Adobe Workfront Fusion

I have a scenario that is mapping data into Workfront from excel  and the fields I'm trying to map to were created as Formatted Paragraph fields which are rich text fields.   I'm not able to map them directly as it throws an error [403] The following parameter value is invalid 'Ad Specs'. Please adjust and try again.   How do I convert the plain text into something that can be mapped into that field? 

Hi everyone, I have a question reg. parsing CSV. While processing data, it's replacing " with empty string to get clean data.Everything is working fine until we get comma separated values in one of the columns, for example "Senior Manager Audit, Compliance, and Risk Management" as then Fusion throws an error as it sees it as multiple columns and it does not match the expected number.I tried to escape it in different ways but was not able to make it work.Any idea how to do this? Could you please advise? 

I would like to use the answers from a custom form to change the assignment of a task within a project. Created Workfront Search module to look for the task with the template ID I needed. I filled in the collection section with "assignments:ID".Created a Workfront Misc Action module with the following:Record Type: Assignment Assignment Action: SwapUsersOnTasksID: Assignment ID (grabbed from the search module I described above)hardcoded in the userIDs for this test It seems that this updates the "Assigned to: ID" in the project's task, but the "assignments" column remains unchanged. Any thoughts on how to update the assignment column of the task?

Hi, does anyone know if Fusion can be used to create a parent projects, or tasks that are resolved by projects? For example, I have a project template with tasks which act as a checklist for the project manager. These tasks remind them to do things like "Create a Registration Page Project." So they will create the project, but there isn't a way to tie that project to that checklist task as a resolvable. I'm trying to find a way to tie that "child project" to the task, so that as the project percent complete updates, that task's percent complete updates. Has anyone tried this or something similar? Open to suggestions and other ways to achieve the parent/child project relationship.

Hi,  I have a set of modules in a scenario to convert approved issues to be project. However, I notice that we are not able to carry over the custom data from the issues to the resolving project unless the fields or forms are attached to the project beforehand.    I know we might be able to resolve this by attaching the custom form to the project template so that once it is converted, the forms will be there to capture the information from the requests.  However, we don't think this is feasible since we have a lot of queue topics with different forms and we don't want to bombard our project templates with 5-10 custom forms.  May I know what would be the best practices to carry over the custom data when converting an issue to a project using Fusion? Any appreciate is appreciated. Thanks! Regards, Arthur

I'm using the Workfront update record module to copy data from a CSV file to a custom form. I'm getting a 403 error message and I think its because I'm trying to map a text field to a field rich text field. I have tried formatting the data using the parameters available but still run into the same error. Does anyone have any suggestion on how to work around this error message?  {{stripHTML("<b>" + 2.`Topic / Research Subject` + "</b>")}}

Hello,  I'm still new to Fusion and learning. I recently started leveraging data stores and the related modules more and was wondering if there is a way to iterate through the entries in a data store without having to call each row/entry using the "Get a Record" Module for Data Store?  This seems like something most folks would want to do.  If there is no module for this, is it possible via API?  Curious,DD

Hi Everyone,I got a requirement in fusion as shown below,input JSON : [{"key1":"value1"},{"key1":"value2"},{"key1":"value3"}]OUTPUT [{"data":{"key1":"value1"}},{"data":{"key1":"value2"}},{"data":{"key1":"value3"}}]Split JSON array to individual JSON object by adding a common key for each Object to access in further modules. please help me with this. I appreciate any help you can provide. 

Hi all ,I am using 'Make a Basic Auth' fusion module to update metadata properties (calling PUT) in AEM after uploading Asset to AEM using 'upload an Asset' module. This works perfectly fine. Later when changes are made in Workfront, I want to update AEM asset Metadata Properties, in this case my 'Make a Basic Auth' with PUT is failing with 404 error even though I using same path in both cases. May I know where I am going wrong? If you have any examples, can you please share?

Hi all, I'm thinking through how to use teams in Fusion--along with other governance-y stuff. I'm pretty sure what I want to do but want to float out my thoughts.  The history of our instance of Fusion: We (Aetna) were the only users of Fusion till we brought in the other teams from CVS Health. Now that we're all in one place, I want to be sure that we have the right level of segmentation while allowing for use of shared scenarios.  So, my thinking: We have some scenarios that Aetna developed which run a bunch of different automations based upon a common trigger. I'm calling those scenarios "General" scenarios. For those scenarios, I'm planning on moving them into a new team called "General Enterprise Scenarios." Scenarios that are "Company" specific exist within teams (e.g. CVS Retail, Aetna, Caremark, Bob's Burgers, etc.). Integrations with other systems exist within their own teams.  Our governance structure for Workfront is relatively new but is n

Hi all, Pretty new to fusion and trying to work out a new problem. I think I am close but can't get it to work exactly.I am looking to find the previous version of a document with Fusion, if the new version is greater than the previous version then run the scenario. I have a different scenario that runs based of a watch event for new and update but was wondering if this alt route is possible? I was able to get all the versions using a read related module on the document versions.How would I filter for the last previous so I can assign it to a variable?I tired something like this but I can't get it to work: Bundle order position = Total number of Bundles - 1   Alternatively if there is a better way to pull the last version what would be the best module to use?   

Hello, The map() function allows you to get a subarray using filtered values. For example, if I have map(People[]; first_name; age; 20), the results will be a subarray that contains all the first_name variables in array People[] where the age is equal to 20. I am wondering if there is a way to use this function to get multiple variables in my subarray with multiple filters. For example, if I want to get all the first_name and last_names in array People[] where age is equal to 20 and height is equal to 172, does anyone know if there's a way to use the map filter to get this information? If not, is there any low operation way of getting a subarray with various filters on the big array?

Hi there, I'm struggling with two things - my custom form data from the issue carrying over into the newly created project, and, mapping assignments to that new project.The template online doesn't get into that detail.  Does anyone have a blueprint to share? Or screenshot of the scenario? Signed,Me - who goes on vacation in two weeks and backup is a noob

Sorry if this has been covered in the past.I've set up Fusion to trigger based on a form change. However, in my experience, the form needs to be the top form in the stack or Fusion doesn't trigger.Is this a known issue?

So I'm trying to create an event on a outlook calendar that was shared with me using dates from a Workfront Object (task) using the module called Microsoft 365 Calendar > Create Event module.What I noticed is that while the event is created on the calendar with no issue, is that the Start Date Time + End Date Time are always off (by several hours).  I found this on the help page related to the module but I'm having a hard time understanding why I'd need coercion to set the events date / time to match what is in WF.  The format suggestion below also does not work (I've also tried parsing the date and time using the format below with no result.Via: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/adobe-workfront-fusion/fusion-apps-and-modules/microsoft-365-calendar-modules#create-an-eventEnter a single point of time when the event starts in a combined date and time representation. Use the format ({date}T{time}; for example, 2017-08-29T04:00:00.0000000.An

I just wanted to say that I noticed the new Search modules available in Fusion today. Or rather, when I was working on a scenario, I noticed that my Search modules had "(Legacy)" next to them.This, of course, piqued my interest. So for fun*, I put a new Search module in a scenario, made it search for Documents, and exported it. 14k. OMG. Earlier today, I copied a legacy Search module, one that I use for Documents. Did the same thing. 202k. What a difference. Usually I come on here when I'm trying to think about something or when I want to complain about getting surveys in Workfront or something else. But this....this is such an amazing gift to get on a Thursday. So...just wanted to say thanks! -j *My current idea of "fun" needs some TLC. 

I just stumbled upon this - Could anyone tell me what Fusion's *concepts* mean?

I have a scenario built that will periodically check for On Hold Projects which and retrieve all updates (notes) made to that project since it was put on hold. If the Project sponsor has not provided an update since it was put on hold after a given timeframe, reminders will be sent out and/or the project will be changed to Dead if no response received.    The issue i'm facing is that when Fusion searches for projects and retrieves a collection of updates, no more than 20 updates are included. This poses a problem if the project sponsor responded "21 updates ago"    Does anyone know if/how you can increase the limit of collections that can be retrieved?  

Does anyone have a quick fix in which to add vacations, without having users enter it into your HR system, then Outlook for Out of Office, and then Workfront for Workload Balancer? All suggestions are appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Hi Fusion Community, We have field called 'Service Area' in our Salesforce Org.  It is a (single select) picklist field, but is changing to a multi select picklist field.  This field currently syncs data bi-directionally (SFDC --> WF and WF --> SFDC) to a related Service Area field on a program custom form in Workfront. It's looking like I need to change my Workfront field from a dropdown field to a text field to house what's coming from Salesforce if more than one value is being passed (e.g. Strategy, Implementation, Assessment).  However, making the Workfront Service Area field a text field leaves us open to data quality issues if someone updates these values in Worfkront, and inputs an incorrect value, and the system then needs to sync data back to Salesforce. Is there anything in Fusion I can do whereby I can keep both Service Area fields in each system as multi select picklists and still pass data bi-directionally (e.g. parse incoming data into

Hello, as it is not possible to setup the Automatic Reminders to apply only a certain groups or teams, I was thinking about another approach to achieve that. We need this feature, but not for all users / teams / groups.Does anybody know, if there is a possibility to send a Workfront email triggered by Fusion / an API call on a "direct way"?I am aware of the fact, that I could create a note or an announcement via the API / Fusion. But to make sure, that the user will also be notified by email, the necessary notification settings need to be active. I would like to avoid using another email server to send a reminder.In the API explorer, there is an endpoint called EMAILC under api-unsupported, which among other things has an action called sendEmailNotification, but I did not get this to work yet. Is there anybody, who already successfully used this endpoint? Thanks in advance. RegardsLars

Hi everyone,  Right now we are building a scenario to assign a specific user based on issue status selection. For example, if the issue status is set to be 'For Translation Review' we will put the issue assignment to John.  We are using the 'Update Record' module to set the assignment to specific users. However, what we are noticing is that the Assigned to ID function above will replace the assignment instead of adding more users to it. For example if there was another person assigned to the issue previously, Fusion will replace the old users with the new user ID put in the Assigned To ID in the module.  Is there a way for us to not un-assign the previous user assigned to the issue but to add more users to the assignment? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you! Regards, Arthur

Considering the current limitation of manual token refresh, what steps can be taken to mitigate the associated risks and improve the efficiency of the authentication process? Currently, we have to do a manual refresh of the token used for authentication. There is no direct way to automatically update the token within the system. Therefore, each time the token needs to be refreshed, it must be manually updated in the Headers field.This is for the field type, External Lookup, and currently our token refreshes about every 20 minutes due to security but also results in errors.   Is there a way to avoid this and have this somehow set up using Adobe Fusion? 

Hello all.  Does anyone know the syntax of the fulltext search in the Fusion execution history?  I can search for an object ID by putting double quotes around it but nothing else seems to work.  For example, searching for hyphenated words or multiple words doesn't return anything or just unconnected records.  Any help would be very useful.  Thanks v much

Has any seen a change in their OAuth modules and the client token not being passed correctly? We have several scenarios that use an OAuth module to connect with the Go To Webinar service. In these scenarios, we added the client token generated by GTW as part of the authorisation process. However, at some point on Thurs 28th 2024 there was a problem with the client token and the scenarios stopped working. After some manipulation, we were able to reauthorise the connection and pull out the newly generated client token (this information is usually all hidden in the Fusion module.) When we tried with the new client token we found that this information was not being passed up to GTW correctly. Instead we had too manually add this info into the Header as the following:Name: AuthorizationValue: Bearer xxxxxxxx (client token) While this worked intially, it quickly stopped working again with 404 errors.We found that the token expired after 1 hour (3600 seconds) and had