CQRules:CQBP-84 | Community
Skip to main content
T
Adobe Employee
thanikonAdobe Employee
Adobe Employee
May 29, 2023
Solved

CQRules:CQBP-84

  • May 29, 2023
  • 1 reply
  • 937 views

Hi community,

 

i am receiving these errors:

  1.  The product interface org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.JackrabbitAccessControlPolicy annotated with @ProviderType should not be implemented by custom code. Detected in org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.JackrabbitAccessControlList contained in /apps/<MY PROJECT>/application/install/org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.rcp-3.6.0.jar.
  2.  The product interface org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.JackrabbitAccessControlEntry annotated with @ProviderType should not be implemented by custom code. Detected in org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.security.authorization.jackrabbit.acl.AccessControlEntryImpl contained in /apps/<MY PROJECT>/application/install/org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.rcp-3.6.0.jar.

during the cloud manager deployment raised as Critical Bugs with rule CQRules:CQBP-84.

Any suggestions about this?

 

As per now i am receiving D rating for that.

 

I tried to upgrade the version from 3.6.0 to 3.6.6 and 3.6.8 in my POM file and did deployment, issues are not getting resolved.

<dependency>
   <groupId>org.apache.jackrabbit.vault</groupId>
   <artifactId>org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.rcp</artifactId>
   <version>3.6.0</version>
</dependency>

  Thanks in Advance..

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
Best answer by krati_garg

@thanikon After reading the error again. I believe it is self explanatory. Both org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.JackrabbitAccessControlPolicy and org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.JackrabbitAccessControlEntry are annotated by @ProviderType and cannot be implemented via custom code.

This has been answered here as well:
https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/cqrules-cqbp-84-archetype-27/td-p/428408

1 reply

krati_garg
Adobe Employee
krati_gargAdobe Employee
Adobe Employee
May 31, 2023

@thanikon 

I believe you are trying to implement dynamic or custom ACLs via Code. This is not recommended on AEMaaCS, due to container deployment and the arch design of AEM on a Cloud. It is recommended to use Repoinit scripts which gets executed everytime a container shuts down and another goes up, and a build image is propagated.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/deploying/overview.html?lang=en#repoinit


If my assumption is incorrect, kindly share the piece of code mentioned above.

    T
    Adobe Employee
    thanikonAdobe EmployeeAuthor
    Adobe Employee
    May 31, 2023

    Thanks for your response @krati_garg . In our assets implementation projects we have custom implementation for upload and update files. But in the servlet code there is no ACL specific code changes.

    Thanks,

      krati_garg
      Adobe Employee
      krati_gargAdobe EmployeeAccepted solution
      Adobe Employee
      June 4, 2023

      @thanikon After reading the error again. I believe it is self explanatory. Both org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.JackrabbitAccessControlPolicy and org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.JackrabbitAccessControlEntry are annotated by @ProviderType and cannot be implemented via custom code.

      This has been answered here as well:
      https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/cqrules-cqbp-84-archetype-27/td-p/428408

        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

        Loading footer...