Adobe Target

Hi Guys.On the same page I need to add two components both using  different criteriadesigncollectionposition on the page. If I select Recommendation - Visual composer I can only split the traffic between between multiple activities - I need two recommendations on the page. I am guessing I need to user the from visual composer but before going down this road - Is it actually possible? Is this working fine?

Hey Guys,How do I enable the below parameters ?sdid - parameter is absent in Analytics callmboxSDID - parameter is absent in Target callThanks

We had some a/b/c/d tests that concluded pretty quickly (normally within a week) with a winner and high confidence level. However, after leaving the test running for another 2 weeks, the confidence level went down and tests concluded with a completely different winner with 95%+ confidence. Has anyone had the same experience and how do you deal with this situation? We have seen the worst performing variation when it's first concluded became the winner when it concluded the second time...

Hi,We are trying to implement Adobe Target API next to Launch (with Adobe Analytics and Experience Cloud ID Service).We would like to:get the variant content via the Adobe Target API call before Adobe Analytics / Experience Cloud ID Service is loaded.for that, we would like to use Server Side Batch Delivery call: Target API v1.0to see the results of the tests (variation / unique visitors / conversions etc.) in Adobe Analyticsfor that, we could use Data Insertion API as described here: Target API v1.0 IssueThe Data Insertion API requres one of the following parameters to be passed:mcidvidaidHowever, none of them is available at 1).QuestionsHow do we make sure 1) and 2) are linked in terms of some common id that would allow for proper serving of experiences for each user as well as tracking the test and variation name in Adobe Analytics via Data Insertion API?Perhaps there's some other way you would suggest approaching the implementation of the server-side testing combined with test repo

We have an on going issue with Adobe target .Our engineering team is aware of these issues impacting delivery and working to quickly resolve them. A full root cause analysis will be provided after the incident is resolved.For now you can subscribe to the incident currently open on status.adobe.com to get notifications on the status .Adobe Status

Hi,We have a problem with Target. A quick fix from our end could apparently be to download a newer version of the adobe at.js while setting a very short timeout (as it is now 15 seconds) and upload it on our CDN. Because of the long timeout all pages where the at.js is implemented are loading that long.Does it sound relevant? How can we do this? Thanks!

Hello, We are facing an issue in our websites, that causes a random delay on loading pages. We are trying to figure out which is causing that the page gets stopped up to 8 seconds, in a completely random way. Sometimes, page loads instantly, sometimes it stops 5 seconds, sometimes 8… What all of them have in common, is that they have an Activity in Adobe Target, or at least, there is a call to Adobe Target, although there is no activity to apply. We have debugged directly in the browser, and we have seen that the event “at-content-rendering-succeeded” event, that the at.js library throws, sometimes takes too much time to fire, even when there is nothing to apply to the website. Our doubt is: if there is no offer to apply to the website because Adobe Target says there is no Activity on that website, why the call and the event “at-content-rendering-succeeded” takes so much time to be fired? And our second question would be: for that event (rendering-succeeded), what thing causes it to fi

I am trying to create the Campaign where. For example the unique visitor has visited the website,the function should save the user profile in some database and when the user revisits the Campaign it should show the offer for that particular visitor.How is it possible using the target ? Is it possible using the global mbox ? Not sure about this as I am new to the Target tool.

I have been having this intermittent problem of the mbox call only returning the sessionId in the network tab instead of the tests associated with the URL. My getOffers call is correct and I have tests live that should be delivered to the page.Sometimes I have this issue when I am implementing at.js other times it just starts happening when after at.js has been working and delivering tests. Does anyone know what this is an indicator of?

I have made Exprience A and Exprience B, now  I want to get all the expriences on my test page with javascript,how should I do ?thanks a lot !

I am referring to the following: File “Adobe Target - Google Chrome 2019-01-04 13.58.22.png” If I put 55555 in one line, and 44444 in the next line, will it interpret this as an "or" where only one of these crtieria must be met, or will it interpret it as an "and" and require both conditions to be true?

I'm able to follow the Target API documentation and use Postman to fire API request to get Target activity details. However, when I retrieved activity details in Postman, the modifiedtime seems weird.For example: I activated a test on 12/26 6PM CT, but the information I retrieved in postman was 12/27 0:00AM, which is 4 hours late. "startsAt": "2018-12-27T00:00:00Z",Can anyone shed some light on this one? How do I check the timezone settings in postman, or is this a common issue?

I am trying to set profile cookies using profile scripts...Scenario :if (page.url.indexOf ("xx")  != -1){"Click on CTA/button"  user.setLocal('yy', "true"); Is it possible ? and how can this be done.ryanr8​

I watched the Personalization Thursdays: "Analytics for Target Best Practices" webinar that originally aired 10/25/18 and one of the topics mentioned was making sure your Analytics TnT variable matches your Target cookie expiration. What is the benefits of doing this and what are the consequences if the two don't match? I'm trying to understand if I need to make any adjustments.

Have a similar question so won't start a new thread.  We're in a similar situation here. The conversion cycle tends to be longer than 14 days. For most of our A/B test or MVT, they tend to run for at least 45-60 days before reaching confidence. Say if we keep the default setting - 14 days for Adobe Target visitor profile, does that mean:A visitor previously exposed to the control experience could be captured under experience B if this person visited the testing page again after the initial 14 days? This could skew our testing results significantly so just want to ask. Any help is appreciated.

I am trying to add a Banner or a box with some text and color across the header of one of my experiences, basically the variation of the activity. I cannot see a way to do this when selecting the container of the page to add or replace with. Am I able to do this without having Adobe Scene 7 integrated? Keep in mind I am not swapping out an image, only adding a banner to the top of the page with new text and color to go with it. Any help would be great.

Hi Objective : Which label (label A vs Label B) leads to more clicks on the navbar. Site Name : abc.comI have a simple A/B test on a navbar which is as below:Exp A: Home | Contact Us | Label A | ProductsExp B: Home | Contact Us | Label B | ProductsAs this is on the navbar - I have implemented template rule which says:domain contains : abc.comSo the exp. remains the same for different URLs of the site. Problem: The "Products" link actually lands to : subdomain.abc.com -- so if a user clicks on products while he is still in Exp B - he can see "Label A"  in the navbar - which is not great . (subdomain.abc.com and abc.com -- are visually very same - header and footer is same - so it leads to a bad experience for user. )I have tried the following :1. Add subdomain.abc.com in my template rule . I tried with and without comma as a separator - but it doesnt work. I guess the answer is somewhere else . How can i fix this issue ? Do I have to do anything on the subdomain -- subdomain.abc.com . T

Hello, I am new to running MVT tests in Adobe Target. Today I set up a proof-of-concept in which 3 page elements each had 9 content variations. This results in 729 possible combinations.When I tried to save the draft I received an error stating:The number of combinations has crossed the permissible limit of 300. Please reduce the number of locations or offers to bring it back to acceptable level   Is this a standard Adobe Target limit for MVT or are there account settings that I need to update?I could not find anything about this combination limit in the MVT documentation. Thanks,Keith

Hello, I have setup 2 test -  an A/B test for Mobile Users and an Adobe Recommendation test for Desktop users. So i have: Test A (A/B) with page delivery (url + page template) and Audience targeting set up to mobile visitor onlyTest B (REC) with page delivery (url + page template) and Audience targeting set up to desktop  visitor only  If a desktop visitor land on page that qualify for both tests, how the collision is managed?  Does the user automatically qualify for the test B or should I expect to see some cases where the user go through test A, but doesn't qualify for the experience at the audience level.Many thanks,Jerome

Hi Folks, As per my knowledge Adobe Target is using DeviceAtlas for mobile targeting.As per article from DeviceAtlas it's possible to detect iPhone 6s vs iPhone 7 audience given at link How DeviceAtlas detects iPhone models So now question is since Adobe target is using DeviceAtlas can I create a two different audience for iPhone 6s and iPhone 7 which will serve different experience to iPhone 6s and 7 users.this is need for mobile web not native app Thanks,Manish Agravat

Hello,I am planning to use Adobe Target to setup A/B tests on our e-commerce website to check the performance of new features that are added to various pages.I was trying to understand the methodology on Adobe Target to determine the results of A/B test and got the following document after some research.https://marketing.adobe.com/resources/help/en_US/target/target/c_determine-winner.htmlAs per my understanding, the back end uses p-values based on Student's T-test for hypothesis testing (Frequentist method) to determine a winner.I wanted to understand if there is a way to analyze A/B test using Bayesian statistics on Adobe Target. Please let me know if there is such an option

How to I use getOffer() to create mbox on a specific div? Let said I have a container name id="wrapper" and I want to create a dynamic mbox in this wrapper.  Please provide an example

I am able to capture click data when attempting to serve up Target content in emails deployed via Campaign Classic; however, when I run tests focused on impressions for the Target content, nothing comes back via A4T.Is it possible to capture those impressions?

We have set up some customer attributes for testing, and are seeing them available in Target. The Customer ID we use is sent on the authenticated area of our site, but we also have many pages that people might visit before / after they log in.Can we target users on customer attributes after they have logged out? Or the next time they return to our site and before they have logged in? Or will this work only in the authenticated area where the Customer ID is being collected?What is the difference if I create an Audience in Target based on the customer attribute, vs. creating a segment for it in Analytics and sharing that audience to Target?