Adobe Target

I often have similar goals and settings sometimes very time consuming to re-create. It woudl be such a wonderful feature if I could simply specify to copy  goals and settings from any previous activity.

It would be great to be able to look at all the activities updated by a specific user.

It would be wonderful to have the test start and end dates in the Activities view with the ability to sort and filter on them. 

HiI work on a wide screen monitor so find it bizarre that the code editor will only take up a third of the width by default.In order to see more of my code I therefore widen and lengthen this window, fine. However, as soon I save, look at another experience, etc, it'll revert back to the original size.  Is there anyway to make this a bit more smart, e.g. make the window a reasonable size for my display, or retain the size I adjust the window to?ThanksDan

We need to ability to run a script to determine if a visitor should see the test before the test generates (2 request schema). This qualification script should live with the test so that it's only running to determine qualification for that specific activity (NOT a global script).Example:1. visitor hits the test page url (as specified in the a/b test activity)2. qualification javascript runs (checking for window object value, existence of DOM element, visitor activity on page, etc.)3a. if qualification script returns true/determines visitor IS qualified to see test, test determines if visitor will see control or 1 of the challengers and test will display for visitor and visitor will count in reporting for this test3b. if qualification script return false/determines the visitor is NOT qualified to see test, test does not run and visitor does not count in reporting for this test

Currently if we select multiple elements in single metric (i.e. clicked and element) it gives combined report for all selected elements, Suppose if I have added 8 new banner blocks on my page and I want to know which banner is getting more clicks, I need to create 8 different goals to get individual banner reportInstead of this we need to be able to get individual banner report within one goal metric i.e Clicked an element(all 8 elements in single goal) without dependency of adobe analytics.This would be more easier to understand conversions for more than one element.Thanks,Gauresh.

Would be nice to be able to clean up the Adobe Target Recs profile attributes. They are one bad implementation away from being permanently filled with errant data.

Currently it is extremely difficult to create a multivariate experiment in Target using code (either JavaScript or CSS changes). Currently you have to select a element and apply a HTML offer(s) to it.Ideally there would be an easier to add code multivariate in the UI without the need to select an individual element to apply it to.

Add an option to switch the reporting method to Bayesian reporting instead of frequentist.Some of the benefits of using Bayesian over frequentist are that it takes a shorter time to get results, results tend to be easier to communicate to other stakeholders using this method and helps reduce the Peeking bias issues.

Feature: Target should generate a QA URL for each Experience URL. So if we have ExpA/ExpB URL1 and URL2 there should be four QA URLs generated.Issue: Target assumes that the journey will always be a journey from QA URL1 to other locations like: URL2 and that is not always the case. The customer is testing two different URLs. URL2 is not accessible from URL1 so it appears that there is at least one use case that woudl benefit from the UI being more helpful. Here are some suggestions on how the user experience could be made better:1. Only provide the Parameter and indicate that the customer should add it to the URL they want to test with the experience. (Acceptable)2. Provide the customer QA URLs for every single URL in each experience. (Ideal)Each experience has two URLs:Ideally there should be four preview QA URLs for all of the URLs:

Feature: That we have the ability to use Virtual Report Suites (VRS) with A4T. It would be very useful to be able to run reports and share segments based on Virtual Report Suites.

We currently have an algorithm set on our Order Confirmation page that shows items that a customer previously viewed. It will also show the same item that they just purchased because they also previously viewed it, we wish to exclude that

There have been a few instances where I wish I were able to roll-back to a previous version of ExpB in a given activity. If perhaps we could just go back 1-3 saves that would be really useful.

In order to make it easier to troubleshot catalog/feed issues it woudl be nice to have access to logs that keep detailed track of product updates (Showing exactly what was chaneged and when) directly in the UI. Such as: Product deleted for inactivity. Product 1234567 price updated. etc...

When leveraging the URL search in the activity search pane in Target, results are limited to activities that are set up as the primary/base URL (not truly surfacing ALL activities that are running on that particular URL if they are added within "page properties" as alternate URLs).For example, if I set up an activity on abc.com/utah, and in the page properties I also add abc.com/newyork and abc.com/texas, only searching the primary URL of abc.com/utah will surface this particular activity, even though it is actually running on other pages as well.Secondly, it would also be great to search activities by mbox name. Some properties are simply easier to manage via the form composer, but there is no efficient way to filter a list of all activities that are targeting a particular regional mbox.These enhancements would certainly improve the efficiency of managing various XT and AB activities that run simultaneously. Thank you.

We would like to have an attribute added to the Adobe Target API.   Currently the id, thirdPartyID, type, state, name, priority & modifiedAt values are returned.  We would like to have the test URL added so we can report on all URL’s that have running activities on them.

I would like an option to have Adobe minify the offer code before it is served.  For example:Why?The code with in our offers is not minified and contains a lot of comments.  This is so other users of Target can understand what the offer code is doing.However, it feels undesirable to serve this to real users:It feels unprofessional to serve production code unminified with lots of comments in itthere would likely be a small performance gain through minificationCurrently I can't see a neat way round this. Either we:minify the code placed in the offer, making it unreadableleave it unminified and have this serve to productionhave duplicate minified/unminified offers stored in the tool

If multiple experiences target the exact same selector on the page, all experiences are still returned. Due to the selector conflict, only one of these experiences will actually be visible to the user while the others will effectively do nothing. This leads to additional unnecessary client-side processing and misleading A4T impression metrics.Please only return the highest priority experience for a given selector.

We would like a folder structure for Target Audience list to organize large number of segments.

In Setup > Hosts allow for whitelisting of specific domains only, instead of having to go in and constantly delete domains that shouldn't have access to your account.

Issue: Customer is trying to make change to contextual menu that only comes up on hover. When she moves off of the menu to change back from Browse to Compose the menu disappears. Feature: The customer woudl like a way to go into Compose mode based on keyboard shortcuts lets say CTRL+E this would enable her to go into Compose mode while the menu is activated by the mouse.

Issue: https://forums.adobe.com/message/10885428#10885428Feature Requested: Provide option for end user to hide experiences in reporting.We wish we could hide these:

Issue:We want to be able to easily set up an audience based on time spent on specific URL however there is no OOTB way to do this native to Target.Feature: Provide an option in the audience set-up screen to use Time on Page as a targeting parameter.| URL: http://www.url.com | Time on page | < = > | Time in Seconds: 60 |Cc: burcakk14301493

As it stands the report seems to be of very limited use.  The attribute report justshows the overall attributes that had the highest impact on your KPI (in ourcase clicks)  and our list just has the Target basics all the way out tothe top 10—time of day, browser type, etc, not much actionable that a businesscould do with that information.The Segment report shows the segments but no information why the system created differentsegments (in our case there were about 216 segments made by the AIengine).  Is there some way to understand why the system created differentsegments? We are curious how when we only get 9,444 clicks a month on the spot where we are using Sensei, how the system candraw statistically significant distinctions between 216 segments for thoseclicks? That’s only 44 clicks per segment on average.The report doesn’t show any relation between the segments and their component variables onone side, and the creative variations on the other, other than going line byline and havin

Background:Currently when setting up an A4T redirect activity we have the option to preserve the prams from URl1.Feature:It would be really nice to have a feature that woudl allow you to mere the params so that you can preserve URL1 params and URl2 params.Currently existing:Option1: Include Current Querry Parameters: Unchecked.Result: URL1 is redirected to URL2. If URL1 had any URL parameters they are ignored.Option2: Include Current Querry Parameters: Checked.Result: URL1 is redirected to URL2. If URL1 had any URL parameters they are preserved.Proposed:Option3: Merge Current Querry Parameters with final Destination Parameters: Checked.Result: This imagined feature woudl merge the URL parameters from URL1 and URL2.