Why Is One Domain Dominating the Internal Referrer Marketing Channel in CJA? | Community
Skip to main content
Level 2
January 26, 2026
Question

Why Is One Domain Dominating the Internal Referrer Marketing Channel in CJA?

  • January 26, 2026
  • 4 replies
  • 61 views

I have a question regarding an issue I am seeing with internal referrer data appearing in my marketing channels within Customer Journey Analytics (CJA).

I am observing that the same site domain is being classified under the Internal Referrer marketing channel with a very high volume of traffic. This is unexpected, as I would expect traffic to be distributed across multiple internal domains within my organization.

My current setup is as follows:

  • The Internal Referrer marketing channel rule is based on Referring Domain contains any Internal Domain
  • In the Internal Domain list, I have included all domains belonging to my organization
  • This logic is implemented using a CJA Derived Field


My concern is that a single site domain is contributing a disproportionately large amount of data to the Internal Referrer channel, instead of traffic being attributed across other internal domains within the organization.

Could you please help clarify:

  • Why the same site domain may be appearing with a much higher volume in the Internal Referrer channel?
  • Whether this behavior is expected due to session resets?
  • Any best practices to ensure internal referrer traffic is classified correctly across all internal domains?


Thank you for your assistance. Please let me know if further details are required.

4 replies

Jennifer_Dungan
Community Advisor and Adobe Champion
Community Advisor and Adobe Champion
January 27, 2026

Do you have any specific flows that drive traffic from one internal domain to another? Or a flow that might cause the user to stay on a page long enough to trigger a separate session?

 

I don’t know about CJA, or how your derived field is made, but typically you would only track an Internal Referrer in your Marketing Channels for new sessions. You don’t want to track every page to page link, or that would kill the attribution of your other channels.

 

Internal Referrers shouldn’t typically be a high traffic channel, since it should really only happen in a few scenarios, like:

  • when the user is on the site, leaves for a while, then comes back (creating a new session) and resumes their journey (in this case, the first page of the visit would be from an internal page)
  • If the tracking is incorrectly configured, then flows that send users from Domain A to Domain B could treat Domain A like a Marketing Channel… this isn’t good, because you would lose the correct Marketing Channel that drove the visit (and while yes, you can change your attribution model to look at something like Participation for cross-channel attribution) its harder for non-analysts, and it still does destroy the “Last Touch” if that is the interested model.

 

Having a single domain dominating the results may just be the result of a flow that more often causes the user to trigger a new session (like, maybe you have an embedded crossword puzzle that keeps people on the site by not sending tracking), or maybe there is a tracking issue that is causing site to site flows to re-track a new Marketing Channel mid-session…. or maybe there is a problem with your derived field… 

Level 1
January 28, 2026

Are you using this in a report with Landing Page or Session Start? As in are you only looking at the Channel for the first page of the visit, not for all pages on site?
I’ve also noticed that the template for building Marketing Channels in CJA from Adobe isn’t always ideal, there are some instances where it doesn’t quite work. Are you using the template or have you built your own custom rule for Channels?

bjoern__koth
Community Advisor and Adobe Champion
Community Advisor and Adobe Champion
January 28, 2026

The problem is that derived fields evaluate with every request. In other words, on the second page view of your visit, the referrer is your internal domain and hence the marketing channel overwrite previously set search and social channels.

The key here is how you set up the internal referrers rule. 

1. set up the internal referrer rule to return “no value” instead of a “internal referrers” channel name. The internal referrers and/or session refresh marketing channels you may know no longer exist in CJA

  1. Outside the derived field function, in your data view’s component section, choose the middle “no value” setting “show no value by default”. This will prevent the previously set value from being overwritten 
  2. allocation: "most recent"
  3. expiration: whatever is suitable for you e.g., 30 days

 

Cheers from Switzerland!
Vinay_Chauhan
Community Advisor and Adobe Champion
Community Advisor and Adobe Champion
January 28, 2026

What you are seeing is expected behavior in CJA and is usually driven by session mechanics rather than a classification issue.

In CJA, the Internal Referrer channel is evaluated at session start. Whenever a session resets (for example due to cross-domain navigation, identity changes, consent updates, or session timeouts), the referring domain that triggered the new session is credited. If one internal site acts as a central hub or common handoff point, it will naturally contribute a much higher volume to the Internal Referrer channel.

Because this logic is implemented via a derived field, it reflects the referrer present at session start and does not distribute traffic across multiple internal domains within a single journey. As a result, internal referrer data is often skewed toward one or two key domains.

Best practice is to treat Internal Referrer as a diagnostic signal rather than an acquisition metric, ensure identity and session continuity across domains, and avoid expecting even distribution across internal sites.