Adobe Workfront

Hello, Is there a way to extract total number of licenses purchased using APIs? Image for reference:

I find the sharing functionality of request queues very limiting. We want the ability to specify more than one group that we want to have access to the queue rather than just the one the project is tied to. The current 4 choices for who can add requests to this queue do not fit this criteria and here's why:Anyone - this is okay if you're the only group using the tool. However, if your tool is at an enterprise level, then the list of request queues are too much.People with view access to this project - we don't want to give our clients access to our projects. They are the main group submitting requests.People in this project's company - We have requestors across multiple companies.People in this project's group - one group is not enough

I need to be able to group and bar chart a task report by the current task's predecessor's parent name. I've created columns on the task report that show the correct results using this text mode: Predecessor name: displayname=Preceding Tasklistdelimiter=listmethod=nested(predecessors).liststype=iteratevalueexpression={predecessor}.{name}valueformat=HTML Predecessor parent name: displayname=Predecessor parent namelistdelimiter=listmethod=nested(predecessors).liststype=iteratevalueexpression={predecessor}.{parent}.{name}valueformat=HTML However, I'm unable to group or chart with these values.  So I'm thinking of creating a calculated field on the task that captures the predecessor and predecessor's parent so that grouping and charting will be possible. But, I can't figure out the code because {predecessor} is invalid. Any suggestions on the field calculation, or how to group by the text mode column?  

Hello community, Our team is looking into the timesheets feature and we are trying to figure out what is the best report type to be able to pull in the General buckets (PTO, sick time, meetings) and all the notes tied to these entries? Thank you!

🎶✨ If you missed my Adobe Workfront Skill Exchange session at Adobe Summit last week, "Project Management and System Admin Best Practices 'Through the Eras'," you're in for a treat! My amazing colleague, Elysia Huntington, and I took the stage to share insights from two perspectives: the system admin's and the power user's. We took you on a Swiftie-themed journey through Qualcomm's ‘Eras’ of workflow transformation. Here are 5 key takeaways from the session from a system admin perspective to avoid any "Bad Blood" with your teams:  1.   ✍️ "But I've got a 'Blank Space' baby and I'll write your name..." When setting up a blank instance, start strong! Utilize features like calculated fields on user custom forms, customize fiscal years if your org works with them, and create custom statuses and access levels. These steps will set the foundation for a smooth and organized system.  2.  💄 “Cause we’re never

Hi all! My team is looking to allow external users from our company to access a request form. We do not know who the individuals are specifically - they can be from across the company. We currently also have admin console, and we use SSO to access Workfront. What are some options for external users from the company to access the request link to fill out the form?

Any Workfront users that use Workfront for something other than Marketing Campaigns?   Looking to connect with other Workfront Users that use Workfront for more than marketing.   We are a manufacturing company that uses Workfront as our Operational System of Record.   I would like to connect during Summit if possible.   We will have 3 sys admins from our company attending this year. Looking forward to Networking at Summit!!!

I would like to create one line chart report on the number of requests submitted 2023 vs 2024. I am struggling how to get the second line on the line chart.Has anyone been able to achieve something like this? Thank you!

Hi,We are looking for a way to allow people outside of our organization to submit requests. Is there anything like this, or workarounds, creative ideas on how to achieve this? Anyone has experience with that? Idea is to have separate request queue that's accessible to external users, and this would be the only item available to people without the account - they'd access it through shared direct link to the request queue.Looking around and trying ideas ends up with account requirement, but most of those topics are pretty old, so I'm hoping there is a way nowadays to set it up. All the best,Mateusz GolasSenior Project AdministratorEPAM Systems

Hi, I am trying to create a scenario that would be triggered whenever a document's proof status is updated. Quick setup is there's a Workfront project with issues; issues will have documents (although it's not mandatory) and those documents will have a proof workflow. I need to trigger my scenario every time there's an update to the proof status of any document. Idea is to change the issue status when all documents are approved. I tried triggering the scenario with issue record type and lastUpdateDate changed filter, but it seems that when the proof is updated, it does not alter the issue updated date. Same happens with the document record type and lastUpdateDate filter.I can use the document version record type, but then I can't seem to target a specific projectID. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.

Hi All,by default a typeahead field referencing the user object returns only active users (if my observations are correct).Is there any way to override this default behaviour? I tried applying a basic filter (isActive=false|isActive_Mod=eq), this brought no joy, as expected.Thanks for the feedback.Tibor

Hi everyone,We have a number of users who have a custom form attached to their profiles. What would be the most efficient way to track users who have and don't have the custom form attached to their profiles? I've tried testing a user report with a filter and also a filter for the user list, but neither has panned out. I'm welcome to all thoughts and suggestions. 

I have a Type Ahead Name Field in the system that I am trying to Group by and pull into a Chart Report.When I group by the Name the Chart view shows as No Value with a solid block as if there is no Grouping applied. I can group by the ID but then the ID's show in the Chart view and make the report difficult to view. How can I tweak this so I can group correctly by the ID but display the name in the Chart? The Text Mode is here from the Grouping if that is useful?  group.0.iscollapsed=true group.0.linkedname=T2 Picked Up By group.0.namekey=view.relatedcolumn group.0.namekeyargkey.0=T2 Picked Up By group.0.namekeyargkey.1=User:name group.0.valuefield=T2 Picked Up By:User:name group.0.valueformat=customReferenceObjectAsString textmode=true  

I have a Billing Record report that I want to sort by project total billed amount (highest to lowest). There may be more than one billing record per project. I have the report grouped by Project Reference number and showing a sum of the amounts. The report is currently sorting in descending order on the Billing Record amount. The attached screenshot shows the group sums but it's not in descending order. Is there a way to sort by the group sum? 

In ProofHQ, we have 3 stages for approval.Stage 1: Team 1Stage 2: My teamStage 3: Team 3 Is there a way to make a change even though proof isn’t Stage 2 (My team) yet; I can still comment on proof?

Hi All, when Fusion creates a record (Project / Task / etc.) in Workfront, the enteredByID field on the new record will reflect the Workfront user that represents the Fusion automation (more precisely: the WF user who created the Oath application used by Fusion to connect to WF). I wonder if there is any way for Fusion to create a WF record with a different enteredByID. For example, when Fusion processes a request and creates a new task (not by converting from the issue), I'd like the task to have the enteredByID matching enteredByID of the original request. I tried mapping enteredByID in the Create Record module, and also tried changing the enteredByID via Update Record, but neither worked. Thank you for any inputs.Tibor

Hi there! When creating a form and trying to apply or save and close, it shows this message. Does anyone know how to resolve it? Thanks!

We use a proof approval report to show users proofs which need their approval.I realized that if proof has been archived, it no longer shows on the report - even though the proof is still "awaiting decision." I'd like to create a report to show proofs that are archived, but are awaiting decision. Or, maybe even Archived but project is Current? I would use this to unarchive proofs, so the user remains aware of the need to approve.The only place I've seen a designation of 'archived' is in Proofing, Views, "Archived proofs."Does anyone know if it's possible to filter for archived proofs in a proof approval report (or other type, if necessary), or even to include a column that has a designation of archived?

Do you tend to keep and leave deactivated users in their home groups and teams or do you remove them? Until now, we've kept deactivated users in their home groups and teams. We've got about 400 deactivated users in our instance, and I'm wondering if we should create a deactivated users group and move them there.