Intention to End-of-life Ad Hoc Analysis (Discover) announced | Community
Skip to main content
Adobe Employee
July 27, 2018

Intention to End-of-life Ad Hoc Analysis (Discover) announced

  • July 27, 2018
  • 27 replies
  • 53185 views

On August 6, 2018, Adobe announced plans to end-of-life Ad Hoc Analysis, as well as the Discover point-product. Ad Hoc Analysis functionality and capabilities are being moved to Analysis Workspace. It is common practice for Adobe to announce plans to deprecate a technology at least one year in advance, to give our customers plenty of time to migrate projects, learn new workflows and ease into the transition. To ensure all users make a smooth transition, Adobe is targeting Q3 2019 to deprecate Ad Hoc Analysis. For more information, visit https://adobe.ly/discoverworkspace.

 

In support of this announcement, we are working toward improving 3 primary workflows in Analysis Workspace, giving you the ability to:

1) Build advanced queries, without having to wait for individual components to build

2) Download 50K rows from freeform tables

3) Remove repeat instances from Flow

A date for end-of-life/access will not be set until these workflows are improved.

 

This thread has been created to provide a channel for feedback about the announcement.

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.

27 replies

joaquinv7785283
October 24, 2018

Good morning. I don't know if it has been mentioned, but another key feature that needs to go in workspace if this is to replace ad hoc the ability to download 20K rows of information. Currently you can only pull what is displayed.

November 9, 2018

Hi All,

It was nice of Adobe to provide a forum here to discuss and log our discontent with this decision. However, after reading their responses, in my opinion, it seems they are not seriously entertaining the group's general consensus to reverse the sunset decision.

I have created a simple petition to show them how many of us there are. My initial goal is to gather as many signatures as possible and get this into the hands of the right decision makers in Adobe Senior Mgmt. My ultimate goal is to change their minds!

Petition Viva La Ad Hoc!

I hope you'll sign it and also share it with your various colleagues, groups, circles, etc.

We still have a lot of time. Together and with the help of the awesome Adobe Analytics community I honestly believe we can accomplish the goal of retaining Ad Hoc Analysis as a supported product.

I welcome anyone's feedback.

All the best,


Rob

December 6, 2018

First, let me start off by saying that I think Workspace is a great tool.  I've been very impressed by the progress made on it in the last 2 years.  It started out only having a few simple visualization options, etc. and now it's a really rich tool.  Little things like doing side-by-side date comparisons in the same table are great features recently added and much appreciated.

That being said, as a "power user," it still isn't at the point where I can do in-depth analysis.  It is mainly a performance issue, which I know has been brought up many times by other folks.  However, if I cannot even get a fairly simple Workspace to load the first panel and let me interact with the first visualization, I cannot even start my work while waiting for the entire workspace to load.  This has plagued Workspace since the very beginning and I have not noticed any improvement in performance wrt load times and being able to interact with the workspace while the entire thing is loading.

This past Cyber Monday, Nov 26, I was contacted by a former director asking if I was able to get any data from Adobe.  Her team and our BI team in charge of automated reporting were not even able to log in, let alone get any info.  I opened up Workspace and after a minute of waiting for it to load, I decided to open Ad Hoc in parallel.  Ad Hoc loaded as typical and I was easily and quickly able to get hourly visits for this year's Cyber Monday and last year's.  I switched over to Workspace and it still had not even loaded the first panel or first visualization.  It was a very simple project with maybe 2 tables for daily visits and UVs.  I think I had 3 segments applied but the timeframe was only set for the last week so it should not have taken very long to load such a basic project.  Perhaps that was a rare occurrence due to Cyber Monday traffic highs.

Yesterday I was working in Workspace.  Again, it was a very simple project, but it had 9 graphs for the last 90 days and 9 corresponding hidden tables.  I was graphing visits, UVs, and PVs with basic dimensions like day, channel, english vs. spanish, etc.  At first Workspace was working fine, but as I kept tweaking it, the entire project would freeze.  This went on for the entire hour that I was trying to work on this dashboard.  I was not even trying to do analysis, just simple setting up a dashboard for a team to get daily updates.  I do not know if anyone else experiences these issues, but I run into them on a regular basis using very simple workspaces.  I've found that even if I only look at 7 days with day as the dimension, if I have more than 3-4 tables (not even graphs!), it freezes up. 

An average project of mine in Discover has 2-4 workspaces and 4-6 reports within each.  The reports range from simple tables of visits to flow reports.  The reports span 3 years and have different time granularities as well as some use page url dimension, etc.  While one report is loading, I can easily switch back and forth to other reports in the project and I am not delayed at all.  This kind of parallel work is NOT possible in Adobe Workspace right now for the type of work that I do on a daily basis.

Please please please do not discontinue Ad Hoc.  Minimally, please maintain it so that it remains relevant and working on Windows 10 and beyond.

Thanks!

Level 2
December 10, 2018

I agree with what Lindsay writes - WS is often very slow too load and may fully freeze or crash if I try to do things too quickly. It seems that especially freeform tables with (multiple) breakdowns and segments are vulnerable to this. 

Level 2
March 1, 2019

Adobe team - Any update to the state of workspace?  Trying to come to terms and migrate my workflows, but it seems a lot of capability is still missing, and I keep running into issues like the attached.  Would love updated timeframes on some of this stuff.

frankd55973318
Level 3
May 10, 2019

I've seen, on the Ad-Hoc product/download screen, that there is now a version that can be used with Java 11. Will this version also be killed off or will it continue you work when you end of life Ad hoc?

Thanks.

Level 3
July 2, 2019

Most people replying to this thread seem to have similar ideas...that workspace is the much needed upgrade to the standard reports. Instead of trying to replicate ad-hoc analysis into workspace, Adobe should be looking to ensure all functionality available in the standard reports is available in workspace (e.g. Calendar Events). And then leave ad-hoc analysis for the analysts to be able to quickly drill down further.

It is undoubtedly much quicker than workspace and most importantly you can export 50k rows. I know this functionality is 'in the pipeline' for Adobe...but that means until then we have the limited capabilities of data warehouse or spend weeks downloading 400 rows at a time...it's just not feasible. Our solution has had to be that we set up a clickstream feed and force our business outside of the tool...which means we become supplier agnostic.

Andrew_Wathen_
Community Advisor
Community Advisor
November 11, 2019

One thing that has tripped us up is that panel level segments are not applied to the fallout report in the same way as Ad Hoc Analysis.

To recreate the same affect you have to add the segment to every touchpoint which is a pain.

I was wondering if Adobe might consider aligning this? (or at least explaining why they are different)

Workspace: Make Fallout visualization respect hit level panel segments

Andrew_Wathen_
Community Advisor
Community Advisor
November 11, 2019

Our biggest problem with this behavior is the following scenario where we have an application process that users can apply for several products through.

We wanted to have a fallout report for the different steps with a panel level segment drop down filter for the different products over the top of this.  However, if a user applies for more than one product in a visit data from one products shows in the fallout for the other which is a real pain

It means you potentially have to build out 20 fallout reports where you could have had 1 fallout report with 20 drop down options.  This feels like a very common use case that can't be properly accommodated.