Skip to main content
Carly_Gaver
Adobe Employee
Adobe Employee
Mar 2, 2026 7:25 PM UTC
Pinned

Beyond Opens & Clicks: Rethinking Email Engagement in the Age of Bots

 

Opens and clicks have long been considered the gold standard for measuring email performance, thanks to their simplicity and broad accessibility. But in recent years, the gap between these metrics and real human behavior has grown rapidly. Today, relying on basic metrics like opens and clicks can be misleading. Why? Because they track technical signals, not real human behavior.

 

Why Email Metrics Often Don’t Reflect Real Human Behavior

 

Here’s the reality: Opens are recorded when a tracking pixel loads, and clicks register when a link is requested. Neither proves that someone actually read your email, paid attention, or intended to engage. Factor in modern email bots, security scanners, and privacy tools, and what looks like an “engaged” audience can be a mix of real humans and automated systems.

 

As marketers, it’s crucial to grasp not just how this skews standard email engagement metrics, but also the ripple effects it can have on revenue and the sales funnel:

  • Compromised A/B Test Results:

    • When your open rates are inflated, A/B tests can end up pointing you in the wrong direction—making certain subject lines or content seem like they’re resonating when they’re not

  • Inflated Lead Qualification:

    • If your lead scoring model gives a lot of weight to clicks, you might end up giving too much credit to non-human activity — and prioritizing the wrong prospects because of it.

  • Misleading Success Metrics:

    • Campaign performance reporting can make it look like things are working—even when there’s little real impact on the business.

 

In the meantime, real human behavior is happening outside the email itself: prospects are visiting your website directly and completing a form later, or they are interacting with content across multiple channels. By relying solely on opens and clicks, marketers risk missing the signals that truly drive conversions, pipeline progression, and revenue.

 

The solution? Marketers need to shift from measuring activity to measuring outcomes and behaviors that correlate with business impact. When email metrics are tied to actual engagement in your funnel—like form completions, demo requests, or revenue-influencing actions—they become far more meaningful for optimizing campaigns and proving ROI.

 

Engagement Metrics That Actually Drive Revenue

 

So if opens and clicks only tell part of the story, what should marketers actually be tracking to understand real human engagement—and how it’s impacting the funnel? Focus on metrics that reflect behavior and outcomes, not just email activity.

 

Beyond Opens & Clicks: Rethinking Email Engagement

 

Here are some recommendations to get you started: 

 

1. Look at Downstream Behavior

  • Track actions that occur after the email: website visits, content downloads, or video views. These actions signal genuine interest and often correlate directly with lead qualification or funnel progression.

2. Look at Conversion Events

  • Measure form submissions, demo requests, free trials, or purchases that are influenced by email campaigns. These are the touchpoints that generate pipeline and revenue, not just “activity” inside an inbox.

3. Engagement Quality Over Quantity

  • Look at repeat interactions over time—like multiple page views, returning visits, or interacting with premium content—rather than one-off opens or clicks. Depth of engagement indicates high-intent prospects.

4. Take Care of Your Data

  • Track unsubscribe trends, spam complaints, and deliverability. Healthy, responsive lists amplify ROI, while inflated metrics from bots can mask list fatigue or deliverability issues.

 

Rethinking How We Measure Marketing

 

The future of email measurement isn’t about chasing opens or clicks—it’s about understanding how emails influence real human decisions and revenue impact. By aligning metrics with downstream behavior and funnel progression, marketers can optimize campaigns for actual business results rather than inflated signals.

 

Alternately, if your organization is ready to move beyond just measuring engagement to measuring real impact, it might be time to look at a marketing attribution tool (like Marketo Measure). Why? Because attribution reporting helps you connect marketing activity directly to pipeline and revenue in a clear, defensible way. It shows how marketing is actually contributing to revenue—so you can prove impact and make smarter investment decisions.

 

What engagement data are you measuring right now? Is it actually helping you run smarter campaigns? Let’s talk about it in the comments.

14 replies

JPGiuliotti
Adobe Employee
Adobe Employee
Mar 5, 2026 2:04 PM UTC

Good stuff.

Translate
berrygirl044-1
Level 2
Apr 14, 2026 10:08 PM UTC

Love this topic! We’ve done some deep dives on this exact issue.

Translate
JakubB
Level 2
Apr 23, 2026 3:45 PM UTC

​@berrygirl044-1 what was your insights after this deep dive? Did you saw anything different form the post above?

Translate
Level 1
May 7, 2026 3:18 AM UTC

Great insight! Loved how well you brought all the pain points together.

Translate
ManishRohilla
Level 2
May 11, 2026 4:56 PM UTC

This is a great take, Carly. I see way too many teams still crying wolf to their sales teams because of bot-inflated scores. The shift I’m pushing within my team is moving away from email clicked as a primary trigger and focusing on program success and high-intent web activity (like contact page hits or form fills) resulting from these email clicks. Agreed that if an activity doesn't clearly represent a hand-raiser, it shouldn't be driving a MQL.

Translate
anildhull
Level 2
May 14, 2026 8:15 AM UTC

Good Information!

Translate
Anil D
oliviamoreira-2
Level 1
May 15, 2026 2:29 PM UTC

This is a great topic to explore and discuss. Loved the insights!!!

Translate
DanyelleDell
Level 2
Jun 2, 2026 12:51 PM UTC

Agree 100% - opens and clicks are out, page views and conversions are in! :)

Translate
Danyelle
NicoDobrev
Level 2
Aug 18, 2026 7:55 AM UTC

This makes me think that email content should be focused solely on bringing them to the webpage. Keep the good content for the website, and invite users into a terrific UX. 

Translate
EllenSchwier
Adobe Champion and User Group Leader
Adobe Champion and User Group Leader
Aug 19, 2026 7:13 AM UTC

Really good summary!

 

I also like using Marketo’s program status for this as well. I hate having a click as a “success” in an email program…..you didn’t send an email to get a click. You sent an email to drive a webinar registration, or to encourage a log in to your portal, or to update a customer about a change. I like to track if that action was taken with X days of being sent the email. With bot clicks and cookie consent rules, other metrics are hard to use.

Translate
Ellen
Katja_Keesom
Adobe Champion and Community Advisor
Adobe Champion and Community Advisor
Aug 20, 2026 7:59 AM UTC

I have actually recently begun taking a new look at behaviour scoring too, based on the same logic. Although Sales need the context of what content a person has engaged with, becoming an MQL should be centered around those converting events rather than inflated, half-reliable scores on email clicks and other lower-value engagements.

Translate
Level 1
Oct 28, 2026 2:57 PM UTC

Hi Katja, I’d like to understand how you approach behavior scoring. I know this may seem like a basic question, but I’m new to Marketo and still learning. I came across your reply and would appreciate learning how it works so I can understand the bigger picture.

Translate
Katja_Keesom
Adobe Champion and Community Advisor
Adobe Champion and Community Advisor
Oct 28, 2026 3:41 PM UTC

The traditional way of lead scoring is to create two Marketo fields with field type Score: Behaviour Score and Demographic score. Demographic indicates how interesting a person is to you based on their profile and behaviour is how much interest they show in your brand. This has always been quite the elaborate model where points are allocated to what a Marketing team considers “positive engagement”. Different interactions would get points where the amount of points depends on how valuable that engagement is considered to be. Typical values would be 2 points for an email cta click, 2-5 points for a web page visit depending on the relevance of the page and of course much higer values for event/webinar registrations and attendance and contact us forms. As soon as a person reaches the threshold they get handed over to Sales. Problem is that those points can be rather arbitrary and usually based on internal bias.
If you look at older webinars, you will find a Learn from your Peers webinar I did on the topic last year.

Translate