Adobe Workfront

I wanted to suggest an improvement regarding how we handle delegated issues in Workfront. As it stands, unless a delegate user takes ownership of a project, the delegated issue will only appear in their "my work" widget. This setup isn't quite streamlined enough for our needs. Could we request to have Workfront include delegated tasks in the "my task" widget as well? This adjustment would provide a more cohesive and efficient view, allowing us to better track and manage our responsibilities. Thank you for considering this suggestion. Looking forward to your thoughts on this matter.

What do we need:Create or update a user notification option that lets assignee(s) know when a task can start work!  (Can Start = True = Notification)                                        My Ask → Please Upvote this idea! There is currently not an option for users or admins to enable a notification to be sent to a user or team that is assigned to a task that lets them know that they can start working on a task; a trigger once the Can Start indicator on a task moves to True.   Users do not receive notifications that let them simply know they can start working on their task.   What’s available today in user notifications?   There is an option for “All predecessors of my tasks are completed” located in the Information about Work Assigned to Me section, but this does not always work and is not always accurate.  This runs simply off directly associated predecessors on a task.  If you manage predecessors at a parent task level, notification will not be sent to your users and affect your tea

One challenge many users face across Adobe products is navigating documentation, tutorials, and community resources efficiently. Even though Adobe provides extensive documentation, finding the exact answer quickly can still require multiple searches across help pages, forums, and external tutorials.Proposed Idea:Introduce an AI Documentation Agent embedded directly within Adobe Help, product panels, and community pages.This agent could allow users to: Ask natural language questions about features or workflows Instantly search and summarize official Adobe documentation Surface relevant tutorials, guides, and community threads Walk users step-by-step through tasks directly inside the product Suggest related features users might not know exist Example Use Cases “How do I remove background noise in Premiere Pro?” “Show me how to create a gradient mesh in Illustrator.” “What’s the difference between Smart Objects and Linked Objects in Photoshop?” The AI agent could return: Direc

When a user copies a URL from within Workfront (e.g., via 'Copy URL' in the Documents folder menu), it pastes as a raw URL with no display name — exposing a long string of alphanumeric IDs that is hard to read and unprofessional when shared in tools like Slack, Outlook, or Teams.Current Behavior:Pasting a copied Workfront URL displays the full raw URL. Example:https://companynamehere.my.workfront.adobe.com/issue/11aa11a0001123456df123dfcc1e1234/documents?initialFolderID=11b01cbf00010123bb12345ac12d123dAdditionally, there is no 'Copy URL' option on project or task pages, so users have no native way to share a direct link to those objects, other than copying the raw links from the browser address bar.Desired Behavior:1. Copied Workfront URLs should carry a friendly display name on paste — such as the document name, object name + ID, or folder path + document name — similar to how Microsoft Teams handles copied links.Pasted Teams link comes with Display text2. A 'Copy URL' option should b

Within the Fields library you have columns:Name Type Instructions Display Type Active/DeactiveCurrently, there is no way to add a description column for fields. This makes it difficult to document important information about each field within the system.A description column would allow administrators and developers to include key details about a field, such as what the field represents, backend or integration-related notes, data source information, or other relevant technical context. This type of information is different from user instructions and is intended to provide internal documentation about the purpose or structure of the field.Having a dedicated description column would improve clarity, reduce confusion, and make it easier for teams to maintain and understand complex forms or datasets over time. It would serve as a central place to store field-specific metadata that is currently difficult to capture within the existing interface.

Add a Full‑Screen Toggle for Proof ViewerAdd a button that allows the Proof viewer to be displayed in full‑screen mode. With the new unified experience, both the Adobe and Workfront toolbars occupy space at the top of the screen, reducing the available viewing area. Our editors would find it much easier to review Proofs if they could toggle into a true full‑screen view and see the content at full size without interface distractions.

This feature was recently removed. Now if I happen make a change to my document and require the approver’s decision again, I have to remove them and then re-add them. This will trigger an email to the approver saying “Your approval is no longer required.” followed by “Your approval is required” which is extremely confusing. From a user-experience standpoint, the removal of this option is a step backwards. It was a feature up until a bug was fixed. Why remove a feature?

Hello, at the moment, there is no possibility of adding any type of column descriptions in the reports. A some reports can be quite complex it would be beneficial to have some kind of descriptions of columns, either an information icon or mouse-over text. It would be great if this could be implemented. Best regards,Sara

Description - when marking your own PTO in Workfront, at that point to also offer the opportunity to create an out of office notification if you are tagged, messaged or sent requests etc within Workfront - a notification to send to the originator that you are not available to process their ask or make comments etc.Why is this feature important to you - we encourage all project related comms to be in the relevant projects. If you are not aware of people not being in the office/at work then assumption is that they are there to receive the message.How would you like the feature to work - as an email out of office notification.Current Behaviour - if you have not heard from someone after a while, need to investigate if they are working by checking email out of office notifications. 

It would be great if you could see a Thumbnail from a Video once you upload it to Workfront in Documents right Away before you proof. As we usally take a few versions until we start the proof process and we have large lists of files, sometimes even 200 :) Thanks

ContextAn enterprise customer implementing Adobe Workfront Planning encountered a platform‑imposed limit of 20 calculated fields per record type while trying to add a few additional calculated fields to support new teams. They asked whether this restriction could be overridden.Steps takenSupport investigated and confirmed that Workfront Planning currently enforces a hard limit of 20 calculated fields per record type. This limit is part of the product’s performance guardrails and cannot be changed or increased within an individual customer environment.Business impactThe customer is using a single, centrally governed workspace to maintain consistent intake, taxonomy, and reporting across multiple lines of business. Calculated fields are a core component of their sizing, normalization, and reporting logic. The 20‑field cap forces them to:Remove or consolidate existing calculations Introduce manual workarounds Fragment their data model across multiple record types or workspacesThis undermi

We would like to be able to use the AI Assistant to extract information from custom fields on custom forms on a project, etc. Currently it is not able to intelligently answer questions related to custom field selections and entries.

Workfront Administrators should be granted system permissions that allow them to configure, control, and govern notification behavior across the Workfront domain for their system users. This would help to ensure consistent system communication, reduce notification fatigue, and support enterprise standards for how and when users are informed of Workfront activity.

SUMMARY FOR WORKFRONT FUSION detailed Observability requirements.We are working on offloading the Workfront Fusion logs to Splunk and have explored the recently shared Workfront fusion activity log api . Below are the enhancements we are looking to get from Workfront Fusion platform._______________________________________________________________________1.Fetching Notification Logs (Execution State/Errors/history)•    Currently Fusion maintains execution logs for each scenario, and you can view these logs in the Fusion UI under the scenario’s execution history.•    Enhancement: Is there a way to fetch notification logs or see where they are stored (e.g., scenario stopped, execution errors)?________________________________________2. Enhanced Message Field for Module Actions (Create/Delete/Modify/etc.)•    Currently, Fusion logs actions such as module creation, deletion, and modification, but the log messages are not highly descriptive about the specific changes made.•    Enhancement: Is

The Workload Balancer is one of the most useful tools within Workfront but could be made even better with some quality of life updates.Ability to extend the length of time you’re viewing.  Right now there are limitations on the number of weeks or months you’re allowed to view (only up to 12 weeks/3 months).  Extending the ability to view as long as 6months to even a full year would be helpful. We see a variety of use with entering and managing allocations. Some teams enter allocations for the year on a handful of tasks and redistribute allocations as needed on a monthly basis when changes occur. Others focus on the more granular allocation to short-duration tasks that they need to see totals by day but over a period of several months. Clear allocation to capacity comparison on the screen. A toggle to turn this on/off and display on screen rather than only having the pop up that shows you this information.  Correcting the Workload Balancer so that when hours get contoured in the WLB an

Description -The quality of the proof downloaded, viewing comments is severely compromised and the proof is incredibly blurry, so much so that it can be very difficult to make out the text within a PDF/document. It's also very time consuming because we need to download the marked up proof and it is delivered as an email. This can take several minutes to arrive. The solution of downloading a high-res proof is compromised because it takes even longer to download and takes up memory. We want to download a marked up PDF, which opens in Adobe Acrobat.  Why is this feature important to you -We want this because we have users who don't sit on the system so we need the ability to share these marked up proofs offline. How would you like the feature to work -We want to be able to allow users the proofing tool but when you download it, it downloads as a PDF with marked up comments. Leverage Adobe Acrobat to be able to view and work on higher quality proofs.

We have  Workfront proofing custom form with fields, as per requirement we have to hide the few field values. We have submitted the Adobe Support request (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/support?support-tab=my-cases&case-id=E-002089146&org-id=A1B8BC4D584032500A495DE5%40AdobeOrg#home) & team suggested to submit a feature request to enhance the feature. Example: Field Name: Vehicle (Project Type)  Field Values to hide: Digital Paid Media and Third Party E‑CommerceFind the attached screenshot for more details;  

Description - ability to create custom fields/forms that we could attach to hour types in WF.Why is this feature important to you - would allow for improved grouping and reporting for charts and graphs.How would you like the feature to work - TBDCurrent Behaviour - Not able to lump hour types together in current setup.

We have an integration with out timekeeping system. We need go be able to track custom fields based on hour entries. This will allow us to manage multiple budgets within the one project.

This might sound unusual, but I request custom form for HOUR object. On hour records, such as on January 1, we would like the option to enter more information along with the comments.There is where the custom form should be available:

Current state there are Object specific icons, we would like the ability to upload an image to an Object type to customize it based on User Preference or at a system-wide setting. We love to promote Workfront as a customizable platform that works to help you work. Customizing the Object Icons (Such as a Project, Task, Issue/Request, and especially Teams and Groups) would help acheive this. 

There’s a function that I really like in the Developer Console: In order to delete a project, you need to enter the name of the project in order to delete it.It would be nice to set some Workfront objects with that setting (request queues, certain projects, etc.). Perhaps a toggle switch on the object’s settings.When you’re an admin and you’re stressed and you have 20 tabs open, the possibility of deleting something you shouldn’t becomes greater than 0%. If the admins have the power to delete anything in-system (and we do), we should have a check on things to ensure that we’re deleting the right things.

In the Classic Workfront experience, there was a way to attach a custom form to a task without having to fill in the required field information. My agency has project managers add these forms to the appropriate tasks as new requests come up and then another team member fills the form in. Now we're switching people onto the new experience and realizing that all the required fields have to be filled in whenever a form is attached because there isn't a way to add a form without also hitting that requirement.In our scenario, our project managers do not have the information that goes in those forms, they're just the person getting the form in place because they have the proper licenses. Another user with a work license generally has responsibility of filling in the form information and typically at a later date then when the task & form are added to the project.Losing the functionality from the classic experience really hurts the process we had in place. And if the project

It would be grate if I could better decide what people can do on proofs they are shared with (decide if they can add comment, share, download original file, make decision, edit stage/proof/custom fields, send notifications, print summary, use @mention). Also some of roles available right now should not be used and it would be good to decide what roles are available when sharing proofs.

Description:I'd like the ability to have a little bit of control over the look and feel of custom forms, particularly how they are displayed when used as a request queue. Ideally we'd be able to adjust font size, font weight, color, bolding, etc.  Even if we could apply a default font-size for the form, and selectively bold some text, that would be a huge improvement. Additionally, a complaint I've received multiple times is that the font size for a question is smaller than the font size for an option within that question.  If we could change the font size we could fix this ourselves. Or, if it's easier, make the question font-size match that of the options below it.  Example: Why is this feature important to you -There are new rules that go into effect in April 2026 around accessibility of internal and external documents for Government agencies. All documents must be WCAG 2.1 AA complaint. Depending on your reading of the guidelines the current request queue f