Description - Refresh icon / button on the Updates section to see if any instant replies has been received.Why is this feature important to you - saves time without having the need to refresh the page or go elsewhere in the site.How would you like the feature to work - like the Dashboard report refresh, a refresh button on the UPdates / comments section wlill be very useful.Current Behaviour - when the comments are made, message is sent to the person intended to. However his//her reply is not seen unless we refresh or come back again on the same page later.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When we search any asset on author / Filter the assets, post doing that when we select single/multiple assets, can't see create option and hence unable to trigger the workflow for assets. Can we enable create option so business able to trigger the workflow. Use-case: 1. Business go to author 2. Search the assets / Apply filter and search the assets. 3. Select list of assets post searching. 4. Business looking for the option to trigger the workflow. (to run on single/multiple assets) Current/Experienced Behavior: Create option not visible. (So workflow option unable to use) Improved/Expected Behavior: If we can enable the create option, business can trigger workflow on searched/filtered assets. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.5 ( Also checked in 6.5.7 same behaviour) Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): You can try on vanilla instance. (6.5.7/6.5.5)
Proposing to have 'general time' included within actual hours on the Resource Planner page. While planned and actual project hours tell the story of resource utilization, the missing piece to this story is seeing how general time spent on non project work (administration, training, research, etc.) impacts each users overall utilization. It would also be nice to have the option to filter types of hours. For example, filtering to exclude all general time or specific general time categories. This would give everyone more flexibility in using the resource planner based on how they work and what they consider actual time for utilization/capacity purposes.
Description - The new Boards feature can be configured per layout to show or not show. However, the task menu option always shows "Add to Boards" and "Add to Workstreams", even though users do not have access to boards. This creates confusion and potentially issues of tasks being moved without a way to recover or review. Why is this feature important to you - We cannot fully control access to Boards currently. How would you like the feature to work - If a user's layout does not include Boards, there should not be any options related to Boards
Description - The current local search feature only searches within the current page showing. With a 2k record limit per page, if there are multiple pages of data, the local search does not work to filter the resulting list to just the matching search items. This mean the search is useless since I still have to page through the list to get to the page that might have a local search match. Why is this feature important to you - This is an important feature because it allows searching within the current object without having to page (search for projects in the entire project list or a resource within the entire resource list) How would you like the feature to work - It should do a server-side filter of the search string rather than a local filter on the current page of data. Current Behaviour - Anything in the search box will only match records within the current page of data.
I'm aware that Workfront Reporting Canvas will be available in coming months, but it would be nice to have Workfront API working with Viz tools like Power BI and Tableau.
The new mobile scorecards look great, but SSO organizations that need to be logged in to their corporate network, can't utilize this.I'd like to see Adobe create a mobile device authentication that links a SSO user to a mobile device.For example, If I had scorecards to view in the app (I had either created or they were shared with me in my primary account) perhaps I could access a tool in Adobe Analytics to "Link a Mobile Device". I would submit a phone number, and a unique link would be sent to my phone to authenticate my phone's Adobe App belongs to my SSO account (by way of a shadow account, perhaps). This shadow account would only have access to scorecards in the app, and perhaps needs to be reauthenticated every 30-90 days based on your company's infoSecurity policies. However... if your SSO account is disabled, your scorecard stops working immediately as well.
Description - I think it would be handy if a calculated metric indicated an annotation when one of the metrics inside the calculated metric has an annotation. Having to add calculated metrics to the annotation list can be cumbersome, and users across our enterprise may have made their own calculated metric and are unaware of the annotation on one of the building-block metrics. Why is this feature important to you - I think this would provide context to any abnormalities seen using calculated metrics, especially to those who aren't in the data everyday. How would you like the feature to work - I would like annotations to show up for Calculated Metrics based on the building-blocks of said calculated metric. For example, I have a calculated metric of "Room Nights per Order" (room nights / orders) that showed a historical dip with no annotation available. I added in the metrics Room Nights and Orders on their own to the table, and once added the annotations explaining the historical dip appeared as expected. I think an annotation should automatically come up if a calculated metric is using a metric that has an annotation. Current Behaviour - Currently, calculated metrics don't show an annotation unless it is specified for that exact metric. Thanks!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable cropping of WebP images in AEM Assets. Use-case: Enable cropping of WebP images in AEM Assets. Current/Experienced Behavior: Cropping of WebP images is currently not supported in AEM. When trying to Edit / crop it shows the following message: "Editing is not supported for this type of assets." Improved/Expected Behavior: Cropping of WebP is possible. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service. Customer-name/Organization name: Hugo Boss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like the following feature - Cache Hit Ratio to be refined as a factor for Optimization in BPO Reports Use-case: We received a BPO Report highlighting Cache Hit Ratio of 80% against Adobe's recommendation of 90%.The implementation is AEMaaCS thus using Adobe's Fastly CDN. The metric is also calculated at CDN end. However, a large number of requests which are received at Dispatcher are not cache able. (Health Check based requests like /system/probes/health, /system/probes/live, /system/probes/ready and Bot Based Requests like GET /3x.php/?3x=3x which are blocked at Dispatcher) Current/Experienced Behavior: The metric calculated at CDN would take into account both bot based requests which are blocked at Dispatcher (but not CDN!) and Health Check based requests which are not cached and served to Publish instances via Dispatcher. Improved/Expected Behavior: The metric should exclude these service based requests (if not already done). Also, these bot requests should ideally be excluded from the data collected at CDN. (This might be possible only if these requests are blocked at CDN.) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS - Version - 2023.1 Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): These logs are manually analyzed for 16th March 2023. Code package (if applicable): @kautuk_sahni, @jagpreet_singh_
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like to add the following feature: Extend support for videos and content fragments to be part of Connected Assets. Use-case: We would like to establish a remote DAM instance as single source of truth across all environments. The DAM instance will store not only images and documents but videos & content fragments as well. Current/Experienced Behavior: Videos & Content Fragments are not part of Connected Assets. Improved/Expected Behavior: Videos & Content Fragments should be accessible from Remote DAM Instance. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AMS - AEM 6.5.11 Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): @kautuk_sahni - This might not be a new feature request but would like to know the challenges involved in implementing this idea if it is categorized as non-feasible.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Related case #E-000849947 Use-case: Customer leverages AEM Assets & Screens on cloud service and AEM Sites on Managed service. They use Connected Assets to sync images from Assets CS to AEM Sites Managed service for use in component creation via drag & drop. Currently, they see all images that they have permission to on Assets cloud service. Including images that are not published to Dynamic media / scene7. More details can be found on #E-000849947 Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no way to filter these images with status Published / Unpublished. As a result they see too many images on the connected assets rail. Improved/Expected Behavior: Filtering for published & unpublished assets is necessary to be able to work efficiently on connected asset rail. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: configuration of columns orders in list views Use-case: in the view settings or directly in the table results, be able to change column order as prefered Current/Experienced Behavior: in the settings we can only sort by some of metadata Improved/Expected Behavior: the expected behavior is to be able to order as we want the different columns Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloudservice Customer-name/Organization name: Louis Vuitton Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When deploying to Production from the stage pipeline, if the user clicks Resume manually or Approve that a popup dialog would appear to request the user to confirm the deployment to Production. Use-case: If the user accidentally clicks on Resume manually or accidently clicks Approve Current/Experienced Behavior: The pipeline will deploy to Production without giving the user the option to cancel Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide a popup dialog box giving the user the option to cancel or proceed. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Your application code has been tested for quality and compiled into build artifacts REPOSITORY: OLDDOMINIONFREIGHTLINEINCProgram-p18552 BRANCH: release/WSP.2023.3 GIT TAG: 2023.303.1154227.0002373591 COMMIT: a97608cd708a9d72cfe36cfad945d55ff217fd9e Your built artifacts will be combined with the base AEM 2023.1.10912.20230130T173736Z to produce an image runnable in the cloud AEM RELEASE: 2023.1.10912.20230130T173736Z Customer-name/Organization name: Old Dominion Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use-case: Currently we have several projects / brands that are deployed on AEM, in the case of small fixes we are obliged to deploy all the projects /brands even if the fix concerns only one project / brand or a small module , which is very impactful in terms of deployment time if we consider that we deploy several times a day. We hope to have a way to deploy by project / brand instead of a global deployment, or even better a deployment of modules, sub-projects, or a selection of specific files, which will optimize the deployment time that we currently has (15 to 20 minutes on average). Current/Experienced Behavior: Deployment average 15 to 20 min Improved/Expected Behavior: Deployment average 10 min (depending of the files deployed) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Dev, QA, UAT, Stage, PROD Customer-name/Organization name: Accor Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Make `npm audit` a warning by changing it to audit-level="info" or remove it from the pipeline to prevent it blocking production builds Use-case: Npm audit should be used as an informative tool, not as a gateway test for building to production. The reason this is important is because most audit errors are caused by the build toolchain, and does NOT have an impact on the final application. Furthermore, remediation of npm audit is not always possible, meaning you'd be permanently blocked. For more info, see this article: https://overreacted.io/npm-audit-broken-by-design/ Current/Experienced Behavior: npm audit returns exit code 1, blocking the pipeline from continuing. Improved/Expected Behavior: npm audit returns exit code 0 using audit-level="info", or remove it from the pipeline commands. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Toyota Motors North America (TMNA) Screenshot (if applicable): Error code 1 being returned results in the pipeline stopping Code package (if applicable):
Description - Integrate Core Web Vitals data directly into Adobe Analytics. Why is this feature important to you - Currently have to use outside plugins or tools to find the Core Web Vitals data then cross-reference with Adobe Analytics data. How would you like the feature to work - Run Core Web Vitals reports directly within Adobe Analytics. Current Behaviour - Not applicable.
Description - Currently, all proof indicators switch to green when a proof is approved, even when some reviewers have yet to opened the proof. Users see this as a glitch as it indicates they have seen, commented, etc, when they have not.Why is this feature important to you - ease of use / clarity for usersHow would you like the feature to work - rather than turning green, can the indicators be marked n/a or something other than green? Current Behaviour - all proof indicators switch to green when a proof is approved, even when some reviewers have yet to open the proof
Description - Using the Task Reference #, Add the ability to include it in multiple projects that share the same task but use different workflows or need to see it as a trigger to start a workflow.Why is this feature important to you - Reduce template/workflow redundancy or being forced to include another team's workflow in a larger workflow just to keep the team notified.How would you like the feature to work - When creating a new task, have the option to plug in a Task Reference number from another project. Any updates made in one project would reflect across other projects using the same task#. All aliased tasks could be denoted by using italicized fonts.Current Behaviour - N/A
When copying a project, we would like to be able to remove the budget hours option in the checklist. We still want to allow PM’s to copy a project though but this new option would cause issues to our process if selected.
Hello everyone,When I add a comment to a proof on the desktop application, I can use Ctrl + N as a keyboard shortcut but it doesn't work as I expect on interactive proofs.For example, I create a proof for Google like the screenshot I attached, and open it using the desktop application.If I want to add a markup and a comment to the popup under the mic icon, I have to use any keyboard shortcut because the popup disappears when I move my mouse away.However, any keyboard shortcut doesn't work just after I do something on the page.To use the keyboard shortcut, I have to click the menu bar of the desktop application once.So, when I become able to use the keyboard shortcut, all popups already disappear.Does it make sense?I'm happy if you can agree with me and Workfront will improve the application!Regards,
Use Case - Stock Recommendation Objective: To show relevant buy/sell stock recommendation based on buyers watchlist option chosen in the website. Fields to be Used: Custom Object: Account Securities Custom Field: InWatchlist Custom Field: SecType Use Case Scenario If InWatchlist is Yes and has the SecType Containing specific counter want to show a banner for the user with buy/sell in the website. Example; If user has the counter Sectype DelMonte in Watchlist SecName: DelMonte InWatchList: Yes Then show the Delmonte Banner in web campaign for that particular user (In Future we wanted to make the text within banner to be dynamically updated from the data sets from custom objects) Current Issue: Since we are unable to import Custom Objects within the Account Database (below is screenshot) we are unable to identify that particular user has added the specific counter to his watchlist. And due to the same we are unable to fire the relevant web campaign.
Description - Email notifications are not very configurable, especially at the user level. It would be great if users could mute notifications for specific objects or the admin could select what statuses get overdue notifications.Why is this feature important to you - reduce notification SPAMHow would you like the feature to work - Enable users to mute email notifications on an object by object basis (for a day/week/month) and give admins the ability to configure what statuses do and do not get notifications. e.g. On Hold statuses do not get overdue notifications.Current Behaviour - Users and Admins cannot control notifications at this level causing users to enter arbitrary dates on requests to prevent notification overload.
Description - Formatting options for the message body of the email for scheduled report deliveryWhy is this feature important to you - 1. I would like to include a separate embedded link in the description field to display under the report name when a report if being viewed - (external link, not Workfront link) 2. I would like to use formatting to break up or bullet point report descriptions that display under the report name How would you like the feature to work - a formatting tool bar for the report description field would be idealCurrent Behaviour - currently, the text in the description field of a report displays as plain text under the name. I can use returns, however, I am unable to use bold, underline, italic or embed an html link in that field. If you use ONLY a url, then it is clickable. However, that is pointless when you cannot label it or explain why a user should click it.
Description - Formatting options for the message body of the email for scheduled report deliveryWhy is this feature important to you - 1. I would like to include embedded links in the body of the email instead of long, ugly urls 2. recipients do not pay attention to the plain text in the email notification for report deliveries. It is overshadowed by the large blue report name that looks like the primary point of the email message. How would you like the feature to work - a formatting tool bar to use in the Email Message field would be idealCurrent Behaviour - currently, the message body is lost because the report heading link looks like to most important part of the email and the plain text looks like secondary information or even disclaimer or footnote.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
