Build better products with our product team
Description - When using a $$HOST-based external lookup field and maintaining a data table, such as a list of US States, users currently have to click on each valid option that appears in the picklist for a multi-select-allowed External lookup field. Why is this feature important to you - This will bring parity to the External Lookup Field with the Multi-select Dropdown field. Much of the discussion around external lookup fields is that they can be used as a dependency-driven list of results that helps control front-end user input, especially when flowing through a custom form for an intake process. This really supports staying away from the "Garbage in, garbage out" trap of users mis-selecting options in an intake process. How would you like the feature to work - When "Multi Select Dropdown" is selected in the field setup, users should be given a UI-button that responds the same way the current Multi-select options (Dropdown, Checkboxes) works. A "Select All" option should populate all of the choices that are valid for the JSON path, and then from there, users should be able to use the "x" button on the individual choices they DO NOT want to include. When the 1st option removed, the "Select All" button should also clear, allowing for it to be re-selected, and any options that were removed, should be re-added to the list within the field. Current Behaviour - Users have to click every valid option in an external lookup field result. Bonus fix/Observation!!! - The user experience when selecting multiple options from an external lookup seems to be wildly inconsistent. Some users can click a result, and the list of possible results stays open allowing them to quickly click more options to add to the selection. Other users have the external lookup dropdown interface close with each and every selection, requiring an additional click to re-open the selection field, and another click to select an item, which subsequently closes the field again.
Description -I would like to see the My Projects and My Tasks widget column show the same way project and task view shows in project pages, whether or not the user access has filter edit. Why is this feature important to you - My Projects and My Tasks filter-grouping functions the same as projects and task filter-view-grouping, for users without filter edit permissions. It would make sense if users without filter edit permissions could also see My Projects and My Tasks column, since they can see projects and tasks view.How would you like the feature to work - All users can see My Projects and My Tasks columns, without having access filter edit permissionsCurrent Behavior -Only users with filter edit access permissions can see My Projects and My Tasks columns, without having access filter edit permissions
Description - It would be amazing if the LOG ID or Error Event ID and/or URL were added to the "Add Error Handler" modules. By defualt you only provide the fields "Type, Message, and Detail". Adding the LOG ID to the error would be immensely helpful. Why is this feature important to you - We use the Ignore module but still want to send private message like this - That works well, but we are then forced to search through hundreds of logs to find the right error log related to the event. If we could pass a URL to the log or an ID for the event (that we could use to create our own URL), it would be awesome and save so much time!! How would you like the feature to work - Add the URL of the log and/or the ID of the LOG related to the error that occurred and triggered the "Error handler"! Current Behaviour - it does not exist.
We would like the Workfront Mobile App to allow the screen to be mobile-responsive and display all information in landscape mode.Some of our project names are long so it only displays some of first and last characters with an ellipsis in the middle when searching for projects. We are hoping landscape mode would fix that issue and make the app more user friendly.
Description - Please add the Workfront Project "securityAncestorsDisabled" field to the "Project Endpoint" in the public API!! It's shocking that this is not in the public api and part of the internal-only api. Why is this feature important to you - it would be good for us to have this type of information to better align data over fusion updates and also have the ability to better know which projects are intentionally isolated from permissions. Going through the internal API is harder. How would you like the feature to work - add the "securityAncestorsDisabled" field to the Project Endpoint in the "public api". Current Behaviour - the field "securityAncestorsDisabled" is only available in the private/internal-only api. Thank you,DD
Description - Do not allow time to be entered on a project or task before the Start Date (planned or actual) Why is this feature important to you - better compliance when it comes to entering time/timesheets and in the end give more accurate reporting. Currently our team is using Workfront for time/timesheets so it is important to be as accurate as possible. How would you like the feature to work - When a user goes to enter time on a project or task, the days before the start date of the object are greyed out, not allowing them to enter time in the past or before the object was created. Helpful if this could be an option in the Setup menu. Current Behavior - The user can enter time in the past for a project or task that was just created, giving inaccurate data on Timesheets and in reporting.
When a user is deactivated, they should be removed everywhere. I keep finding little easter eggs of old users and can't even begin to find all the places they need to be removed. Examples, assignments on templates, sharing on projects created from templates, custom views sharing. The only thing that should remain, is a history of what they did. They should not still have views and such shared with them or newly created projects shared/assigned.
Description Sorting for bucketed dimensions in CJA should default to logical sorting by the dimension's numerical value, rather than it's label. Buckets should be displayed more clearly (Less than 30, 30 to 59, 60 to 119, 120 or more) Why is this feature important to you Bucketed dimensions are intuitively understood when sorted in logical order by the value of the dimension. For example, shortest to longest time. It's confusing when two buckets are ambiguously defined and contain the same value (example: 30 to 60, 60 to 120). How would you like the feature to work Bucketed dimensions should default to logical sorting by the dimensions numerical value. At a minimum, users should have the option to sort by logical order. Example: If I have a bucketed dimension for time in seconds (Less than 30, 30-60, 60-120, 120 or more), I'd like the option to sort them logically as either: Less than 30, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, 120 or more, or 120 or more, 60 to 120, 30 to 60, Less than 30 Bucket ranges should be clearly displayed (without any overlap) Current Behavior Sorting by the bucketed dimension sorts by non-intuitive, alpha-numeric orders either: Less than 30, 60 to 120, 30 to 60, 120 or more, or 120 or more, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, Less than 30 Bucket ranges overlap (30 to 60, 60 to 120, 120 or more), causing confusion.
Why is this feature important to you - Everyone has done it: Deleted a report when they didn't mean to or know better. This moves cheese for our users and creates more admin work. How would you like the feature to work - Like other objects, send deleted reports to the recycle bin and therefore allow admins to restore them. Current Behaviour - We cannot restore reports. They're gone forever upon delete.
If you delete a project it is permanent. Adobe should implement a 30 day recycle bin where you can restore your deleted projects.
Description: When we create a filter in CJA, the size is default and we are not allowed to resize it. It limits the information displayed for the user, as seen in the image attatched to this idea.Why is this feature important to you: There are no workaround to solve this to us because the filter with this information is important to our reports, so only allowing to change the size would solve our problem.How would you like the feature to work: Similar at it is implemented in Workfront.Current Behaviour: Each filter has a default size and it is not posible to edit this.
Workfront advertisments for LEAP are listed on our main user login page. We'd like to be able to remove them. We do understand and appreciate your position as a SaaS company. Please try to understand that we are using WorkFront as a portal to working with our customers. So, by having the LEAP Conference splash page, or any other advertisement on the login screen, you are promoting to our customers - not just to us. We're a small company, but that is 400 customers with over 2,000 contacts who think they are logging in to work on a Level Data project. We've been having to explain away the LEAP Conference. My request is that you treat the splash page the same as how Salesforce treats theirs - it is up to the subscribing customer to set how they want to use it. Enabled to Salesforce default with whatever they want, Disabled completely, or set to what the subscribing customer wants.
With two or more report prompts, it's not possible to reorder them without deleting and re-adding them in the new order. It would save administrators time when they want to reorder the prompts.
Would be nice to have the ability to hide the fields that are being used in an archived asset.
It would be great if we can have a bulk upload or excel import/upload options in the Projects/Tasks/Issues pages for saving time when the user enter multiple items at a time.Everytime its not easy and time taking to reach the admins to upload via Kickstarts as it would take more time to prepare the import excel and getting the object IDs in the acceptable format and so on.
Must have - import projects and templates from EXCEL files, not only MS project. why can we export as excel but not import??? it will save hours hours of unecessary work for templates adjustments.
DescriptionCurrently in Workfront, logging hours on a task requires Contribute permission, which also grants the ability to edit certain task details (such as the task name). This creates a governance challenge for organizations that need accurate time tracking but also want to maintain strict control over task data.Why is this feature important to youAccurate time tracking is essential for reporting, resource planning, and performance analysis. However, allowing users to edit task details just to log hours introduces risks of unintentional or unauthorized changes. For organizations with strict process compliance, separating time entry from task editing is crucial to maintain data integrity and governance.How would you like the feature to workIntroduce a standalone “Log Hours” permission that can be assigned independently of Contribute access. This permission should allow users with View rights on a task to enter time without being able to modify any other task attributes. It should be configurable both in access levels and in sharing settings to provide flexibility across different teams and roles.Current BehaviourCurrently, users have Contribute access to log hours on a task. This access also allows them to edit key task details, which creates a risk of accidental or unauthorized changes. There is no way to enable time entry without also granting broader editing capabilities.
Description - It would be great if we had the ability to to pin views, filters, and groupings in individual projects. Why is this feature important to you - It would allow us to already have the preferred view, filter, and grouping set when navigating to a project. This is especially helpful when navigating between normal projects (where assets are created) and request queues (where we typically have unique views, filters, and groupings set). How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how you can pins items to the top of your screen, we could have a way to pin (or remove pin) for the view, filter, or grouping within a project (where the information is selected from). Current Behaviour - Inability to keep preferred view, filter, and grouping within a specific project. It must be manually changed each time you navigate between them.
Ideas to really improve the user experience, increase efficiency and reduce risk: Allow for custom fields to be displayed in header section (e.g. project, task)Allow for a few additional header fields (e.g. up to 7-10)Allow for fields to display the object level field or higher to be displayed - e.g. if on a task, allow a view of a project field (e.g. Display project "Launch Date" as custom defined on a project)
Goodmorning, See an excellent enhancement possibility.Description - Enhancement to attach document with Expense (image, pdf and others) from local drive in project.Why is this feature important to you - Because the required document to be followed with details.How would you like the feature to work - Add a tab of upload document when adding an expense, check attachment.Current Behaviour - No such possibility at the moment. Mvh@2572788 kumar
Currently, to recalculate a custom object with fields from another object requires either 1) manually edit each form on which the custom object resides or 2) using the Recalculate Custom Expressions, after selecting Edit, Custom Forms. The results are: 1) neither of these options are user friendly; 2) this is also a potential risk, as data may be out of synch without the user being aware; and 3) this method is also not 'real time'. If this design option is due to potential performance considerations, perhaps one solution could be to provide options that would allow the user to prioritize which fields to auto-recalculate? This functionality would be really useful to have. It would also help the PR in the client base for as you know, a lot of goodwill from other functionality is quickly wiped out with "I have to keep track of my changes? Isn't the system supposed to be able to do that?" Thanks
It would make for less clicks for users, if a report creator could set default values for report prompts.With default values, in most situations, the end user viewing the report can just click the 'Run Report' button, and the defaults will be used. Currently the default value is '--any--', but for something like a date field, it would be very useful to be able to default it to 'Past Year' or some other value other than '--any--'
Please add the ability to export/download email samples as PDFs. It's helpful for internal sharing of campaigns. Downloading HTMLs are difficult to save somewhere others can access/remains a link and there's no way to convert it.
Description - Why is this feature important to you -My PMO manages projects for a Creative Studio Resource. At any given time there are more than 100 projects open. When we are looking at that teams Workload Balancer we can't tell easily which projects are running ahead or behind as there is no way to see the Priority. The Priority is a field in the Overview section on a Project under Basic Information that is an out of the box field. Today we utilize Flexible and Firm Deadline to know if the Creative Studio has more time or not for their task. They appear in green (Flexible) and red (Firm Deadline). How would you like the feature to work - If Priority was added as one of the Color Theme, then it would color code the projects on the Workload Balancer - green (Flexible) and red (Firm Deadline). Benefits - Team members can see which projects are most critical (green and red), fostering alignment and urgency. Color-coded priorities help visualize workload distribution and plan for capacity more effectively.Reduced PM time going back and forth between opening up every single project to see what the Priority is.Current Behaviour - Under Select Color theme, there are 3 options today:Default: The bars for all projects and their work items display in blue.Project: The bars associated with each project and its tasks change according to the name of the project. All tasks that belong to the project display in bars that match the color of the project. The project bars display in a lighter shade to distinguish them from the tasks. The project bars also include a project icon when choosing not to display allocations.Project Status: The bars associated with each project and its work items change to the color of the status of the project.The project status is that associated with the Group of the project. If the Group does not have group-specific statuses, the color of the work item bars is that of the system-level project status. Both system as well as custom statuses display. For information about group statuses, see Create or edit a group status.However, my team is asking for the Priority field to be added to this Color Theme options.
Current Behaviour - Currently users do not receive a notification when they are tagged on a comment from a Kanban board. I would think this would be available, but was told by Workfront Support that it is not. Why is this feature important to you - users need to know what they are being tagged on just like with anything else in Workfront.How would you like the feature to work - same as how it works for all notifications in Workfront.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
