easy to use then they present roadblocks to the teams attempting to use them. In a perfect world, the Workfront Boards column filter would work similar to the way the report filters do or work the same way as the intake filters do in boards. We are currently able to select OR or AND filters when crafting Workfront Boards intake column filters (found by clicking Configure), but the regular column filters do not give you the same options (found by clicking Filter). I've provided screenshots below to highlight the differences.
Description - Allow recurring advanced search filters to be saved so users don't have to re-enter the filter parameters every time. Why is this feature important to you - The new advanced search page isn't "sticky", so users are spending time re-entering search filters every time they navigate away
Can we get shortened URL links for sharing Workfront proofs similar to bit.ly URLs?When there is a need to reference another Workfront proof in a comment or to share the link another way, the URL is very long (about 180 characters). A short URL is always better.
Subscribing to Projects, Tasks, and Issues is a great feature... and our users would love to view and manage all of their subscriptions in one place. This could be incorporated into the Recent Items & Favorites, or added as a new "Subscriptions" icon in the top right. If that's too much of a stretch, could we at least create a report or reports that filters on items subscribed to?
Description - I use Boomerang's return to inbox functionality in Outlook frequently (where you can set a time for an email to return to you or send you an alert if you haven't received a reply yet). But, most of my communication happens in Workfront, so it would be nice to have a similar feature there. Why is this feature important to you - It would be an easier and automated way to make sure that time sensitive responses are not missed without having to manually manage them. How would you like the feature to work - When you post a comment, have the ability to send me (the comment poster) an alert or email or something if I haven't received a reply to my comment by a certain date (allow the user to pick the date / time). Bonus points if you could select the specific user that you specifically need a response from. ie - there are 5 people tagged, but I REALLY need a response from Bob. Send me an alert if Bob hasn't replied by Friday at 3pm (or whatever day/time I choose) Current Behaviour - I don't think this exists at all?
Description -Why is this feature important to you - we need to track documents, specifically proof versions, to gage the extent of approvals on each verison of a document.How would you like the feature to work - It would function like most other reports in WF: a dropdown in the upper left to export data as PDF, Excel, etc.Current Behaviour - Not able to export data from this type of report
So I select a bunch of report suites and go to edit the classifications to make them consistent. "The classifications for this report do not match for all report suites. Only classifications that match exactly can be viewed and edited across report suites." Now wouldn't it be helpful to tell me which report suites aren't exactly the same?
Hi, Currently there is not simple feature to allow us to update the approver ID through Fusion so that we can read data from either custom form or assigned to ID fields and accordgly assign that ID as an approver ID for a existing approval process.It will greatly help in streamlining approval processes where an approver can be dynamic entity from a wider team depending on some conditions
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
