In Adobe Journey Optimizer Campaigns there is a feature checking if a mail has any issues or problems. We would like to extend this functionality and make our own custom checks if a mail (or any other channel) fulfills our quality standards. This would include the following checks: - (profanity) word filter- image size- overall size- branding guides (fonts, colors, having color palettes or other brand related restrictions while content editing is also desirable…)- remove tracking pixel if no consent for tracking exists (we want to send to both with the same campaign, recipients that consented and those who didn’t)- check URLs- missing assets- when an audience is selected and we include personalization, let us know how many empty or ’invalid’ records for this personalization exist- audience checks before send (this could also become a part of approval process)- let us do audience count validations before sendout (final numbers, blacklist (suppression) subtracted, quarantines, etc.)
It is nice to be able to store/move and organize Fragments in a folder structure. But when you start to have many Fragments and you want to organize them, it is hard to know witch Fragments is in witch folder, and if a Fragment has been placed in a folder or not. So to be able to work faster and easier we would like to have a feature that could show the name of the folder where a Fragment is stored in the folder structure. It would/should then also be easy to see if a Fragment is still on Root, and has not been moved into any folder. This option would make it easier for the user to manage the Fragments in a folder structure. And with a increasing number of Fragments a fast and easy working process is needed to not spend to much time on administration that should be used on running you business.
We are today able to use folders to structure our e-mail templates in a folder tree. The same folder tree is not visible then you are creating a new email and are picking a template from the customized stored. The folder structure should also bee visible when creating the emails, and not just when to administrate them. It is when you are looking for a specific template in the list of templates you really need the folder structure, and not from a administrative perspective. It seems a little meaningless to having a folder structure when the end user cant see it and use it - the one user that really need it to make the workday faster and easier.
We are today able to use folders to structure our e-mail fragments in a folder tree. The same folder tree is not visible then you are creating a new email and are picking fragments from the customized fragments you have created earlier. The folder structure should also bee visible when creating the emails using fragments, and not just when to administrate them. It is when you are looking for a specific fragment in the list of all your fragments you really need the folder structure, and not from a administrative perspective. It seems a little meaningless to having a folder structure when the end user cant see it and use it - the one user that really need it to make the workday faster and easier, is the user that creates emails - where the fragments is actually been used. We would love if the folder structure became visible also when creating emails, from the email designer.
When you are working with creating fragments or creating email templates you can store these in a folder structure. If you then go into the structure, open a template or fragment to make some changes and save when you then goes back in the GUI you start again from a "closed" folder structure. You dont come back to where you was in the structure. We would like the system to remember the folder you have open, and that you return to that folder after you have saved your changes to eighter a email template or a fragment (both where there is a folders structure created). Not go back to root, and you need to navigate again to find your "work" that you are working on.
Description - Add personalization (direct profile attributes and PQL functions) support to Offer custom attributes to be able to pull content from the attributes inside decision policy used in code-based channel. Why is this feature important to you/How would you like the feature to work - Only way to have content (with personalization) and offer (capping & eligibility etc) configured in one place i.e. in the offer item. Otherwise content need to be written directly in code-based channel personalization editor or in a separate content fragment resulting in long if/else conditions inside decision policy (when there are many offers in the collection used in the policy) that are not user friendly or easy to maintain. This way, business users would not need to touch the code-based channel editor, only the offers. Ideally, personalization code could be written in one custom field and called in another one for easier maintainability. Please refer to image attached. Current Behaviour - Only static text is supported in Offer custom parameters.
Description - Currently, audiences defined in Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) are not directly available in Customer Journey Analytics (CJA). This limits the ability to perform advanced segmentation and analysis within navigational reports.his functionality was previously available when using Adobe Audience Manager with Adobe Analytics, where the dimension "Audience Name" allowed direct access to existing audiences. This enabled the kind of segmentation and analysis that is now missing between AEP and CJA.Why is this feature important to you - The lack of direct integration prevents:a)Analyzing navigational behavior of users depending on specific AEP audiences (designed with attribute conditions).b)Enriching navigational reports with segmentation criteria defined in AEP, especially when such data is not available through connected dataviews in CJA; as this attribute data is not useful for daily reports in CJA.This affects the efficiency of analysis and the ability to make business decisions based on relevant audience segments.How would you like the feature to work - the same way AAM Audiences were available in AA.Current Behaviour - We can only create segments (if the data/conditions used in AEP are available in CJA) or doing "manual jobs" via API, which is not very optimal and productive.
Description - Would love to see an option to add modules to a dashboard that affect the user seeing them regarding a particular approval type. Why is this feature important to you - It stacks all approval-types into one module instead of separate reportsHow would you like the feature to work - Drag and drop the module like it is on the homepage, and change the filters to point to a team of people instead of one person.Current Behaviour - If I use Task, Request and Document Approvals, right now I would need to write three reports. I'd prefer to see all approvals related to a specific team to look just like the Homepage module for approvals.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The new editor for content fragments allow to see translations (see screenshots) but doesn't allow to create a translations and you need go with the old editor with a bad UX experience Use-case: I'm an editor and I want to add a translations to a content fragments from the new editor and I need disable new editor go to assets folder and see translations versions and add new translations Current/Experienced Behavior: I'm an editor and I go to edit a content fragment. I click in the right panel and I see if has a translations if case I don't have a translation I can add a new translation Improved/Expected Behavior: Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Can we have the notifications more robust? Why is this feature important to you - It's important b/c it's my daily life How would you like the feature to work - It would be awesome when you click on the webpage if you could filter by viewed and not viewed? Also if the notifications you need to check would come up to the top. Also, if you check your notification in any other place in the Workfront system can it automatically update the number in the menu to a lower number similar to how Microsoft Teams works? It's very manual to check Notifications in so many different places and they are not linked. Current Behaviour - All you can do is mark the notification as seen
Description - currently the Workload balancer view maxes out at 12 weeks/3 months. Our team finds it difficult to scope projects when they have to keep adjusting the date range. Adding the ability to scroll to the end of the project would be extremely helpful.Why is this feature important to you - Our team members prefer to scope projects in excel because they can easily enter planned hours over any period of time. it is difficult to get them to use the workload balancer instead because it is more cumbersome.How would you like the feature to work - instead of maxing out at 12 weeks/3 months, max out to the last planned completion date and allow users to scrollCurrent Behaviour - it stops at 12 weeks/ 3 months and requires users to change the view range to keep scoping hours.
Description - Currently we can turn off "log hours" at the project level, but users still see it on their timesheets AND people with manage access still have the ability to track time. It would be amazing if we could turn off completely at the project (or task level) the ability to log hours which in turn prevents a task from showing on a timesheet Why is this feature important to you - we want users to track time to specific tasks and keep their timesheets as easy to view as possible so it's easy for workers to track time and easy for project owners to viewHow would you like the feature to work - a simple option at the project and/or task level to disable the ability to log hours.Current Behaviour - turning off 'log hours' at the project level still shows assigned tasks on timesheets and users with manage access can still log hours.
Description - See screenshot for description.Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work - We need to be able to right-click on links to open items in a new tab. We also need to see late tasks in a separate category. The "this week" category should be reserved only for deadlines that are still upcoming in a given week.Current Behaviour -
A great addition to Workfront would be the ability to add external links via the Main Menu or Top Navigation bar that could be set via layout templates or by the user (custom pins for top navigation). This would dramatically assist with Workfront becoming the work management solution that can drive users to various areas quickly. Currently, the external links need to be embedded into dashboards and with many users serving many different roles, this becomes a challenge and causes too many clicks via way too many dashboards.
Description: Currently, Issues can only be raised at the project level. However, some issues impact the entire portfolio/program, and therefore need visibility and ownership beyond a single project.How would you like the feature to work: Enable an Issues section in the Program and Portfolio left-hand panel, similar to Projects. Users should be able to raise, assign, track, and report on issues directly at the Program or Portfolio level. Current Behaviour: Issues are restricted to the project workspace only. Program and portfolio views do not currently provide an option to manage issues that span across multiple projects.Example below: Issues section should be available in portfolio and program page along with queue topics management to address the issue.This is a very much needed feature, other tools in the market already offer it.
Description - As a Project Owner or User, I want the ability to exclude project or tasks from my timesheet. Why is this feature important to you - This is important to a user because this creates clutter and confusion. A user may want to assign or be assigned to tasks for system alerts or workflows, but should not track time to that project or task. How would you like the feature to work - Expand the existing feature that disables the ability to log time or preventing users from logging time to a project to also exclude the project or task from the timesheet. Current Behaviour - As System Admin, I am able to disable users from logging time at the project level, but when assigned to a task it still shows up on a users timesheet. This would also help to support the limit of 45 tasks automatically populated to a timesheet by excluding those that should not appear.
Description - Ability to set a Start Date or End Date for Exchange Rates (similar to the capability for Job Role). Why is this feature important to you - Because Exchange Rates change monthly by our Finance/Accounting team. How would you like the feature to work - It would work similarly to the functionality available to Job Role. Current Behaviour - Only have the ability to set the rate with no control over the start or end date.
We have discovered a strange ting that happens when we are pasting text into a fragment. If we are cleaning up the text in Notepad, and uses the text in a fragment we are running into some issues. It seems like if the text from Notepad has several paragraphs something strange happens. The first paragraph is recanalized as a paragraph and is placed inside a P-tag <p>. But the other paragraphs that is pasted in is for some reason placed into div-tags <div> This causes problems with the design of the content. Explained in code this would look something like this:Notepad text:Here is our paragraph text oneHere is our paragraph text twoHere is our paragraph text treeIn our fragment in AJO the code for this would look like this: <p>Here is our paragraph text one</p><div></div><div>Here is our paragraph text two</div><div></div><div>Here is our paragraph text tree</div>As you can see the tree paragraphs are acting in different ways, one as a pragraph tag, the two others as div-tags. And it seems like there is used a div-tag to create line space between the paragraphs -where Notepad has space.This causes some problems with styling if you are using customized style classes since a p-tag and a div-tag isent the same thing - and in most cased has different classes. It would be great if pasting of plain text with several paragraphs could have the same tag conected to each of the parapraphs - like <P> is been used for all.
Description -We recently customised our calendar so that week now starts on a Monday and ends on a Sunday.However, the descriptions in the data dictionary haven't updated and include the sentence: "By default, this refers to the time period that starts on Sunday and ends on Saturday prior to the current week.".We cannot edit these descriptions in the UI as they are "Adobe provided components".We feel that the existing definitions are likely to mislead users. Why is this feature important to you -The current behaviour is misleading. How would you like the feature to work - Either: a) The descriptions of Adobe provided components such as "Last Week" can be edited by users, orb) If users customise their calendar to change the start date of a week then the definitions for these date ranges are updated automatically. Current Behaviour -The descriptions cannot be edited as they are "Adobe provided components".
Issues:1) No horizontal scroll to see all the milestones. 2) Milestones names are missing when scrolled to the bottom to see horizontal scroll.3) Updating the filter breaks the page.
Being able to add a risk at the task level would allow team leads to gain deeper insights into specific workflows, assignees, etc. that may need to be looked into further. Right now, they rely on project managers to add risks to the task description which they can't pull into a categorized report. This would allow team leads to gain feedback from their team members that it would help them better track and manage risks directly within the workflow.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: API to get variation of Content Fragment Use-case: There is content fragment. Have to create variation of CF eg: FB , LinkedIn. Want to automate variation creation. Suppose we send content along with params like audience, Tone etc. On API hit we get the variation data. Current/Experienced Behavior: We have editor where we input data and get dariation. This variation we can copy paste or export as variation. Improved/Expected Behavior: Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - There was an update in Workfront on 10/22 which changed the request page to a new experience. Previously there was an ability to copy requests. Now we don't see that function. Please add this back.Why is this feature important to you - This was used daily by our marketing teams. We want to use the new experience but can't toggle it on until this is added.How would you like the feature to work - Add a "copy request" button that works the same as the old one in the old requests pageCurrent Behavior - There is no copy button on the new requests page
DescriptionWe are requesting an enhancement to Workfront’s Proofing tool to allow greater flexibility in review workflows. Specifically, we would like the option for proofs marked as “approve with changes” to be sent back to the proof creator for updates before progressing to the next review stage.Why is this feature important to youSome internal teams currently use other project management tools because they offer more adaptable review workflows. The inability to send proofs back to the creator for updates after an “approve with changes” decision in Workfront creates challenges for teams that need to revise content before further review. This feature is crucial for meeting compliance requirements and would facilitate broader adoption of Workfront across our organization.How would you like the feature to workWe would like a configurable setting within automated proofing workflows that, when enabled, routes proofs marked as “approve with changes” back to the proof creator. The creator would then have the opportunity to make the necessary updates before the proof continues to the next reviewer. This should be an optional workflow step that administrators can enable or disable based on team needs.Current BehaviorCurrently, when a reviewer selects “approve with changes”, the proof automatically moves forward to the next stage in the workflow. There is no built-in option to send the proof back to the creator for updates first. Our only workarounds are either manually uploading a new version and adjusting the workflow, or creating multiple automated workflows for different scenarios, both of which add complexity and risk errors.
Similar to the recycle bin idea but more of a real time snap back to your last action. I know there is some functionality for this but our PM's accidentally delete tasks accidentally because they are moving so fast and it would be great if there was a button similar to other products out there so you can undo / redo your last several actions within a project. Having to go to a recycle bin to restore work is a multi step process that would cause frustration in times of fire drills.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
