Adobe Workfront

Hi everyone,we have a client who wants a pie chart showing the breakdown of projects by one single-select field and multi-select dropdown field. Single-select field is straightforward. However, a multiselect field is a challenege as I can't use it for grouping in the chart.Has anyone dealt with a situation where a client wants to display report data based on a multiselect field?Your inputs are much appreciated!Best,Sara

Hi WF Community!I’m looking to add red highlighting to values in a project’s task list, under the Planned Completion Date column, when the date is less than $$NOW and the task’s Status is not equal to “Complete”. I was working with leftmethod in text mode on the Planned Completion Date column, but still not getting the result I need.  Here’s my text mode: displayname=Planned Completion Datelinkedname=directnamekey=plannedCompletionDatequerysort=plannedCompletionDatetextmode=truevaluefield=plannedCompletionDatevalueformat=atDatestyledef.case.0.comparison.icon=falsestyledef.case.0.comparison.leftmethod=AND(({plannedCompletionDate}<$$NOW),({status}!=”CPL”))styledef.case.0.comparison.lefttext=truestyledef.case.0.comparison.operator=equalstyledef.case.0.comparison.operatortype=stringstyledef.case.0.comparison.trueproperty.0.name=bgcolorstyledef.case.0.comparison.trueproperty.0.value=eac6c9styledef.case.0.comparison.truetext= Anyone know where I might be going astray?  Thanks!Nick

Hello EveryoneI have a Workfront Search module that returns multiple attachments. The challenge is that I want to send all these attachments in an HTTP form-data request in one module (e.g., to one API endpoint that expects multiple files)  How can I achieve this ?  

I’m trying to identify Standard access users who are not involved as Assignee to any object except issue and Approval process and who haven't changed any object status.Goal:If a user with Standard access has never performed a Task or Project status change or not been an assignee (excluding comments, document uploads, or approvals), we’re considering moving them to a Light/Contributor license.

Hello,I have listed for my understanding from the “Mark as done” behavior. Please advice, it’s correct?“Work on It” and “Mark as Done” options are visible only to users with a Standard access-level license. These options cannot be configured at the access-level or individual user level; they can be configured only at the team level. Example:Arunachalam has a Standard access license, so she can see both options. However, when he clicks “Work on It” or “Mark as Done,” the task status does not change because the option values are not set or configurable at the individual user level.When the same user is added to a team where these options are configured, and that team is assigned to a task, the options will be visible and clicking them will update the task status based on the team-level configuration.

Hi all, I have a custom field in my form that used a name as the name but an ID as the value underneath. For instance;Starter: Soup - ID1234Main Course: Pizza - ID2345Dessert: Ice Cream - ID3456 Now I want to concat my three course meal in a different field called (three course meal) such that the outcome is;Three Course Meal: Soup, Pizza, Ice Cream However, if I concat based on the field itself it now gives the output:ID1234, ID2345, ID3456 I know for all other ID fields in Workfront you can get rid of the ID and add .{name} but this does not seem to work for custom fields. Is there any other way that I can do this?

I want to create a custom PDF export that aligns closer to how it shows on WF. Example of how it’s exported and how I would like it to look. Do I have the option to customize the export? Exported: How it looks in WF:  

Hi everyone,we have recently been facing an issue where a document attached to a request disappears if the same document is moved to a folder on the project level. It doesn’t seem to make any difference whether the request is converted into a task or not.Has anyone experienced a similar issue? If so, how did you manage to solve it? Or does anyone have an idea what we could try to fix this?Thanks in advance for your support!

I'm using the Workfront Search API to retrieve documents for a project. When I delete a folder (keeping its contents), the documents correctly appear in the root folder in Workfront's UI. However, my API document search queries aren't returning these documents.What I tried:- folders:ID_Mod: "isblank" - Only returns documents that were never in a folder, but misses documents fromdeleted folders that currently live in the root.- Various search modifiers with "isblank", "isnull", filtering by folderID, nameTo me it seems there is some remnant of these documents having been under a folder previously, and that's causing an issue here? Or I could just be missing something. Has anyone found a server-side filter combination that works for this use case, or is client-side filteringthe standard approach?

Hey Team, is there a way to customize the "name" that comes out when you send a proof? It comes from a generic email address, we were hoping instead of our name it would just say "our company name Proofing" or something like that? Any ideas? thanks! 

Hello,  Trying to update fusion certificate secret ID.  Can someone share how to this in Fusion? Luis

I want to recreate a production scenario in sandbox for some changes and testing. I imported the production json into a new scenario with sandbox connections, removed the production scenario custom webhook and added a new custom webhook for the sandbox connection scenario. The new webhook is activated but errored out on the first send since the request ID and all other data wasn’t received.The production webhook is triggered by new, unconverted request creation and creates old and new state data fields. Many of the webhook data fields are used throughout the scenario. When I create a new unconverted request in sandbox, the new scenario doesn’t run through the webhook. I know I’m missing something here, but can’t figure this out. Thanks for any help with this.

Hi everyone- I am looking for some resources, thinking, conversation, training etc for what to do now that timesheets/time tracking is enabled for my team. How can I make the most of this data via reports or dashboards? Ideally I’d love to understand how often we’re going over or under hours, which task types are often the most culprits?  What are people spending time on? I am a WF admin team of one, and the timesheets was requested to be enabled by my BU. That was all fine to figure out, but now that we are collecting this data, I feel a little lost how to get the most value of it. Thanks in advance!

Hi all , In reports is that possible to track Number of reassignments (In Project report is task can be tracked by reassignments count) , Number of Handoffs (How many times the task is changed to someone ,is that can be tracked in count) . I need confirmation, is this possible .If not any another possibilities.

Hi,Screenshots attached......I'm trying to remove a Project User from a project in the People area, when they are no longer assigned any Tasks.I'm looking at the object Project User, which I believe is an array of the People on a Project.When I use the Search module in Workfront, I get an error saying that the object PRTU isn't available even though it's in the module drop down selection.'[422] PRTU is not a top level object and can't be requested directly in internal'Has anyone faced this issue?thanks,Kelly

Hello brilliant Workfronters! I have a few folks that want to use one project to manage multiple deliverables (flyers, email, etc.). I know that's not best practice but they insist as they don't want to set up multiple projects. There are also some projects that run all year (say, social posts for the year) and users don't want to open a separate project for every single social post.  What is a good way to "capture" all that work via a custom form so I can "count" it in a chart reporting on number of deliverables completed in a period of time? Multiple "project deliverable" form fields? As in Deliverable 1, Deliverable 2, etc. 

It is cumbersome when scrolling through a long list of options (such as from Search Criteria Fields, Select Forms to Map, Outputs, etc.) to see which are checked.  It is especially so when you have long custom forms hundred of fields long.I suggest incorporating an action where if boxes in Fusion Scenario Modules are checked that they could be automatically pinned to the top for easy reference.

Hey Workfront admins!We’re planning August Skill Exchange sessions and want to make sure we’re building content that actually hits what you need most.👉 What’s the number one topic you’d love to see covered?It could be anything, for example:Reporting & dashboards Instance cleanup or inheriting an existing setup Governance and COE best practices AI in Workfront End-user adoption strategies Cross-solution workflows (e.g., Workfront + other Adobe apps)Drop your top pick (and a sentence on why it matters to you) in the comments. Your input will directly influence what we put on the agenda for August.Looking forward to hearing what’s most important to you right now. Let’s design these sessions together!

We track the number of projects for KPI. Is there a way to filter for when a project status is changed to complete  so we know the date that was done.

Hi Everyone,I created an Assignment Report to view current projects for a selected users are working on. The report works as expected for admins, but I’m running into an issue the a non-admin user is unable to view theProject >> Line of Business columnIssue The report includes a column: Project >> Line of Business When I (admin) view the report, the Line of Business values display correctly When a non-admin views the same report (no filter/view changes), the entire Line of Business column is blank  What I’ve already tried Verified no filters, prompts, or views are changing between users Used Text Mode to reference the Project field directly Set Report Settings → “Run this report with the access rights of” an admin user → The column is still blank for non-admin users I appreciate any guidance or insight on this issue!