Using the revenue model to track users in a sales cycle | Community
Skip to main content
A
Anonymous
July 4, 2016
Question

Using the revenue model to track users in a sales cycle

  • July 4, 2016
  • 2 replies
  • 1696 views

Hi all,

As the title suggests, I am looking to track where users are in a sales cycle.

Currently, I am attempting to use the revenue model function as a means to go about this.

The application is B-to-C and we would like to be to track to a fairly specific level.

To give a little more context, the stages have been defined as follows:

1) Anonymous

2) Mail Address Acquired

If the consumer is looking to purchase within one year or above, start at stage 3:

(If purchasing within 3 months, skip to 7.)

3) Added to "long-cycle" mailing list

4) "Long-cycle score" reaches 40 (as a result of e-mail opens and clicks)

5) Visits LP for campaign aimed at "long-cycle" prospects

6) Applies for campaign aimed at "long-cycle" prospects

Users that apply for the "long-cycle" campaign will be moved to the "short-cycle" mailing list.

7) Added to "short-cycle" mailing list

4b) "Short-cycle score" reaches 40 (as a result of e-mail opens and clicks)

5b) Visits LP for campaign aimed at "short-cycle" prospects

6b) Applies for campaign aimed at "short-cycle" prospects

7) Visits LP for face-to-face consultation

8) Books consultation

While I'd like to know how many people are at each stage, the revenue model seems to assume that previous steps have all been completed rather than allowing users to "skip".

For example, there will be some users who don't apply to any campaign and will skip straight to booking a consultation.

In this case, I'd like those users to skip other stages and be counted in (8).

Adding arrows to the model to account for every single possible route would soon get pretty ridiculous. Is there a better way to go about this?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,

Luis

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

2 replies

Josh_Hill13
Josh_Hill13
Level 10
July 4, 2016

Please check the Marketo Summit 2015 slides on Tale of Two Lifecycles.

But you do need to setup a campaign system to manage the flows in the way you want. Yes, you do need to account for skipped stages so you will end up with lots of campaigns to manage these situations.

A
Anonymous
July 5, 2016

Hi Josh,

Thank you for referring me to your incredibly useful video!

On yours and Jeff's advice,  I have created a campaign for each stage in the lifecycle.

In the "Smart List" tab I have defined the action that makes the user belong to a specific stage.

In the "Flow" tab I have stamped each user that enters, including stamping any previous stages.

I have also added a "Change Revenue Stage" flow action.

In the Revenue Model, I have changed all my existing transition rules (which are now in the campaigns)

and added a single "Revenue Stage is Changed" transition rule between each stage.

My guess is now all I need to do is add arrows (transition rules) for each possible scenario

(i.e. someone who signs up to the mailing list and then books a consultation without going through any of the other stages).

I'll end up with a ton of arrows, but I suppose that's the only way if I want to account for every possible route?

Thanks again for your advice.

Kind regards,

Luis

A
Anonymous
July 5, 2016

I'd also like to clarify a couple of things if possible, regarding how leads move through the Revenue Model.

1) If there is no arrow in the revenue model but the user does something to join a new stage and triggers the "Change Revenue Stage" flow action in a campaign, does the users stage in the model still change?

If it does, I'm guessing having the arrows in place is purely for analytics to see a typical customer route.

2) Can a users revenue stage go backwards along the success path?

If so that would present a problem for me. Two of my stages are "Visited Campaign LP" and "Applied to Campaign".

If a user applies for a campaign and then later looks at the LP for that campaign, they would have regressed to the former.

Any help would be appreciated!

Luis

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

Loading footer...