Skip to main content
PrashanthAl
Level 3
August 1, 2023
Solved

Schedulers in AEM

Hey Guys,

 

I want to know the difference between White board pattern and Scheduler API for scheduled execution of the code. Which method is preferred ? Please help me.  

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
aanchal-sikka
aanchal-sikkaAccepted solution
Community Advisor
August 1, 2023

Hello @prashanthal 

 

a. Whiteboard Pattern: create a simple Runnable thread to perform a specific task at regular intervals.

Pros:

- Simplicity: The Whiteboard Pattern is straightforward and easy to implement. You create a simple Runnable thread that performs your task.
- Light-weight: It typically involves fewer dependencies and is suitable for simple scheduling tasks.

Cons:
- Limited features: The Whiteboard Pattern might be more suitable for basic scheduling tasks, but it may lack some advanced scheduling features provided by Quartz.

 

b. Scheduler API (using Quartz): Describing how to use the Apache Commons Scheduler API with Quartz to implement more complex and feature-rich scheduling tasks, utilizing the powerful features provided by Quartz library for job scheduling. https://www.quartz-scheduler.org/ 

 

Quartz is a powerful and mature library with a wide range of scheduling features, such as cron expressions, repeat intervals.

 

Implementation details: https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/scheduler-service-commons-scheduler.html#examples-of-scheduled-jobs-registered-through-the-scheduler-api-1

 

In summary, if you have simple and basic scheduling needs, the Whiteboard Pattern can be sufficient. However, if you require advanced scheduling features, job management, and better control over your scheduled tasks, then the Scheduler API with Quartz might be a more suitable choice.

 

Incase you use Whiteboard pattern, please make sure you replace SCR with OSGi R6 annotations 

Aanchal Sikka
View in thread

3 replies

Ekhlaque
Adobe Employee
EkhlaqueAdobe Employee
Adobe Employee
August 1, 2023

Hi @prashanthal ,If you are already working within an OSGi environment, the Whiteboard Pattern can be a powerful and flexible choice and if you are not using OSGi or do not have complex scheduling requirements, the Scheduler API provided by your framework or library might be the preferred and simpler option.

Translate
    varun249715
    Adobe Employee
    varun249715Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    August 1, 2023

    @prashanthal You can choose any option based on your requirement

    Whiteboard pattern — Creation of scheduler with the help of Runnable interface implementation and overriding protected void activate(final Config config) method.

    Examples of jobs that are scheduled by leveraging the whiteboard pattern

    1)Scheduling with a cron expression
    2)Scheduling at periodic times
    3)Preventing concurrent execution
    4)Scheduling the job just once in a cluster

     

    Scheduler API — Scheduler created with the help of Scheduler OSGI Service using @Reference annotation.

     

    Examples of scheduled jobs registered through the scheduler API
    1) Defining the job
    2) Scheduling with a cron expression
    3) Scheduling at periodic times
    4) Scheduling at a given time

     

    Please avoid using white board pattern as scr annotations are deprecated.

    Translate
      aanchal-sikka
      Community Advisor
      aanchal-sikkaCommunity AdvisorAccepted solution
      Community Advisor
      August 1, 2023

      Hello @prashanthal 

       

      a. Whiteboard Pattern: create a simple Runnable thread to perform a specific task at regular intervals.

      Pros:

      - Simplicity: The Whiteboard Pattern is straightforward and easy to implement. You create a simple Runnable thread that performs your task.
      - Light-weight: It typically involves fewer dependencies and is suitable for simple scheduling tasks.

      Cons:
      - Limited features: The Whiteboard Pattern might be more suitable for basic scheduling tasks, but it may lack some advanced scheduling features provided by Quartz.

       

      b. Scheduler API (using Quartz): Describing how to use the Apache Commons Scheduler API with Quartz to implement more complex and feature-rich scheduling tasks, utilizing the powerful features provided by Quartz library for job scheduling. https://www.quartz-scheduler.org/ 

       

      Quartz is a powerful and mature library with a wide range of scheduling features, such as cron expressions, repeat intervals.

       

      Implementation details: https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/scheduler-service-commons-scheduler.html#examples-of-scheduled-jobs-registered-through-the-scheduler-api-1

       

      In summary, if you have simple and basic scheduling needs, the Whiteboard Pattern can be sufficient. However, if you require advanced scheduling features, job management, and better control over your scheduled tasks, then the Scheduler API with Quartz might be a more suitable choice.

       

      Incase you use Whiteboard pattern, please make sure you replace SCR with OSGi R6 annotations 

      Translate
      Aanchal Sikka
        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

        Loading footer...