It would be great to be able to classify standard reports. We end up having to use custom variables to copy the reports and the data never ties exactly.
Hi,Currently in the workspace we can use the option "Display only selected rows".Can we add the opposite : "Hide selected rows" or "Delete selected rows" and recalculate the total ?Best regards,Mathilde
Currently when month segment is used in calculated metrics it doesnt roll up or aggregate tot he changed time period. For example: Lets say for some reason there was no data for a page during April 01 to April 15, and calculated metric is built with If function to populated static number (say 1000) for those days, data display appropriately with day breakdown however when date range is changed to week/month/quarter it doesnt aggregate instead display 1000.
Running into an issue with visitor vs. hit level segments, that's also causing issues with virtual report suites and the new distinct count segment operator.Basically, it seems like regardless of where segments are applied, visitor segment is always applied first, then hit-based segmentation second.Example:Visitor level segment where it only includes visitors that have 1 distinct value for something like "shopping category"Apply a hit-level segment to exclude some category values (possibly due to accidentally bad data, or if you want to analyze a subset).The result is you still have visitors in the 1 distinct value segment, but they have no hits. These visitors should be moved into the 0 distinct value segment since their hits were deleted.The problem that exists currently is that if you end up with data pollution, you have no way to delete bad data and the dimension now becomes error-prone when doing the intended reporting.
Hi Adobe,since ages I wait for you to do some proper stuff for your customers. This is the first time I follow the invitation to place the idea here, but I still find it blaming for you that I have to do so!Here's why:- I need YTD- I need it through sFTP- For sure there will be more than 50.000 rows of dataUnfortunately, there is no tool that can fulfill all the 3 requirements!YTD can only be fetched through Report builder but it wouldn't support rows more than 50,000 and it delivers to FTP only!Data warehouse will give you unlimited rows with SFTP support but doesn't support YTD feature!Don't talk about delivering by mail and forget reports & Analytics or Workspace!This is like the distinct count, which is also not available and a ton of other really normal things when working with data, but you're the Leader in analytics, well....
Currently the printer-friendly options for Workspace are horrendous - the PDF always displays as a single page, regardless of project length. And I get this is partially because the full breadth of features are in visiting the page, but not all of our clients have the user capacity to create a new login for every person to whom they want to distribute this information.Idea is two-fold:- Create a "Page Break" option/feature so reports can be more easily designed for printing of the reportAND- Create Workspaces that can be viewed by anyone with a link (not required to use a login or allow logins that don't count against total users)It severely limits the usability of Workspace in the current format, as our clients have to budget when they can actually use it and many end-users of the data still prefer physical documents in front of them.
Can we have the ability to alter rule builder vai the admin / classfication api? When you have hundered of sites imapcted by serveral rules it would be nice to utalize an api to do bulk edits. ThanksSteven
It would be infinetely beneficial to enable processing rules to build/handle the product variable. This is something other 3rd party tools like Segment & mParticle are able to do. As our implementation becomes more complex and spans multiple platforms we are reliant on mutliple developers (web, ios, android, windows, etc) for implementation support. Asking our developers to update the product string for all new measurement requirements requires time & money. However, asking them to prgoramatically solve adding new variables to a product context variable (or any context variable) reduces developement resources and increases implementation speed & flexibility. It would be great if we could pass an array of product data as a context variable that we could then use to build the product string with processng rules. See below for an example array. Also, it would be an added bonus if we no longer had to set s.events for events existing wthin the product variable. But if this idea ever comes to fruition, I would hope the processing rule would automatically do the work for us. : ) {category: xxxxx,prooduct: xxxxx,units: xxxxx,revenue: xxxxx,variable1: xxxxx,variable2: xxxxx,variable3: xxxxx,etc},category: xxxxxprooduct: xxxxx,units: xxxxx,revenue: xxxxx,variable1: xxxxx,variable2: xxxxx,variable3: xxxxx,etc
I would have to say the transition from the admin console to manage group permissions in Adobe Analytics has taken a significant step DOWN. The UI on Adobe Analytics, while clunky in its performance, at least gave us the ability to quickly interact with and understand the context for what choices were related to certain functionalities. There is nothing intuitive in the choices provided in the newer interface, and worse, any new user to administrating user access will have no clue what certain choices relate to in the product.Which is easier to understand, Screen A or Screen B?Screen A:Screen B:PLEASE update the interface in Screen B, which is the current configuration of the Admin Console to help us manage our associates' access more efficiently.Please provide groupings for better understandingPlease provide mouse over descriptions to aid understandingDo not reset the user to the top of the list every time they add an itemDo not reset the user to the top of the list every time they search and add an itemThanks!
Allow for configuration of colors like you can do for conditional formatting. Right now this visualization displays data best against a positive goal, meaning more is good = green. What if you want to visualize costs and you don't want to go over a certain budget threshold? Allow not only changing of the scale but also defining whether high or low is good vs. bad.
Problem:I see many Workspace (or standard Reports) users drilling down from things like Marketing Channel Last Touch reports down to other reports like "Referrers." The problem here is that the user is drilling down from one report/var that might be Last Touch, 30 Days to another variable that is Last Touch, Visit. This causes breakdowns that do not make sense to the average user.As a consultant, I have answered question as to why things like this do not make sense for more than 10 years (i.e. the basic idea that not all things should be broken down by one another just because they can be), and this comes up on a regular basis to this very day.Solution:When hovering over a dimension or clicking the "i" icon, integrate admin console data as to the attribution and expiration of that dimension (to at least make people aware of a possible difference if they lookWhen one dimension is dragged under another (for drill-down) notify the user with a message as to the fact that they are using dimensions with different attributions and/or expirations.#2 may be difficult to execute since dimensions can be used in segments and other complex ways. But at a minimum #1would speed things up so that a user (who has admin access) doesn't have to go to the admin console to look up this information.
With everything changing over to Admin Console for user management within Adobe Analytics, it would be extremely helpful for us to have the ability to include some additional information against our users:A notes section, which would provide a centralized location and an easy documentation process for recording any important notes about a user's role as well as the justification for the role any specific user is given.A way to designate 1 or more individuals as overall lead Administrators for any certain tool, especially Adobe Analytics, because we have a number of different groups who use the tool. As a result, it make it a lot easier for us to identify a very small subset of individuals who can make decisions about the entire tool.Last, if we could also have the ability to give a user the ability to Administrate a single report suite instead of gaining Admin access to the entire tool, that would be EXTREMELY helpful and provide for a better security model.Thanks in advance!
Hello Team,Right now getPercentPageViewed Plugin is not working for Single Page Applications. Kindly help to update the plugin so that we can use it for Single Page Applications.Thank You!Arun
Adobe CampaignUse Case: Our business has departments and business functions using ACS with their own "Brand Instance" within ACS. Example: Sub brands of our company who send visitors via email to one or more websites we own. We have separated report suites within Adobe Analytics for our sub brands and our various websites/apps. We would like to send our ACS data into their corresponding report suite relevant to their website and/or sub brand.Issue: Currently the new Adobe Campaign Standard integration with Adobe Analytics brings all campaign data into the selected Adobe Analytics report suite, not just specific "Brand instances" or "Programs".Feature/Idea Request: Allow for more ability when setting up the ACS and Adobe Analytics integration to filter for specific data based on all or most of the variables available in ACS (brand, delivery, program, etc). This would allow us to provide email metrics and data in Adobe Analytics per report suite that is relevant to the website or sub brand owning those report suites and not see a bunch of ACS data not relevant to their business function.
Some versions of Regex include a "\L" syntax that allows a string to be forced to lowercase. This would be really useful as at the moment the classification that is created reflects the case of the original input - which can lead to messy looking values in reports. For example... Input value:website.com/PROMotion RegEx:^(.+)(\/.+)$ Mapping rule:$2 Results in:"/PROMotion" appearing in the report, where as I would prefer "/promotion" to appear in the report Note: this is about the output, not the matching criteria - aware we can already do case insensitive matching
Trying to enforce a naming convention taxonomy in Adobe Audience Manager and utilize that for reporting in Analytics is burdensome and prone to error. It also requires the creation of segments in order to roll those segments up into broad criteria for reporting. It would be massively helpful if Audiences ID could be described using a user-defined classification table to support reporting in Adobe Analytics.
Right now it is not possible to create product profiles via the API, but only manually within the Admin Console. Since this is very time consuming and annoying, it would be great if it will be changed.
when I try to transfer an asset from one user to the other, I have 3 things that makes the process slow. I kindly request the following changes to the "asset transfer process"1) by default all categories/assets are checked. that means if I only want to transfer some of all the items, I first need to disable/uncheck all categories before starting to select. since the most common case is to transfer single items:=> set "unchecked" all items by default2) transferring single assets from a user with a huge library can be a mess. I would love to search for names/tags as it is possible in any other asset manager screen (eg. project manager, segment manager,...)=> implement an option to search for names/tags3) when transferring assets from an admin to a non admin user, the receiver gets admin rights. that means I need to hot to admin console and undo the change.=> add option to disable "admin" propagation
See in the Admin Console > under Products > Permissions. How do I get a lising of the Metrics, Dimensions, etc… So what I need is a csv of the 1,400+ Metric, the 580+ Dimensions, the 50+ Report Suite Tools and the 35+ Analytics Tools.Also a short definition of each item in the Report Suite Tools and the Analytics Tools would be very useful.
We have many report suites, and many users, each of which can see only 1 or 2 report suites. I have access to all the report suites. I need to make a dashboard that I can share with all the users. When each user views the dashboard, it needs to show the data for the report suite that the user has access to. So the dashboard will be a template that is filled in with different data, depending on who is using it. This could be done by each user having a default report suite that will be used automatically in the dashboard, or by letting me assign a report suite for each user that will be used in the dashboard.The current situation requires me to re-create the dashboard, along with all reportlets, for every single user, using a different report suite each time. Since we could have over 100 report suites and users, this is time consuming and impractical. Thanks,Christopher Stanwood
The "Devices" Report, probably based on data from DeviceAtlas.com is not really useful, since it contains the device identifier in the Name string and thus does not group equivalent devices. There are e.g. dozens (hundreds?) of "Galaxy S7" devices which are all the same, but have slightly differing names. Utilisation of more inclusive DeviceAtlas tables would be beneficial here. Today, we don't know our most common Android devices -- especially since the Devices Report can not be classified.For example: https://sc5.omniture.com/x/5_1uf35 lists all "Galaxy S7" devices. However, - Orange Galaxy S7 (SM-G930F)- Verizon Galaxy S7 (SM-G930V)- T-Mobile Galaxy S7 (SM-G930T)and dozens of others are all listed as individual devices. This is not at all helpful when trying to understand common hardware in your userbase. It would already be helpful if "Device Name" would be available in two variable, e.g. "Samsung Galaxy S7" and "SM-G930". Even better if these variables would be classifieable.
I depend a lot on the use of Workspace Templates in my usage. Now that we have all of the standard templates and a growing number of custom templates, the initial "All Templates" tab is pretty long for me.But I, personally, tend to use just a few of those templates (but I use those few many times a day).I would like to be able to tag or mark as "favorite" templates - the effect of which is then to have a new (default) tab in the New Project dialog that shows me just my favorited templates (but still leave the "All", "Standard" and "Custom" tabs in that dialog). This would empower the user to control their work environment and help improve productivity.This is related to idea 10402 - "Ability to hide standard templates" - taking a different approach to the same problem.
I am shocked that this isn't already supported.
Hello ActivityMap developers!ProblemWhen I use the ActivityMap plugin on a given page, it only lets me select the report suite(s) currently populated in s.account variable on the page. I understand the logic behind this probably has something to do with ensuring users only select the correct report suite(s) for a given page, and it seemed easiest to ensure this by referencing s.account on a given page. However, In practice, this does not work in practice for a lot of our clients. A lot of our clients dynamically populate s.account based on a variety of things, such as logged in user type, or IP address. So for example visitors on their network (employees) will pop an internal rsid instead of the normal visitor rsid. But since ActivityMap only allows you to select what s.account pops with, many of our clients are unable to make use of it for the data they actually want to look at 99% of the time - visitor activity (vs. activity for their own internal rsid). One "workaround" to this is before activating ActivityMap, open up the js console and assign the desired rsid to s.account. Then open run ActivityMap, and it will allow to select the desired rsid. But this is not a good solution for several reasons. First, it is a process that has to be repeated on every page view: exit ActivityMap, update s.account, log back into ActivityMap. Second and more importantly, setting s.account to another rsid affects data collection on the page. Anything that triggers an AA call on the page (e.g. a link click) would send data to that rsid instead of where it normally goes (internal rsid). SuggestionSo, my suggestion is to have ActivityMap list all available rsids for a given account. You can have ActivityMap flag/highlight/whatever which rsid(s) are currently in s.account to make it easier for people who benefit from how it currently works. But also allow for ActivityMap to select any rsid so that users with scenarios such as the above can actually use ActivityMap without shady workarounds.
We need a time segment that take current weekday and compare it to average of the same weekday the last 12 weeks. Eg. One section has xx pageviews this Friday - and to find out if its high or low level, we need the average of the last 12 weeks, on the same day. As we are a news publisher house, we cannot just compair with yesterday or same day last week, as everyday is affected of todays history. The segment is required to be rolling dates as we wan't to display the numbers in a data visualization app.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
